The administrators indicate that they will seek a tax levy increase to continue to pay the teachers for the extra non-contract work time, which would be used for mentoring and meetings, after the Race to the Top grant period expires.
The money that would be needed to continue paying the 21st Century learning coaches and career path coordinators administrators are seeking would be absorbed into the district's budget when the federal money is spent, according to the application.
That would appear to be an accurate statement since the coaches and coordinators have already been added this year, despite the rejection of last year's Race to the Top request.
The portion of the Race to the Top request regarding the budget is printed in its entirety below, with no editing.
F. Budget and Sustainability
(F)(1&2) Budget
for the project (Including
Identification of One-time and Reoccurring Expenditures and Sustainability)
Joplin Schools Race to the Top – District Application
for Funding (CFDA 84.416)
Budget
Justification
Project
1: Infrastructure Development (Including Project Management)
BUDGET NARRATIVE: 4 Years
PERSONNEL
1: Project Manager
|
Total Grant Request
|
Project Manager salary (1
FTE/yr for 4 yrs)
|
271,937
|
Project Manager benefits
|
40,760
|
Total
|
312,697
|
Use of funds and necessity to project:
The Project Manager will
direct, coordinate and manage the project being proposed in this grant
application. This “Manager” will have at a minimum a Master’s in education and
commensurate experience. Administrative or curriculum/instruction background
will be desired. The Project Manager will be responsible for the direct
supervision and support, in collaboration with building principals and the
Assistant Superintendent, of the project staff as well as the implementation,
continuous improvement monitoring, staff development, fiscal management,
oversight, timelines and daily operation as well as the planning and
coordination of trainings and collection of formative and summative program
evaluation data. Program manager will assure ongoing collaborative
relationships with businesses, community agencies, the city, chamber and local
entities as it relates to the development of the career pathways.
Proposed cost includes fringe benefits (sufficiency
and reasonableness):
Base pay:
The base salary for the Project Manager will be based on qualifications
(experience and education) and will be comparable with the director/coordinator
position salaries. The position will be in place for the full term of the
grant. It is expected that this amount will be approximately $65,000/year (with
an anticipated annual increase of 3%/year). This salary will be for a 220 day
contract.
Benefits/fringe: Fringe Benefits include the district’s contribution to health
insurance, life insurance, FICA, and district contribution to retirement. This
is approximately 15% of the salary of a certified person.
Sustainability:
The funds are being
requested for the 4 years of the project, but are not considered perpetually
reoccurring. It is assumed that this role is one of start-up and implementation
and that the roles and responsibilities can be integrated into the
administrative structure. It will be the responsibility of the central office
leadership team to ensure this integration. Once the reforms outlined in the
proposal are the “way of doing business” then additional managerial resources
will not be needed.
Project
2: Highly Qualified Staff Development – Provided by 21st Century
Learning Coaches and Career Pathways Coordinators
2. A. 21st
Century Learning Coaches
|
Total Grant Request
|
21st Century
Learning Coaches Salaries (7 FTE total - 4 High School and 3 Middle School)
|
1,903,538
|
21st Century
Learning Coaches Benefits
|
285,321
|
Total
|
2,188,858
|
Use of funds and necessity to project:
The 7 personnel will
provide job embedded staff development to all secondary teachers and other
educators in order to support the development of their ability to provide
personalized learning experiences designed to ensure that all leave high school
career and college ready. This will include the development of the career
pathways and the implementation of impactful use of data to monitor student
progress and the use of technology as an effective and efficient teaching tool.
It will be their role to build the capacity of educators, parents and the
community to implement this new paradigm.
Proposed cost includes fringe benefits (sufficiency
and reasonableness):
Base pay:
They will be
paid per the salary schedule, which considers experience and education. The
contracts will be 200 days. Each position will have a fringe cost of about 15%.
There will be an anticipated annual
increase of 3%/year.
Benefits/fringe: Fringe Benefits include the district’s contribution to health
insurance, life insurance, FICA, and district contribution to retirement. This
is approximately 15% of the salary of a certified person.
Sustainability:
The funds are being requested
for the 4 years of the project. It is assumed that the coaches will build
proficiency and capacity in teachers and administrators and will integrate the
curriculum and technology into the system, thereby reducing the need for their
support. After the grant period the Instructional Coaches will ensure ongoing
support as the project transforms the educational environment. It will be the
responsibility of the central office leadership team to ensure this
integration. Once the reforms outlined in the proposal are the “way of doing
business” then additional resources will not be needed.
2. B. 21st
Career Pathways Coordinators
|
Total Grant Request
|
21st Career
Pathways Coordinators Salaries (5 FTE ) for 4 years
|
1,359,685
|
21st Century
Career Pathways Coordinators Benefits
|
209,800
|
Total
|
1,569,485
|
Use of funds and necessity to project:
The 5 personnel will
develop the career pathways, including curriculum, course of study and
competency scope and sequence. This will include the development of
internships, work experience and other applied and “real world experiences” at
the high school and middle school level. They will work as a member of the team
with educators to insure seamless integration of the career pathways and core academic
curricula. It will be their role to build the capacity of educators, parents
and the community to implement this new paradigm.
Proposed cost includes fringe benefits (sufficiency
and reasonableness):
Base pay:
They will be
paid per the salary schedule, which considers experience and education. The
contracts will be 200 days. Each position will have a fringe cost of about 15%.
There will be an anticipated annual
increase of 3%/year.
Benefits/fringe: Fringe Benefits include the district’s contribution to health
insurance, life insurance, FICA, and district contribution to retirement. This
is approximately 15% of the salary of a certified person.
Sustainability:
The funds for 5 FTE are
being requested for the first 2 years of the project. It is assumed that the
curriculum and model development will be completed at the end of that time
period. It is anticipated that the coaching function will be assumed by
business and/or other community partnerships at the end of the 2 years and then
completely by the completion of the grant period.
2.C. Academic Advisement
Time
|
Total Grant Request
|
Out-of Contract time
stipends for all secondary teachers: 1 hr./day ($26/day) for 170 days for 200
teacher x 4 yrs.
|
884,000/yr
|
Total
|
3,536,000
|
Use of funds and necessity to project:
All teachers who
participate (it will be expected that all teachers will) will be assigned
student advisees. They will work with these students as much as possible, but
at least 3 hr/week. The other two hrs/week will be teacher collaborative time.
Teachers will log time and be paid from these logs. Teachers will be expected
to monitor the progress of students and to collaboratively plan with other
teachers, parents and students for “next steps” (need for reteaching,
specialized instruction and/or supports, enrichment). They will be responsible
for monitoring data and as necessary leading problem-solving teams.
Collaborative time will be used to monitor the implementation of the model and
to ensure continuous progress toward full implementation.
Sufficiency and reasonableness:
The hourly cost is based on
current out-of-contract rate. The teachers who work with the students every day
are the most logical to act as academic advisors (rapport has already been
established and they understand the parameters of the learning environment.
Because teachers are implementing so much simultaneously they need the extended
time to be able to take on this extra duty.
Sustainability:
We anticipate that this
will be an ongoing expense, though it might be possible to reduce it somewhat.
It is anticipated that the district would have to seek a levy at the end of the
grant period.
2.D. Contracted Services
for 21st Century coaches, staff and other educators on developing
and implementing facets of the proposed model (in district training provided
by an outside trainer e.g. Persons from the ICLE)
|
Total Grant Request
|
20 days/$3,000/day x 4
yrs (provided by out-of-district consultant)
|
240,000
|
Total
|
240,000
|
Use of funds and necessity to project:
We will need to bring
expertise into the district as we implement the model. Providing training in
district maximized both the efficiency and effectiveness. We will use a
train-the-trainer model, thus will be able to expand the impact.
Proposed cost includes fringe benefits (sufficiency
and reasonableness):
Base pay:
All federal, state and district regulations and policies will be followed as
training is procured. Training costs will be as minimal as possible.
Benefits/fringe: Fringe Benefits include the district’s contribution to health
insurance, life insurance, FICA, and district contribution to retirement. This
is approximately 15% of the salary of a certified person.
Sustainability:
The need for professional
development, while ongoing is determined annually, based on district needs and
resources. While we know there will always be a need for outside training, the
most expert our own people become, the more these costs are minimalized.
Project
3: Development of a 21st Century Data Management System
3.A. Data
Manager
|
|
Salary 1
FTE/yr for 4 years
|
271,937
|
Benefits
|
40,760
|
Total
|
312,697
|
Use of funds and necessity to project:
The Data Manager will
performs specialized technical, administrative, and supervisory
work in the development of
a data management system that significantly expands the capacity of the
district to use data to make educational decisions and to manage complex
instructional tasks (e.g. scheduling, resource allocation). It also includes
the support, operation and coordination of the computerized student information
management systems for the school district. Work involves providing
coordination between current data needs and those of the future.
Proposed cost includes fringe benefits (sufficiency
and reasonableness):
Base pay:
The base salary for the Data Manager will be based on qualifications
(experience and education) and will be comparable with the director/coordinator
position salaries. The position will be in place for the full term of the
grant. It is expected that this amount will be approximately $65,000/year (with
an anticipated annual increase of 3%/year). This salary will be for a 220 day
contract.
Benefits/fringe: Fringe Benefits include the district’s contribution to health insurance,
life insurance, FICA, and district contribution to retirement. This is
approximately 15% of the salary of a certified person.
Sustainability:
The funds are being
requested for the 4 years of the project, but are not considered perpetually
reoccurring. It is assumed that this role is one of start-up and implementation
and that the roles and responsibilities can be integrated into the
administrative structure. It will be the responsibility of the central office
leadership team to ensure this integration. Once the reforms outlined in the
proposal are the “way of doing business” then additional managerial resources
will not be needed.
3.B.
Development of Current Data Management System and/or Purchase of a New System
|
|
Purchased
service for the development of data management system that will meet district
needs or purchase
of a new system. We are allocating $100,000/year for 4 years,
|
425,000
|
Total
|
425,000
|
Use of funds and necessity to project:
Our current student
information management system will not meet our 21st Century needs.
Because we have already invested in the system we hope to be able to work with
the company to retrofit the current system. We know, however, that we do not
want systems that are not interoperable and will therefore seek out the system
that will meet our needs as soon as possible, while still meeting our cost
objectives.
Proposed cost includes fringe benefits (sufficiency
and reasonableness):
We are budgeting$100,000
per year for the 4 years.
Sustainability:
Start-up and implementation
are the primary cost factors. After that costs will be minimal.
Project
4: Technology to Enhance the Learning of 21st Century Skills
4.A Purchase
of IPads for 1to1 Initiative at the Middle School
|
|
1to1 devises
for all students at the Middle School
2,000 IPads @
$500/devise
|
1,000,000
|
Total
|
1,000,000
|
Use of funds and necessity to project:
This will be a one-time
purchase (in year 1) that will allow use to extend the 1-to-1 Initiative down
to all middle school students.
Proposed cost includes fringe benefits (sufficiency
and reasonableness):
2,000 IPads @
$450/devise
Sustainability:
This will be a one-time
purchase. Cost of maintenance and other ongoing expenses will be absorbed by
the tech department as they transition from the “computer lab” format.
4.B
Additional Tech Support
|
|
Salary:
Additional Tech Support 3 techs at $30,000/yr
|
360,000
|
Benefits
|
54,000
|
Total Mileage
|
414,000
|
Use of funds and necessity to project:
As the amount and
complexity of technology has increased, the need for tech support is also
increasing. In order to meet the added demands of this project additional tech
support is required.
Proposed cost includes fringe benefits (sufficiency
and reasonableness):
They will be
paid per the salary schedule, which considers experience and education. The
contracts will be 200 days. Each position will have a fringe cost of about 15%.
There will be an anticipated annual
increase of 3%/year.
Benefits/fringe: Fringe Benefits include the district’s contribution to health
insurance, life insurance, FICA, and district contribution to retirement. This
is approximately 15% of the salary of a certified person.
Sustainability:
We anticipate that this
will be an ongoing expense, though it might be possible to reduce it somewhat.
Students will be trained (We already have a group of students who provide tech
support – the Eagle Squad. Expansion of this program addresses both this need
and will fit into our Career Pathways program). It is anticipated that the
district would have to seek a levy at the end of the grant period.
TOTAL GRANT REQUEST
|
9,998.737
|
(More information from the Race to the Top request, including the lengths the Joplin R-8 School District is going to in its efforts to implement Common Core Standards (which is a necessity for any school district hoping to get RTTP funding) and a recounting of how the district found a "silver lining" in a funnel cloud, and how administrators helped keep Joplin together following the May 22, 2011, tornado, will be featured in an upcoming post.)
Oh gag. Definitely not staying for more of this. Taking my child and leaving for someplace normal.
ReplyDeleteThey got career people last year. Added another from what I hear for this year. Have 21st century coaches already. So why are they soaking us for more tax money? What are they using now--and why do they need to change? I'm tired of throwing money in that bottomless pit. It'll be a big NO on any more money for R 8!!
ReplyDeleteStill mining that tornado for silver. Heartless and greedy bunch. Please make them go away.
ReplyDeleteJoplin Schools is a money pit and disgusts me! I am DONE with there shenanigans, we must FIRE Angie Besendorfer AND Dr. Douchebag Huff
ReplyDeleteAnd, I want a 6 bedroom mansion with a swimming pool, a cook, a maid, a driver, a facelift, a personal trainer, a gardner, a lake cottage, etc. .... And, anything else that will help lme live the good life for the 21st Century
ReplyDeleteWe must get a new BOE, elect a person of character, who has a love for education & someone with no agenda.. Most importantly not a slave to CJ Huff, because currently they all are!
ReplyDeleteThey will stop when enough of you join the rest of us parents who have been fighting and say enough already. As long as It's just a few of us they have no reason to think they should change. Remember that when you vote this April. Time to change the way things go in this town.
ReplyDeleteR8 can color me gone.
ReplyDeleteWhat the hell is this? Let's see. 62 million in the bond issue. Tens of millions in insurance. Who knows how many millions in donations, because lord knows bright futures got it all and CJ sure won't tell what they got, and these jerks still want more? Hell no. Learn to live within your means like the rest of us. Or go someplace richer. Either way works.
ReplyDeleteTime to get out those pitchforks I guess.
ReplyDeleteI can hardly stand it til the end of the day in that madhouse as it is. There's no way I'm staying another hour every day when I could be with my own family. Screw that. And R8. No wonder they hid this from the teachers.
ReplyDeleteDeception is what R8 does best.
ReplyDeleteIs Palace Huff for sale?
ReplyDeleteIt's too bad there's no money for a spelling coach to help whoever wrote this learn how to spell "device." Educational dollars thrown in all the wrong directions...
ReplyDeleteThey need to hire an editor. The whole thing is full of errors. You have to expect that from people who don't believe in teaching anything but soft skills. Old school stuff won't get you noticed anywhere.
ReplyDeleteWhy is this being hidden from the teachers! I just dont understand...soon the Admin building will be full of "administrators" & the classrooms will be empty of teachers...school board members wake up, you are their bosses ..they are not your bosses...they work for you..yes, there are people who should not be teachers or EVER around children as we have discovered , or are so frozen in just what they should be doing by constant threat of being "written up" due to some arrogant principals...but, how many potential good teachers have left because they have been frightened away ...
ReplyDeleteThe current crop of administrators disdains teachers. Hence the teachers have left by the hundreds and will continue to do so. That the Board allows the bankrupting of the district, the fleecing of taxpayers, and the abuse of teachers tells us that they have given Huff and Besendorfer their stamp of approval, probably with a 7-0 vote.
DeleteSo, spellcheck doesn't always work! :-0
ReplyDeleteI guess 21st Century learning just isn't the answer to everything. Gosh, however do those of us who grew up learning to do things right get through our day?
ReplyDeleteNow, you all don't be mean. CJ wasn't born to a family with silver spoons in their mouths. They had pitchforks in their closets. He cain't be expected to be none too bright with that kind of upbringing.
ReplyDeleteWhich is it $500 or $450 per devise (sp)?
ReplyDelete$30,000/ yr per new tech? The work they will be doing keeping kids safe and making sure the IPads are secure and operational is more important " in the trenches" work than the newly added admin ...
If I heard right we have been cutting corners on the construction projects because the district is out of cash. I'd like to know how that could be. And now they want more tax dollars to throw away on crap no student ever needed. They should be audited and fired.
ReplyDelete8:00--
ReplyDeleteI found my pitchfork, but I burned up my torch wandering around the administration building searching for an honest soul. Had no better luck at city hall. These are sad times.
It's amazing how much they are willing to invest in everything but teachers. There are way too many people who never go near a student making a whole lot more than teachers. But teachers carry the pressure of test scores. I don't see where their previous decisions have paid off in learning, which is what I send my children to school to do. It all looks like a tremendous waste of tax dollars and time to me.
ReplyDeleteCutting corners on the construction!! We were told that we could hope to get some money restored. So they've burned through the insurance, the bond money, and the donations. Good grief. And the reserves are at an all time low. Perfect. Great managent. And for what? For German furniture, trips, and crap like they have listed here. I'm an angry voter.
ReplyDeleteWill they be able to finish that building? I read in the paper that the Board tabled discussion on finishes for the high school. It was a matter of saving around 450 grand. Considering that the district is about broke, I'd say they better take any savings they can find. We need an audit to see what was spent where and how much is left. This is what greed and a lack of accountability gets you.
ReplyDeleteI know a couple of things that kids need for 21st-century-learning: Buildings. Teachers.
ReplyDeleteBut how to afford these futuristic devices?!?
A batch of moderately-used ipads should bring in the necessary funds.
Dispensing with more than a few unnecessary learning coaches should put some change in the coffers.
A superintendent pay cut putting Huff on par with the superintendent of Springfield (who is paid less for running a larger district) might create a few kopins.
Alternately, you could short-change construction and fire teachers in order to pay for ego-projects, ipads and administration, marginally-work-oriented trips to Germany, retreats, tours, friends with for-hire motivational speaking engagements. King Huff and Queen Besendorfer have raided the treasury and need more moolah.
I can't believe that they really submitted this shoddy piece of work for consideration. But even if they did it won't get anywhere because it has the same problems the last one had. No teacher buy-in, no financial transparency (which they cannot do, of course), and no data to prove all this success they claim to have had. You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear, even with all their modern technology. It's a wash.
ReplyDelete