Thursday, October 11, 2007

RES lawsuit returned to Jasper County Circuit Court

A lawsuit by a Carthage woman against Renewable Environmental Services (RES) has been returned to Jasper County Circuit Court.
U. S. District Court Judge Ortrie Smith made the ruling today, after a motion had been filed by Cynthia Sundy asking for the case to be remanded.
Ms. Sundy initially filed her class action lawsuit against RES June 5 in Jasper County, but the case was moved to federal court following a motion by lawyers for RES.
In her three-count lawsuit Ms. Sundy claims RES has created a continuing nuisance and has been negligent in the operation of its plant, which converts turkey waste material from the nearby Butterball plant into fuel.
Friday's court filing says the case belongs in Jasper County because "it is a local controversy," "the primary defendants are Missouri citizens," and RES has its "first and only plant" in Carthage.

In her lawsuit, Ms. Sundy's lawyers list the checkered history of the company in Carthage:


Since the RES plant began operation, the Missouri Department of Natural Resources has received hundreds of odor complaints against RES, including over 500 in 2004 and 2005 alone. DNR receives far more complaints against RES than any other entity in the entire state of Missouri. From Nov. 1, 2005 through Nov. 30, 2005, there were 75 odor complaints to DNR in all of Missouri. Of these 75 complaints, over 40 were made against RES for odor emissions. From March 1, 2007 through March 15, 2007, there were 52 odor complaints statewide. Over 37 of these complaints were levied against RES for odor emissions. The location of these complaints also indicates that the offensive and noxious odor reaches most of the northern one-half of the city of Carthage.
The RES plant has repeatedly been cited by the Missouri Air Conservation Commission and Missouri Department of Natural Resources for violating the Missouri Air Conservation Laws.


The lawsuit asks for compensatory damages, punitive damages, interest, attorneys' fees, injunctive relief and costs in bringing the action.

No comments: