Tammy Dickinson, United States Attorney for the Western District of Missouri, announced that the wife of a Joplin, Mo., man who was previously indicted on child pornography charges was indicted along with her husband by a federal grand jury today for the sexual exploitation of a second child victim.
James Hajny, 49, and his wife, Gina Hajny, 39, both of Joplin, were charged in a four-count indictment returned by a federal grand jury in Springfield, Mo. Today’s superseding indictment replaces the original indictment returned on June 10, 2014. The superseding indictment adds Gina Hajny as a co-defendant and charges both defendants with an additional count of sexual exploitation of a minor.
James and Gina Hajny are each charged in the additional count. Today’s indictment alleges that they used a minor, identified as Jane Doe #2, to produce child pornography.
Today’s superseding indictment also contains three counts from the original indictment. The indictment alleges that James Hajny used a minor victim, identified as “Jane Doe #1,” to produce child pornography in May 2014. James Hajny is also charged with distributing pornographic images of Jane Doe #1 over the Internet between Dec. 12, 2013, and May 12, 2014. The indictment also charges James Hajny with possessing child pornography on May 19, 2014.
The indictment contains a forfeiture allegation, which would require James and Gina Hajny to forfeit to the government any property used to commit the alleged offenses, including a laptop computer, two tablet computers, two cell phones, an iPod and a digital camera.
Dickinson cautioned that the charges contained in this indictment are simply accusations, and not evidence of guilt. Evidence supporting the charges must be presented to a federal trial jury, whose duty is to determine guilt or innocence.
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Patrick Carney. It was investigated by the FBI and the Joplin, Mo., Police Department.
The information from the original probable cause affidavit can be found at this link.
I wander if frank ness gave this guy up to the police .
ReplyDeleteI know this family personally! This is slander on your part and lies.
ReplyDeletethere is ONE thing to post your opinion but it is another to post lies! non of that is true OR open to the public. It is an ongoing investigation!