tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5985022.post6469597584330073366..comments2024-03-28T22:51:22.174-07:00Comments on The Turner Report: Testimony increases problems for GonzalesRandyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05760019501046060231noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5985022.post-38336671710055139182007-04-02T08:57:00.000-07:002007-04-02T08:57:00.000-07:00anonymous, for what it's worth: your worries about...anonymous, for what it's worth: your worries about the reason are addressed in the first two points of Big Lizards' timeline. (Big Lizards, by the way, is a sci-fi author named Dafydd ab Hugh.) The reason: the administration gets complaints in 2004 (around an election), Bush tells Gonzales to do something, it takes a long time. I don't see why any more digging is necessary.<BR/><BR/>As for the slarrowhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05735974243744092022noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5985022.post-65468802191366754362007-03-30T14:56:00.000-07:002007-03-30T14:56:00.000-07:00I don't know about Randy, but I thought he/she/it ...I don't know about Randy, but I thought he/she/it sort of has faulty logic. For one thing, you don't discuss a process without first having a <B>reason</B> for the process. The reason you use defines "who" goes and "who" stays. Ergo, "who" goes and "who" stays has already been decided before any discussions of the process takes place. <BR/><BR/>The 93 lawyers Clinton fired were done at the Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5985022.post-2144481225366909582007-03-30T07:52:00.000-07:002007-03-30T07:52:00.000-07:00I'd be interested in your take on this piece on th...I'd be interested in your take on <A HREF="http://biglizards.net/blog/archives/2007/03/still_the_fever.html" REL="nofollow">this piece</A> on the prosecutors saga.slarrowhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05735974243744092022noreply@blogger.com