The kids called him “Bulldog” but never to his face.
That’s because we were all scared to death of Mr. Walker,
our junior high school principal. It was easy to see where he got his nickname.
He had a bulldog-like countenance and never seemed to smile, at least when it
came to those who strayed from the straight and narrow.
Orvie Walker is no longer with us; he died more than 15
years ago, The last time I saw him I was working as a reporter at a high school
basketball game. He was no longer the stern taskmaster whose face haunted the
nightmares of many a teen in the ‘60s and ‘70s. He was bound to a wheelchair,
which he always parked near the court so he wouldn’t miss any of the action.
No matter how much he had diminished in physical stature by
that time, he still commanded respect and I would never have thought of calling
him anything except Mr. Walker.
I thought of Mr. Walker the other day as I saw the Time
Magazine cover talking about the “rotten apples” in our nation’s classrooms.
I thought about him a few moments ago when I read a
Huffington Post blog from a teacher who recommended that changes be made to
teacher tenure.
Perhaps if all principals were like Orvie Walker, this would
not be a discussion topic. I remember him as a principal who worked with his
faculty, giving the teachers an opportunity to learn and grow. If they did not
show promise after being given ample opportunity, the teachers did not return
for the next year. The “rotten apples” did not last the five years that it
takes for a Missouri teacher to earn tenure.
Those days appear to be gone forever.
In three days, Missouri will vote on Amendment 3, which
would eliminate teacher tenure and require that teachers be evaluated on the
basis of student test scores. This mirrors moves that have already taken place
in other states.
The dangers of what is happening in public education-
charter schools that are accountable to no one, a testing culture that has
drained the creativity from the classrooms, an emphasis on statistics that mean
nothing, but keep a lot of lower-level administrators employed, a lack of
support for classroom teachers- have been written about over and over by
teachers and former teachers.
I have written many times that the so-called “crisis” in
American public schools is non-existent, a creation of the people who either
want to destroy public education so they will not have to pay taxes for it, or
those who want to make profits off the attempts to rescue the schools.
As the years pass, I am growing fearful that public
education may be destroyed from within. In the days when Orvie Walker was a
principal, the principal was an educator who had worked his or her way through
the system, a veteran teacher who wanted the opportunity to run a school and,
of course, make more money in the process.
Nowadays, we have far too many principals and school
superintendents who have spent no more than a few years, in some cases as few
as two or three, in a classroom, but earn the degree and go right into
administration.
Two years in a classroom is not enough for an administrator
to have an understanding of what teachers are going through and what tools a teacher
needs to succeed. While I have seen some solid administrators who have only a
smattering of classroom experience, most of those who have bypassed the old way
of earning a promotion through success in the classroom and diligence have no
idea of how to help a teacher who is experiencing difficulty or how to build a
culture in which learning is paramount.
In many of our nation’s schools, the educational leaders are
there because they have mastered workplace politics and squeeze the words “rigor”
and accountability” into every other sentence.
Most of them have not spent enough time in the classroom to
have any idea of what works and what doesn’t, but they do know that students
will succeed if they have the latest in technology, not matter how much it
costs, and if teachers just get out of their way and let them learn using the
technology.
Some of those who don’t succeed in the classroom are making
a good living extracting thousands of taxpayer dollars from school districts by
presenting “professional development workshops.” You can tell them when you see
them- they are the ones who have their entire program on power point and are
happy they are out of the classroom and no longer have to try the things they
are recommending for others.
It may surprise some who are not in education to know that
so many of the people who are responsible for making decisions that affect
their children have mastered the jargon and master the politics, but have no
idea of what will help a student learn.
Many of them are the ones who have told reporters that all
of their problems would be gone if tenure was eliminated and they could get the
staff they need to succeed.
Sure they could. They could get a staff of people who are
willing to do whatever they are told without talking, even when they know that what
they are being asked to do is not in the best interest of the students.
Those favorite teachers we all had, the ones who did their
job professionally every day, but occasionally stood up and challenged the
status quo. Those teachers would be a thing of the past.
To far too many of those who are making the decisions in our
nation’s schools, teachers are interchangeable parts; one is just as good as
another. If they weren’t smart enough to get out of the classroom and get into
a higher paying job, they deserve whatever they get.
In public, the ill-prepared administrators talk about the
value of their hard-working teachers. In private, they often have no problem
passing along edicts that make the teachers’ jobs more difficult and please,
whatever you do, don’t send any unruly children to the office; it will make the
statistics look bad.
You may think there is no way that this could happen in
American education. How in the world can people rise to the top in education
with only two or three years in the classroom?
Of course, it could be worse. At least those administrators
have two or three years more classroom experience than our Secretary of
Education Arne Duncan.
So, is this an excerpt from the Time magazine or from your book?
ReplyDeleteMy apologies. I thought when I wrote at the top of the post that this was my latest submission to Huffington Post, that most readers would understand that this was my latest submission to Huffington Post. The picture of the Time Magazine cover simply goes along with its mention in the post since it was one of the things that inspired me to write about it. The Let Teachers Teach at the bottom is an advertisement, the same kind of advertisement I have used for my books many times below my posts.
ReplyDeleteThank you for highlighting one of the biggest problems that many teachers face - bad administrators with limited experience in the real world of teaching and/or who so clueless that they should not be in a classroom, much less a school office.
ReplyDeleteHey Turner, this is 5:00am.
ReplyDeleteSorry that I overlooked your citation at the top. Not everyone is out to get you. I Appreciate what you are doing for our community so don't get so defensive.
I do agree with everything that you stated. Thank you again and just remember that, not everyone is a troll.
Randy,
ReplyDeleteYour submission to the Huffington Post is constructive. Essentially you call for more classroom experience from those that supervise teachers. I agree.
Before I became really in charge of an organization, a ship in the Navy, I had to start at the bottom and work my way up, over about 20 years, before the Navy decided I knew enough and had demonstrated good performance to be placed in charge. We don't come close to that in public education.
Most top level professional educators have PhDs almost as a required ticket to gain a "top spot" in public education. I had only a Bachelor's degree upon being assigned to a "top job", but I had, again, about 20 years of experience and demonstrated superior performance. I will take that last criteria over a PhD any day.
BUT, "Let teachers teach" is not the solution in my view. Assign teachers to teach and "trust but verify" they in fact learn to teach through experience and correcting mistakes pointed out along the way. I made a ton of such mistakes as a junior officer and learned a lot from such experiences.
Why can't teachers?
Anson