(From Missouri NEA)
The Missouri NEA will host a conference call with the office of Sen. Jane Cunningham Tuesday, August 23 at 9 a.m. to discuss legislation for a possible legislative special session to address concerns and confusion about SB54, which was passed unanimously by the legislature and signed into law by Gov. Jay Nixon earlier this year. The main features of the law include the Amy Hestir Student Protection Act and establishment of the Task Force on the Prevention of Sexual Abuse of Children. The law has become controversial because of provisions regarding electronic communication between teachers and their current and former students.
WHAT: Conference Call with Otto Fajen, Legislative Director for Missouri NEA, and Kit Crancer, Chief of Staff for Sen. Jane Cunningham
DATE: Tuesday, August 23
TIME: 9:00 a.m.
CALL-IN NUMBER: 866.210.1669; CODE: 8418609
"School is starting and we want to seek clarity for both teachers and students as quickly as possible", said Missouri NEA President Chris Guinther "When we heard about the varied interpretations of the law, we immediately contacted Senator Cunningham, the original bill sponsor, to propose solutions that could be considered in the September special legislative session."
The controversial legislation bans teachers from using a nonwork-related internet site to gain "exclusive access" with current or former students who are age 18 or younger and have not graduated. Among other things there is concern that teachers who have their own children in class will be limited in communicating privately with their immediate family members.
The law also mandates that by January 2012, school districts pass policies regarding teachers' use of social media and electronic communications such as texting. There is controversy about whether the state or local district policy outlines the parameters for educators' involvement with Facebook and similar sites.
According to a spokesperson for Senator Cunningham, Missouri NEA is the only education organization that has contacted her seeking solutions.
"Clean up bills are sometimes necessary and special session could provide an opportunity for a quick fix." said Otto Fajen, Legislative Director for Missouri NEA. "If the education community and sponsor of the original legislation can find a commonsense solution, we will formally ask the Governor to consider the legislation for a special session.”
All major education groups with a lobbyist at the capitol testified in support of the bill. One teacher group that testified for the bill now claims their leaders did not read the legislation as it was crafted, and has since filed a lawsuit against the State of Missouri.
"We did read the bill," Fajen noted, "and we asked lead legislators to make adjustments to the electronic communication section in question. However, that didn't happen prior to passage. We hope that by acting during the September special session, we'll have a chance to bring clarity to the issue before local school boards are required to adopt policies in January.
When asked about the lawsuit filed by another teacher group, Missouri NEA President Guinther stated that "Trying to fix this problem with a long drawn out court battle that costs the state a lot of money doesn't make sense to us, especially when the bill sponsor is willing to work on a timely solution. We'd rather have that money spent on educating kids. It seems like a waste of state resources."
An FAQ on the bill can be found on the Missouri NEA website at http://bit.ly/n2wu2J.
This is not the first time, and sadly not the last, that the Missouri legislature has created a law only to find out after the fact what they just outlawed. Isn't making laws what we elected them to do? How hard is it really? To hear Rep. Cunningham stand up and say "I didn't meant that?" is really too much. Either, she really did mean to outlaw all texting to any student or she wrote, and then it was passed and then signed, a really poorly written law.
ReplyDeleteB Msta
ReplyDeleteIf NEA doesn't believe in wasting money why do they on average charge teachers over $600 a year and pay their employees on average $150,000 a year. But an organization that looks to protect teachers rights is turned into the bad guy . Any other time NEA would have been happy to file suit if it had thought of it first.