Sunday, April 30, 2006

Settlement enforced in Freeman lawsuit

Former Freeman Neosho employee Charis Seaton will receive only a $7,500 settlement, following a federal judge's ruling Wednesday that her lawyer, Donna Kitchen, Joplin, had accepted the settlement terms.
Attorneys for Freeman Hospital had claimed Ms. Seaton accepted a settlement agreement and indicated her lawyer was trying to weasel out of it. Ms. Seaton sued for wrongful dismissal. The case had been scheduled to come to trial on June 1.
In documents filed in February in U. S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, Freeman attorney Dwight Douglas claims he received three telephone calls from Ms. Kitchen Jan. 29 between 7 and 8 p.m.
"During the first telephone call, Ms. Kitchen asked me if defendants were interested in settling the case," Douglas wrote. Ms. Kitchen had made an offer to settle for $47,000 that had been rejected. At the time, Freeman had a counteroffer of $7,500.
During that conversation, Douglas told her he did not have the authority to approve a settlement. "A few minutes later, Ms. Kitchen called me for the second time," Douglas wrote. "Mrs. Kitchen asked, 'I want to know what you're going to pay to settle this case.' I explained to Ms. Kitchen that plaintiff's last demand was so far from defendant's offer of $7,500 that defendants had chosen not to respond."
Ms. Kitchen asked if Freeman's offer was still on the table. Douglas wrote, "I responded that it was not and that I did not have the authority to re-extend the offer." At that point, Ms. Kitchen asked if Freeman would cover Ms. Seaton's costs for depositions "I again responded that I did not have the authority to settle the matter."
At 8 p.m. Ms. Kitchen called Douglas for a third time. "She stated, 'We will take $7,500 to settle the case.' " Douglas said he would get back with her.
The next morning, at 9:26, Douglas e-mailed Freeman's acceptance of the settlement offer. "When I received no response to this e-mail, I called Ms. Kitchen at approximately 1 p.m. and left a voice mail for her. She immediately returned my call. Ms. Kitchen told me that she had not read her e-mails. She further stated that she assumed the offer was no longer outstanding since I did not respond to it on Sunday, January 29, 2006."
Ms. Kitchen e-mailed Douglas to let him know her client was not pleased with the agreement that had been drawn up since it "says nothing about expunging negative documents from her record. Nor does it say anything about her termination being changed to a resignation. I have told you all along that is very critical and important to her. My client is ready to move on, but not at the expense of her employment record.
"We have no settlement at this point."
In his e-mail response, Douglas said, "During our conversation on Sunday night, you made a firm offer to settle the case for $7,500. Not one word was said about her employment record or changes to her file. These were not a part of the settlement offer. These conditions cannot be obtained by your client even if she was successful in her suit. As I have said many times, your offer to settle was accepted and there were no special conditions.
"I am not responding to other discovery issues since the case is settled."
The checks have been issued and are being held by Freeman Accounting, according to court documents.
Freeman officials are asking the court to enforce the settlement.
Ms. Seaton, Joplin, was initially seeking more than $10 million from the hospital, claiming she was wrongfully fired. She said Freeman Neosho Chief Operating Officer Janice Walker violated criminal law by obtaining and disclosing patients' health information. The patients to whom Ms. Seaton is referring allegedly "were having sex with the Freeman Hospital physician who was under investigation for allegedly abusing drugs," according to the lawsuit. The petition also said Ms. Walker used Ms. Seaton's private medical records for her own gain.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Mr. Douglas did not include all of the facts to the Judge/Court when he excluded his verbal threat and intimidating statement made towards the Plaintiff and her attorney in his attempt to "settle". Perhaps you should speak with Ms. Kitchen before you print your one-sided distortions, Mr. Turner. Did you know that Freeman allows their supervisors and executive staff members to view the medical records of their subordinate employees and family members of employees without patient consent? Did you know that Freeman was found to be noncompliant by the State of Missouri Worker's Compensation Division in the Plaintiff's case? Did you know that Freeman tried to force a settlement, requiring the Plaintiff give up her U.S. Constitutional and Missouri Constitutional rights? Did you know that Freeman determines the quality of its patient care and medical equipment (hip/joint replacement hardware) based on the patient's ability to pay and the type of insurance the patient has, if any? Did you know that Freeman allows its executives to release confidential patient information to staff who do not have a "need to know", clearly violating Federal HIPAA laws? Did you know that Freeman allows a physician to resign when confronted with a willful/unlawful act, but terminates "lower level" staff for non-criminal acts, clearly discriminating based on their monetary ability to sue? Again, Mr. Turner, if you really want to "inform the public", do some fact checking first so that your articles are worthy of print. Signed: Anonymous

Anonymous said...

Why aren't these "comments" clearly posted directly below the original posting, Mr. Turner? Why did you feel you had to camouflage the link below the original posting? If you are after the whole truth, you wouldn't favor one side over the other. Aren't blogs great if you are the one creating your own "truths". There should be a law against those who use blogs to hide the truth and cruely hurt others. If you want to be a real reporter, Mr. Turner, you should use more ethical methods to deliver your "news" and ensure that the average news reader has all of the facts to make an informed opinion. Signed: Anonymous

Randy said...

I haven't the slightest idea what you are talking about. I reported on this story directly from court records. I have not hid or deleted any comments. Information about the case can be found on my blog by entering search terms at the top of the page where it says "search blog." That story was written almost a year ago.