Wednesday, October 17, 2007

Herschend, wife contribute maximum to top voucher supporter

When Matt Blunt reappointed Peter Herschend to the State Board of Education Oct. 9, he praised the Silver Dollar City millionaire as a supporter of public education.
Two days after that statement, Herschend and his wife, Jo Dee, made their only political contributions of 2007, according to Missouri Ethics Commission, giving identical maximum $675 contributions to the Senate campaign of Rep. Jane Cunningham, R-Chesterfield...the most outspoken proponent of educational vouchers for private schools in the state legislature.

I wrote about Mrs. Cunningham's support for vouchers in the Jan. 6, 2006, Turner Report:


However, an even more illuminating picture of Rep. Cunningham's true views about public education comes from an Oct. 1, 2003, article in the conservative School Reform News.
Under the headline, "Trying to Make a Difference in the Show-Me State," the article tells the story of how Ms. Cunningham came to favor vouchers following her experiences as a school board member. When she tried to do something about parents taking their children out of public school and placing them in private school, she said, she ran into a lack of interest. "We have fewer children to educate and we still get their taxes," she says her fellow board members told her. She said that with her background in economics she could see the harm this education "monopoly" was causing.
The point was further driven home, she said, after she took one of her sons out of public school (the article does not say why) and put him in a Catholic school. Her son, who had been receiving A's and B's in math in public school, did poorly in the private school.
"The staff at the Catholic school thought he must have a learning disability, because they could not imagine his local school had done such a poor job," Rep. Cunningham said.
The article goes on to say that "after intensive personal attention by his teacher, her son rose to the 90th percentile in math."
Rep. Cunningham makes no bones about her efforts to move Missouri toward a voucher system. The School Reform News article says, "In 2003, Cunningham sponsored two school choice bills, both designed 'to get folks comfortable with the concept.' One bill addressed the issue of access to programs in public schools denied to non-public schoolchildren whose families were residing in and paying taxes to the public schools. The other, HB 345, would have given school choice to at-risk children in low-income families and in families where a parent is a prison inmate. Although neither bill passed, she was happy to be able to bring some Black Caucus members on board with HB 345." The magazine article was written by Laura J. Swartley, communications director for the Milton and Rose Friedman Foundation, Indianapolis, Ind. The Friedman Foundation began the school voucher movement in 1955.
Rep. Cunningham is serving as chairman of the ALEC Education Task Force. Her co-chairman is Robert Enlow of the same Milton & Rose Friedman Foundation.




Though the contributions do not put Herschend in the voucher supporters quarter, the fact that he was reappointed by the governor, who has nominated two voucher supporters who are currently serving on the board, Derio Gambaro and Debi Demien, as well as another who appears to lean in that direction, Rev. Stanley Archie, and backs Mrs. Cunningham, could indicate a long road ahead for supporters of Missouri's public schools.

9 comments:

  1. Anonymous4:19 AM

    Good catch Randy. I know I'm probably in a minority on this one, but one more step from them in that direction and I won't be buying any future season tickets to SDC.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous6:26 AM

    Good for her! We need more people like her representing a different mentality. There is something wronf with our shcools and we need a change!

    ReplyDelete
  3. They've also donated to Presidential Candidates and the party as well.

    I do think it's important to note that they're the only company in the state that has a TIF without an adjustment for property taxes - they didn't want schools to lose money.

    They're the largest contributer to the district.

    It's about time we focus on education and by education I mean the children of the state not the fat cat filthy rich Educational Bureaucrats who seem to be very well funded.

    Branson Missouri

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous10:50 AM

    Amen Darren!

    ReplyDelete
  5. The fact remains: The former president and current member of the state board of education has contributed to the political campaign of Jane Cunningham, the most outspoken proponent of educational vouchers for private schools in the state legislature.

    If Cunningham were not a proponent of vouchers, the contributions would not even be worth mentioning.

    By making a donation to Cunningham, Herschend, who is on the state school board and supposedly a friend of education, is making a pretty powerful statement.

    Add to that the appointment of such pro-voucher school board members Blount has appointed and you can see a shift in the direction of the board.

    Additionally, Sinquefield(sic?, another voucher supporter, was a major contributor to the recent lawsuit re the education formula, his side won.

    Something is going on, just don't know what it is yet.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous5:16 PM

    Its great that he doesn't take the adjustment because he doesn't want schools to lose money. Its also great that he's the largest contributer in the district. But he's taking on the appearance of trying to play both sides of the issue and I just can't and won't support anyone who is pushing vouchers. Our kid's and grandkid's futures are too important for that.

    As far as the voucher issue itself, I see it as an attempt to use government money to send children to private schools, to make certain in advance that only those who can perform at grade level, to keep out those children whose parents don't care enough to participate.

    When I look at private schools, the ones that I see at least, appear to be a sideways attempt return to the smaller schools and smaller classrooms of the past without admitting the big schools have gotten too big and to avoid making people think their taxes are going to be raised.

    I'm sorry but I am not supporting anyone who is involved with vouchers.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous7:02 PM

    If Peter Herschend is involved in anything, there is something BIG in it for him, otherwise, he couldn't be found.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous7:10 AM

    I suppose if I could figure out a way to get the Government to 100% subsidize my business no matter how good or bad the product I produce is then I would be just as fixated on Randy on the Government turning on me and injecting such silly market notions as competition in an effort to improve the product.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous10:58 PM

    Veronica O'Brien also gave the $675.00 to Cunningham. She seems to be getting a lot of democratic support. Jane shold get the senate seat

    ReplyDelete