Saturday, March 03, 2007

Former Springfield legislator lands first lobbying clients


Former State Representative and unsuccessful state auditor candidate Mark Wright, R-Springfield, has landed his first two clients as one of Jefferson City's newest lobbyists.
Documents on file with the Missouri Ethics Commission show Wright is representing the Missouri State Chiropractors Association and the Brown Lobby Firm LLC/Missourians for a Better Economy. Both clients were added Feb. 23, according to the document.

Andrew Blunt's remarkable streak continues

In what is probably the most remarkable streak any Missouri lobbyist has ever seen, Andrew Blunt has once again filed a no-expenditure report with the Missouri Ethics Commission.
According to the report, Blunt spent no money on wining, dining, and otherwise plying state legislators during the month of January, continuing a streak which has lasted through 2005 and 2006.
Obviously, there must he some other reason why Blunt's high-powered clients keep hiring him.

Post editorial: Firing of Cummins, other U.S. attorneys mismanaged

The firestorm over the axing of eight U. S. attorneys, including Bud Cummins of Arkansas, continues with an editorial in today's Washington Post saying it was mismanaged:

The department and Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales have served themselves and the public poorly with their ham-handed, hide-the-ball handling of the dismissals. "I would never, ever make a change in a U.S. attorney position for political reasons," Mr. Gonzales assured the Senate Judiciary Committee -- only to have Deputy Attorney General Paul J. McNulty acknowledge that the U.S. attorney in Little Rock, Bud Cummins, was ousted to make way for J. Timothy Griffin, a political ally of White House adviser Karl Rove. The revelation that all but one of the other U.S. attorneys had received positive to glowing performance reviews appeared to undercut the assertion that the prosecutors had been removed for "performance-related" reasons.


Of course, Cummins was also right in the middle of an investigation into the awarding of license fee offices in Missouri when he was fired.

Friday, March 02, 2007

Farm Bureau president supports ousted ag director

Missouri Farm Bureau President Charles Kruse issued a statement of support Thursday for fired Agriculture Director Fred Ferrell:

Anyone who knows Fred Ferrell personally, as I do, knows him to be a visionary individual who exemplifies competence, strength and integrity. Fred has dedicated his life and career to Missouri agriculture, and for that we all owe him and his family a great deal of gratitude.


Kruse makes no mention of the tawdry circumstances that led to Ferrell's dismissal. Apparently Kruse, who once held the agriculture director position, believes that agriculture is a man's world.

Cummins to testify before House subcommittee

Former U. S. Attorney H. E. Cummins, one of eight who was fired by the Bush Administration in recent months, will testify before a House Judiciary subcommittee Tuesday, according to an article in today's New York Times.
Cummins was fired despite excellent job reviews. His firing came during a time in which he was investigating the methods used by Governor Matt Blunt's administration to award license fee office contracts in Missouri:

Syndicated columnist offers views on intellectual diversity

The Emily Brooker Intellectual Diversity Act in Missouri is just one of a number of similar efforts across the United States. The act is named for the former Missouri State University student who sued the university after a professor forced her and other students to write letters to the state legislature promoting gay adoption.
Supposedly, the idea is to allow all ideas, conservative and liberal, to be allowed on colleges and universities, though critics of the proposal claim it is an effort to shut out liberal viewpoints.
Syndicated columnist Jeff Emanuel offers a different take. Referring to a similar proposal in Georgia, Emanuel writes:

On the surface, these seem like admirable enough goals. What measures, though, would actually be put into place should HB 154 pass – and would the passage of this legislation serve as an end in itself, or would it only encourage government to further legislate the thoughts and actions of those on this nation’s college campuses? For, regardless of whether or not this bill would actually provide a temporary respite for conservatives students and faculty who have long had to struggle to get by in an environment which is predisposed toward modern liberalism, there is the worrisome prospect that HB 154 is simply the first step in a process to legislate the actions and, more importantly, the thoughts of those who inhabit America’s "marketplaces of ideas."

State audit set for Agriculture Department


Missouri State Auditor Susan Montee will conduct an audit of the Agriculture Department following State Treasurer Sarah Steelman's announcement she had stopped payment on a $70,000 payoff check to a former employee who charged Director Fred Ferrell with sexual harassment:

State Treasurer Sarah Steelman's office said Tuesday that the check had been authorized Feb. 5 out of an Agriculture Department fund for "equipment and expenses" and processed by the treasurer's office two days later. State departments routinely certify that their own payments are proper.

"I have questions about the way this was done," said Montee, a Democrat. "One of the issues surrounds the approval of expenditures."

Ferrell was forced to resign Monday at Gov. Matt Blunt's request.

Thursday, March 01, 2007

Emery: Buckling up is a personal choice


Count Rep. Ed Emery, R-Lamar, as one of those who will oppose a law which would allow officers to arrest drivers for not wearing their seatbelt, even absent of any other violations.
According to an article in the Feb. 13 St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Emery said:

"I don't get into a car without putting on my seat belt, but the government doesn't have a right to force people to buckle up," said Rep. Ed Emery, R-Lamar. "It's an education issue, not an enforcement issue."


Proponents of the bill offered a different thought:

The cost of treating an unbuckled person injured in an accident, including $10 million a year in Medicaid statewide, make primary seat belt laws needed, said Dr. Douglas Schuerer, director of trauma at Barnes-Jewish Hospital in St. Louis. "Society, the hospital, the victim's family, they all pay when someone who isn't wearing their seat belt gets injured," Schuerer said.

Chatter: Brooker continues to hog the spotlight

Former Missouri State University student Emily Brooker won her lawsuit against the university, but she can't give up her time in the spotlight.
That's the way Ron Davis sees it as Miss Brooker testified this week for the bill named in her honor, HB 213 , the so-called Emily Brooker Intellectual Diversity Act. Davis notes that the bill's supporters, including sponsor Jane Cunningham, R-Chesterfield, and co-sponsor Marilyn Ruestman, R-Joplin, are more interested in limiting diversity than in increasing it:

Take "intellectual diversity." Under the Brooker Act, it's defined as "the foundation of a learning environment that exposes students to a variety of political, ideological, religious, and other perspectives."

C'mon. Do you really believe they mean it? A "variety" would include perspectives from across a broad spectrum. Brooker and her supporters in the Missouri General Assembly want to squelch perspectives that differ from their point of view. They're pushing for less diversity, not more. That's anything but intellectual.

News Leader editorial: Brooker bill is waste of time

An editorial in today's Springfield News-Leader says the Emily Brooker Intellectual Diversity Act, named for the former Missouri State University student who sued the school after her social work professor required her and other students to write letters urging legislators to support gay adoption, is a waste of time.
According to the editorial, the bill, which is sponsored by Rep. Jane Cunningham, R-Chesterfield, and co-sponsored by Marilyn Ruestman, R-Jopln, "should die a quick death on the House floor. In fact, we suggest it shouldn't last any longer than the Emily Brooker controversy at Missouri State University lasted — about a week."

The editorial notes:

Cunningham's bill is purely an attempt to brand universities as bastions of liberalism and force them into unnecessary state-controlled remediation that might make a few legislators feel good but will do nothing to further the goals of better educating our young people.


The university already has a system in place to deal with this kind of situation, the editorial says. I might add that it seems strange for members of a political party which constantly decries unnecessary bureaucracy and government paperwork is supporting a bill which would add even more unnecessary paperwork.

Apparently, bureaucracy is all right if it enables you to kiss up to your political base.