As far as I can tell, only two media sources even mentioned the Facebook portion of the Amy Hestir Student Protection Act before it was passed by both Houses.
The Turner Report has written about this bill each of the five years Sen. Jane Cunningham, R-Chesterfield, has proposed it, including three years when she was in the House of Representatives.I wrote about it again this year.
The only other report I have been able to locate also came from Joplin, courtesy of KODE reporter Gretchen Bolander, who interviewed me about the bill.
I was also interviewed by an Associated Press reporter, who, for some reason, never published the story. Whether that was his decision or one made by his editors, I have no idea.
Had the Facebook portion of the bill been mentioned earlier, it would have received the same reaction it is receiving now. The questions about this poorly-written law would have already been addressed and most likely, that part of the bill would have been removed long before it was passed in both chambers and signed by the governor.
One thing that has not been mentioned is that this bill did not go through the Senate Education Committee. Instead, Sen. Cunningham kept it in the General Laws Committee. The chairman of that committee, not surprisingly, is Sen. Cunningham. The hearing for the bill included testimony from Amy Hestir about horrific crimes committed against her by a teacher long before social networking became a part of our everyday life.
It appears the only other testimony was provided by a police officer who worked with schools and talked about "passing the trash," the practice of allowing teachers charged with sexual infractions with students to quietly resign and then sign on with another school.
The Facebook provision was not addressed and continued to be left out of any discussion of the Amy Hestir Student Proection Act.
It might never have been brought up by the media until August 28 had it not been for the May 22 Joplin tornado. Social networking, primarily Facebook, played a key role in Joplin educators' ability to locate students and make sure they were all right. This process could have taken weeks had it not been for social networking.
At that point, the media jumped on the story for a brief time, and then quickly let it drop.
What finally made everyone sit up and take notice I have no idea, but the insidious wording of the bill and its vagueness appear to be having exactly the effect Sen. Cunningham was hoping for.
Not only are school districts starting to construct policies limiting Facebook "friending," but because the law is so vague, some are thinking of taking the law much further:
And out of the Kansas City area, there have been reports of a district requiring teachers with Twitter and Facebook accounts to give school officials access to those accounts.
All of this is being done while the media continues to give a free pass to Sen. Cunningham's selective use of statistics and facts.
The challenges to the law are already beginning, according to an article in today's St. Louis Post-Dispatch. If the media had done its job in the first place, those challenges would not be necessary.
I really feel like my First Amendment rights have been taken away. I teach preschool and have only had one student with a facebook page that I friended when he was no longer a student but I can see the benefits of staying in touch with students and that option is no longer available. We are all being punished for the mistakes one person made.
ReplyDeleteHere's a great example of how dumb this law is, granted I no longer live in MO, but my family does. My mom is a teacher (semi-retired) she only recently got a facebook account. One of her friends is a former student...that person is also an elementary school principal. She taught her like 30 years ago. And in reality she's taught 3 generations of some families. So she can't be 'friends' with other parents and grandparents in the community? Ridiculous.
ReplyDeleteLawmakers need to think, really think before they act.
I am afraid that the fallout from this bill is going to be bad. The five students at our school that I friended were all children of colleagues, board members or friends in the community. The students actually requested me to be friends as I will not ask students to friend me. Parents need to be more involved with their childs online activity also. This will not stop the abuse-those who are going to do it will find another way. All the while I have to give up some of my rights because of the profession I chose.
ReplyDelete1st Amendment rights for a teacher to be friends with a minor regarding anything beyond being an educator do not exist. Really.
ReplyDeleteAs bad as this law is, and it is bad, the definition of former student in the bill says it only includes students until they have graduated from high school, so this will not affect any social networking friendships with former students who are adults.
ReplyDeleteAs bad as this law is, and it is bad, the definition of former student in the bill says it only includes students until they have graduated from high school, so this will not affect any social networking friendships with former students who are adults.
ReplyDelete