Monday, January 06, 2025

Agenda posted for Joplin R-8 Board of Education special session


The Joplin R-8 Board of Education will meet in special session 5 p.m. Tuesday at the Memorial Education Center.



A. Call to Order
1. Roll call

B. Pledge of Allegiance

C. Approval of Agenda








D. Consent Agenda

1. Real Estate Broker Services
2. Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment Design Services
3. Salary Schedule Updates per Minimum Wage Increase

E. Regular Agenda
1. CMAR Process and Procurement Phase 1
2. 2025-26 Capital Outlay
3. Phase 1 Elementary Projects
4. Elementary Classroom Furniture

F. Adjourn to Closed Session per 610.021 (1) Legal actions, causes of action or litigation involving the district... (2) The lease, purchase or sale of real estate by the district... (3) Hiring, firing, disciplining, or promoting of particular employees... (13) Individually identifiable personnel records... - Action (Hartwell)

Missouri bills would let utilities use projections to set rates, may increase prices


By Allison Kite

Utility companies could base customers’ rates on projected expenses rather than actual costs under legislation critics worry would increase Missourians’ bills.

(Photo- Legislation in Missouri would allow gas, water and sewer companies to use future projections rather than past costs to set customers' rates (Tim Carpenter/Kansas Reflector).

Several bills prefiled ahead of the Missouri General Assembly’s legislative session, which starts Wednesday, would apply the new ratemaking standard to gas, water and sewer — but not electric — utilities. Lawmakers considered similar bills last year, but they did not make it to final passage.






 

Currently, utilities rely on audited past expenses — called a “test year” to set rates. Supporters of the legislation say using a historic test year means the information used to set customers’ rates is dated. A future test year, they argue, uses more current information.

“Just as a business or even the state of Missouri plans with the budgeting looking ahead, this method allows regulators to set rates based on updated information,” Sen. Mike Cierpiot, a Lee’s Summit Republican, said in a committee hearing last year.

Cierpiot, who has again filed a bill mandating use of a future test year, did not return requests for comment.

Critics say it would inflate Missouri utility bills.

“Essentially, it’s an accounting trick by monopoly utilities to take a little extra money out of your pocket,” John Coffman, an attorney for the Consumers Council of Missouri, said in an interview this week. Coffman estimated utility rates could climb by more than 10% under the legislation.

During the same hearing last year, Coffman called the legislation “anti-consumer” and said it amounted to a “rate increase piece of legislation.”

For-profit utility companies in Missouri are highly regulated because of their status as a monopoly. Every few years, they propose new rates to the Missouri Public Service Commission, which must sign off before companies change prices. Staff of the Public Service Commission, along with consumer and environmental advocates, are allowed to analyze the requested change and voice their opinions. Public hearings are held before the new rates can go into effect.

The Public Service Commission’s counterpart, the Kansas Corporation Commission, said Kansas utilities are not permitted to use future test years and it was not aware of any effort in the Kansas Legislature to change that.

The rate-setting process, supporters of the future test year legislation argue, should look ahead to upcoming expenses, not to past costs.

Christine Page, director of government and external affairs for Missouri American Water, said in a committee hearing last year that using a future test year would make for a more “collaborative” process.

Page said if Missouri American Water, which provides water to 1.6 million Missouri residents, were planning to invest in its infrastructure, stakeholders would be able to give input ahead of construction about how much is appropriate for the utility to spend.

Of the 13 states where American Water operates, Page said, nine use a future test year in ratemaking.

In a statement Friday, the company’s spokeswoman, Christie Barnhart, called the legislation “vital to addressing the critical water and wastewater infrastructure needs of our state.”

“These bills would allow for a more aggressive replacement of aging infrastructure before it has outlived its useful life, which is both more efficient from a cost standpoint and reduces service interruptions to the customer,” Barnhart said.

Jason Merrill, a spokesman for Spire Missouri, which serves gas customers in both Kansas City and St. Louis, said the company supports the legislation.

“Rather than rates being set on dated financial information, this would allow utilities to plan budgets in real time and regulators to set rates based on more current data,” Merrill said.

But that regulatory lag, Coffman said, is good for consumers. He argues it’s an incentive for utilities to keep their costs down. With a future test year, Coffman said, the incentives flip.

“The incentives become like a government where they have a budget, and if you don’t spend it, you lose it…so it flips the incentives from one that encourages cost control and cost management to one where the incentives are to spend all the money you can,” he said.

Ameren Missouri, which provides both electricity and gas service to Missouri customers, said in a statement that it supported the idea of a future test year.

“Currently several large new users of electricity that could provide thousands of jobs and billions of dollars of investment are considering Missouri as a place to locate,” Ameren’s vice president of regulatory affairs, Warren Wood, said. “To seize on these economic development opportunities and to continue to be a leader in reliable and affordable electricity, new generation plants are critically needed.”








The bill is one of several introduced for the coming session that could affect utility rates. Another would allow utilities to start charging customers for new electric generation facilities that are still under construction.

Last year, Senate Majority Leader Cindy O’Laughlin filed legislation meant to stop mandatory time-of-use pricing for electric utilities after Evergy rolled out new rates that quadrupled in price during times of peak power demand.

In a statement, O’Laughlin didn’t take a position on the test year legislation.

“Utility policy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration of both the needs of consumers and the challenges utilities face in providing reliable service,” she said.

Neosho man held without bond after allegedly planting camera in underage girl's bedroom


A Neosho man is being held without bond after being charged by the Newton County Prosecuting Attorney's office today with invasion of privacy- victim under 18 years of age, a felony.

Joey D. Brown, 36, allegedly installed a Wi-Fi operated security camera in an underage girl's bedroom, according to the probable cause statement.







On 01/03/2025, a security camera that uses Wi-Fi to transmit video to another source was located in the bedroom of the juvenile victim under the bed facing a full body mirror where the victim frequently gets dressed. 

The suspect Joey Brown admitted to the victim and the victim's mother, he placed the camera there to listen to the victim and victim's sisters' conversations. The camera was focused on the large mirror in the room. 

The camera had the ability to move up and down and side to side using the app. It is estimated the camera has been under the bed for the last 3-4 weeks.


Jason Smith: Protecting the homeland


(From Eighth District Congressman Jason Smith)

Just hours after we officially entered the New Year, an evil terrorist drove a truck down Bourbon Street in New Orleans, killing at least 14 people and injuring dozens of others. After crashing his vehicle, which was flying an ISIS flag, the terrorist was shot and killed by heroic law enforcement officers who didn’t hesitate to rush toward danger to save countless lives. My heart goes out to the loved ones of the victims of this heinous terror attack.

The people of New Orleans are incredibly resilient. They made it through the devastation of Hurricane Katrina and won’t let a deranged lunatic frighten them or change their way of life.








There are many questions that must be answered following the attack. The federal government must work around the clock and do everything it can to get Americans the answers they deserve. And it’s critical that authorities keep President Donald Trump and his team up to date on the latest in the investigation.

For years, Republicans have sounded the alarm over the Biden administration’s failure to focus on going after groups and individuals who actually pose the biggest threat to our safety and security. They claimed the number one threat was so-called “racially motivated extremism.” They went after parents who protested at local school board meetings, painted certain Catholics as violent extremists, and waged a years-long witch hunt against President Trump. Enough is enough. The federal government needs to focus on keeping Americans safe by going after terrorists like the one who carried out the attack in New Orleans.

Since day one, the Biden administration has ignored the terror threat stemming from the southern border. Following Hamas’ October 7 terror attack against Israel, Customs and Border Protection issued a memo warning that terrorists involved in that war could attempt to enter the U.S. from Mexico. In August, a suspected Palestinian terrorist known for using “explosives/firearms” was caught at the southern border. Just weeks earlier, three other suspected Palestinian terrorists were caught at the California border. And according to a report released by the House Judiciary Committee in August, the Biden administration has released into American communities at least 99 illegal aliens on the terrorist watchlist.








The New Orleans terror attack underscores how critical it is for the Senate to move swiftly to confirm President Trump’s nominees who are in charge of keeping America safe. That means confirming South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem as Homeland Security Secretary so she can help President Trump secure the border and protect our nation from terror attacks. In addition, the Senate needs to confirm Kash Patel as FBI Director so he can clean house at the troubled agency, which has lost the public’s trust and strayed from its mission. And once Tulsi Gabbard has taken the reins as Director of National Intelligence, she’ll immediately get to work investigating actual threats instead of wasting precious time and resources pursuing conspiracy theories like the Russia Collusion hoax.

Trump’s return to the White House cannot come soon enough. I’m incredibly thankful that our next president will do everything he can to protect families. I look forward to working with him and his team to make America safe again.

Joplin 44 truck stop to pay $186,642 for violations of Clean Water Act


(From the Environmental Protection Agency)

Two truck stops in Iowa and Missouri – Iowa 80, advertised as “the world’s largest truck stop,” and Joplin 44 – agreed to pay a combined $390,784 to resolve alleged violations of the federal Clean Water Act. (Joplin 44's portion of that amount is $186,642.)

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the facilities failed to comply with regulations intended to protect water bodies from petroleum discharges.








“This settlement represents the federal government’s commitment to protecting our nation’s waterways and creating a level playing field for businesses who are complying with the law,” said EPA Region 7 Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Division Director David Cozad.

EPA discovered the alleged violations during inspections of the truck stops in 2023.

According to the Agency, the truck stops, which are owned by Iowa 80 Group Inc., failed to adequately develop and implement Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) plans, as required by the Clean Water Act.

Facilities that store 1,320 gallons or greater of oil products in aboveground storage tanks are subject to SPCC regulations. Such plans require, among other things, proper containment to control petroleum releases, inspections of tanks and piping, and integrity testing of petroleum storage equipment.

In response to EPA’s findings, the facilities revised their SPCC plans, conducted internal and external tank inspections, and completed the necessary repairs.

The settlements are detailed in Consent Agreements and Final Orders that will be subject to a 30-day public comment period. The Consent Agreements are available online for public review and comment: Iowa 80 and Joplin 44.








Consent agreement for Joplin 44

In accordance with Section 311(b)(6)(c) of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. § 1321(b)(6)(C), and 40 C.F.R. § 22.45 of the Consolidated Rules of Practice Governing the Administrative Assessment of Civil Penalties and the Revocation/Termination or Suspension of Permits (“Consolidated Rules”), the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) is providing notice of a proposed Administrative Penalty Assessment against Truckstop Distributors, Inc. d/b/a Joplin 44, for alleged violations at the Facility located at 4240 South Highway 43, Joplin, Missouri, 64801.

Under Section 311(b)(6)(B)(ii) of the CWA, 33 U.S.C. § 1321(b)(6)(B)(ii), the EPA is authorized to issue orders assessing civil penalties for various violations of the CWA. The EPA may issue such orders after filing a Complaint commencing either a Class I or Class II penalty proceeding. The EPA provides notice of the proposed assessment of a Class II civil penalty pursuant to 311(b)(6)(B)(ii) of the CWA, 33 U.S.C. § 1321(b)(6)(B)(ii). Class II proceedings are conducted under EPA’s Consolidated Rules, 40 C.F.R. Part 22.

In this case, the EPA alleges that Respondent violated the requirements of the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan (“SPCC”) and Facility Response Plan (“FRP”) regulations in violation of Section 311(j) of the CWA, 33 U.S.C. § 1321(j). The EPA alleges that Respondent failed to fully prepare and implement an adequate SPCC Plan and failed to prepare an FRP. Respondent has reached agreement with EPA on the terms of a proposed Consent Agreement/Final Order which would resolve this matter. Under the proposed Consent Agreement/Final Order, Respondent will pay a civil penalty of $186,642. Final approval of the proposed Consent Agreement/Final Order is subject to the requirements of 40 C.F.R. § 22.45.

The EPA will receive written comments on the proposed Administrative Penalty Assessment for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of publication of this notice. All such comments shall be submitted to the Regional Hearing Clerk at the address provided below. The procedures by which the public may submit written comments on a proposed Class II order or participate in a Class II proceeding, and the procedures by which a respondent may request a hearing, are set forth in the Consolidated Rules.








Persons wishing to obtain additional information on the proceeding, receive a copy of EPA’s Consolidated Rules, review the proposed Consent Agreement/Final Order, comment upon the proposed penalty assessment, or otherwise participate in the proceeding should contact Regional Hearing Clerk, at R7_Hearing_Clerk_Filings@epa.gov or 913-551-7972. 

Please reference Docket No. CWA-07-2023-0140. For Technical questions contact Mark Aaron, Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Division, at aaron.mark@epa.gov or 913-551-7205. Persons with legal questions may contact Shane McCoin, Office of Regional Counsel, at mccoin.shane@epa.gov or 913-551-7955. In order to provide opportunity for public comment, EPA will issue no final order assessing a penalty in this proceeding prior to forty (40) days from the date of this notice.

The battle over Missouri’s minimum wage didn’t end with November vote


By Rudi Keller
Missouri Independent

BOONVILLE — In 2022, Heather Overstreet moved her growing dog grooming, training and boarding business into a converted garage.

(Photo- Heather Overstreet, owner of Top Dog Training in Boonville, explains the impact of a higher minimum wage on her small business. Her business includes a 10,000 square foot outdoor area to exercise dogs.- Rudi Keller/Missouri Independent)

It was a milestone for a business she started at age 16 by training dogs for friends of her mother. She innovated on the furnishings, refurbishing a bathtub left behind by the previous owner to use for dog washing. She built indoor kennels with room for 12 dogs and fenced 10,000 square feet outdoors to exercise dogs in daycare and overnight boarding.








But future expansion is on hold, Overstreet said, until she understands the impact of voter-approved Proposition A, which increases the state minimum wage, on her payroll and customers.

“It not only throws off my math, but it just is an entirely new challenge,” Overstreet said.

Under the provisions of Proposition A, Missouri’s minimum wage rose to $13.75 an hour on Jan. 1, up from $12.30 an hour. It will increase again to $15 an hour on Jan. 1, 2026, with future adjustments tied to inflation.

Along with increasing the minimum wage, Proposition A requires some employers to provide paid sick and family leave starting May 1. Businesses with revenue of $500,000 or more must provide one hour for every 30 hours worked, up to five days per year for businesses with fewer than 15 employees and seven days per year for larger businesses.

Overstreet, who is also a member of the City Council in Boonville, with a population of about 8,000, admits she didn’t pay close attention to the details of Proposition A. She expected a more modest increase and had hoped to hold prices steady in 2025. Instead, she will notify customers of a rate hike, she said.

She needs three employees to cover the hours she is open.

Overstreet hires young people, often for their first job, to care for boarded dogs, and starts them at minimum wage. Over the course of a year, the increase will add $3,247 to employer payroll costs for every full-time minimum wage employee — $3,016 for additional wages and $231 for additional Social Security and Medicare taxes

“With minimum wage rising, that’s at least one extra dog that I need per day, which I guess you could say, is no big deal,” Ovestreet said. “But this is a small town, and I’ve only had that shop for two years.”

Proposition A, placed on the ballot via initiative petition, passed in November with 58% of the vote with support from unions, workers’ advocacy groups, social justice and civil rights organizations, and a coalition of more than 500 business owners.








There was no large-scale opposition campaign prior to the election. But a court challenge filed in early December by major business advocacy groups asks the Missouri Supreme Court to invalidate the vote. And legislation filed in advance of this year’s session seeks to exempt 96% of private employers from the higher minimum wage.

Randy Vines, co-owner of a St. Louis business that also began as a home-based operation and a backer of Proposition A, said he’s sympathetic to Overstreet’s dilemma but argues that more money in the hands of workers helps the economy.

Other costs can squeeze profits as well, said Vines, who founded STL-Style, which makes merchandise themed to St. Louis for retail and wholesale markets, with his brother..

If the price of T-shirts goes up, for example, that has to be part of his pricing, he said.

“We’re kind of at the mercy of what the markets are doing and what the industry is doing in general,” Vines said. “So when costs go up for manufacturers, we have to, you know, pass that on.”

Minimum wage history

For most of the time since a federal minimum wage of 25 cents an hour was established in 1938, there was no Missouri law mandating a separate state rate. In 1990, lawmakers extended the minimum wage to all businesses, including those exempt under federal law.

The first ballot measure setting the Missouri rate above the federal requirement passed in 2006. It boosted the state wage to $6.50 an hour and required future adjustments based on inflation. The federal rate at the time was $5.15 an hour and had not been changed since 1997.








In 2018, when adjustments had increased Missouri’s wage to $7.85 an hour, voters passed a proposal boosting the rate in yearly increments until it reached $12 an hour at the start of 2023.

An inflation adjustment set it at $12.30 an hour for 2024. If Proposition A had failed, the inflation-adjusted wage for 2025 would have been $12.65 an hour, the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations stated in a news release.

The current federal minimum wage is $7.25 an hour, a rate that has been unchanged since 2009. The highest inflation-adjusted minimum wage was the Feb. 1, 1968, increase to $1.60 an hour, which is equal to $14.76 an hour.

Prior to November, opponents argued that increasing the minimum wage would cause inflation, job losses and slow the state’s economy. Supporters point to research that calls those assumptions into question, noting that the state’s unemployment rate has fallen faster since the start of 2019 than adjoining states that did not boost their minimum wage.

“Working families are the drivers of the economy,” Caitlyn Adams, executive director of Missouri Jobs with Justice Voter Action, said in a news release issued Dec. 30. “We are proud to take another step forward in building an economy that works for all.”

As he is leaving office, Gov. Mike Parson made job gains and low unemployment the top two bullet points in a news release listing the accomplishments of his administration, which began in June 2018.

Missouri added nearly 190,000 new jobs, saw more than $17 billion in new business investment and enjoyed unemployment that was as low as 2.1%, the lowest ever recorded, the release stated.

The impact of the increase will be significant for the economy, proponents estimated in filings used by State Auditor Scott Fitzpatrick to write the fiscal summary of the proposal. Based on 2022 data, backers said 330,000 Missourians making minimum wage will get a pay raise, and almost 200,000 earning more than the minimum would likely receive raises because their pay is tied to the minimum. Wage costs in 2026 will be about $850 million more than 2022.

Rollback efforts

Business groups opposed to Proposition A didn’t mount a campaign to defeat it at the polls. Instead, they are asking the Missouri Supreme Court to declare the election invalid, alleging the ballot language was misleading and incomplete.

And instead of ordering a second vote, the challenge seeks to have the initiative proposal tossed completely for combining the minimum wage increase with the requirement for businesses to provide paid sick and family time.

The court refused to hear the case before the increase took effect. Instead, the court appointed Cole County Circuit Judge Josh Devine as a commissioner to take evidence in the election challenge and report his findings by Feb. 10.

That could make it possible for the court to rule by the time the sick and family leave provision takes effect May 1.

By that time, there should be clear signals from lawmakers on whether they intend to step in.

A bill filed by State Rep.-elect Jeff Vernetti, a Republican from Camdenton, would exempt businesses employing almost half of all Missouri workers from the higher minimum wage.

The bill would exempt seasonal businesses or those employing 50 or fewer workers. The bill would freeze the minimum wage for those businesses at $12.30 an hour.

Vernetti represents the tourist regions around the Lake of the Ozarks, where he owns a small Italian grocery and is a partner in a baseball/softball complex that hosts tournaments and other events.

Under his bill, the grocery would qualify for an exemption as a small business and the ballpark business would be exempt as a seasonal operation.

“I want to pay employees the most that they can possibly make,” Vernetti said. “I just think the market should dictate it.”

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Missouri had 231,753 private businesses in the first quarter of 2024. Of that number, 96% had fewer than 50 workers, employing 46% of the private workforce.

The state minimum wage law does not apply to government jobs. But it would have no effect on state government if it did — in 2022, lawmakers agreed to set $15 an hour as the base wage for all state government jobs.

As a freshman, Vernetti said he knows he will have difficulty getting action on his bill. But he said he’s encouraged by the reaction from other new lawmakers he met on the freshman tour and hopes to get a committee seat that will allow him to push for it.

Proposition A passed overwhelmingly in high-population counties and failed in 79 of 94 counties where fewer than 25,000 votes were cast. That highlights the cultural and economic differences between urban and rural areas, Vernetti said.

“You couldn’t get a person in, say, St Louis city, to look for a job that’s even close to the minimum wage,” Vernetti said. “But in a lot of rural Missouri, those are important jobs. If it continues to increase, businesses are going to have no choice but to cut lower paying jobs altogether.”








A bill with a smaller impact, filed by State Rep.-elect Carolyn Caton, a Republican from Blue Springs, would rollback the minimum for workers younger than 20. The minimum for those workers would be $12.30 per hour.

No bills changing the provisions of Proposition A have been filed in the state Senate.

Attempting to rollback the increase is short-sighted, Vines said. His business pays above minimum wage and has low job turnover even though most workers are part-time employees.

“If you’re at the point where you either have to pay everyone minimum wage and survive barely, or go under paying a little more than minimum wage, your business probably isn’t on stable footing anyway,” he said.

Overstreet, however, said she’s worried that customers will look for other options if she raises prices.

“Dogs are a luxury. They’re not a necessity,” Overstreet said. “I’ve had people leave already because they think I’m expensive.”

Boarding a dog overnight with Overstreet at Top Dog Training costs $40. Daycare costs $30. In much larger Columbia, about 25 miles east of Boonville, overnight boarding can be found starting at $55 and doggy daycare starts at about $40 per day.

“It’s good for them, the people receiving the minimum wage increase,” she said. “But like everything else you do, the rest of us are going to have to raise our prices on services or goods, essential or non-essential, luxury or not.”

Friday, January 03, 2025

Parson signs executive order in preparation for predicted winter weather


(From Gov. Mike Parson)

Today, Governor Mike Parson signed Executive Order 25-01 as a precautionary measure to prepare for hazardous winter weather expected to impact the State of Missouri starting this weekend. The Order waives certain hours of service requirements for commercial vehicles transporting residential heating fuel and activates the Missouri National Guard for state and local response efforts, if needed.

"With a hazardous winter storm forecasted for this weekend, we want to be prepared to respond however may be needed," Governor Parson said. "Missourians should be proactive in their preparations and so too should state government. This Order helps ensure Missourians' homes stay heated and that state government and our National Guard members stand ready to assist. We ask that all Missourians stay aware and use extreme caution during this potentially dangerous winter weather event."








Executive Order 25-01 suspends hours of service regulations for motor carriers transporting residential heating fuels, including propane, natural gas, and heating oil. The Order also give the Adjutant General of the State of Missouri the authority to call and order into active service such portions of the organized militia as he deems necessary to aid Missourians.

The National Weather Service has issued a winter storm watch covering nearly every Missouri county from Saturday afternoon through Monday morning. The forecast indicates snow and sleet accumulations of more than 10 inches in many areas, particularly in northern Missouri, and notes power outages and tree damage are likely across areas of the state due to accumulating ice. Extreme cold is also expected into next week, particularly during the overnight hours.

Motorists are encouraged to postpone travel if possible. If you must travel, use extreme caution and check road conditions before driving to help determine if your trip can be completed safely. 






The Missouri Department of Transportation's (MoDOT) Traveler Information Map app can be downloaded free-of-charge to smart devices here. Please also see this latest announcement from MoDOT for more information.

The Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services has provided additional health and safety tips to Missourians in preparation for severe winter weather.

Executive Order 25-01 will expire on January 13, 2025. To view the Order, please click here.

Thursday, January 02, 2025

Sentencing scheduled for Joplin man for kidnapping that led to murder

Sentencing for Freddie Tilton, 51, Joplin on kidnapping and weapons charges is scheduled for 2 p.m. January 27 in U. S. District Court in Springfield.

Tilton pleaded guilty to the charges in connection with the kidnapping that led to the death of Michael James Hall, Joplin, whose decomposing body was discovered during the execution of a search warrant at 3517 Cherry Road in Joplin July 28, 2020.








Tilton's crimes were described in the news release issued by the U. S. District Attorney for the Western District of Missouri after a jury found him guilty in September in connection with a separate kidnapping. He will be sentenced for that kidnapping during the same hearing:

A Joplin, Mo., man who earlier pleaded guilty in a separate kidnapping case has been convicted at trial by a federal jury, along with his accomplice, of kidnapping a woman who was rescued from her attacker at a Neosho, Mo., hotel room.

The Turner Report: Probable cause: Joplin man violates protection order, kidnaps, chokes, pistol whips and threatens to kill woman at Neosho hotel (rturner229.blogspot.com)

Freddie Lewis Tilton, 51, of Joplin, Mo., and Alvin Dale Boyer, 39, of Rogers, Arkansas, were found guilty on Tuesday, September 17, of one count of conspiracy to commit kidnapping and one count of kidnapping. Tilton was also convicted of one count of stalking. This is Tilton’s second conviction in a federal kidnapping case.

Tilton has pleaded guilty and awaits sentencing for his role in a kidnapping just a few days earlier, which resulted in the torture and death of the victim, and for illegally possessing firearms.

Four co-defendants pleaded guilty in that case and have been sentenced. Amy Kay Thomas, 41, of Webb City, Mo., was sentenced to 20 years in federal prison without parole. James B. Gibson, also known as “Gibby,” 42, of Neosho, was sentenced to 30 years in federal prison without parole. Russell Eugene Hurtt, also known as “Uncle,” 52, of Greenwood, Mo., was sentenced to seven years in federal prison without parole. Lawrence William Vaughan, also known as “Scary Larry,” 53, of Neosho, was sentenced to 25 years in federal prison without parole.

Tilton admitted that he participated in a conspiracy to kidnap the victim, identified as “M.H.,” in July 2020. Tilton offered Ward and Vaughan $5,000 each to locate and secure M.H. for him. Carla Ward picked up M.H., whom she knew was being sought by Tilton, and took him to Vaughan’s residence.








Tilton, Thomas, and Gibson arrived at Vaughan’s residence in the early morning hours of July 15, 2020. They bound M.H.’s hands with handcuffs, and duct tape was placed around his mouth and other parts of his body. Gibson, Thomas, and others assaulted M.H. for a period of time. M.H. was cut, beaten, and shot at. Gibson burned M.H. with a blowtorch. Tilton fatally shot M.H. in the head. Thomas and others cleaned up the blood and damage created during the assault and shooting of M.H. They wrapped M.H.’s body in plastic wrap and Thomas, Tilton, and Gibson transported it to Hurtt’s property.

Law enforcement officers executed a search warrant at Hurtt’s property on July 28, 2020, based on information that a deceased body was located on the acreage. When officers attempted to contact the occupants of the residence, Tilton fired multiple shots from inside the residence at the officers. Tilton was apprehended.

Officers found M.H.’s body on the property. Officers searched the residence and found a Rigarmi .25-caliber pistol, an Ithaca .22-caliber rifle, a Remington .22-caliber rifle without a serial number, a Harrington and Richardson 12-gauge shotgun, a Ruger 9mm handgun, and a Taurus 9mm handgun without a serial number.

The Turner Report: Federal grand jury indicts six Joplin, Neosho, Webb City residents on murder/kidnapping conspiracy charges (rturner229.blogspot.com)

Agenda posted for Joplin City Council meeting



 JOPLIN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
MONDAY, JANUARY 6, 2025
5th FLOOR COUNCIL CHAMBERS
602 S. MAIN ST. JOPLIN MO
6:00 P.M
.

1.

Call to Order

Invocation
Pledge of Allegiance of the United States of America
2.

Roll Call

3.

Presentations

1.

McAuley Cross Country Proclamation

2.

Finance Committee Presentation

4.

Finalization of Consent Agenda

5.

Reports and Communications

1.

News from the Public Information Office

6.

Citizen Requests and Petitions

1.

Mary Price Requested to Speak on City Fiscal Accountability

7.

Public Hearings

1.

Public Hearing Procedures

2.

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-001

A RESOLUTION granting a Special Use Permit (2nd Request) for the operation of a Concert House, located at 2120 E 24th St, City of Joplin, Jasper County, Missouri.

 

3.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2025-253

AN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance No. 2022-274, passed by the Council of the City of Joplin, Missouri, August 1, 2022, by removing from District C-2 PD (Central Business – Planned Development) and include in District C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) property as described below and located at 1222 E 32nd St, Newton County, Missouri.

4.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2025-251

AN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance No. 2022-274, passed by the Council of the City of Joplin, Missouri, August 1, 2022, by removing from District R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) and include in District R-3 HP (Multi-Family Residential – Historic Preservation Overlay) property as described below and located at 117 N Moffet Ave, Jasper County, Missouri.

5.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2025-252

AN ORDINANCE providing to vacate an alley way, lying near property described as 1036 S Range Line Rd, City of Joplin, Jasper County, Missouri.

 

8.

Consent Agenda

1.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2024-165

 AN ORDINANCE approving the issuance of a purchase order to Mechanical Sales Midwest Inc. in the amount of Two Hundred Ninety-Nine Thousand Four Hundred Twenty-Six and 00/100 DOLLARS ($299,426.00) for purchase, and delivery of 4 Multistack Modular Chillers for the City Hall Facility and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin; and setting a date when this Ordinance shall become effective.

Documents:
  1. CB2024-165.pdf
9.

Resolutions

10.

Ordinances - Emergency

1.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2025-603

AN ORDINANCE approving the issuance of a Purchase Order to Leo M Ellebracht Company to cover the purchase of a mid-size attack hose package as approved in the Annual Budget of the City of Joplin for the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 and containing an emergency clause.

11.

Ordinances - First Reading

1.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2025-100

AN ORDINANCE approving the issuance of a Purchase Order to Premier Truck Group of Joplin in the amount of One Hundred Twenty-Eight Thousand Nine Hundred Sixteen and 00/100 Dollars ($128,916.00) for the purchase of a 2026 Freightliner 114SD; and, setting a date when this ordinance shall become effective.

2.

COUNCIL BILL NO 2025-101

AN ORDINANCE approving the issuance of a Purchase Order to S&H Farm Supply, Inc in the amount of Two hundred Twenty-Four Thousand Two Hundred Seventy-Five and 00/100 Dollars ($224,275.00) for the purchase of a 2025 New Holland T6.155EC Tractor & BB25 Bengal Boom Mower Package; and, setting a date when this ordinance shall become effective.

3.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2025-600

AN ORDINANCE amending Chapter 114, Traffic, Article III, Operation of Vehicles, by enacting Division 6, Sections 114-351 through 114-357, for the purpose of adopting the “Siddens Bening Hands Free Law;” prohibiting the use of electronic communication devices while driving.

4.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2025-601

AN ORDINANCE     Authorizing the City of Joplin to issue a purchase order to Motorola Solutions, Inc. in the amount of One Hundred Fourteen Thousand, One Hundred Twenty-Eight Dollars and 00/100 Dollars ($114,128.00) for the purchase of a remote dispatch console; authorizing the City Manager to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin and setting an effective date.

5.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2025-602

AN ORDINANCE   Authorizing the City of Joplin to issue a purchase order to Don Brown Chevrolet in the amount of One Hundred and Eight Thousand Four Hundred Twenty Dollars and No Cents ($108,420.00) for the purchase of two (2) replacement Chevy Tahoe Police vehicles; authorizing the City Manager to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin and setting an effective date.

 

12.

Ordinances - Second Reading and Third Reading

1.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2024-403

 AN ORDINANCE approving an Agreement between the City of Joplin, Missouri, and the Homeless Coalition that pertains to 2024 CDBG public service grant funds; authorizing the City Manager to execute same on behalf of the City.

Documents:
  1. CB2024-403.pdf
2.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2024-629

AN ORDINANCE authorizing the City of Joplin to enter into a Funding Agreement and MOA with the Regional Commission on Homelessness for the purpose of coordinating implementation of homelessness issues and efforts with the qualified Collaborative Entity/Lead Agency and Joplin Homeless Coalition (The Partners) within the Joplin region; identify, aggregate, and direct significant donations, resources, and in-kind services to address the agreed upon homelessness priorities as edified and in annual work plan adopted by The Partners; and, authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute said Agreement by and on behalf of the City of Joplin, Missouri.

Documents:
  1. CB2024-629.pdf
13.

Unfinished Business

14.

New Business