Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Speck administration blocks Southern Watch

The Missouri Southern State University Administration has reportedly blocked the renegade website Southern Watch from all campus computers.

The website, whose blogger or bloggers have remained anonymous has been a thorn in the side of the Bruce Speck administration since his arrival on campus. At times, it has provided solid information about the seedy side of what is going on the campus, though its scoops have been replaced for the most part in recent months with potshots at Speck and other administrations, including many that have been in poor taste.

If Southern Watch has been permanently blocked, it marks the latest in a long line of attacks on the First Amendment by the Speck administration:

From the October 12, 2008, Turner Report:

All Missouri Southern State University President Bruce Speck had to do was say his director of enrollment services Derek Skaggs was wrong when he had copies of MSSU's newspaper, The Chart, removed from a student recruitment fair.

He did not even have to say Skaggs was wrong. He could have said Skaggs should have used better judgment or Skaggs was misguided. Instead, Bruce Speck took exactly the path those who were hoping for a more open era at MSSU should fear. He told the Chart and the Joplin Globe it was something the lawyers would have to decide.

Now that's leadership and it sends exactly the wrong message to those who already have concerns about the Speck regime.


From the April 23, 2011, Turner Report



When Missouri Southern State University journalism instructor T. R. Hanrahan was named Missouri College Media Association Adviser of the Year in 2010, he was praised by Dr. Bob Berglund of Missouri Western University for his courage.


In his speech, Dr. Berglund quoted Hanrahan as saying the faculty adviser position “is one of the few jobs in which the better you do your job, the more likely you are to lose it.”

Thanks to the hard work of his young reporters and the lack of support from Joplin’s daily newspaper, T. R. Hanrahan will soon join the ranks of the unemployed. 

Hanrahan, who does not have tenure, was told a few days ago his services would not be required for the fall semester. Many were surprised he lasted this long. His young staff broke one story after another revealing controversy and incompetence during the three years the university has been led by President Bruce Speck.

Hanrahan never backed down from his belief that a reporter’s job is to seek the truth. Not once did he tell the young people under his charge to back off a story because it dealt with a sensitive subject. He never took the easy route. Had he done so, he might still have a job.

A few weeks ago, the Chart won MCMA’s Sweepstakes Award as the best newspaper in its division, while its editor, Brennan Stebbins, was named Journalist of the Year, for exposing the university’s hiring, without a background check, of an accounting teacher who had pleaded guilty to embezzling at least $130,000 when he worked at the William McKinley Museum in Canton, Ohio.

That was just the latest in a string of scoops that embarrassed university officials, including the following:

-A complete investigation into the hiring of Speck, who was the only person interviewed for the position.

-The back-door dealings between Speck and a Kansas City medical school president to bring a satellite school to Joplin. (The plan fell through and the medical school president has been indicted for theft.)

-One of Speck’s underlings removing all copies of the newspaper from a recruitment fair because it had stories that were critical of the university.

-Complete coverage of a faculty vote of no confidence in Speck’s administration

-Coverage of the president’s refusal to speak with members of the media, including the Chart, and a strong editorial noting how juvenile it was for the president to stay silent on important issues.

That is only a partial list. Were it not for the hard working young reporters at the Chart, the taxpayers would have remained blissfully unaware of what was going on in this area’s most prominent institution of higher learning.

For a long time, the Joplin Globe did not print anything about the controversy at MSSU. Finally, one intrepid reporter, Greg Grisolano, began mining the nuggets that had been unearthed by the Chart and delivered a series of hard-hitting stories that earned him investigative reporting awards.

Unfortunately, by the time he received those awards, Grisolano had been pulled off the beat and the critical focus on the university was abandoned by the area’s paper of record.

The reasons why were revealed in an e-mail sent from Joplin Globe Publisher Michael Beatty, formerly the publisher of the Baltimore Examiner, to Speck.

In that April 6, 2010, e-mail, Beatty said he had put a stop to Freedom of Information requests filed by Grisolano, offered to bring the newspaper’s editor to meet with Speck to give him "examples of positive stories" the Globe wanted to run about MSSU, and offered Speck advice on how to manage the news to avoid further controversy.

The university and some of its top financial supporters are major Joplin Globe advertisers.

The Globe publisher’s shirking of his responsibilities as a newspaper publisher would have remained a secret, as I am sure Beatty intended, had it not been for a Freedom of Information request filed by The Chart.

The job done by the Chart staff, under T. R. Hanrahan’s direction, has been a sterling example, not just of what student journalism should be, but what journalism should be. 

With the Chart effectively neutered by university officials and the Joplin Globe publisher asking which part of the president’s anatomy he can kiss next, it may be a long while before anyone can shine a light on the darkness at Missouri Southern State University.



***
And now Southern Watch, though still free to continue its commentary, may well be kept from the people on campus, another symbol of what happens when someone crosses the Speck Administration.








3 comments:

Anonymous said...

A recent faculty-wide survey showed that MSSU faculty have a lower opinion of Speck (and the board of governors)than they did last year at this time, which is really quite remarkable. What's more alarming is that the so-called university "Master Plan" film dealt exclusively with campus cosmetics and completely ignored the ever-growing elephant in the room. As if that weren't enough, the revolving door continues to spin at the VP position with Anglin - who worked with Speck for a couple years - now rediscovering his passion for teaching after a 35 year hiatus from the classroom. Speck has now had six VPs in his relatively short time at Southern and competent faculty are leaving or looking for jobs elsewhere. Regardless of when - and how - Speck leaves Southern, his impact will be felt at the campus level for quite some time. Meanwhile, the board of governors does absolutely nothing at all to address the situation. Shame on them.

Anonymous said...

Speck has surrounded himself with yes-men and yes-women, and the Southern ship is in danger of capsizing. This once proud institution has had its' reputation tarnished under this regime. Censorship and violation of first amendment rights are just the tip of a dangerous iceberg. The Board needs to take action before MSSU is completely irrelevant.

Anonymous said...

It is extremely sad to me as an alum to watch the progressive destruction of the reputation of my alma mater. No one seems to do anything to try to halt the downward spiral.