By Anna Spoerre
The news was announced Wednesday afternoon by coalition members of Missourians for Constitutional Freedom, the organization behind Amendment 3.
Leaders with both Planned Parenthood Great Plains and Planned Parenthood Great Rivers said if the court grants their injunction, they plan to start providing abortions the day the amendment goes into effect on Dec. 5 at the health centers in Columbia, the Central West End in St. Louis and the Midtown neighborhood of Kansas City.
A series of “targeted regulation of abortion providers” laws enacted by the legislature, including a mandatory 72-hour waiting period between the initial appointment and a surgical abortion and mandatory pelvic exams for medication abortions “were parts of a web of impenetrable, onerous, and medically unnecessary restrictions targeted at abortion providers,” that limited access for Missourians for years prior to the state’s abortion ban, the lawsuit reads.
“The restrictions we’re challenging today do not actually help patients. They hurt them,” Richard Muniz, interim President and CEO of Planned Parenthood Great Rivers, said during a press conference Wednesday. “The ripple effects of these overreaching policies can be felt throughout the state. Missouri continues to have high STI rates and poor pregnancy outcomes, and providers do not want to train or practice in Missouri, creating even further scarcity and gaps in coverage for thousands of women and pregnant people throughout Missouri.”
The constitutional amendment, which won with 51.7% of the nearly 3 million votes cast Tuesday, goes into effect in 30 days and prohibits the legislature from regulating abortion prior to the point of fetal viability — generally seen as the point at which a fetus can likely survive outside the womb without extraordinary measures.
But both proponents of and those opposed to Amendment 3 have warned that abortion access would not be immediate, as a bevy of challenges to current law must first make their way through the courts.
The lawsuit, which was filed in Jackson County, challenges a number of current state laws, including the state’s current abortion ban, a trigger law enacted in June 2022 that only allows abortions exceptions in cases of medical emergencies.
Among the TRAP laws targeted by the new lawsuit include: Requirements that abortion clinics be licensed as ambulatory surgical centers.
A 72-hour waiting period between a patient’s initial visit with a doctor and their abortion procedure.
Mandates that abortion clinics be located within 30 miles of a hospital where they have admitting privileges.
The required submission of all tissue removed during an abortion be submitted to a pathologist.
Rules requiring abortion providers report all abortions and abortion complications to the state.
Requirements that the same physician who initially sees a patient must also be the physician who performs the abortion procedure.
Current law requiring only physicians can perform abortions, excluding physician assistants and advanced practice registered nurses.
The lawsuit also addresses access to medication abortion, asking that a judge lift the current restrictions that would make it difficult to prescribe, including a telemedicine ban that requires the physician who prescribes the medication to also be in the room when the patient takes the first dose of the medication.
It also seeks to end criminal penalties for abortion providers, who currently face loss of their license and up to 15 years in prison if they perform an abortion that doesn’t fall under the current exception for medical emergencies.
The lawsuit does not challenge Missouri’s current law requiring parental or guardian consent for minors seeking abortions. Muniz did not specifically say whether this will be challenged in the future, but rather noted this is only the first lawsuit.
Court challenges can take months, if not years. In Ohio, where citizens voted to protect abortion rights one year ago, a county judge just struck down that state’s “heartbeat” law.
Freda Levenson, legal director for the ACLU of Ohio, said while the payoff is worthwhile, the road can be long to reach widespread access.
“They shouldn’t engage in magical thinking or fic tion that these restrictions will fall away on their own,” she advised Missourians who voted in support of Amendment 3. “This is going to take hard work.”
Tori Schafer, director of policy and campaigns at the ACLU of Missouri, said while she hopes the legislature will respect the will of the people, those who supported Amendment 3 stand ready to hold them accountable.
Missouri lawmakers including state Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman and U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley have said they intend to give Missourians the opportunity to vote on abortion again.
When asked in September what GOP lawmakers might do if Amendment 3 passed, Coleman pointed to a 2018 citizen-led amendment that would have required legislative districts be drawn to ensure partisan fairness. This amendment, known as “Clean Missouri,” was repealed two years later through a legislature-proposed amendment.
On Wednesday morning, Mary Catherine Martin, an attorney with the Thomas More Society who previously argued against the amendment before the Missouri Supreme Court, promised to defend Missouri against Amendment 3.
“They’re not going to stand back and give up,” Levenson said. “They’ll fight around the edges to keep any restrictions in that they can.”
Former President Donald Trump’s victory means Missouri abortion-rights organizations may have more than just state anti-abortion forces working against them. It could soon also be the federal government.
One example is federal enforcement of the Comstock Act, an 1873 law that bans mailing obscene material, including for the use of abortion.
Hawley, who was re-elected to a second term on Tuesday, was among a number of senators who signed a letter in 2023 asking the U.S. Attorney General to enforce the Comstock Act and make illegal the mailing of abortion medication, which has increasingly become popular and accessible across the United States over the last two years.
“We are being thoughtful about what a change in the federal administration could mean,” said Emily Wales, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Great Plains. “I think more than anything, it will be the time for Missourians and individuals in other states who may have crossed political lines to hold accountable national leaders who have said they think this should be an issue decided by the states.”
Kellie Copeland, executive director of Pro-Choice Ohio, which led that state’s successful abortion-rights ballot measure last year, noted that it also takes time to rebuild health care infrastructure that had been limited or eliminated with abortion restrictions.
4 comments:
Gotta get that fix of killing babies it’s been a while they are blood thirsty
Fact: babies aren't being killed, as at the time of abortion they are not a baby.
Just keep believing that, I bet you believe Biden got 81 million votes as well. Funny that Trump won with about the same numbers in 20 as he did in 24.
And yes there are about 3 million votes in AZ and NV between the 2 with Trump leading totals about 146 million.
155 million total votes in 20, we all know democrats vote blue regardless. Where are the other 10 million votes and where are all the new voters. How many new voters are there.
What does a vote count have to do with abortion? Simple, in this context it means that 11:03 is just making things up.
Post a Comment