Tuesday, July 28, 2026

Stotts City Mayor: Audit oversight, accountability should unite, not divide city


(From Stotts City Mayor Tracy Knight)

As recent news coverage has highlighted the challenges facing Stotts City following the Missouri State Auditor’s report, I believe it is important for residents and the public to understand the purpose behind the actions I have taken as Mayor. The coverage notes that the audit and differing views on how to respond have contributed to division within our community.

From my first day in office, my focus has remained on one objective: faithfully carrying out the responsibilities entrusted to me by the citizens of Stotts City.








My efforts to review city records, monitor implementation of the State Auditor’s recommendations, examine financial controls, and evaluate potential conflicts of interest are not intended to create division or assign blame. They are part of the oversight responsibilities that accompany the office of Mayor and are intended to ensure that public resources are managed responsibly, transparently, and in accordance with Missouri law.

The State Auditor identified significant areas where improvements are needed, including financial recordkeeping, internal controls, reconciliation of city finances, and accountability measures. Those findings deserve thoughtful attention and meaningful action—not because of politics, but because they concern the stewardship of public resources.

Likewise, reviewing situations in which public officials or employees have overlapping responsibilities is a routine governance practice. Such reviews are not accusations of wrongdoing. Rather, they are intended to determine whether appropriate safeguards, disclosures, and internal controls exist to protect both the public and the individuals serving in those positions.

Public confidence is strengthened when government demonstrates transparency, welcomes accountability, and verifies that proper safeguards are in place.








I recognize that change can be difficult, and I understand that there are differing perspectives on how best to move forward. My hope is that we can shift our focus away from conflict and toward cooperation in addressing the audit findings and strengthening city government.

Every request I have made for records, financial information, and documentation has been guided by a single question: Are we doing everything we can to protect the interests of the citizens of Stotts City?

That question should unite us rather than divide us.

I remain committed to working respectfully with the Board of Aldermen, city staff, state agencies, and our residents to implement improvements that will benefit our community for years to come.


The citizens elected me to provide leadership, transparency, and accountability. I intend to continue fulfilling those responsibilities fairly, professionally, and without favoritism.


8 comments:

  1. Anonymous6:22 PM

    I have watched the city meeting videos and this mayor is extremely hostile in the way she speaks to the alderman - almost like “I’m better than you” and you will do as I say.
    I don’t know how many times I have heard her say “I am confused” or alderman had to show her what papers she was supposed to be looking at.
    I think she is on a power trip and the way you can see her single out certain individuals and their jobs is going to get her into trouble.
    You don’t have to be a citizen of the town to see it come across in the videos. She is causing hostility and division among the town.
    How are the citizens not concerned about her doing that?
    This is most definitely it a town I would want to live in with a mayor like that. She might think she is doing good but in reality all she is doing is showing how bad that little town is.
    I wish you all the best of luck because I think you will continue to to have trouble until you can get her out.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous8:56 AM

      I think there is a lot of things happening that you are not seeing or hearing. Maybe if you spoke with some of the people who lived here they could help give you some perspective n insight

      Delete
  2. Anonymous7:36 PM

    I have watched a few of the live meetings and the ridiculous TikTok page and I don’t see respect from the mayor. She comes across snotty and picks and choices when to address someone to speak. Just an observation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous9:12 AM

      Are you the one that watched one and made a very disrespectful comment?

      Delete
  3. Anonymous3:10 PM

    The Mayor states “My efforts to review city records, monitor implementation of the State Auditor’s recommendations, examine financial controls, and evaluate potential conflicts of interest are not intended to create division or assign blame.”

    Admirable, and with good intention but in the course of recent goings on, one, and only one, non-elected position has been singled out (blamed???) for short comings, perceived lack of performance, and general lack of confidence in the position the City Clerk. This position and duties are and have been under the supervision and direction of elected city officials as are the resources, training, and tools necessary to carry out those responsibilities and duties. For perhaps a small percentage of the funds expended on the latest audit which identified many of the same issues detailed in a similar audit conducted some 25 years ago, the city might procure adequate technology with at least fundamental supporting applications. This might include but not be limited to, for example, Microsoft Office, some iteration of Quick Books, and Missouri Rural Water’s SUBS (Small Utility Billing Software (previously suggested by the Mayor). This technology could also include portable external storage devices for back up/archive to allow offsite storage to alleviate concerns surrounding keeping such data exclusively on personal devices with increased vulnerabilities for loss through system failures, natural disasters, and so forth. Utilizing current cloud technologies (iCloud, Google Cloud or similar) would also provide offsite storage/operational capabilities. It appears at this point these tools only include physical ledgers/spreadsheets, pens, pencils, typewriter, maybe a PC running Win 1.0 on top of MS-Dos, and carbon paper. A tough way the handle administrative duties with a limited official time for the clerk position (10 hours per week??). Looks like the Clerk position may be the messenger and we know what the messenger has to put up with most times.

    No wonder for the last 25 years, at least, the statement “that’s the way we have always done it” may be the rallying cry for the revolving door that is the clerk’s position.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous9:10 AM

      Yes there is definitely a program on Quick Books or such that would definitely help with the bookkeeping. But the city clerk and city collector absolutely should be separate positions., according to a State Statute! There is personal on city council that leads people to believe that people in Stotts City doesn't want to participate in our community politics and cleaning up of our city . There is a lot of people who are very interested in helping and getting involved in making Stotts City Shine again!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous2:42 PM

      lets go with that and consider the following comments

      In Missouri, holding two incompatible public offices is a civil common-law violation rather than a crime, meaning no one faces criminal prosecution or jail time; instead, accepting and qualifying for the second, incompatible office operates as an automatic, implied resignation (vacating) of the first office.

      Nature of Incompatibility
      • Civil, Not Criminal: The common-law doctrine of incompatible offices treats the simultaneous holding of conflicting positions as a structural and legal contradiction, not a criminal act.
      • The Remedy: When a person accepts a second office that conflicts with their first position, the law treats it as an immediate resignation from the first post.

      • (Assume that under conditions that neither the controlling municipal bodies nor the individual holding incompatible positions were aware of these legal provisions, the dual position holder would be allowed to select which position they would relinquish, particularly since the collector position is an elective office.

      No Prosecution: Because it is a civil disqualification issue rather than a statutory crime or misdemeanor, no individual or city official is criminally prosecuted or penalized for allowing the overlap to happen.

      So no rock throwing, no mud slinging or nasty personal characterizations from either side, no wild accusations of wrong doing or nefarious activities - just execute the rational legal remedies noted above and move along

      Delete
  4. Anonymous9:56 AM

    how about a go fund me page for Stotts City Missouri IT Development

    ReplyDelete