Friday, July 17, 2026

Ellen Nichols puts another $100,000 into her campaign; Medical PAC contributes another $100,000 to PAC supporting Nichols


One day after Ellen Nichols put $100,000 of her own money into her 32nd District State Senate campaign, saying she had to do because her primary opponent, Sen. Jill Carter accepted money from gambling and labor interests, the Stand For Truth PAC that supports Nichols' candidacy received a $100,000 contribution from the Missouri State Medical Association PAC.

The source of the money from the medical association PAC won't be available until the PAC files its quarterly disclosure report in October.

In its most recent report, which was filed July 7, the PAC contributed the maximum $2,400 to the Nichols campaign but ended the quarter with only $65,483 in the bank, indicating the $100,000 likely came from a single source and was designated for Nichols' support PAC.







Nichols loaned her campaign $250,000 earlier.

The following news release was issued by the Nichols campaign Thursday:

Dr. Ellen Nichols announced today that she is contributing $100,000 of her own money to her campaign for State Senate, responding to a surge of $217,000 in out-of-district special interest money that has poured into Sen. Jill Carter's committees in just the last two weeks.

Missouri Ethics Commission records show that of the $635,239 raised by Carter's two committees — Friends of Jill Carter For Senate and her personal Show Me Values PAC — $496,849, or 78 cents of every dollar, came from PACs, corporations, and special interest groups rather than individual voters.

No industry has given Carter more than gambling. Her single largest business donor is an Illinois video gambling company, that has written her PAC $55,000 since February — including two $25,000 checks in June alone. Close behind are St. Louis labor unions: the Mid-America Carpenters Regional Council PAC gave $50,000 on June 30 — the largest single check in her file — four days after the Laborers PAC gave $10,000. None of it came from Jasper or Newton County.

“I have been humbled by the support of my fellow Republicans, my friends, and my former patients,” Nichols said. “But there is no way the citizens of Joplin and Newton County can write checks fast enough to match $217,000 in out-of-district special interest money in two weeks. "So I'm investing in my own campaign to make sure voters hear my vision for this district — freezing property taxes, giving parents a real say in their children's education, and protecting the unborn and private property rights." Just like President Trump funded his own campaign, I will never be beholden to special interests. The only people I'll be beholden to are the voters of this district.”








The gambling money arrives as Carter publicly distances herself from the industry. Appearing on KSN/KODE's “On the Record” this week, Carter said of the video gambling machines her son noticed at a gas station: “Gambling, I'm not a proponent of gambling either. I think as a Christian, that's not something that we really want infiltrated in our communities.”

Her voting record says otherwise. On April 5, 2023, Carter voted for Senate Amendment 11 to Senate Bill 30 — the amendment that would have legalized video lottery terminals statewide and authorized up to three VLT machines per location in truck stops, gas stations, and other retail establishments. The vote is recorded on page 939 of the Senate Journal.

“Jill Carter is in trouble because voters are learning her record — votes to fund billionaires' stadiums, to keep parents out of their kids' education, and against cutting property taxes,” Nichols said. “Now an Illinois gambling company just sent $55,000 to keep a pro-gambling friend in the legislature. Voters can look at the checks and look at her votes and draw their own conclusions.”

Plea agreement calls for no prison time for Aurora teacher charged with sex with student


Former Aurora High School industrial arts teacher Kyle Doss, 33, won't be spending any time in prison after pleading guilty Monday in Lawrence County Circuit Court to an amended charge of harassment in the first degree.

Doss, a Monett resident, was initially charged with sex with a student.

Under a plea agreement with the Lawrence County Prosecuting Attorney's office, Doss was sentenced to four years in prison, the sentence was suspended and he was placed on supervised probation for five years.







The agreement specifies that Doss is to have no contact with his victim and must "surrender all teaching certificates from any state and do not apply for a teaching certificate in the future."

The case against Doss was detailed in the probable cause statement:

On 01/30/2025, I received information from the administrators of the Aurora R-8 School District regarding a teacher having a past inappropriate sexual relationship with a student.

The administration received a report from the victim's mother which prompted the investigation. The teacher was identified as 32-year-old Kyle Doss.

The victim was a student in his industrial arts class from 2021-2024. Doss met with administrators that morning and was placed on administrative leave. During his conversation with school administrators, Doss admitted he had made a mistake.

I interviewed CV on the afternoon 01/30/2025. CV stated she was a sophomore when she first start taking Doss' classes. She and Doss developed a friendly relationship, which eventually became romantic in 2024 during her senior year.

CV explained she and Doss began communicating outside of school, first messaging on Tik Tok, then by phone, then by other social media applications, including Snapchat, Instagram and Facebook. CV stated once she turned 18 during the second semester of her senior year, she and Doss began exchanging sexually explicit photos and videos of one another.








CV explained she began staying after school to visit Doss in his classroom/shop. They would go to a back storage room where they would kiss. CV explained on one occasion, she allowed Doss to put his hands under her shirt and feel both of her breasts over her bra. She stated Doss frequently groped her buttocks and he would press his erect penis into her vaginal area as they embraced one another. CV explained she and Doss planned to have sexual intercourse after she graduated but it never actually happened.

During the interview, CV showed me several messages she exchanged with Doss on Tik Tok. These specific messages began on 04/11/2024. They discussed their romantic fantasies with one another. Doss asked about CV's sexual history. Doss fantasized about taking CV to the back storage room. Doss provided his phone number and asked CV to save his number under a girl's name. They began communicating through text message.

CV explained she and Doss exchanged most of their nude photographs through Snapchat, but she did show me a text message where Doss sent her a shirtless photo.


Thursday, July 16, 2026

Probable cause: Former girlfriend slashes Barry County man's tires, labels him a rapist on Tik-Tok

The Barry County Prosecuting Attorney's office charged a Galena woman with first-degree harassment after she allegedly slashed her ex-boyfriend's tires, threatened to file a report saying he raped her and then posted a Tik-Tok video calling him a rapist.

The initial appearance for Hope E. Daines (DOB 2004) in Barry County Circuit Court is scheduled for 8:30 a.m. August 27.









On 06/29/2026, I, Detective Meyers, interviewed V1 at the Barry County Sheriff's office in reference to harassment.

In the interview, V1 disclosed that he had a relationship with Hope Elizabeth Deines. V1 stated that when he stopped speaking with Hope, she threatened self-harm if he stopped talking to her, and he believes she slashed all four of his tires in December 2025 because of her actions. 

Hope would also arrive at various places that V1 was at uninvited between December 2025 and February 2026.

On 02/04/2026, Hope went to V1's residence and told him that if he did not stay in a relationship with her, she would file a report claiming that he raped her. 








A short time later, Hope filed a report with the Barry County Sheriff's Office accusing V1 of raping her (Refer to case number A26-0163).

On 04/25/2026, Hope began randomly messaging a girl that V1 was speaking to.

In the messages, Hope was inquiring about V1. V1 stated he did not know how Hope obtained the other individual's phone number.

On 05/22/2026, V1 presented a video that Hope had made on TikTok. In the video, it shows a picture of {V1]with the caption "He's a rapist."

V1 stated that because of Hope's actions, he filed for a protection order against her, which was granted.

V1 also stated that Hope caused him emotional distress because of her actions.

Milo man sentenced to 12 years for meth trafficking

Caleb Blaine Stark, Milo, was sentenced to 12 years in prison for methamphetamine trafficking during a hearing today in U. S. District Court in Springfield.

Judge Douglas Harpool assessed five years of supervised release following the completion of the sentence.

Caleb Blaine Stark was arrested during a December 8, 2024 Webb City Police Department traffic stop. A search revealed more than 50 grams of methamphetamine, according to the federal complaint.




Agenda posted for Joplin City Council meeting



 JOPLIN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
MONDAY, JULY 20, 2026
5th FLOOR COUNCIL CHAMBERS
602 S. MAIN ST. JOPLIN MO
6:00 P.M.


1.

Call To Order

Invocation
Pledge of Allegiance of the United States of America
2.

Roll Call

3.

Presentations

1.

RAVENii Cyber Security Presentation

Annual presentation by Tylor Lovette, RAVENii, LLC., to discuss City of Joplin state of cyber security & awareness training.

4.

Finalization Of Consent Agenda

5.

Reports And Communications

6.

Citizen Requests And Petitions

1.

Maurice Filson 

2.

Christopher Wayne Swanton

7.

Public Hearings

8.

Consent Agenda

1.

Minutes Of The July 6, 2026, City Council Meeting 

2.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2026-131

AN ORDINANCE  approving the City of Joplin to enter into an agreement with Blevins Asphalt in the amount of One Hundred Eighty-Four Thousand Six Hundred Sixty-Five and 40/100 Dollars ($184,665.40) for the Mill and Overlay of a portion of the General Aviation Terminal Parking Lot at the Joplin Regional Airport, and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute this agreement by and on behalf of the City of Joplin; and, amending the Annual Budget of the City of Joplin for the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 as adopted by Ordinance 2025-143 on October 20, 2025; and setting an effective date.

Documents:
  1. CB2026-131.PDF
3.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2026-135

AN ORDINANCE approving an agreement with Cunningham Investment Properties, LLC, to provide sanitary sewer service to a tract of land located East of Coyote Drive and north of I-44 HWY in Newton County, Missouri, authorizing the City Manager, or his designee to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin; and setting a date when this ordinance shall become effective.

Documents:
  1. CB2026-135.PDF
4.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2026-136

AN ORDINANCE approving Work Authorization OLS-OC-26-03 with Olsson in the not to exceed amount of Three Hundred Nine Thousand Five Hundred Ten and 00/100 dollars ($309,510.00) for professional engineering services for the Davis Boulevard Improvements project and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin; and setting a date when this Ordinance shall become effective.

Documents:
  1. CB2026-136.PDF
5.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2026-270

AN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance No. 2022-119, passed by the Council of the City of  Joplin, Missouri, August 1, 2022, by removing from District C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) and District R-1 (Single-Family Residential) and include in District R-2 (Two-Family Residential) property as described below and generally known as 2601 S Joplin Ave, Jasper County, Missouri.

Documents:
  1. CB2026-270.PDF
6.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2026-272

AN ORDINANCE establishing grades and accepting the Final Plat of the Prospect Village Addition located near the Southeast corner of Geneva Ave and 20th St, in the City of Joplin, Jasper County, Missouri.

Documents:
  1. CB2026-272.PDF
7.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2026-450

AN ORDINANCE authorizing a Program Services Contract, by and between the State of Missouri, Department of Health and Senior Services, and the City of Joplin, Missouri, for the City of Joplin Health Department to receive compensation, for Thirty Nine Thousand, Nine Hundred Fifty Four Dollars, no cents, ($39,954.00); and, authorizing the City Manager to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin, Missouri; and, setting a date when this Ordinance shall become effective.   

Documents:
  1. CB2026-450.PDF
8.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2026-613

AN ORDINANCE approving a Purchase Order to be issued to SHI/Microsoft, to cover the annual support payment for the financial software and related systems the amount of $247,932.42, was budgeted and approved for FY2026 by Council during the budget process and finalized by Ordinance 2025-143 on October 20, 2025; and establishing a date when it shall become effective.

Documents:
  1. CB2026-613.PDF
9.

Resolutions

10.

Ordinances - Expedited

11.

Ordinances - First Reading

1.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2026-137

AN ORDINANCE authorizing the City of Joplin to enter into an agreement with Lumos Fiber of Missouri,  L.L.C., for the purpose of installing, maintaining and operating facilities for communications related capabilities within the City’s Right-of-Way and ensuring compliance with the City’s requirements of such use of City property; authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute the same by and   on  behalf of the City of Joplin and setting a date when this Ordinance shall become effective.

2.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2026-614

AN ORDINANCE approving the revised Employee Promotion Policy and setting a date when this Ordinance shall become effective.

12.

Ordinances - Second Reading And Third Reading

13.

Unfinished Business

14.

New Business

1.

Vote To Go Into Closed Session, Which Shall Pertain To Legal Action, Causes Of Action, Or Litigation Including A Public Governmental Body And Any Confidential Or Privileged Communications Between A Governmental Body Or Its Representatives And Its Attorneys Pursuant To State Law, And To Discuss Leasing, Purchase Or Sale Of Real Estate By A Governmental Body Where Public Knowledge Of The Transaction Might Adversely Affect The Legal Consideration Thereof, Pursuant To State Law; As Set Forth In Section 610.021 (1) (2) RS MO, As Amended, 2021. This Meeting, Record, And Vote To Be Closed To The Extent Provided By Law. The Council Shall Adjourn At The End Of The Session. 



Purdy man sentenced to 8 years on fentanyl, cocaine, heroin, weapons charges


(From the U. S. Attorney for the Western District of Missouri)

A Purdy, Mo., man was sentenced in federal court for trafficking fentanyl, cocaine, and heroin, and illegally possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime.

Dennis E. McMullen, 69, was sentenced by Chief United States District Judge Brian C. Wimes to eight years in federal prison for possessing fentanyl, cocaine, and heroin with the intent to distribute, and for possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug-trafficking crime, followed by five years of supervised release. McMullen pleaded guilty to the offenses on Sept. 29, 2025.








On July 30, 2024, investigators with the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Ozarks Drug Enforcement Team (ODET), and Barry County, Mo., Sheriff’s Office (BCSO) executed a search warrant on McMullen’s residence following a controlled purchase of fentanyl from McMullen. Investigators searched the residence and discovered various controlled substances, paraphernalia, and a firearm. In the kitchen, investigators seized plastic baggies containing suspected controlled substances, including a baggie located inside a plastic tub of candy, an additional white rock-like substance, and scales.

In the residence’s upstairs bedroom, investigators located a Jennings model J-22 .22 caliber pistol, several boxes of ammunition, and two additional baggies of a white powder-like substance. Investigators also located a bag of a white powder-like substance from the console area of a vehicle parked outside. The suspected controlled substances were sent to a DEA laboratory for analysis, which resulted in the following substances being identified: 8.1 grams of fentanyl and lidocaine; 2.007 grams of fentanyl (found in the tub of candy); 2.169 grams of fentanyl; 2.501 grams of fentanyl and lidocaine; 5.2 grams of fentanyl, lidocaine, and acetaminophen; 31.874 grams of cocaine; .087 grams of fentanyl, heroin, cocaine, lidocaine, and xylazine; and .754 grams of fentanyl, lidocaine, and acetaminophen. 








According to court documents, McMullen has a criminal history that extends back decades, including prior felony convictions for forgery, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, money laundering, and solicitation to kill a federal witness.

This case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Wyatt A. Cross and Supervisory Assistant United States Attorney Jessica R. Eatmon. It was investigated by the United States Drug Enforcement Administration, the Ozarks Drug Enforcement Team, and the Barry County, Mo. Sheriff’s Office.

Agenda posted for Carthage R-9 Board of Education meeting

 







































Webb City R-7 Board accepts resignations of three teachers


During a short meeting Tuesday, the Webb City R-7 Board of Education accepted the resignations of three teachers.

Andrew Doennig, business teacher, baseball coach

Amy Doennig, high school math

Sierra Jacques, third grade teacher at Mark Twain Elementary School.


Missouri State Board of Education seeking to increase its authority


By Annelise Hanshaw

Recently appointed members of the Missouri State Board of Education’s probed the board’s power at its annual retreat Tuesday, repeating a discussion from last year’s workshop but with a new tone.

Under new leadership, the board is seeing how far its authority reaches, intending to test it through rulemaking.

“I do not think there’s a person at this table that wants to hurt a school in a negative way, but we do want to impact them,” board president Brooks Miller said. “It’s all about the child and making sure they are well-educated.”







State law sets up the board as a guiding force for the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education and the Commissioner of Education. The department’s regulations state the board is responsible for “policymaking and general oversight of public education.”

Members are appointed by the governor and confirmed by the state Senate, and there is no requirement for board members to have a background in education. Statute bars members from “being connected as an official or employee” to any K-12 school or higher education institution. Board members oftentimes enter the role with limited knowledge of the department’s functions.

Former board member Pamela Westbrooks-Hodge’s term ended earlier this month and all but one member have been appointed by Gov. Mike Kehoe since he took office last year. And these new members seem eager to break the status quo.

Former education commissioner Karla Eslinger retired in May, and the board’s previous president Mary Schrag stepped down June 2 after serving one year on an expired term. As the board’s two leaders, they reigned in discussion at times when new board members proposed more radical changes.

Interim commissioner of education Stacey Preis has a history working in the department and in education policy positions. Tuesday, she explained department norms and helped steer the board away from some ideas, like lowering the threshold to remove school districts’ accreditation, but allowed for the board to share its thoughts.

One of the discussions centered around the board’s ability to make rules — which isn’t entirely clear.

Last year, board member Mike Matousek from Kansas City asked how the board could initiate the rulemaking process and was largely shut down. Eslinger told him that the board doesn’t write regulations on its own.

The department’s chief legal counsel at the time Sarah Madden said the department can only create rules where they have legislative authority, adding “it is a pretty narrow lane.”

Tuesday, the board was interested in finding where it has leeway to create a regulation.

“In my opinion, the board has rulemaking authority unless it is preempted by federal or state law,” Matousek said. “I think the board in general has very broad authority to do what it wants.”

Meaghan Forck, the department’s newly hired chief legal counsel, said she “did not disagree overall,” but it relies on what permission state law gives.







“We do have a pretty broad rulemaking authority, but there is some temperance there,” she said.

Other proposals discussed during the retreat included changes to the way the board presents its legislative priorities. Matousek said the current model looks more like “position statements.” He’d like to instead propose specific changes to state law, like an idea that came up in its April meeting that would give the board authority to deny charter school applications if members find the proposal fiscally unsound for state funding.

“It doesn’t have to be 20 or 30 issues to start,” he said. “It can be two or three.”

Last year, the board formed committees to spearhead tasks like forming a strategic plan. The committees, made of four or fewer board members, allow them to discuss issues without having to meet publicly.

The board talked about focusing more on committees in the months ahead, allowing members to look at issues in greater detail. One such group looks at the board’s legislative priorities, and another is analyzing the department’s budget.

The board also formed a new committee intended to boost student outcomes and look at low-performance schools.

“We want to make sure that schools have the tools and everybody has what they need to improve,” said Jon Otto, a board member from Kansas City.

He suggested the legislative priorities committee work with lawmakers to enumerate the board’s authority.

“I think if we want to really make change,” Otto said, “we are going to have to roll our sleeves up and become a working board.”

Missouri Independent is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Missouri Independent maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Jason Hancock for questions: info@missouriindependent.com.

Remembering the Lamar Catcher in the Rye controversy

Today is the 75th anniversary of the publication of J. D. Salinger's controversial novel Catcher in the Rye.

I've never read the book and haven't really had any inclination to do so, but in December 1986 when I was editor of the Lamar Democrat, the book, already on the shelves at that time for 35 years, became the center of a controversy that split the Lamar community.

The book was available in the Lamar High School library at that time. I don't know how long it had been there. That's a question that should have been asked, but for some reason I never thought of asking it.

I never was able to quite found out how the situation blew up, but apparently it happened after a parent glanced through the book after a student checked it out and couldn't believe the language being used by the novel's main character Holden Caulfield.








Since my journalism philosophy has always been "nothing succeeds like excess," page one of the next Democrat was completely devoted to Catcher in the Rye.

The controversy came at an opportune time for the newspaper, just a few weeks after we were able to put spot color on our pages for the first time, so we had an illustration of the Catcher in the Rye book, similar to the picture that accompanies this post, on the top left hand corner of page one, done in bright red.

Five articles were placed on page one, two advocating for the removal of the book, two defending it and my article describing the discussion on the subject that took place at the Lamar R-1 Board of Education meeting.








Following that discussion, the board reached a compromise. The book remained in the library. Students could check it out, but they had to ask for it. It was not on the shelf.

It wasn't much of a compromise for those who were arguing against censorship and I always thought it was kind of stamping a scarlet letter (another classic I haven't read) on anyone who had to ask the librarian if they could check out that book.

A couple of students told me later that the first person to ask the librarian for The Catcher in the Rye was the son of a board member who advocated forcefully for the book's removal.

He survived the experience and from all evidence his mind wasn't warped.