Saturday, June 22, 2013

More than 150 attend Common Core Standards meeting at East Newton

Those who were expecting to hear the pros and cons of Common Core Standards during the meeting Friday night in the East Newton High School gymnasium went home disappointed, but it was through no fault of the organizers of the informational session.

Bobbi Sherwood opened the meeting by telling the more than 150 in attendance all of the efforts she made to get someone to speak for the standards, which are being implemented in all Missouri schools.

Department of Elementary and Secondary Education officials turned down the request, as did numerous other officials contacted by Ms. Sherwood and Jill Carter, including Joplin R-8 Superintendent C. J. Huff.

One of those the women talked to was the legislative assistant to Sen. David Pearce, R-Warrensburg, chairman of the Senate Education Committee, who told them, “You can bring your torches; but it’s going to be implemented.”

The speakers, Nina Dean, a legislative assistant to Rep. Kurt Bahr, R-St. Charles, and Mary Byrne of the Missouri Coalition Against Common Core, warned about the incredible amount of data that will be collected by the government through Common Core and how its mandates will effectively remove control of schools from local boards of education.

Ms. Dean, who emphasized she was speaking as a private citizen and not as a state employee, criticized the consortium that created Common Core. “If we were in New York and this consortium were the Mafia, we would call this a money laundering scheme.”

States and local school districts will end up footing the bill for the added testing that will be required by Common Core, she said.  Testing will take place three times a year. “They’re definitely going to be teaching to the test.”

This will cause an even greater emphasis on the tested subjects, Ms. Dean said. “Our kids will no longer learn cursive. They will no longer have social studies.”

Much of Ms. Dean’s presentation centered around a distrust of government, with frequent mentions of the recent scandals that have enveloped the NSA and IRS, with a message that the government cannot be trusted with information about students and parents and that efforts are being made to see to it that classes are taught the same way at the same time in school districts across the United States.

The big brother images she conjured were completed with an answer to a question she had received about whether cameras would be installed in classrooms to make sure the Common Core curriculum is being taught.

“We don’t know,” she said, “but if people don’t stand up, it will probably eventually happen.”

Parents can play a role in stopping what Ms. Dean indicated were the excesses of Common Core and she advocated tough tactics.

Ms. Dean recommended pulling kids out of school during testing. “Make sure your kids aren’t feeling well during assessment.” Funding for Missouri schools is based on attendance.

She suggested personalized letters to legislators and reminding them that it is local school boards, not superintendents currying favor with state and federal education officials and trading in local autonomy for the promise of free technology, who should be deciding what is taught in local schools.

Ms. Byrne’s presentation detailed how Common Core came about  and how only one person with classroom teaching experience participated in the creation of the standards and that person’s recommendations were largely ignored.

One of the most serious problems with Common Core, Ms. Byrne said, is that it was essentially created by big business with the idea of changing public education into a training ground for the workforce, rather than a vehicle to teach young people the knowledge and skills they need to function effectively in society and to be effective citizens participating in their government.

“This is turning our schools into a training program for businesses,” Ms. Byrne said. “That is the intent of Common Core. The driving force behind all of this is money.”

Though Common Core Standards are purported to be a creation of the consortium that was began by the National Governors Association and supposedly has nothing to do with the federal government, nothing could be further from the truth, Ms. Byrne said.

States and individual school districts that wanted any part of the billions of dollars in Race to the Top money and stimulus money that was available through the federal Department of Education have to follow Common Core and also agree to its standardized testing regimen and basing at least a percentage of teacher evaluations on student test scores.

Ms. Byrne also noted the danger of all educational decisions being taken out of the hands of local school boards and a one size fits all approach being mandated on education in all public schools in the United States.

“I’m not trying to incite a riot,” Ms. Byrne said. “I’m trying to get things back to the way they belong.”


Ms. Sherwood and Ms. Carter will make a presentation on Common Core Standards to the East Newton R-6 Board of Education at its Thursday, June 27, meeting.

(In the accompanying video, Bobbi Sherwood explains how everyone from Peter Herschend to David Pearce to C. J. Huff to DESE officials rejected her offer to come to East Newton to talk about Common Core Standards.)

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Did they offer CJ the prerequisite ten grand for a presentation?
I don't know if I find the CCSS as alarming as some in this article. There is an alarmist/conspiracy group that is putting out a lot of unfounded information. However, the assessments for the CCSS are alarming. They are huge, quite rigorous, and require districts to have extensive access to technology and bandwidth that most districts won't have by the time of the first go round. That is hardly fair. They are also predicted to be quite time consuming, which means more time given up to testing instead of in the pursuit of knowledge, which is at great risk in our "21st Century," skills-based atmosphere as it is. Knowledge for the sake of knowledge is no longer prized, and that puts us at the mercy of cultures with a mindset beyond Google.
I would suggest more research using very objective research sites before jumping to conclusions about how the CCSS were made and why. Considering how long they have been in the making, I'm wondering why parents and community members are just now showing concern? These were easily available on the Internet in 2010. It is easier to be proactive than reactive. Now that they've been adopted and are about to be launched it will be hard to turn the tide. Perhaps rather than battling the CCSS, they should battle the assessments and demand something more reasonable.
I am thrilled to see so many people at a meeting for such a small district. I wonder if Joplin could muster that many together for a conversation about education in their district?

Unknown said...

I was one of the organizers of the meeting at East Newton. I would like to answer your valid question of why now? Why after three years would there be so much concern?

It could be said that I was behind in my understanding of what was happening in my local school district. I was not made aware of CCSS until my daughter came home from school and happened to mention the school was implementing a new curriculum. I didn't think to much about it. Then the children were sent home with a paper saying that they were doing some pilot testing on new assessment tests. I became even more curious so when I had the opportunity, at a school levy meeting, I asked the superintendent who was paying for the new Common Core Curriculum, which he stated that they were. It was that night that I came home and looked into it. What was I going to be paying for? I became increasingly concerned and was looking to have my concerns alleviated. Surely, this isn't what it seems to be?

I started with my school board. I shared some things I had learned, hoping they could refute it. They weren't sure of the answers. I called my representative. He did know some about it, but he also had questions. On up the chain I went. The most alarming thing to me is, no one knew the answers to the questions. Obviously, the easiest thing to do was to have a community meeting where we could have an open dialogue and conversation. Get it all out in the open. Both sides at the same time, where there wouldn't be a "he said, she said." That is where I ran into difficulty.

My girlfriend Bobbi, who shared my concerns,couldn't find anyone from DESE,who was willing to accept the invitation to come to our meeting and answer our questions. DESE did, after extended invitations from Representative Mike Moons office and from Representative Fitzpatricks office, send out an email saying it was the superintendents job to answer the questions. Really? hadn't we started there.

We made more phone calls, just to name a few these are just a few: The State Board of Education President, and the Commissioner of Education Chris Nicastro, Senator Pearce, who is a proponent of CCSS and the Governors office. We didn't think that they could come, but surely they knew someone just as well educated that could represent a proponents view of CCSS. No one accepted our invitation. Many were kind and did give us other referrals.

The blessing is, after an exhausting journey to try to educate myself, I have found enough documentation and spoke to enough educators and policy makers to know, I don't want this for my children or school.

This has taken me places I didn't expect to go, but we did finally find answers to my questions. Some of them through the silence of those who should have been answering them.

Unknown said...

I was one of the organizers of the meeting at East Newton. I would like to answer your valid question of why now? Why after three years would there be so much concern?

It could be said that I was behind in my understanding of what was happening in my local school district. I was not made aware of CCSS until my daughter came home from school and happened to mention the school was implementing a new curriculum. I didn't think to much about it. Then the children were sent home with a paper saying that they were doing some pilot testing on new assessment tests. I became even more curious so when I had the opportunity, at a school levy meeting, I asked the superintendent who was paying for the new Common Core Curriculum, which he stated that they were. It was that night that I came home and looked into it. What was I going to be paying for? I became increasingly concerned and was looking to have my concerns alleviated. Surely, this isn't what it seems to be?

I started with my school board. I shared some things I had learned, hoping they could refute it. They weren't sure of the answers. I called my representative. He did know some about it, but he also had questions. On up the chain I went. The most alarming thing to me is, no one knew the answers to the questions. Obviously, the easiest thing to do was to have a community meeting where we could have an open dialogue and conversation. Get it all out in the open. Both sides at the same time, where there wouldn't be a "he said, she said." That is where I ran into difficulty.

My girlfriend Bobbi, who shared my concerns,couldn't find anyone from DESE,who was willing to accept the invitation to come to our meeting and answer our questions. DESE did, after extended invitations from Representative Mike Moons office and from Representative Fitzpatricks office, send out an email saying it was the superintendents job to answer the questions. Really? hadn't we started there?

We made more phone calls, just to name a few these are just a few: The State Board of Education President, and the Commissioner of Education Chris Nicastro, Senator Pearce, who is a proponent of CCSS and the Governors office. We didn't think that they could come, but surely they knew someone just as well educated that could represent a proponents view of CCSS. No one accepted our invitation. Many were kind and did give us other referrals.

The blessing is, after an exhausting journey to try to educate myself, I have found enough documentation and spoke to enough educators and policy makers to know, I don't want this for my children or school.

This has taken me places I didn't expect to go, but we did finally find answers to my questions. Some of them through the silence of those who should have been answering them.

Anonymous said...

The reality of this shady(and expensive) endeavor will hit America suddenly. The truth of it has been suppressed by media, special interests and educators and the sudden shock will make the Obamacare mess look good.