Unfortunately for Missouri, two of the eight "no" votes were cast by representatives from the Show-Me State, Democrats Lacy Clay and Emanuel Cleaver.
The rest of the Missouri delegation, including Seventh District Congressman Roy Blunt, R-Strafford, and Fourth District Congressman Ike Skelton, D-Lexington, voted for the bill.
The bill calls for the following:
• Senators must disclose special spending projects called "earmarks" two days before a vote and must certify that they or their family members do not have a financial interest in the project. (The House adopted similar rules in January.)
• Lawmakers and their staff may not accept gifts from lobbyists and their clients (The House adopted a gift ban in January.)
• Senators, Senate candidates and presidential candidates must pay charter rates when traveling on private planes. House members and candidates may not accept travel on private planes.
• Lawmakers convicted of bribery, perjury or similar crimes lose their retirement benefits.
ยช Senators must wait two years before lobbying Congress after leaving office. House members and senior congressional staff members must wait one year.
• Lawmakers may not attend parties in their honor sponsored by lobbyists during national political conventions.
• Lawmakers and their staff may not influence employment decisions in exchange for political access.
• Lawmakers must disclose lobbyists who raise at least $15,000 for them within six months by “bundling” campaign donations from several contributors.
• Lobbyists must file reports twice as often each year, and for the first time must file them to a publicly searchable database.
SOURCES: Senate majority leader's office, Associated Press
The Washington Post
Let's not forget all the things the Senate Majority Leader has changed that make this a bad bill.
ReplyDelete1) Senate Majority Leader, not the Senate Parlimentarian, decides if earmarks comply with the law.
2) Senators are still allowed to submit earmarks that benefit their direct families
3) Senators are still allowed to trade earmarks for votes.
4) Requires 67 votes to fight earmark disclosure rule.
5) no longer requires 24 hours before voting on earmark disclosure.
6) no longer requires posting of earmarks on internet 48 hours before vote (so citizens can look through and expose earmarks).
7) Allows "secret" earmarks in conference, where they are not discussed, or disclosed.
In other words - Harry Reid has a giant ethics bill that doesn't actually solve the problem of earmarks and allows the corruption to continue.
And the Republicans are marching along with them, afraid to vote against a bill with ethics on the title.