Wednesday, February 15, 2006

Joplin Globe apologists missing the point

It is always a lot of fun to rile the people at the Joplin Globe, but judging from some of the comments that have been left on this blog over the past 24 hours, I question the understanding a few of them have of journalism in general and blogs in particular.
At least two took potshots at a small item I posted late last night about Clarksdale, Tenn., mulling over a Global Entertainment proposal. This was one of four articles I either quoted or posted links to from other newspapers, something which is generally done by blogs. At least one of the cheap shot artists who commented said it was one of the rare occasions on which I gave credit to my source. It is even more rare that I do not give credit to my sources.
I am fully aware that the Globe has done extensive coverage of Global Entertainment and Clarksdale, Tenn. What in the world does that have to do with posting an item about a story that appears in a Tennessee newspaper about something that is of interest to Joplin readers?
Another person talks about how there is no original reporting in this blog. I will grant you that much of this blog is not original reporting. Some of it is commentary, some of it is items taken from other media (with attribution and more often that not, with links), some of it is musings about the state of journalism in this area.
But anyone who says there is no original reporting in this blog needs a few lessons on what original reporting is. I don't even have to go back into the archives to come up with a few examples, most of them based on my combing over public documents:
-The connections between Advantage Waste, CHP Environmental and Allied Waste and the lawsuit filed against Advantage Waste, the company that is wanting to operate the Southwest Regional Landfill in Jasper County.
-A whole string of stories over the past 18 months or so about the problems of O'Sullivan Industries in Lamar (and before anyone starts raking me over the coals about it, yes, both the Lamar Democrat and KODE beat me to the story about a bankruptcy court judge's decision in favor of O'Sullivan concerning the city of Lamar's request for help with the company's utility payments.)
-Thorough examinations of area and statewide legislators and the campaign finance money and lobbyists' gifts they have received. With the Jack Abramoff scandal and everything that is going on in Washington, I would have thought this story would have become a priority for our area newspapers, but except for a one-shot by the Globe last summer, it has been woefully neglected- and it is a very serious problem.
-And, of course, the article that set off this most recent baying of Joplin Globe wolves, the $12.5 million settlement reached with a New York widow over the death of her husband in a RegionsAir (formerly Corporate Airlines) crash.
There are dozens and dozens of further examples.
When the Joplin Globe people initially picked up on this blog months ago, reporters picked up a number of ideas from it and ran with them. John Hacker, who was with the Globe at that time, took the information and came up with more on his own, doing it the old-fashioned way, he got on the phone and made calls and he actually checked out the original source documents. I can recall a story or two that Andy Ostmeyer did on the O'Sullivan situation, in which he, too, checked the source documents, then came up with further information on his own. The television stations in the area, the Neosho Daily News, and The Carthage Press have done the same thing. I have no problems with any of these, nor should I. That is the way it should be done.
That was not the way it was done in the Globe story on the air crash settlement yesterday. I did not get the idea that the reporter examined the documents from the U. S. District Courts in Texas, New York, and Missouri that I did; I did not get the feeling that he had looked over the National Transportation Safety Board's report on the crash as I did. I had the feeling that all of his research came from two sources, the Associated Press and The Turner Report. Only one of those sources was credited, the Associated Press. The lead of the story was about the settlement. As of last night, I could still find only two media sources for the settlement story...The Turner Report and The Joplin Globe. The apologists immediately began screaming about how unfair I was being and how bigheaded I was being for having the audacity to accuse the Globe of stealing a story. I might not have even mentioned it, except a few weeks back, a Globe reporter wrote two stories, both of which ran in the same edition (it was a different reporter, by the way), that appeared to follow the same formula. The story first appeared in this blog, then appeared in the Globe with no further original reporting and no facts in it that were different from those I ran initially.
There is nothing illegal about what the Globe has done. It is not plagiarism. Facts cannot be copyrighted. It is a question of ethics. It appears to me that the Globe apologists are trying to avoid the central problem by dragging in extraneous issues.
The fact that I have an ego, which I will readily admit, has nothing to do whatsoever with the Globe's recent transgressions. Worry more about your reporting and less about mine and maybe the Globe can get back to the stature it once had in this area.

11 comments:

  1. Anonymous11:53 AM

    Boring post. Nobody wants to read 30 inches of you talking about how righteous you are. Turner, you make yourself a target by taking cheap shots at others. And, don't assume that your critics have any affiliation with The Globe. That's another problem you have. You assume too much.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous12:00 PM

    You can't prove that the Globe stole those stories from The Turner Report. Until you can. Just shut up.

    Disclaimer: This cheap shot artist doesn't have anything to do with the Globe.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous2:53 PM

    All that print! It's clearly too much for someone with a second-grade attention span. I read this post because the Globe would rather fill it's pages with inane columns, PR releases from the Chamber of Commerce, and the endless, redundant rantings of a cadre of local discontents. Randy goes to the trouble to research and read those tons of tomes that are required by open government laws, and then reports on the information hidden in them. That's good reporting. Keep up the good work, Randy.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous3:22 PM

    Good reporters would call the subject of their stories and ask for an interview. I don't think Turner calls those he attacks.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous7:49 PM

    It would seem that someone wants to read 30 inches of Turner reporting, you did and I did. I actually would rather get my news here, I get more news that way.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous6:58 AM

    Nobody reads the news on here. The only reason people read this blog is to see who Turner is mad at that day.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous8:53 AM

    Randy I love the way you continue your blog regardless of the stupid negative comments you get on here. After all, who gives a rip what they think. They sure bust their butts to read it and comment though.

    ReplyDelete
  8. What I love is how all of these people are brave enough to post obnoxious comments, but only so long as they don't leave their name so they can't actually be held accountable for what they say. At least if Mr. T says something asinine, you know where to find him and call him on it, as opposed to some jackass hiding behind "anonymous".

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous3:25 PM

    I appreciate your efforts to keep us "less informed" on what is going on. I can read your opinions and then decide if I want to agree to or not. Keep up the good work! Someone said that "small minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, and great minds talk about ideas".......keep those ideas coming.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous5:36 PM

    The Joplin Globe online opens at about 1/10 the speed of every small town paper and big city paper I read, if it opens at all. Do you think they know that I read this blog and they're messing with me? What will they do next, order fifty delivery pizzas to my work (hint: I work at he city managers office)? Am I paranoid or is the Globe's tech managers - John Cruzan and Randy Hines, I believe - just incompetent? And if I'm paranoid, is the Globe out to get me anyway?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous7:40 PM

    Just send those pizzas to my office, please.
    And a side of breadsticks.

    ReplyDelete