Saturday, December 21, 2024

Billy Long, Trump’s nominee to lead IRS, touts credential tax experts say is dubious


By Jeremy Kohler and Alex Mierjeski
ProPublica

ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for The Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox.

Former U.S. Rep. Billy Long of Missouri, whom President-elect Donald Trump has named his nominee to head the IRS, touts his expertise in tax matters.

He advertises his credential as a certified tax and business advisor, and he adds CTBA to his name on his X profile. That profile encourages people to message him to “save 40% on your taxes.”







But tax experts told ProPublica that they have never heard of CTBA as a credential in the tax profession. The designation is offered by a small Florida firm, Excel Empire, which was established just two years ago and only requires attendance at a three-day seminar. That is in stark contrast to the 150 credit hours and the rigorous exams required to become a certified public accountant, a standard certification for tax accountants.

In most tax cases, only lawyers, CPAs and enrolled agents — federally authorized tax practitioners — can represent taxpayers at the IRS.

“The cost of relying on tax advice from somebody that is solely focused on minimizing the tax liabilities that you have — as opposed to somebody that’s focused on both minimizing the tax liabilities and complying with the tax law — can be extraordinarily high if you are found to be in violation of the standards,” said Nathan Goldman, an associate professor of accounting at North Carolina State University.

Excel Empire’s three-day certification course has been advertised for as much as $30,000; its upcoming session is advertised at $4,997. Matthew Pearson, one of its founders, said this summer in a podcast that about 135 people have earned the CTBA designation, which the firm designed to help people without tax backgrounds to become advisors.

Nina Olson, a prominent taxpayer advocate, said that the modern tax industry has seen “a proliferation of different groups and entities that are providing tax advice” and that consumers have no way of knowing who is competent.

“It could just be that you’ve taken a very short course, and paid a large fee for that course, and that gives you the ability to put some initials after your name,” said Olson, who served as the IRS’ national taxpayer advocate from 2001 to 2019. She is now executive director of the Center for Taxpayer Rights, a Washington-based nonprofit that promotes fairness and access to justice in tax systems.

Tax experts said that Long’s years of experience as a real estate agent and as an auctioneer — before spending a dozen years in Congress — pales next to the deep experience in tax policy or management of the people who have held the job. For instance, the current IRS commissioner, Danny Werfel, previously served as acting IRS commissioner and held leadership roles at the Office of Management and Budget. He also worked in the private sector as a managing director at Boston Consulting Group.







Long’s experience in the tax world has been more narrowly focused. In the two years since he left Congress, he worked to bring in customers for at least two firms that marketed the employee retention credit — a pandemic-era benefit designed to support businesses that kept workers despite revenue losses or disruptions caused by COVID-19.

The credit also attracted fraud, eventually landing on the IRS’ “worst of the worst” list for tax scams. Two Democrats on the Senate Finance Committee on Wednesday announced an investigation into the firms, noting Long had neither a “background in tax preparation nor any credential as a licensed accountant, attorney or enrolled agent.”

Worth up to $28,000 per employee, the credit was available for the 2020 and 2021 tax years and has been widely used by both for-profit companies and nonprofit organizations across the country. However, the IRS raised significant concerns about aggressive promoters pushing ineligible businesses to file questionable claims. Red flags included inflated payroll numbers, claims for all quarters without proper eligibility or citing minor government orders that did not directly impact business operations.

The IRS says it has recovered over $1 billion from businesses that voluntarily reported improper claims. And it has launched hundreds of criminal investigations to try to recoup what it says could be billions of dollars more.

In a prepared statement in November, Werfel said businesses should review their claims and see if they were misled by firms marketing the tax credit.

“They should listen to trusted tax professionals, not promoters,” he said.

In a 2023 podcast discussing his work for the two firms, Long joked that he had a hat bearing the name of the credit glued to his head. He said his work marketing the tax credit had caused some clients to question their CPAs’ advice.







“Hey, this auctioneer, real estate broker, former congressman told me I’m going to get $1.2 million back,” he said. “Uh, you’re my CPA. Why didn’t you tell me that?” And he said the response of CPAs would be: “That’s a joke. That’s a fake deal. That’s not true. You’re going to have to pay all that money back. You’ll get audited.”

But he said the firms he worked for had never seen the IRS turn down one of their claims.

There is no evidence that either Excel Empire, Long or the firms that he worked for — Lifetime Advisors of Hudson, Wisconsin, and Commerce Terrace Consulting of Springfield, Missouri — engaged in wrongdoing. In the same 2023 podcast, Long emphasized he and his colleagues had helped only taxpayers who were entitled to the benefit.

Neither Long, Lifetime Advisors nor Commerce Terrace Consulting responded to requests for comment.

If Long is confirmed and succeeds Werfel, he’ll have the power to influence how Americans pay their taxes and how the federal government collects revenue. Trump has promised to end IRS “overstepping,” while Republicans have said that they would slash billions of dollars in funding passed under the Biden administration to modernize the IRS and enhance tax enforcement.

The IRS and the Trump transition team did not respond to requests for comment.

During his time representing Southwest Missouri in Congress, Long pursued legislation to abolish the IRS and establish a national sales tax. Billionaire Elon Musk, a Trump advisor, recently asked on X if the agency’s budget should be “deleted.”

Like Long, members of Excel Empire suggest that accountants don’t feel it is their role to save their clients money because they prioritize compliance over planning and are too busy during tax season to discuss strategies. The company’s website claims the firm has saved taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars.

Edward Lyon, who is listed on Excel Empire’s website as chief tax planner and tax attorney, writes on his personal website that the seven most expensive words in the English language are “My CPA takes care of my taxes.”







Lyon elaborated on a podcast last year, noting that accountants “generally are rule followers,” but when it comes to lawyers, “we are trained to understand the rules but we’re trained to stretch the rules and bend the rules and poke at the rules and do an end run around the rules. It's a much more proactive focus.” Still, he has consistently emphasized that his company acts “legally, ethically and morally.”

The company’s co-founder, Pearson, once described Lyon on a podcast as the “preeminent proactive tax attorney in the country.” Lyon and Pearson declined to comment.

The Ohio Supreme Court suspended Lyon’s law license in 2005 for failing to meet registration and fee requirements on time, and he hasn’t regained it. He also does not appear to be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an investment advisor.

Despite this, Lyon says he has trained tens of thousands of tax and finance professionals. As the author of several books and a column, he claims to be one of the country’s most widely read tax strategists and commands speaking fees of $15,000 and first-class travel arrangements.

Lyon has also developed several tax certification programs. On the Excel Empire website, some officers, including Pearson, use a title created by Lyon: tax master.

Appearing on another podcast, Lyon discussed how small businesses can be used as tax shelters. As an example, he asked the host, Heather Wagenhals — who also carries the CTBA title — if she had a swimming pool at her home, where she records her show.

“I do,” Wagenhals said. “That’s why I picked this one.”

Lyon responded: “All right, so I’m gonna rock your world in five words, ready? On-premises employee athletic facility.”

“Oh my God!” Wagenhals said.

Lyon added: “It’s really there in the tax code, and nobody’s told you that.”

In another podcast, Pearson brags about firing an accountant who balked at his request for advice about how to use a new Corvette “to keep from paying taxes.”

Olson said that attitude was disturbing and that simplistic answers can create problems for taxpayers in IRS audits and in the courts. “A swimming pool in someone’s home, even if employees are working in the home and using it, still would require the court to look at the percentage of employee use versus personal use — and they would look really closely at that,” she said.

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

Anyone dumb enough to listen to Billy...

Anonymous said...

So in other words, trump is appointing a kindergartner to do brain surgery. Just like an ignorant electorate who voted for a reality show, 34x charged felon to become president. There's alot wrong with that picture. Are you all really that stupid?

Anonymous said...

We have got to simplify our Taxes and the Tax Process. The Government gives you 3.5 Months (January 1st to April 15th) just to File your Taxes and then an additional 6-Month Extension till (October 15th) to file your Taxes. That is 9.5 Months to File your Taxes. This is way to Time Consuming, Technical, and Cost Consumers to much.

What if we had a Flat Tax - where even a First Grader could file their Taxes.
Flat Tax Calculation - Gross Income * .17% (Flat Tax) = Income Tax to Pay. Simple!

Consumption Tax - Consumption tax on goods and services is calculated by multiplying the tax base by the tax rate
Flat Tax Calculation - Item Cost * .15% (Consumption Tax) = Income Tax to Pay.

1. Everyone would pay the Exact same Amount - Flat or Consumption Tax.
2. The IRS Employs - 93,654 Employees which we could eliminate the majority of this Bloated Government Organization.
3. The Government would not be Bogged Down Writing and Maintaining Tax Laws - Which would Stop Lobbying and Special Interest Groups for asking and buying influence for their Tax Breaks.
4. The federal tax code is incredibly complex—so complex that it covers 6,871 pages. If you add in the U.S. tax regulations, which are the U.S. Treasury's official interpretation of the tax code, to that, you'd be up to 75,000 pages.

75,000 Pages of Tax Code this is Ridiculous - Who has read and understand all of those Tax Regulations - Why Not Make It Simple, So a First Grader can do your Taxes and Save our Government Billions of Dollars Per Year, while making every Tax Filler Equal when Filing their Taxes. So do we need another Brain Surgeon, CPA, or Lawyer running the IRS - NO - NO - HELL NO!!!

Let's Make Taxes Easy - Remember we Fought for our Independence because of High Unequal Taxes - the Boston Tea Party and the Tea Act were both events that contributed to the American Revolution and the Fight for independence from Britain.

Anonymous said...

1. Everyone would pay the Exact same Amount - Flat or Consumption Tax.

Demonstrate you probably don't comprehend the difference between the taxation rate and the amount of taxes due in one sentence.

Either your words don't mean what you think they do, or you just told us you think Jeff Bezos would pay the same tax as you would under a flat rate scheme.

Anonymous said...

5:47PM - Everyone Would Pay the - Exact same Tax Percentage "%" - OK. OMG - Tax Percentage - Einstein. Of course, You have - NO IDEAS - Just to Complain over a Typo - Just anything to Complain. WHAT IS YOUR IDEA - There are more Facts in those Statement than you can Comprehend.

Everyone would pay the Exact same "Tax Percentage" - % - Flat or Consumption Tax. Just pick the Percentage - % Rate - Of Course Jeff Bezos / Elon Musk - Would pay more especially with Consumption Tax - They use their Stock Valuations to Borrow Money against, so they take No Salary or Little Salary to lower their Tax Bills - this is one of many Tax Breaks that the Rich use to Pay very little Income Taxes. If you can Understand that?

Again, Stop worrying about a TYPO and worry about why we pay so many Taxes and is there a Better, Easier, Faster, and Cheaper Way to Calculate Taxes that would make it Equal across the Board for all Americans.

As of November 22, 2024, Warren Buffett was ranked sixth on the list of the world's richest people, with a net worth of $148.3 billion.

Debbie Bosanek, Warren Buffett's secretary since 1993, was in a town hall meeting with Warren a few years ago - Warren stated that - Bosanek pays a tax rate of 35.8 percent of income, while Buffett pays a rate at 17.4 percent.

I believe in Capitalism and Paying Taxes, but the Rich can engage in Rooms full of Accountants, Rooms full of Attorneys - to find every Loophole in the 75,000 Pages of Tax Code - that the Average American can neither Afford or every have the Opportunity to utilize - So do we need a Brain Surgeon, another CPAs, or High Priced Attorneys running the IRS or do we need a Simple 5-Minute Tax Form that uses a "Flat Tax Percentage or Consumption Tax Percentage - So that every American Pays their Fair Share and their Fair Percentage - Across the Board - WHY OH WHY - Can't we make things Simple that Save Billions of Dollars and Months of Labor, and Free the Legislation to concentrate on other important issues - - or we can keep adding to the 75,000 Pages of Tax Code - Similar to our every Increasing National Debt -
of $36,168,710,327,411 Trillion Dollars???

Anonymous said...

Keep Shouting.

No One Cares!

Anonymous said...

President Dwight David Eisenhower, perhaps the last real Republican, had a 90 percent tax rate for the super rich during his administration.

Eisenhower explained it this way: The super rich could avoid the high taxes by investing their money in things that make America stronger. If they wanted to avoid high taxes, he said they could invest in business expansions and higher employee wages. They could give a million or two to tax-exempt non-profits that feed, house and clothe poor people of America, among other things. By Dave Peyton
Published 12:28 AM CST, January 31, 2019

Randy said...

I'm sure there are some I have missed, but guys, I am deleting any comment where you make derogatory comments about other commenters. I was hoping you would get the message, but I am still deleting more comments than I am publishing. If you can't make a comment with attacking someone, please don't make any comments at all. I am also automatically deleting any comments that make reference as to whether I will allow the comment or not.

Anonymous said...

7:33AM - It is only Words of Wisdom to people that can understand that Taxes are one of the most important things to your Financial Future - But you may not understand how important it is to convert to a Flat or Consumption Tax to simply and Save Time and Money. If you are on the Government Roles and as long as you get your Monthly Stipend you are just fine - the rest of us Hard Working Americans - would like to Retire with a Healthy Nest Egg - So Tax Savings are Very Important -

3:26PM - The claim that the top 1% of earners in the 1950s paid a 91% tax rate is based on the statutory top marginal tax rate, which was indeed 91% at its peak. However, this figure does not reflect the actual effective tax rate paid by most of the top earners, as the tax system then, like now, included numerous deductions, exemptions, and loopholes. The effective tax rate (the actual percentage of income paid in taxes after deductions) was much lower than the marginal rate.

1950s: The number of people actually paying the top 91% rate was minuscule, likely fewer than 10,000 households in a country of over 150 million people. Most wealthy individuals managed to pay a lower effective rate through deductions.

Again, a Flat Tax Percentage or Consumption Tax Percentage - Would allow a more Fair and Standard Rate / Percentage across all Income or Usage Levels - Everyone would pay the same Tax Percentage - making it so simple to calculate even - 7:33AM would be Shouting - "I CARE"...

Anonymous said...

Agaiin Flat tax is Regressive!

Anonymous said...

During the Eisenhower era, high tax rates incentivized charitable giving, benefiting various institutions. While the corporate tax rate was not as high as sometimes claimed, it still reached up to 52%, and individual income tax rates for top earners exceeded 90%. This tax structure encouraged both corporations and wealthy individuals to donate to charitable causes.
Key Beneficiaries
Religious Organizations: Churches saw less of a decline in donations compared to other charities, even when tax policies changed in later years2. This suggests that religious institutions were significant beneficiaries of charitable giving during the Eisenhower era.
Educational Institutions: Universities and schools likely received substantial donations, as education has traditionally been a major focus of charitable giving in the United States.
Social Welfare Organizations: With the booming post-war economy and emphasis on social programs, organizations focused on poverty alleviation, healthcare, and community development likely saw increased support.
Research and Development: High corporate tax rates created incentives for businesses to invest in research and development, which could be deducted from taxable earnings. This indirectly benefited scientific institutions and technological advancement.
Long-term Impact
The high tax rates of the Eisenhower era contributed to a more equitable distribution of wealth. In 1955, Fortune magazine noted that the incomes of the top 0.01% of Americans were less than half of what they had been in the late 1920s5. This redistribution of wealth likely benefited a wide range of charitable institutions and social programs.
It's important to note that while tax policies significantly influence charitable giving, the relationship is complex. Some data suggests that charitable giving has increased in real terms even as top tax rates have fallen in more recent decades. However, the Eisenhower-era tax policies created a strong incentive structure that encouraged substantial charitable contributions and investments in societal development.