By Annelise Hanshaw
Last year, bills that sought to ban critical race theory spurred a Democratic filibuster in the Senate as opponents predicted “unintended consequences” that would remove parts of history from the classroom.
The bill discussed Tuesday, sponsored by Warrensburg Republican Sen. Denny Hoskins (pictured), would allow Missouri’s attorney general to investigate compliance and would revoke half of a district’s state funding if a violation were found.
Hoskins, who is running in the Republican primary for secretary of state, told committee members his bill is not “trying to erase history.”
“We’re not saying that you can’t talk about history,” he said. “What we’re trying to do is say that, ‘Hey, just because you’re white, or you’re Black, that doesn’t make you automatically a racist. That doesn’t automatically mean that you think one way or another way.’”
Critical race theory, Hoskins argued, would label each of the white committee members and those that testified “a racist” and “an oppressor” because of their skin color.
Critical race theory, according to a Columbia News article, is the study of how racism has affected United States society and law.
Hoskins’s bill bars instruction of “divisive concepts,” which it defines as concepts that teach that “the United States is fundamentally racist or sexist.” or that “any individual should feel discomfort, guilt, anguish, or any other form of psychological distress on account of his or her race or sex.”
No one testified in support of the legislation at Tuesday’s hearing.
Sharon Geuea Jones, a lobbyist for the Missouri NAACP and the LGBTQ advocacy group PROMO, tied similar efforts in recent years to increased violence toward Black students.
“We have to have these hard discussions. We have to have them in our educational sessions, and they have to be done in a way that is sensitive to everyone involved,” she said. “I don’t want any children, white, Black or otherwise, to feel like they are targeted by their peers.”
State Sen. Doug Beck, a Democrat from Affton, said he doesn’t like “the entire bill,” but noted that he had a particular qualm.
“My biggest issue right now is the last page of it giving the attorney general any type of power because the last two attorneys general have abused their office,” he said.
Beck said he was worried it would fuel attacks against public schools on social media.
Otto Fajen, a lobbyist for the Missouri branch of the National Education Association, said the bill could have consequences for already strained teacher recruitment and retention efforts.
“It is not so much the specifics of the bill itself, but the collateral damage it causes to, first, the desire to be in that space, to be a classroom teacher to devote your life to that while knowing that you’re going to have state laws basically communicating that the legislature has concerns about your professional judgment,” he said.
Fajen said education is important to democracy, and he worries teachers may pull back on more curriculum than the bill requires.
“This causes teachers to look at the topics that are most central to our public schools being a place where these informed discussions can be had,” he said, “and says, for fear of your livelihood, for fear of retaliation, for fear of all sorts of things that might happen: don’t delve deep into these discussions.”
The committee did not take action on the bill Tuesday.
6 comments:
Republicans are so disgusting
Democratic politicians generally want to do things to help people.
Republican politicians generally want to do things to people. Lock them up, ban their speech, lock them up for their speech, ban their birth control, arrest them for birth control, etc. Their evil plans are clear at this point. They seem to get a thrill about talking about them.
Racist fear-mongers=MAGAts
FACTS
9:21 You have just described Benny Baker. Read Randy's latest legislation of his.
The rodentlicans need a lobotomy between now and November. Otherwise, we're up schitts creek.
Post a Comment