Tuesday, February 02, 2010

New study shows direct correlation between standardized testing frenzy, increased dropout rate

(The following is my column for this week's Newton County News.)

Schools across the United States, under pressure from the federal No Child Left Behind Act, began taking more practice tests to prepare for the high stakes standardized exams.
Then in a constant battle to stay one step ahead of the competition (neighboring school districts) schools began taking practice tests to practice for the practice tests that serve as preparation for the standardized tests.
Even that is not enough as the pressure to succeed mounts. Soon, since reading and math are the only areas covered by No Child Left Behind, elementary schools began eliminating science and social studies; they reduced the time allotted for art and music classes, and recess suddenly became an unnecessary frill that gets in the way of what is really important at school- scoring at a proficient level on standardized tests.
The last three paragraphs sound like the stuff of satire, but sadly, that is what American public schools are becoming in the 21st century.
Time that has been spent engaging students in the past is now being spent teaching them test-taking tricks, tricks that will not help them in any way when they enter the adult world, but may help them garner an extra percentage point or two on these all-important standardized tests.
And what has this unholy emphasis on high stakes testing done to American students? Ironically, a new study indicates it is causing more and more children to be left behind.
Test, Punish, and Push Out, How Zero Tolerance and High-Stakes Testing Funnel Youth into the School to Prison Pipeline makes a convincing case that the test-crazed culture of 21st century schools has stripped American public school students of the one thing that guarantees they will become lifelong learners- engagement in the learning process.
As an eighth grade teacher, I have listened for the past few years to the frustrations of students who are so overtested that they no longer see anything special about tests. Schools have gone from one practice standardized test in the fall which is designed to let teachers know their students’ weaknesses to prepare them for the spring state test to monthly practice tests and weekly tests to prepare students to do well on those practice tests. In many schools, students who do not score well on these practice tests, have to take yet more practice tests so they will do better next time.
And to help make those practice tests scores shoot to the top, other days are spent drilling on test-taking skills.
The report includes this passage:

“Perhaps more important is the damage done by high-stakes testing to the student experience in school. Not only do formulaic, test-driven reforms neglect the important role
schools have to play in helping students become well-rounded citizens, they also turn school into a much less engaging, and even hostile, place for youth by eliminating the components of education they find most interesting.

“Additionally, the emphasis placed on test results above all other priorities has an alienating and dehumanizing effect on young people, who resent being viewed and treated as little more than test scores.

“The effects can accumulate even more when additional consequences are attached to the tests. For example, there is a long record of research demonstrating the consistent
association of high-stakes exit exams with decreased graduation rates and increased dropout rates.”

Hopefully, events of the past week will start a movement in another direction. The Obama Administration will recommend the removal of the ridiculous requirement of the original No Child Left Behind that 100 percent of all students score at proficient levels in math and reading by 2014. That was never anything but a recipe for public schools to fail. In Missouri, for example, proficient generally rounds out to about a B average. How realistic is it for 100 percent of students to have a grade of B or above?

A C grade is considered average. How can anyone realistically expect all students to be above average?

The new goal, according to published reports, is for all students to graduate from high school college-ready or career-ready. That is much more realistic. The first step toward reaching that goal is to stop this test-taking frenzy and restore the standardized test to its previous standing- as one weapon in our educational arsenal.

Until we do that, we will continue to see a growing number of children left behind.

6 comments:

  1. Randy, I think the report (and your take on it) is right on the money. There are a zillion things wrong with NCLB that need to be dealt with and I'm also glad to see the Obama administration is taking a round-turn on it.

    Most of these kids don't give a crap and why should they? We are supposed to be making content relevant to what they will use it for in real life. How is test-taking a real-life skill? What will these kids be when they grow up, professional test-takers?

    These tests are taken over the span of a few days. Some of these kids have family issues like daddy's drinking or beating on mommy again, they didn't get a good night's sleep, or they don't eat breakfast because they are trying to lose 20 pounds before prom. And so they're not in the right frame of mind when they have this test plunked down in front of them, but we base all these decisions on whether or not they are filling in the right circle?!?! On ONE test?! I personally know of kids who made patterns on the answer sheet because "it was stupid" and they were "bored."

    Yes, there needs to be accountability. No, NCLB is not the way to do it, at least not in its current incarnation.

    Randy, your hyperlink to the report is broken - it can be found here:

    http://www.advancementproject.org/sites/default/files/publications/01-EducationReport-2009v8-HiRes.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous5:01 AM

    we do need accountability. what ideas do randy and kay9 have to accomplish this goal? i don't like NCLB but i don't want to go back to anything goes either.

    ReplyDelete
  3. There have to be benchmarks and methods of judging success and failure and for that reason I don't advocate scrapping NCLB. I do think we'd be better off with a system that evaluates continuous progress all along the learning continuum.

    One idea actually being implemented are involvement by state governors. They are working on common K-12 standards with the goal of preparing students either for college or for a career after high school. I subscribe to that idea knowing that not every student is college material.

    Another area of improvement is in teacher certification. We could get a benefit from recruiting teachers who are not on the standard teacher education program track. Allowing experienced professionals who want to be in the classroom and who want to share their expertise is a good idea.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous7:46 PM

    boy there's a pair: Randy and kay9...the world's knowledge all on one page...whooopeee

    ReplyDelete
  5. Curious Minded9:53 PM

    While I do not necessarily disagree with the sentiment of your post, I'd like for us to consider the following.

    1) I'm uncomfortable with the suggestion that a "direct correlation" implies a causal relationship. Perhaps I am misunderstanding your claim. Are you suggesting that increased standardized testing is a causal factor in kids dropping out of school(re: "Ironically, a new study indicates it is causing more and more children to be left behind.")? A direct correlation supports no such claim.

    2)A grade of "C" is considered average? How does one come to this conclusion? When you grade your students do you normalize/transform the distribution around a grade of "C" such that you get relatively equal numbers of Bs and Ds and relatively equal numbers of As and Fs? Grading distributions are often skewed.

    3) It is quite possible that every single student in a class earn above a C and not so far-fetched that most earn an A or B when the criteria are "meets or exceeds" some objective (e.g., "can multiply two fractions accurately") rather than "does better than others in his/her class" or "outstanding student" criteria.

    I believe there are problems with NCLB, But I don't believe that your conclusions are supported by the evidence.

    Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous6:30 PM

    My experience with NCLB is on the other side of the spectrum. My son scored 96% on his MAP test. The teacher pulled me aside and told me that my child has no room for improvement and that it would benefit him and the school if he scored less the next year and than show "improvement" the next. Why is my child being penalized for being bright?

    ReplyDelete