Saturday, November 04, 2006

A few thoughts about the president's visit

I didn't have much of an opportunity to evaluate the live coverage of President Bush's visit to Missouri Southern State University in Joplin Friday since I, like most other southwest Missourians, was working at the time.
Since it was something of a historic occasion for Joplin, many of the classes at South Middle School watched the coverage of the speech. Mine was only able to watch part of it since it began right at the start of our fifth hour and my class has the second lunch shift. My class went to lunch just as the president was preparing to shift his remarks toward national security and the war on terrorism.
After the lunch break, the students were in the computer lab and read from the Joplin Globe's coverage of the visit, then wrote their assessments. Reading through the papers, it appears that eighth graders are not too much different from the rest of us:
-They are tired of the barrage of negative advertising on both sides, but they do pay attention to it. All of them know who Jim Talent and Claire McCaskill are and many of them are also familiar with the advertising of the hotly contested Kansas race between Republican Rep. Jim Ryun and his challenger Nancy Boyda.
-The support for the president appears to be less among the students than it has been in the past and it all stems from the war in Iraq.
-Students almost unanimously agree that political speeches are boring.
-I was amazed by the preponderance of students who were irritated by the president's pronunciation of our state as Missourah. That is now how the state's name should be pronounced, several of them wrote.
-The students, with only a few exceptions, were extremely respectful of President Bush and Sen. Talent and though they may not be thrilled with Iraq, they lean toward re-electing the senator because they do not like the things they have heard about Claire McCaskill in the Talent ads.
***
As for media coverage, our local stations, as expected, took the responsible approach and offered live coverage. Though it was a routine political event in the grand scope of things, visits by a sitting president to Joplin are rare and should be offered extensive coverage.
I only had an opportunity to watch the news at 5 p.m. Unelss I missed something, and that's quite possible, KODE was the only one that sent an anchor to cover the story, including Brian Hamman on its on-the-spot coverage. I don't know that it makes any difference, but it is an approach that has worked in recent weeks for the station, especially with Tara Brown's coverage of the McDonald and Newton County sex cult stories.

After the initial barrage of coverage of the president's campaign stop for Sen. Talent, KOAM made a concerted effort to show coverage of the campaign of Talent's opponent, Claire McCaskill.

As expected, the local stations all offered coverage of the protesters.

KSNF naturally started its 5 p.m. newscast with banter between Gary Bandy and Tiffany Alaniz, though most of it was related to the visit, followed by the weather before buckling down to showing the work its reporters did covering the campaign stop.

From what I saw flipping back and forth between the stations, the reporters did their jobs well.

14 comments:

  1. Anonymous7:02 AM

    The last time he was here, the graduate of Yale and leader of the free world chose to say "gooder" instead of "better". He did it multiple times.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous8:59 AM

    The Joplin Globe KICKED the Joplin Daily's ass with its coverage of Bush's visit. I was expecting so much more from Joplin Daily. Say what you will about the Globe, but its real-time coverage of the visit was very impressive. Way to go, Ed Simpson! Boos and hisses, John Hacker!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous9:29 AM

    A couple things from the real rat:

    I'm so glad I just read eighth graders' analysis of the event ... three days later. So much for timeliness. That sucked.

    Randy needs a Tivo and Christmas is coming up. What room in your house holds the Tiffany Alaniz shrine. Randy's analysis sucked.

    Hacker is hamstrung by a bad web site and a company that could really care less about the product since they have the advertising revenue. There was no doubt the Globe was going to win this battle, they have more resources, those resources are better trained and more seasoned, and The Globe easily had a better battle plan in place. However, watching the Globe's web coverage all day, I'd give it a C-plus. There was little substance there, but it was still better than the Daily's D-minus effort. The newspaper web coverage sucked.

    As for the TV coverage, thanks for showing the events and offering no useful insight afterward. TV news continues to suck.

    And last but not least, Bush sucked. He comes to an area where two hotly contested senatorial races are being fought and he says nothing of substance, value or usefulness. He gives essentially a "hold the line" speech and goes off to Montana to go fishing and check out the Unabomber's cabin. Republicans should ask for their money back.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous10:25 AM

    Everyone of the local stations sent anchors to the event. KSN actually did a very good job. Tiffany and Jim talked politics with their old favorite, Tom Simpson from MSSU. They did a great job. KOAM and KFJX used both of their main anchors, Dowe Quick and Michael Hayslip. They simulcast their coverage and had Doreen Scanlon back at the desk. KODE was the least comprehensive with Brian Hamman. He did okay, but was alone and had no one to talk politics with. KSN had a live shot from the airport at the same time as their anchors discussed the current climate. I'd say all four stations did their jobs very well and even if you are not a fan of the President or his current administration, you should know that having a sitting president visit your town is newsworthy. He is, afterall, the leader of the freeworld.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous12:18 PM

    I think one of the least productive views all the media presented was to pick on one or two or three people to hear what they thought. Readers have no way of knowing where these people are aligned except for the nasty remarks made by those who don't like Bush and just harp on what they have heard or read elsewhere. Even if you pick three random people off the street, there is no way they represent any large segment of the population.I clearly do not understand that unless it is merely to cover that much ballyhooed "local angle."

    Greatly disadvantaged in all this is a paper I read regularly, THE NEOSHO DAILY NEWS. While they mimiced feed from the JOPLIN DAILY, I will look forward to what they present in their Sunday edition. Having a Friday afternoon paper and no Saturday paper is probably a handicap. Let's see if they take advantage of the time to come up with something different and more interesting.

    And could someone please gag Tiffany? I started out watching that channel but her constant chatter and butting in drove me away. Put a muffler on her!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous7:47 PM

    first of all, you know the word verification at the end of this that I have to do before I leave this comment? lol, it says "dorkgodo" how funny is that?
    dork go do?
    lol.

    second, I totally went to see the president, was in gold ticketing, and was so freaking CLOSE it's amazing, dude.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous8:51 PM

    I sat at my computer during the president's speech and I agree with the earlier post about The Globe hammering the Daily in its coverage. The only story the daily had on its site was about some airplanes delivering the presidents vehicles the day before. Meanwhile, The Globe had several updates about what was currently happening, and although they were brief, they provided useful information to get a picture of what was going on. I checked the Daily website an hour or so after the speech was finished, and still no story about anything other than the airplanes.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous8:54 PM

    Joplindaily needs to scrap its cookie cutter website. It's boring as hell and just doesn't draw any attention at all. Having a professional come in and design a real website for the Daily would improve the paper dramatically. The website now is absolutely terrible gives off the impression of not caring very much about the actual news product. Please, design a good, eye-catching site!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous11:44 AM

    Mr. Blaukat and Mr. Hacker: We implore you to do a better job! You promised us a viable alternative to the Globe, but now said paper is kicking your collective butt! You seemed to have reached a plateau of coverage that you're comfortable with, but your readers are expecting so much more!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous12:21 PM

    Talent has plenty of SNAKE OIL left to sell you if your ignorant enough to buy it. I respect no one who dis's other people in order to get re-elected just to continue screwing the american people. Down with this regime and it's time for new faces that speak the language and do the actions of what America is.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous1:59 PM

    If a tree falls...

    Who cares that the Globe kicked the Daily's butt during the president's visit.

    Here's an example of the Globe's coverage:

    9:23 a.m. Bush smiles.
    9:24 a.m. Bush blinks.
    9:25 a.m. Bush shakes hand.
    9:26 a.m. Bush waves at crowd.

    Worthless. Was anyone actually refreshing the Globe's Web site to read these updates? Seems to me that anyone who interested would be able to get the same information (and more) by watching local television.

    Congrats to the Globe. You sure kicked the Daily's ass. Too bad you were owned by KOAM/KSN/KODE/Fox14.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous2:43 PM

    KZRG had the speech on live, but didn't provide any analysis afterward, since they immediately went back to Rush. Believe it or not, they were the only radio in the market that carried the speech.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous5:52 AM

    It is laughable that there is this much interest in a predictible stump speech. Can the people working in local media not recognize that THIS...the over the top coverage is exactly what they want---forgetting the content.
    Unchallenged soundbites filled with crap like "A vote for the Democrats is a vote for terrorism" rule the day with no mention of other stories worthy of news time or print.
    On the same day Bush was in Springfield it was revealed that the Military Commissions Act signed by "W" will eliminate oversight of contractors in Iraq next year.
    Billions of your dollars pouring into the pockets of Blackwater, Halliburton, KBR and many other contractors will no go unchecked.
    Kind of like the coverage of Bush's visit.
    It's time local journalists stop drooling when a big name comes to the area and start being...well, journalists.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous10:11 AM

    I am happy the President of the United States came to Southwest Missouri. The visit of a President anywhere IS big news and deserves the full force of local media coverage. Whether it was well covered by this or that outlet does not matter in the long run. The people are glad he came and it is, and should be, an honor to host him (and maybe in the future "her").

    Let all the whiners complain - that's one of the best things about our country, and as far as students having to be inconveniced for one day - let them whine...for the most part, their legs are much younger than those of many who came to see the President...a good walk is good for us all!

    ReplyDelete