Based on these screenings, kids can receive speech or occupational therapy at the center, and staff can connect families with community support like help sourcing healthy food.
“The economy right now is just really challenging,” said Denise Wiese, the center’s executive director. “So we feel that those extra supports we give parents and children are really critical.”
More than 60% of the children the center serves qualify for a state subsidy program that helps cover the cost of day care for low-income and foster children.
But if lawmakers approve a proposed $51.5 million cut to that program, Wiese told The Independent, the center could be forced to roll back services or reduce scholarships that make child care more affordable.
The cuts are part of a budget plan laid out by Republican state Rep. Dirk Deaton of Seneca, chairman of the House Budget Committee, that would eliminate incentives the state currently pays on top of the basic child care subsidy rate.
Deaton told the committee the enhancements were created before the state started paying market-rate costs for child care.
“When those were put in place, the rates weren’t, in some cases,100% of market rate,” he said. “In a lot of cases, we’re already paying the market rate. So why would we be paying more than the market rate?”
“Some people think, ‘Okay, that funding just gets cut, and so they still get paid the market rate. They don’t get this extra bit,’” Hanson said. “But it’s not an extra bit to be able to provide that additional therapy or additional support.”
With the cut to their bottom line, child care providers may have to turn families away.
“What decisions do they have to make?” Hanson asked. “Do they have to lay off staff? Do they have to close?… Do they just quit taking foster families?”
Some facilities already hesitate to take on those families, Hanson said, and the proposed cuts would “de-incentivize that even more.”
The cuts come during a period of instability for the program. At the end of 2023, the state changed software providers to manage the subsidy payments, and technical difficulties led to a backlog of missed payments that dragged on for months.
Some day care providers closed under the pressure, and the stress continues today.
Demand for child care subsidies has risen 19% in the past year, exceeding the amount of money appropriated to the program this fiscal year.
With available funds shrinking, the state’s education department launched a waitlist for the program at the beginning of March. Children under state care, like foster children, are exempted from the waitlist. Those who qualify based on their income, though, will have to wait until funds are available.
“Our system is already at or over capacity,” Hanson said. “We don’t have enough resources to serve the children and families that are qualified with this current [funding] structure.”
Despite mounting pressure, providers are expected to see a long-awaited change in the way subsidies are paid that state officials promise will be initiated by this summer.
Currently, child care providers submit attendance logs and are reimbursed based on the number of days subsidy children are in their care. In May, the department plans to pay subsidies at the beginning of the month based on enrollment, not attendance.
Gov. Mike Kehoe championed the switch in his inaugural State of the State address last year.
“We will not allow late payments, or technology issues to put these small businesses at risk of not being able to provide for families in need of child care,” he said.
The governor is still supportive of paying providers based on enrollment, but Deaton’s proposed budget could prevent this change.
Deaton’s budget plan includes instructions to pay “solely on a child’s actual attendance and shall not be made prospectively, on authorization, enrollment, contracted slots or any other non-attendance-based methodology.”
State Budget Director Dan Haug told the House Budget Committee Monday that the state would hold off on paying by enrollment in May if Deaton’s suggestion is signed into law for next fiscal year, which begins in July.
“I don’t think it would make sense to make a change in May and then go back on July 1,” he said. “That would not be good for the providers, moving them around with how they’re being paid.”
Paying on enrollment gives flexibility to providers, Wiese said. A family may need to miss 10 days in a month, but the center can only get paid for five absences.
“If a family wants to spend their day with their child, that’s the best thing for the child,” she said. “If [the state is] paying us based on authorization, that slot is paid for whether that child is here or not.”
With budget amendments forthcoming, Hanson hopes to see edits to benefit child care providers.
“We know that (lawmakers) care about children and families,” she said. “But sometimes these decisions don’t reflect that these [cuts] are going to be really painful for children and families in our state.”
The Independent’s Rudi Keller contributed to this report.

Not unexpected. Durk is a magat and magats hate children.....particularly kids of color.
ReplyDeleteDook is doing dookie things again.
Delete6:06, that's quite the claim, sources please.
DeleteGet your red neck out of the sand and watch a little news 936. The last year has been a deplorable exercise in racial eradication putting people of color in detention centers much like the Japanese American interment during WW2 and the Jews being hunted like animals by the nazi regime. Mags hate anyone not white. Case in point is all immigration is suspended except for white Afrikaans who trump has grotesquely politicized. This is a truly embarrassing and repulsive time in history.
Delete6:19 oh gotcha, you want me to watch propaganda that is known as mainstream media. You need someone to tell you how to feel and what to think, got it.
DeleteWhy are "people of color" being put in detention centers? How is that racially eradicating them? How many people were detained in Japanese internment camps, for how long, vs people being detained right now before being sent back to where they came from?
Any proof that Maga hates anyone that isn't white other than the vibes you get? Why is there a much higher percentage of POCs backing Trump than any other republican candidate before him? They're part of Maga, so are the numerous POC and women folk that work for the Orange man bad. So that's a weird accusation to make.
White Afrikaans were being murdered for their land long before Trump brought it up, one of the main leaders in Africa is on tape during a huge festival with hundreds of thousands of people chanting "kill the boar!" (aka white people) We have a few recent White Afrikaan refugees in Joplin as we speak, maybe you should go tell them that their problems are being grotesquely politicized.
Sounds like you don't know history if you think THIS is any more of an embarrassing or repulsive time to be alive than literally any other point in history.
Sounds like the "news" you watch is garbage.
the "pro life" party. lol
ReplyDeleteRemember back in the day when men would work while the mother stayed at home to take care of their children. And over time the parasites in high places figured out if they could convince women that they would be much happier sitting in an office for 8-9hrs a day working for a man that's not their husband, they could double the money they receive through income taxes.
ReplyDeleteAnd after a few decades of propaganda, more tweaking of culture , bringing in millions of low wage workers to displace American born workers, n
ow women have to work 40 plus hours a week just to barely afford to have someone else watch their children!
Amazing stuff!
11:21 those back in the days were definitely different than the times are now. It now takes two people working to be able to afford some of what was affordable back in the day. Try buying a house or even affording rent now days on a single persons’s income. I guess you conveniently forgot about the interest rates and inflation on the 1970’s, when more women began really working outside of the home. The 1980’s wasn’t much better. Maybe women also wanted or needed to make money of their own instead of being dependent on their husbands. Maybe some husbands liked having independent wives. There are too many reasons why this occurred to list here but the past is past us and the future lies ahead. Always looking at the past as the “good ole days” limits your future prospects. Money spent on our children’s education, which is our future, is money well spent.
ReplyDeleteThings have really been in the crapper for the average person ever since Ronald Reagan and the Republicans started trickling down on the average person.
DeleteNewt 'Open marriage so I can have another affair' Gingrich and Tom 'The draft dodging bugman' Delay's Contract for America was always a 'Contract on Uhmerryca.'
The trouble is most Uhmerrycans are not smart enough to realize they vote to make themselves the targets when they vote republican.
Uhmerrycans have always liked voting for politicians with shiny objects, like banning non existent things.
May I add to 1000 that to be a republican you must demonstrate a deep fear and hatred for people of color and desire to return to the 1950's for the "golden age" of Jim Crow, segregation, women in the kitchen, and large environmentally destructive automobiles to compensate for small things. This is the republican dream.
Delete1102 is most definitely a Faux news follower of rightwing nut conspiracy theories. Your take on anything rational and real (white Afrikaans are not being forced off land and black farmers are more likely to die of murder....per your own pro right channel CBS 60minutes) is utterly more toxic trump airwave pollution.
ReplyDelete