(Author Kim Frencken taught for 20 years in the Joplin R-8 School District and currently teaches at Vatterott College in Joplin.)
Education has become too divisive. There are now distinct groups within the educational system, each touting that they have the best interest of the kids in mind, but rarely showing it. You have administrators that taught for a maximum of three years, teaching coaches that maybe taught for one –two years, and people in HR that have never taught. Schools have become political arenas for agendas to be pushed.
Education has become too divisive. There are now distinct groups within the educational system, each touting that they have the best interest of the kids in mind, but rarely showing it. You have administrators that taught for a maximum of three years, teaching coaches that maybe taught for one –two years, and people in HR that have never taught. Schools have become political arenas for agendas to be pushed.
Back in the day things were different. I know that memory
has a way of making the past seem better than it was, but there were some
things that were better. For instance,
teachers taught. We knew what was
expected, we knew what our kids were expected to know by the end of the year,
we had a pacing guide (a guide to be used as a guide, not a “set in stone”
follow it to the letter or else guide), and we knew how to teach. We had gone
through our college programs and, more importantly, student teaching. We worked
with our teams and our administrators when it was, not only fashionable, but
also true that everything we did was “for the kids”. Our principals had our backs. They were in
our classrooms, in the hallways, on the playground, and in the lunchroom. They
planned PD that had nothing to do with professional development, but everything
to do with team development. Meetings
were at a minimum. You had one if you needed one. Teachers were kept in the classroom, not
pulled out to attend the latest conference on the newest educational trend. Parents were held accountable for their role
as parent. They were expected to be part of the education of their child. Parents were invited to take part in class
activities. The students were
responsible for their part, after all it was their education. Students were expected to be in class on
time, with all assignments complete. They were expected to show respect to
adults and peers. They were held to a
higher standard. Everyone was.
Now, accountability is becoming a thing of the past. New
grading methods do not require students to be responsible OR accountable. Unprofessional fraternization between
administrators and their ‘pet’ teacher leaves conduct open to speculation. Teachers have increased expectations, with
less time to meet them. Meetings have
become all the rage. There is a meeting for every purpose you can imagine. Most
of the meeting content could be handled through email, rather than a drawn out
affair that cuts into class time with students.
Teachers are treated less like professionals and more like
puppets. Why do all educational trends start with someone that isn’t in
education? It never ceases to amaze me
that the most valuable resource available is the one ignored. Why aren’t we
asking teachers what works and what doesn’t work? Why aren’t we asking teachers
about curriculum, discipline, and best practices? Why aren’t we asking teachers
for their opinions and ideas? And, why
aren’t we listening?
So, maybe things weren’t all that great back “in the good
old days”, but things were better than they are today. I think we could (and should) learn from our
past and turn things around to make a better educational system for our
kids. I think it is time that we treat
teachers as the hard-working professionals that they are.
***
Those wishing to contribute to Kim Frencken can use the button below for any amount. Make sure you write Kim's name in the message. Eighty percent of the money will go to Kim with the remaining 20 percent going to the Turner Report/Inside Joplin.
15 comments:
I'm curious as to why Kim needs contributions.
It is not a matter of Kim needing them. For the most part, the people who have agreed to write material for the Turner Report and Inside Joplin are aware they will not receive much money, if any, for doing so. But if people want to show their appreciation for a particular writer or a particular column this offers them an avenue for doing so.
I'm not sure if your article is suppose to be an indictment of your former school district or your current. The problem with articles such as this one, it makes it seem that all school district's are like the one that you are describing. There are many districts (I am lucky enough to be a part of one) that do what you describe as "the good ole days" and much more. Can we please not paint all public schools with the same brush. They are as unique as the students, teachers and administrators of which they consist.
Can we please not paint all public schools with the same brush. They are as unique as the students, teachers and administrators of which they consist.
Please explain how your school district escapes such influences such as outside curriculum mandates, English language learners, high levels of poverty, high stakes testing, not to mention disconnected and apathetic parents.
Now if you claim to be part of Hayti R-2
I recall about 4 years ago we had a number of meetings about how to have meetings.
It was sureal.
One of the biggest waste of time I've ever had labeled" Professional Development"
>>I recall about 4 years ago we had a number of meetings about how to have meetings.<<
Maybe someone has some evidence of this fantastic example of organizational derpitude. Randy might be interested. This is certainly a contender for the top ten. That the higher-ups felt a necessity to have a series of meetings on the topic rather than shortchanging the concept with just a single meeting most definitely adds to the derp.
I have written numerous times about the Joplin R-8 School District's meetings to have meetings. We had to go through several weeks of those early in the Huff/Besendorfer time and then a few years later, we had to go through the whole thing again. The meetings to learn how to hold meetings were also featured in my novel No Child Left Alive. Professional development time was indoctrination time in Joplin and probably still is.
When teachers start handling bullying issues properly then they will get my respect.
When parents start teaching their children not to be bullies then they will get my respect.
Where did Kim mention those specific issues?
The worst meeting I remember sitting through at least twice was the meeting about how to "professionally dress". The funny thing is the ones who did not dress professional, kept dressing the same way, showing tats, and piercings, wearing flip flops, etc. The sad thing was that one time, I show up at a PD event all dressed up, everyone else in jeans, I DIDN't GET THE "courtesy memo". So the next PD I show up in jeans, and one, get laughed at, two, get chastised. Then to my surprise DRESSING INAPPROPRIATELY IS ON my summative, I HAVE TO HAVE THAT ON MY SUMMATIVE..... SERIOUSLY?????? I was a new teacher in the district and offered to go home on my lunch and change. I was told no, and that appeared on my summative. There is good reason this former Golden Apple finalist no longer teaches in Joplin. Now, all of you, tell me there is not something wrong with that?
In a true bully situation one has a real or perceived power imbalance over another. Sometimes situations are conflicts between two people because the power balance is equal. Teachers do try to handle situations with students whether it be bullying or a conflict. However, when they are sent to the office for discipline, they get sent back. Or the administrators get the kids together and have them apologize to each other. In a true bullying situation that is unacceptable. You also have to remember that most bullying does not happen in the presence of adults and we only hear about it when someone has the courage to report it.
The only true way to prevent bullying is by educating students. I have a really difficult time believing that any administrator would simplyget 2 kids together, have them apologize, then send them back to class without resolving the issue. I think many teachers have no idea what goes on behind closed doors and seem to want an explanation as to every single move every administrator makes and how they handle kids and bullying situations. Sorry but that isn't the way the world works. Just as you don't have time for a hundred meetings every year, every administrator does not have time to go to you and explain every single way that they tried to resolve this conflict. They don't owe it to you to talk to you about the conversation I had with the parents, the conversation I had with the kids, the conversation they had with the guidance counselor or all of the other methods and resources they use to help educate and resolve bullying. I am so sick of this, get over yourself and if you don't like where you're teaching get out.
4:40 PM: Our host has told us that students can physically assault teachers, knock then to the ground, and school administrators will take no apparent actions other than talking to the student.
It would also seem to me to be essential for administrators to coordinate with teachers to deal with problem cases. We also have absolutely no faith in the Huff appointed administrators.
4:40--If that student is from that teacher's room, then the teacher should know what is happening.
There have been times that an administrator and a counselor ignored the bullying or put the two kids in a room together to 'talk it out' and make up. Meanwhile, students are being beaten up on the playground or scared in the halls but nothing is happening so they won't be afraid to come to school.
Maybe since the administrators are bullies, they just aren't going to do the right thing.
Post a Comment