Thursday, October 31, 2024

Josh Hawley, Lucas Kunce trade insults in only televised debate of Missouri Senate race


By Rudi Keller

In the only one-on-one debate of Missouri’s 2024 U.S. Senate campaign, Republican incumbent Josh Hawley sparred with Democratic challenger Lucas Kunce over abortion rights, border security and whether the 2020 presidential election was legitimate.

The abortion issue provoked some of the sharpest exchanges about 20 minutes into the debate. Hawley said he would not vote for Amendment 3, the reproductive rights proposal on Tuesday’s ballot. He co-sponsored a bill to create a national abortion ban at 15 weeks and has advocated outlawing abortion since he first sought office as Missouri attorney general in 2016, saying it is “not a right” and “should be barred by American law.”






 

Hawley said he supports exceptions for rape, incest or the life of the mother, but argued Amendment 3 is not limited to restoring legal abortion in Missouri.

“Amendment 3 would legalize sex change operations and transgender treatments for minors in Missouri without parental consent,” he said.

Legal and medical experts interviewed by The Independent said the claim is a stretch at best — and at worst, an outright lie. Gender-affirming care, they say, would not be impacted by Amendment 3.

Kunce, who has made his support for Amendment 3 one of the key points in his message, said Hawley is obscuring his old positions to fool voters.

“He will literally lie, cheat, steal, do anything he can to confirm his life’s ambition, which is to make sure that there is no abortion, no contraception or anything else,” Kunce said.

The transgender treatments claims are a diversion, Kunce said.

“He sees sex-change surgeries around every corner,” he said.

Thursday’s debate was hosted by Missouri Nexstar stations and broadcast from the KTVI/KPLR-St. Louis studios. It was also carried by other stations throughout the state.

Hawley and Kunce debated once before, at the Missouri Press Association convention in September. In that debate, which was not televised, they shared the stage with Jared Young, who formed the Better Party by petition to get on the ballot, and Nathan Kline of the Green Party.

No third-party candidates were invited to Thursday’s debate.

Hawley is seeking a second term in the Senate. Kunce is making his second run for a Senate seat after narrowly losing the 2022 Democratic primary.

They also clashed face-to-face at the Missouri State Fair, where Hawley demanded an outdoor debate without a moderator and Kunce called on Hawley to agree to five televised debates.

Thursday night’s debate was less than 30 seconds old when Hawley injected a snarky reminder that a bullet fragment fired by Kunce struck a television reporter in the arm at a shooting range near Kansas City earlier this month.








Kunce provided first aid and the injury was not serious, but it has been the butt of snarky social media posts from Hawley and his campaign.

Hawley referred to it in his opening answer of the debate.

“It takes a little bit of courage to share a stage with Lucas Kunce after he shot a reporter last week,” Hawley said.

When his turn came to answer the first question, Kunce described the event and turned Hawley’s quip back on him with a reference to the Jan. 6, 2021, riots in the U.S. Capitol.

Hawley sells coffee mugs with a news photo that shows him raising his fist in solidarity with the groups that later stormed the Capitol hoping to violently stop the certification of the presidential election.






 

“It is crazy to see this guy over here clutching his pearls over this when he is completely cool with inciting a riot that led to the injuries of 174 police officers, God knows how many other civilians, and even led to several deaths,” Kunce said.

Asked later in the debate whether he felt responsible for the mob’s actions that day, Hawley didn’t reference the violence as he defended his lead role in raising objections to the electoral vote count. “What I feel responsibility for is defending our Constitution, which is what I was doing that day,” Hawley said.

On immigration, Hawley said he voted against a bipartisan border security bill this year because it allowed too many new immigrants in while funding attorneys for their amnesty cases.

“What we need to do is close the border,” Hawley said. “What we need to do is reinstate the remain in Mexico program.”

Hawley accused Kunce of backing unlimited immigration and providing undocumented immigrants access to Social Security and Medicare.

“He said he was for amnesty,” Hawley said, referring to Kunce’s 2022 campaign. “He said that he was for no border wall.”

Kunce said he would have supported the bill because it provided for 1,500 new border agents and funding for new equipment. He also said Hawley doesn’t understand the real issues at the southern border.

Kunce, a veteran of the U.S. Marine Corp, said he trained with border patrol units in Arizona.

“I know what’s going on there,” he said. “I have seen it. I haven’t just done a field trip like this guy.”

The debate hit economic issues as well, ranging from whether Grain Belt Express should be able to use eminent domain to obtain a wind power electricity transmission line corridor to Hawley’s legislation to cap credit card interest rates nationally at 18%.

Hawley said he sees eminent domain as a threat to farmers, while Kunce said the national policy should be to expand energy created from renewable resources.

The credit card interest rate policy was one where there was some level of agreement between the candidates.

Kunce said the caps should also apply to payday lenders who charge rates in excess of 100% per year.

“We need to make sure these predatory financial institutions can’t come into these people’s lives and destroy them over and over and over again,” Kunce said.

Hawley said he doesn’t think his proposal would lead to fewer people having access to credit. Credit card companies would still offer credit cards to consumers even with a cap.

“They want the profit,” Hawley said. “They want the market.”

The last question of the debate was about how divisive politics have become, and where to draw the line on hate speech.

Kunce said there has been “a degradation” in politics and said Hawley is partially to blame.

“We have swamp creatures all throughout D.C.,” Kunce said. “Josh Hawley is a swamp creature.”








Hawley sought to turn that around to point to Kunce as part of the problem.

“If that’s my opponent’s attempt to unite the country, we’ve got a long way to go,” Hawley said.

Campaign activities

Kunce has been campaigning for the seat since late 2022, a few months after he narrowly lost a Democratic primary in the race for the seat eventually won by U.S. Sen. Eric Schmitt, a Republican.

He is the best-funded Democrat running statewide this year, raising almost $19 million since the start of 2023. Hawley has raised $26.4 million since taking office in 2019, but only $7.4 million since the start of 2023.

They are the only statewide candidates who have advertised continually on television and digital platforms.

Kunce has purchased $7.3 million in television time on broadcast and cable outlets, tracking by The Independent shows. He has also spent $2.7 million on digital platforms, with another $1.6 million devoted to direct mail, according to his campaign finance reports.








Hawley has spent $5.4 million on television and radio advertising and a PAC called Show Me Strong has spent another $2.7 million on his behalf. The campaign has not spent significantly on digital or mail promotion.

“He’s only run negative ads against me, nothing about his own record, because he hasn’t accomplished anything,” Kunce said.

In fundraising emails, Kunce is pleading for cash to beef up his final television buy. While independent polls indicate Hawley has a double-digit lead, Kunce touted one sponsored by his campaign that shows a margin of three percentage points.

Kunce’s campaign has not purchased any ads beyond Friday.

Hawley, meanwhile, is begging for more money to hold Kunce off. In an email sent Wednesday, he told supporters that “I’ve got BAD news. It’s Sen. Josh Hawley, and a new poll just confirmed my WORST fears.”

Hawley has repeatedly sought to draw out Kunce to say he will vote for Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic nominee, on Tuesday. Even when asked during the debate, Kunce refused to reveal how he would vote.

Hawley is counting on long coattails from former President Donald Trump to boost his chances on Tuesday.

“While my opponent will not tell you tonight who he’s going to vote for, I think we all know whose policies he supports, Kamala Harris,” Hawley said in his closing remarks.

Kunce has been criss-crossing the state this week, with stops in Smithville, Columbia and Cape Girardeau.



Hawley will be part of a statewide GOP get-out-the-vote tour on Monday, the Missouri Republican Party stated in a news release.


Sheriff concludes shooting-range injury of TV reporter at Lucas Kunce event was an accident


By Jason Hancock

A law enforcement investigation of the circumstances surrounding a television reporter being hit by a bullet fragment at a campaign photo op for Democrat Lucas Kunce earlier this month has determined there was “no malice, nor ill intent” by anyone involved.

(Photo- Lucas Kunce applies first aid to KSHB reporter Ryan Gamboa after a bullet fragment ricocheted off a target and struck him in the arm while former U.S. Rep. Adam Kinzinger looks on- Lucas Kunce for Missouri).

The case was also reviewed by the local prosecutor, who decided no charges would be filed, according to the incident report filed by the Clinton County Sheriff’s Office.








Kunce, a Marine veteran hoping to unseat Republican U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley, was holding an event at a shooting range near Kansas City with former U.S. Rep. Adam Kinzinger, an Illinois Republican. While shooting AR-15 rifles, a bullet fragment ricocheted off a metal target and struck KSHB-TV reporter Ryan Gamboa in the arm.

According to the incident report, after receiving first aid from Kunce, Gamboa sought treatment at a local hospital and was told he had a small piece of metal under his skin. Gamboa told the sheriff’s office he was advised by hospital staff to leave it there.

It’s unclear, according to the incident report, who fired the bullet that ultimately hit Gamboa. But Kinzinger told the sheriff’s office that after shooting “various weapons, from handguns to AR-15 rifles,” he stopped while Kunce “was shooting the last few rounds of the magazine.”

That’s when Kinzinger said he became aware that Gamboa was bleeding from his arm. Kinzinger believes it was “a fragment from a .233 round,” the incident report says.

The event carried on after first aid was administered to Gamboa, the report states, with participants continuing to shoot at the targets. After Kunce left he notified the sheriff’s office of the incident.

A spokesperson for Kunce’s campaign did not respond to a request for comment.






 
As the race for Missouri’s U.S. Senate seat enters its final days, Hawley has hammered Kunce over the shooting range incident, mocking him on social media and releasing a television ad saying he “can’t shoot straight” and calling him a “reckless liberal.”

Adding fuel to that criticism are complaints by gun experts who say the set up for the photo op was unsafe because the metal targets were too close to safely fire AR-15 rifles. The sheriff’s deputy who looked into the incident inspected the scene and determined the targets were only “10 paces, approximately 10 yards” from where Kunce and Kinzinger were shooting.

Missouri anti-abortion PAC gets $1 million boost from group tied to Leonard Leo


By Anna Spoerre

A group associated with conservative activist Leonard Leo donated $1 million on Tuesday to a campaign opposing Missouri’s abortion-rights amendment.

(Photo- A handful of people opposed to Amendment 3 protested outside the Missouri Supreme Court on Tuesday, Sept. 10, 2024, following a ruling to keep the abortion amendment on the Nov. 5 ballot- Anna Spoerre/Missouri Independent).  

The Concord Fund, an advocacy organization funded by groups connected to Leo, stepped into the fight over Amendment 3 with a $1 million check to a PAC called Vote No on 3, according to filings with the Missouri Ethics Commission.








The Concord Fund’s previous spending in Missouri was focused on boosting Will Scharf’s unsuccessful GOP primary campaign for attorney general, where it donated $5 million to PACs supporting Scharf.

Leo, a lawyer and activist who is a longtime leader at the conservative Federalist Society, also has ties to U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley. He’s been involved in one way or another with almost every high-profile conservative judicial appointment in recent decades.

Amendment 3 would legalize abortion up until the point of fetal viability. Abortion is illegal in Missouri, with exceptions only for medical emergencies.

Vote No on 3 is among a handful of political action committees hoping to defeat the amendment, including Missouri Stands with Women and the Missouri Right to Life. The donation from the Concord Fund is the single largest contribution made yet to a PAC opposing the amendment.

It also came a week before a General Election that’s already seen huge early voter turnout.

Cassidy Anderson, campaign manager for Vote No on 3, said the late-in-the-race donation was motivated in part by positive internal polling showing “Missourians really don’t want this.”

A September Emerson College poll found 58% of those surveyed support Amendment 3, with 30% opposed. An August SLU/YouGov Poll found that 52% supported the amendment and 34% opposed.



“Public polling in Missouri has consistently shown what we know to be true — there is overwhelming support among Missourians for ending the state’s abortion ban and protecting reproductive freedom,” Rachel Sweet, campaign manager for Missourians for Constitutional Freedom, the campaign behind Amendment 3, said in a statement in response to Anderson.

Despite a recent influx of cash, including $250,000 from a PAC called Conservative Leadership for Missouri, the anti-abortion campaign remains markedly outraised and outspent.

As of Wednesday, Missourians for Constitution had raised more than $31 million, including several seven-figure donations from liberal groups including the Sixteen Thirty Fund, the Fairness Project and Open Source Action Fund, all based out of Washington D.C.






 

Anderson, with Vote No on 3, said the donation will help the PAC launch “one last big education push” through TV and digital ads in the days leading up to the election, adding that the seven-figure check sends a message of hope to Missourians opposing abortion “who have been waiting to see the donor class jump in big time to help.”

As of Monday, Missourians for Constitutional Freedom spent more than $10 million on TV ad buys, including $2.6 million for ads that will air in the final days of the campaign.

Groups opposing Amendment 3 have spent about $700,000 on radio and TV ads, with No on 3 accounting for about $340,000 of that with TV ad purchases in the St. Louis market over the last four days.

No new TV ad purchases were reported for Vote No on 3 as of Wednesday afternoon.

Rudi Keller of The Independent staff contributed to this report.

YOU MAKE OUR WORK POB

Joplin City Council prepared to move full speed ahead on plans for veterans' park


Even as the battle to save Memorial Hall continues, Joplin City Council appears ready to move full speed ahead on its plans for what to do after the historic building falls victim to the wrecking ball.

During Monday night's 6 p.m. council meeting, members will be asked to approve a contract with an architectural firm to design the veterans park that has been suggested as a replacement for Memorial Hall.







After receiving proposals from 10 firms and interviewing five, city officials are recommending a contract with Garver LLC for $149,481 to provide "designs, plans, specifications and construction administration services."

According to the information city staff provided to the council, the plans for the park will incorporate some of the history of Memorial Hall "if possible."






In June of 2024, the Joplin City Council recommended the building be demolished and the site be developed as the Joplin Veteran’s Memorial Park. Given its history, the building holds significant war memorials and related artifacts to be preserved and incorporated into the future park. The building itself is a memorial and we expect some architectural design features may be retained or incorporated into the design and future park if possible. Strategies and methods for educating on and incorporating the history and significance of the site should be included in this design.

During the same meeting in which the architectural contract is expected to be approved on first reading, the council will hear more about Memorial Hall from Jill Halbach and Luke Gibson during the citizen presentation time.

Judge merry go round continues in Carthage mayor's attempt to stall removal, Mouton recuses


It has been less than a day since the attorney for impeached Carthage Mayor Dan Rife filed a petition for a writ of prohibition to keep him in office and already the case is on its third judge.

The first judge assigned to the case, Dean Dankelson, recused himself and the case was assigned to Judge David Mouton.

After Mouton's recusal this morning, the petition was sent to Division 1 Judge Gayle Crane to review, according to Jasper County Circuit Court online records.








Rife was impeached on four of five counts Tuesday by 6-2 margins. His attorney, Christopher Thornton, says the city code requires two-thirds of the number of elected council members, which should be 7 since Carthage elects 10 council members, but two, Dustin Edge and David Armstrong, resigned.

Wednesday, October 30, 2024

One day after Carthage mayor's impeachment, petition filed to prevent removal

 One day after the Carthage City Council impeached Mayor Dan Rife, he took legal action in an effort to prevent his removal.

Rife's lawyer, Christopher Thornton, St. Charles, filed a petition in prohibition in Jasper County Circuit Court today claiming Rife could not be removed despite the 6-2 vote on four of the five counts against him because six is one short of the two-thirds majority of elected city council members required by the city code.

The City Council had 10 elected members earlier in the year but council member Dustin Edge resigned recently and David Armstrong resigned earlier in the year.







From the petition:

Under the City Charter and Missouri statutes, the vote of six (6) Counsel members is insufficient to remove Dan Rife from the office of Mayor. 

Under the City Charter and Missouri law, “a two-thirds vote of all the members elected to the council” is seven (7) members of the Council. The vote of the City Council was not effective to remove Mayor Dan Rife from office under the City ordinance, the City Carter, or Missouri law. 

The facts and circumstances of this demonstrate unequivocally that an extreme necessity for preventive action exists because there is considerable confusion and disagreement over who holds the office of Mayor of Carthage, Missouri. 







The facts clearly demonstrate that the Carthage City Council lacks the power and authority to remove Dan Rife from the office of Mayor of Carthage. However, the Council is proceeding as if Dan Rife has been removed from the office of Mayor of Carthage.

Thornton is asking the court to issue a preliminary writ of prohibition preventing the council from "removing or attempting to remove Dan Rife from the office of mayor and declaring that Dan Rife shall hold the office of mayor of the City of Carthage, Missouri until such time as the court can adjudicate this petition."

Judge Dean Dankelson recused himself from the case, which has been transferred to Judge David Mouton.

Federal firearms charge filed against Carterville man


Bobby Gene Elliott, 39, Carterville, was charged today in U. S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri with being a felon in possession of a firearm.

According to the probable cause affidavit, the Joplin Police Department made a traffic stop at 7th and Schifferdecker and a search of Elliott's vehicle revealed two bags of methamphetamine, a pistol under the front passenger seat and an AR-15 style rifle with a 41-round magazine that contained 34 .223 caliber rounds.







The affidavit noted Elliott has a previous conviction for delivery of a controlled substance.

Jasper County Circuit Court records show Elliott is awaiting trial on a felony drug trafficking charge and driving while intoxicated in connection with a May 15 Joplin Police Department traffic stop. The probable cause statement indicates the police discovered methamphetamine in his vehicle.

Carthage man pleads guilty to DWI in crash that killed Keenan Reed, 19


A 1 p.m. January 27 sentencing is scheduled for Joseph C. Hill, Carthage who pleaded guilty earlier this month in Newton County Circuit Court to driving while intoxicated causing the death of another in the accident that killed Keenan Reed, 19, Carthage July 16, 2022.

In exchange for Hill's plea, assault and driving while revoked charges were dismissed.







The accident was described in a July 16, 2022 Joplin Police Department news release:

On July 16th, 2022 at 2:01 am, the Joplin Police Department Emergency Communications Center received information of an injury crash near Grand Falls at 5400 Riverside Drive in Joplin.

Officers from the Joplin Police Department, along with fire and EMS personnel, responded to the scene and located a single vehicle crash with multiple occupants.








Two occupants were rushed to a local hospital with one occupant being listed in serious condition and the other in stable condition with moderate injuries.

A third occupant was determined to be deceased at the scene of the crash.


Tuesday, October 29, 2024

Richie Fretwell still officially employed by Neosho R-5, being paid to do nothing


Assistant Superintendent Richie Fretwell, who reportedly received a police escort off the campus is still officially employed by the Neosho R-5 School District.

Under a separation agreement reached between the district and Fretwell and obtained by the Turner Report as a result of a Sunshine Law request, Fretwell's last day of employment will be June 30, 2025.









"As of the effective date of this agreement through June 30, 2025, Mr. Fretwell will be a paid leave of absence from the District, will not be required to perform any additional responsibilities for the District and is not precluded from securing any form of other employment or independent contractor work, including any work for another school district, during his employment by the District."

According to the agreement, Fretwell will receive the remainder of his $150,483 annual salary (he had been paid $25,080.50 of that when the agreement was signed). The district will pay into his retirement account and he will continue to receive insurance benefits.

Mr. Fretwell will also be compensated for 85 sick leave days in the total amount of $12,299.07 in a lump sum payment to be made no later than July 31, 2025.

Other provisions of the agreement include:

-Fretwell waives the right to take any actions or file any lawsuits against the district.

-The district releases Fretwell from any claim damages, claims or losses stemming from his employment.

-Fretwell will refrain from officiating any district events and activities through June 20, 2030.

-Neither side can say anything bad about the other. "It shall not be a violation of this provision for the parties to respond to any questions, comments or inquiries regarding Mr. Fretwell's separation from the district by stating: 'Mr. Fretwell/I resigned from the district on June 30, 2025 and we/I wish him/the District well in his/its future endeavors."







-Fretwell is prohibited from saying anything disparaging about current of former employees, administrators, board members or anyone else with the district. This also applies to former board members after they complete their terms.

Fretwell and district officials cannot discuss the terms of the agreement. If Fretwell violates that part of the agreement, he can be fired, with the violation of the agreement being the only reason.

According to the closed session minutes of the R-5 Board of Education's August 19 meeting, the agreement was approved by a 6-1 vote with Dan Haskins, Jonathan Russell, Stuart Puckett, Kyle Swagerty, James Keezer and Jenny Spiva voting yes and Cody Crocker voting no

Fretwell, who at one time was an assistant Neosho High School principal, returned to Neosho from Seneca when former Superintendent Jim Cummins brought him in as the assistant superintendent for operations in 2018. Fretwell, who served as high school principal under Cummins at Seneca, was one of Cummins' first hires.

Fretwell was one of two finalists for R-5 superintendent following Cummins' retirement.

The board opted to hire Jim Davis.

 

Monday, October 28, 2024

Cossey reports $3,400+ in contributions as recall election date nears


Tiffany Cossey raised $3,348.90 since the beginning of the month in her campaign to maintain her seat on the Carthage City Council.

Cossey's funds, which were detailed in an 8-day-before-election disclosure report filed this evening with the Missouri Ethics Commission, included a $1,500 loan from herself to her Carthage for Cossey committee.

Others donating, according to the report, included:

Daniel Lambeth $200

William Putnam $500

Ronald Ross $500

Robert Williams $250

Anthony Smallwood $200







Another $150 was received from people giving $100 or less, the report said.

Cossey spent $3,464.83 during the reporting period including $2,763.17 to Dynamic Signs and Graphics, $443.76 to Next Day Flyers and $174 to Wix.com LTD to establish a website.

Carthage Citizens United, which supports Cossey, reported receiving $1,800 since October 1 in its disclosure report, which was filed Saturday. The PAC spent $1,308.42,

Those contributing were:

William Putnam $500

Julia Scott $500

David Flanigan $500

The remainder of the money came from people contributing $100 or less.







The PAC spent $803 with the United States Postal Service and $491.82 to Carthage Printing for mailers.

Project 508, which is advocating for Cossey's recall, reported receiving $798.98, reported receiving $497, with no names listed as contributors since all contributions were $100 or less, according to the report.

The PAC spent $250 on yard signs.




Carl Junction School District mourns loss of bus driver


(From Carl Junction Schools)

It is with heavy hearts that we share the passing of Steve Doubledee, a beloved member of our Carl Junction Schools family. 

Steve dedicated 18 years to our district as a bus driver, making a lasting impact on the lives of countless students on bus #2. 

He was known for his genuine care, his ever-positive spirit, and the encouragement he offered each day. 






He truly loved his job and his students, and he will be deeply missed.

Please join us in keeping his wife, Ruby—who has long served in our Junior High kitchen—and all of Steve’s family and friends in your thoughts and prayers during this difficult time.

Probable cause: Homeless Neosho man threatens to shoot, cut woman, five children

 


A warrant has been filed for the arrest of a homeless Neosho man who allegedly threatened a woman and five children August 16.

The Newton County Prosecuting Attorney's office filed a felony harassment charge Friday against Bart Darren Link (DOB 1961). 

According to the probable cause statement, Link threatened "to cut" the woman and the children and after she sent the children away, he threatened to shoot her and reached into the seat of his walker.







Link denied ever threatening the woman or the children, but showed the investigating Newton County Sheriff's Office deputy his knife. No gun was found.

The probable cause statement indicates this was not the first complaint the Sheriff's Office had received about Link. 






This office has had multiple calls for service involving inappropriate behavior between Link and children, along with several alcohol-related incidents."

The statement suggested Link needs "mental evaluation along with state intervention for his living conditions."



Anderson man charged with assault, armed criminal action after allegedly shooting at ex-wife, child

The McDonald County Prosecuting Attorney filed assault, armed criminal action, resisting arrest and endangering the welfare of a child charges today against an Anderson man who allegedly began shooting at his ex-wife and child Saturday while intoxicated.

A $50,000 code bond has been set for Martinez Gonzalez (DOB 1989). His next court date is set for 10 a.m. November 13.








According to the probable cause statement, Gonzalez resisted arrest when a McDonald County Sheriff's Office deputy arrived on the scene.

The statement says Gonzalez "has threatened to kill the victim and has assaulted her before."


Jason Smith: Our nation is heading in the wrong direction


(From Eighth District Congressman Jason Smith)

Like millions of Americans, I’m incredibly concerned with the direction our nation is heading. We have faced crisis after crisis ever since President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris took office. 

Families are struggling to make ends meet in this painful economy. We have a border that’s in pure chaos. Families are rightly concerned with violent crime plaguing their communities. No matter how you look at it, the Biden-Harris administration has been an absolute disaster.








Thanks to Biden and Harris’s $10 trillion spending spree, families are having to make difficult financial decisions just so they can afford to put food on the table, clothes on their backs, and gasoline in their cars. Prices have risen by more than 20% and more than one in three workers are living paycheck to paycheck. The American dream of owning a home is out of reach for millions because interest rates are at the highest level in decades. Working-class families can’t go a day without feeling the pain of the Biden-Harris economy.

Our nation is experiencing the worst border crisis in history thanks to Biden and Harris’s reckless decision to get rid of former President Donald Trump’s effective policies. The Biden-Harris administration halted construction on the border wall, reinstated catch-and-release, got rid of Remain in Mexico, and so much more. The contrast between this administration and Trump’s handling of the border couldn’t be clearer: for 41 consecutive months, illegal immigrant crossings were higher under border czar Harris than the highest month under Trump. In addition, more people were caught illegally crossing the border in the first year of the Biden-Harris administration than the entire Trump presidency.

The border crisis is a major public safety and national security issue. Back in September, St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department Officer David Lee lost his life after getting struck by the car of an illegal immigrant who was intoxicated and driving way over the speed limit. Venezuelan gangs took control over apartment complexes in Colorado, terrorizing innocent people. In June, NBC News reported that over 50 illegal immigrants with ties to ISIS were on the loose in our nation after having been released by the Biden-Harris administration. Just a few months earlier, FBI Director Chris Wray told Congress that “[w]e are seeing a wide array of very dangerous threats that emanate from the border.” Despite knowing full well that the border crisis is a serious public safety and national security issue, the Biden-Harris administration refuses to do what’s necessary to keep Americans safe.








Washington Democrats and the liberal media claim that our communities are safer thanks to Biden and Harris. They’re wrong. In October, we learned that the FBI discreetly updated crime data to show a big increase in violent crime under the Biden-Harris administration. That inaccurate data was a central piece of Biden and Harris’s argument that violent crime has decreased under their leadership. In addition, the last several years have been very dangerous for our men and women in blue. According to the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP), 378 law enforcement officers were shot in the line of Duty in 2023 – the highest number the FOP has ever recorded. Americans are sick and tired of paying the price for the Left’s soft-on-crime policies and dangerous anti-police rhetoric.

There is no question that our nation is heading in the wrong direction. The economy is a complete disaster, our border is in absolute chaos, and crime is out of control. As your voice in Congress, I will continue doing everything I can to advance the policies we need to rebuild our economy, secure the border, and restore the rule of law.

Saturday, October 26, 2024

Nancy Hughes: Where is my focus?


“Set your minds on things above, not on earthly things.” Colossians 3:2 (NIV)

My granddaughter went downstairs to her dad’s office where he was totally focused on a project for work. “Hey Dad, is it okay if I wear this dress to church tomorrow?” Without looking up from his drawing, he replied “Sure, that’s great.”

However as she went back upstairs and came face to face with her mother, she received a completely different reaction. “Honey, why do you have that dress on? You’ve gotten so much taller and it’s too short for you to wear.”

But my granddaughter replied, “Mom, I just asked Dad if I could wear it to church tomorrow and he said it was okay.” Within minutes Dad was called upstairs and, as his previous conversation with his daughter was recounted, he immediately shook his head. “I should have looked up,” he said.








In Colossians 3:2, Paul tells the Church of Colossae that they should also look up. But his intent in telling them to keep focused “on things above” has a much deeper meaning. He knew that when we as believers focus on “things above,” we are actually focusing on Christ. And as we focus more on Him, we become more Christ-like in everything we do.

Now let me be the first to admit that my focus can get completely thrown off track by the “earthly things” in life. Just as my son-in-law was absorbed with his work, I can become absorbed in “stuff” in my life, like how much money and possessions I have. I can also become focused on envy or jealousy, holding a grudge smothered in anger and unforgiveness, or gossiping disguised as a “just thought you ought to know” comment.

But when my focus switches to heaven – and to Christ – I begin to understand that “as God’s chosen people” (verse 12) I need to put on His clothing of “compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness and patience.” Instead of gossiping about the woman sitting in a church pew quietly wiping tears, I will sit quietly by her side and share her grief.

I will find no comfort in what I own but will be able to comfort the elderly man in the care center longing for the days when he was healthy and in his home. I will trade impatience for patience with the woman at the gas station or supermarket who is having a rough day.








Earthly things that have no value will be replaced as my mind is set on things above and on Christ. So my question is this: where should your focus be? And the answer? Look up.

Father, forgive me when I focus on the unimportant things of this earth and not on you. Pull me back into your presence. In Jesus’ Name. Amen.

R.A.P. it up . . .

Reflect


Have you ever found yourself so focused on everyday situations here on earth that you lost your focus on Christ?

Do you think it happened suddenly or was it a gradual change?

Apply

Buy a small chalkboard and chalk and place it in your kitchen or by the bathroom mirror.

Write Colossians 3:2 on it in the morning and at the end of the day, write one sentence describing how you focused on Christ during the day. Repeat tomorrow.

Power

Colossians 3:2 (NIV) “Set your minds on things above, not on earthly things.”

II Corinthians 4:18 (NIV) “So we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen. For what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal.”

John 15:19 (NIV) “If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you.”

(For more of Nancy Hughes' writing, check out her blog, Encouragement from the War Room.)

Trial date set for former Joplin Project Graduation president on felony stealing charge

 

A January 28 trial date is scheduled in Newton County Circuit Court for former Joplin High School Project Graduation president Melanie Dawn Patterson, 44, Joplin, who is charged with stealing.

A pre-trial conference is set for 1:30 p.m. December 18 before Judge Kevin Selby.

Patterson allegedly embezzled at least $1,400 from Project Graduation.









According to the probable cause statement, Patterson allegedly stole the money from the Project Graduation bank account through four withdrawals from the Southwest Missouri Bank ATM at 1102 E. 32nd Street.

The withdrawals were made on September 15, September 30, October 12 and October 13, 2022

From the probable cause statement:

Melanie D. Patterson was the president of Joplin High School Project Graduation Inc. Class of 2023 and was issued a Debit Card (last #9478) through Southwest Missouri Bank.

The treasurer for Joplin Project Graduation noticed suspicious activity on the account and upon going through bank records noticed five withdrawals that had not been approved by the organization. The withdrawals had been made with card #9478 at the ATM located at 1102 E 32nd St on the following dates for the following amounts:

1. 09-15-2022 for $150 at 1244 hours

2. 09-30-2022 for $150 at 1731 hours

3. 10-12-2022 for $500 at 1356 hours








4. 10-13-2022 for $300 at 1738 hours

5. 10-20-2022 for $300 at 1214 hours

Video obtained from the ATM confirmed that Melanie D. Patterson withdrew money on each occasion as she exited her vehicle registered to her, and she was the only one present during each transaction.

Patterson was contacted via phone and stated that the debit card in question was stolen a while back and she had nothing to do with the thefts and refused to speak with officers further on the matter.

Friday, October 25, 2024

Lucas Kunce fundraising continues to outpace Josh Hawley in Missouri Senate race


By Rudi Keller

The final pre-election fundraising reports for Missouri’s U.S. Senate race show Democrat Lucas Kunce continuing to outpace incumbent Republican Josh Hawley, bringing his total since the start of 2023 to almost three times his rival.

In the period from Oct. 1 to Oct. 16, Kunce took in $1.6 million, with two committees raising money for Hawley taking in just under $1 million. Since the start of 2023, Kunce has raised $18.9 million compared to $7.4 million for Hawley.







Thanks to fundraising that occurred before Jan. 1, 2023, Hawley continued to hold a cash advantage in the latest filings, with $1.3 million on hand as the period closed compared to $427,729 for Kunce.

The cash advantage allowed Hawley to buy nearly $500,000 of television advertising for the final 10 days of the campaign, while Kunce has yet to make his purchases for the race’s homestretch. Kunce and Hawley are the only candidates in any race who have advertised on television continually since the August primary.

The two are about even on broadcast spending, tracking by The Independent shows.

Hawley has laid out $5 million and a PAC supporting him, Show Me Strong, adding $2.6 million. Kunce has spent $6.7 million on broadcast ads and a PAC backing him, Patriots Prevail, has spent just under $300,000.

Kunce has a big edge in online and direct mail spending. He reported $2.7 million in online advertising since the primary and $1.6 million for direct mail. Hawley has spent just $15,000 on digital ads and $11,075 on direct mail.

A third candidate who formed a new political party, Jared Young, reported raising $14,061 in the two weeks covered by the report, bringing his total to just under $1 million.Young has been traveling the state for his campaign but his advertising budget has been limited to online promotions, with $8,387 spent on Facebook and $17,707 through Google.







In the only other federal campaign where both candidates are running broadcast ads, U.S. Rep. Ann Wagner, a Republican from St. Louis County, continued to outraise Democratic nominee Ray Hartmann as she seeks to retain her 2nd Congressional District seat.

Wagner, who was sitting on a $3.2 million bank account on Oct.16, raised $113,293 in the period, compared to $55,547 for Hartman. Wagner has spent only $18,696 on broadcast ads, all on radio, while Hartmann has purchased $60,000 in television ads.


Democrat says Missouri AG’s teen pregnancy argument in abortion pill lawsuit is ‘insane’


By Jason Hancock

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey’s contention that a decrease in teen pregnancy could hurt the state financially and politically is “an absolutely insane argument,” his Democratic rival on the Nov. 5 ballot said Thursday.

“Apparently he believes we need more teen pregnancies in Missouri, because otherwise we might lose a congressional seat or federal funding if our population decreases,” said Elad Gross, a St. Louis attorney challenging Bailey. He added: “There’s certainly a lot to unpack there.”








Gross was reacting to litigation filed by Bailey and GOP attorneys general from Kansas and Idaho earlier this month seeking to restrict access to the abortion pill mifepristone.

A previous version of the lawsuit was thrown out by the U.S. Supreme Court after it concluded the plaintiffs did not have standing to sue because they couldn’t show they had been harmed.

In order to establish standing this time around, Bailey argues access to mifepristone would lower “birth rates for teenaged mothers,” and thus cause population loss that could result in “diminishment of political representation and loss of federal funds.”

Missouri’s teen pregnancy birth rate has steadily declined over the past several years, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, though it still remains among the highest in the country.

Bailey’s litigation, Gross noted, specifically looks at pregnancy rates of 15 to 19 year olds.

“He’s talking about people in some cases who are underage,” Gross said, “in a state where our abortion ban doesn’t include exceptions for rape or incest.”

In Missouri, 15 and 16 year olds cannot consent to sex with someone who is more than 4 years older or who is over 21 years old.

Bailey’s campaign responded to Gross’ critiques by pointing to a 2009 opinion piece Gross wrote for the student newspaper at Duke University where he criticized then-President Barack Obama for appointing so many “czars” to tackle difficult issues.

In the piece, Gross jokinging says that if Obama insists on appointing “a czar for every crisis area, he may want to appoint a Czar of Reproduction” since “more teenage girls are becoming mothers and more children are born to unmarried mothers…. Sounds like a job for a czar!”








“Andrew Bailey has always protected innocent life, while Mr. Gross advocated for Barack Obama to name a federal ‘Czar of Reproduction’ to oversee teenage pregnancies as a solution,” Bailey’s campaign said in an emailed statement. “The death of innocent human life carries a cost that rips the moral fabric of society, and our pro-abortion opponent grossly ignores those costs in favor of extreme late-term and unlimited abortion policies.”

Gross said his 2009 piece was clearly a critique of “big government” and the Obama Administration.

“I didn’t know that Bailey had such a problem with reading comprehension,” Gross said, “but that would explain a lot of his losses in court.”

Thursday, October 24, 2024

Missouri GOP leader says legislature must respect outcome if abortion amendment passes


By Anna Spoerre

With some GOP leaders in Missouri already plotting ways to overturn an abortion-rights amendment if it passes next month, the Republican set to take over as speaker of the state House says lawmakers should abide by the will of the voters.

(Photo- House Majority Leader Jonathan Patterson, R-Lee’s Summit, speaks during floor debate in March 2021 (Tim Bommel/Missouri House Commuincations).

State Rep. Jon Patterson, a Lee’s Summit Republican expected to become House speaker when the legislature returns in January, says he doesn’t support the proposal to enshrine abortion in the constitution, which will appear on the Nov. 5 ballot as Amendment 3.







But if it wins, he said, the legislature should respect the voters’ decision.

“It will be the law of the land,” he said Wednesday evening at a Lee’s Summit Chamber candidate forum. “And we have to go forward as the people decide.”

Regardless of the outcome on Amendment 3, Patterson — who is running for a fourth term against Democrat Kevin Grover — told Wednesday’s crowd that “I don’t think an abortion ban works. I don’t think it’s working for Missouri.”

In an interview with The Independent on Thursday, Patterson clarified he was talking about a “total ban” on abortion.

“Missourians are telling us they want compromise,” he said.

When the constitutional right to an abortion was overturned in June 2022, Missouri became the first state to enact a trigger law banning the procedure in all cases except for medical emergencies. There are no exceptions for survivors of rape or incest.

In 2019, Patterson voted in favor of the trigger law that would later be used to ban abortion.

Amendment 3 would legalize abortion up until the point of fetal viability and protect other forms of reproductive health care, including access to birth control. The amendment would allow the Missouri legislature to regulate abortion after fetal viability — generally seen as the end of the second trimester of pregnancy — with exceptions for “the life or physical or mental health of the pregnant person.”

State Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman, a Republican from Arnold, told The Independent last month that if the amendment passes, it will not be the last time Missourians vote on abortion.








Coleman noted that after Missourians passed a citizen-led amendment requiring legislative districts be drawn to ensure partisan fairness in 2018, the legislature placed a repeal amendment on the ballot two years later. It was also approved by Missouri voters.

“This is not the end all be all,” Coleman said of Amendment 3. “And I think you will see efforts, win or lose, for Missourians to get another say in this.”

Earlier this month, U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley, a Republican running for re-election, was asked about Amendment 3 during a rally in the Kansas City suburbs.

“I think it’s absolutely right Missouri voters get to make a choice on this,” he said. “And they can vote on it as many times as they want to.”

During an interview last month on Wake Up Mid-Missouri, Lt. Gov. Mike Kehoe, the GOP candidate for governor, was asked what he could do if Amendment 3 passes.

“There will be ideas from the legislature I’m sure, and other groups, on how to continue to protect innocent life,” Kehoe said, later adding: “I will do everything I can to work with legislators and other folks around the state to find ways to make sure we continue to do that in some form or fashion.”

He later said that as a person of faith, he believes “we’ll figure out something.”

So far, polling has favored Amendment 3.

A recent Emerson College poll found 58% of those surveyed support Amendment 3, with 30% opposed. The most recent SLU/YouGov Poll found that 52% supported the amendment and 34% opposed.








An August 2022 St. Louis University/YouGov poll found 75% of likely Missouri voters polled immediately following the enactment of the state’s ban were in favor of exceptions for abortions in cases of rape, and 79% supported exceptions in cases of incest.

Patterson’s call to abide by the outcome of the Amendment 3 vote echoes his opposition to GOP efforts earlier this year to make it harder to amend the constitution through the initiative petition process.

The proposal was an effort to undermine the abortion-rights amendment, and when it came up for a final vote in the House, Patterson was the only Republican to vote “no.” The bill ultimately died in the Senate.

Federal government, Missouri AG’s office argue over future of student loan forgiveness


By Annelise Hanshaw

The fate of a partially enacted federal plan to forgive student loans and lower monthly payments is in the hands of a panel of three GOP-appointed judges on the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Attorneys from the federal government and the Missouri Attorney General’s Office made their arguments Thursday afternoon before Judges Raymond Gruender, Ralph Erickson and Steven Grasz.








The lawsuit, filed in April by Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey and six other GOP attorneys general, seeks to eliminate the U.S. Department of Education’s SAVE Plan, which lowers payment costs based on income and raises the maximum income to qualify for $0 payments. It also promises forgiveness in as little as 10 years, depending on the loan’s original balance.

The plan is on pause while the legal challenge winds through the courts. Borrowers enrolled in the SAVE Plan are currently in a general forbearance without interest accruing.

Arguments Thursday focused on two points: whether the U.S. Department of Education had the authority to create the plan and if the states bringing the lawsuit can prove they are harmed by the plan enough to give them standing to sue.

Thomas Pulham, an attorney with the U.S. Department of Justice, defended the department’s interpretation of the Higher Education Act, which authorizes income-contingent repayment plans.

The law says repayment for these loans is for “an extended period of time prescribed by the Secretary, not to exceed 25 years.” The federal government has held this allows the Secretary of Education to choose the length, as long as it is under 25 years.

Grasz told Pulham that he reads it differently. He believes that it means the loans must be paid in full within 25 years.

“Tell me why I’m reading this statute wrong,” Grasz said. “It talks about a variety of plans for repayment, not forgiveness, repayment — including principal and interest on the loan, which sounds like you have got to repay all the principal and all the interest.”

Pulham said the 25-year period may be unattainable for low-income borrowers, causing high bills at the end of the term if the full balance and interest is due.

“The income contingent repayment plan, by its terms, calls for repayment that is contingent on income. Contingent means possible or uncertain,” he said. “If a borrower does not have sufficient income to cover all the payments, then those payments can’t be made.”

This was the department’s understanding when it implemented the rule and through Congress’s amendments in 2007, he said.

“Congress authorized a repayment plan. If the borrower’s payments are reduced to zero and then forgiven, how is that a repayment plan?” Grasz asked.

“The borrower’s payments are zero only for the time when the borrower’s income is insufficient to make any payment because they’re earning so their income is sufficiently low that they can’t cover the necessities of life,” Pulham said.








The first attempt to forgive student loans under the HEROES Act, which sought to cancel up to $20,000 in debt for borrowers, was squashed when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the department didn’t have authority from Congress. Bailey was a key part of that case and leads the coalition against the SAVE Plan.

Joshua Divine, Missouri’s Solicitor General, said the appellate court is under the precedent of the Supreme Court ruling, which gave Missouri standing to sue. The case also applied a doctrine that requires clear statements of authorization to executive agencies in matters of economic or political importance.

Divine said the application of this doctrine is “game over” for the federal government’s argument.

“The other side asserts an interpretation that would give the secretary authority to cancel every penny of every loan. The problem, of course, is that extraordinary assertions of authority like that require exceedingly clear statements by Congress, and this the Secretary doesn’t have,” he said.

Grasz, who questioned Pulham throughout his allotted time for arguments, had few inquiries for Divine.

An appointee of former U.S. President Donald Trump, Grasz has ties to Divine through conservative law organization The Federalist Society. In January, Grasz was a speaker at the group’s Missouri chapters conference. Divine was also a speaker during the conference, though on a different topic.

Thursday, Grasz asked Divine why the court should block portions of the rule that look at family size and deferment protocol. A decision at the district court level only blocked forgiveness, parsing out other provisions.

“Those are harming us just as much as the other ones are,” Divine said. “What they have done is they have blasted open the eligibility so you can’t just isolate the forgiveness provision from the eligibility for forgiveness provisions.”

In order for the lawsuit to be valid, Divine must prove harm. A quasi-governmental student-loan processor called the Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, or MOHELA, has been the state’s vehicle for standing in the loan-forgiveness litigation.

But the federal government said MOHELA, based on the terms of its contract, would make more money with the SAVE Plan.

James Richard Kvaal, the under secretary of education in the Biden administration, signed an affidavit earlier in the case that MOHELA would lose money if the plan is blocked.








“Missouri should be indifferent as to whether there is forgiveness or the loan is entirely paid off,” Pulham told the panel of judges on Thursday. “The two possibilities are zero balance or forgiveness and either way, MOHELA’s payments end.”

MOHELA has not been an active participant in the challenges to the federal government’s loan-forgiveness plans. But the servicer’s existence has allowed the cases to move forward.

Pulham said the six other states signed onto the lawsuit — Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, North Dakota, Ohio and Oklahoma — have “no standing at all.”