Thursday, March 12, 2026

Lamar man pleads guilty to endangering the welfare of a child


(From the Barton County Prosecuting Attorney's Office)

On March 12, 2026, Jeremy R. Vanmeter entered a guilty plea to the class A felony of 1st degree endangering the welfare of a child (death of a child) for events occurring on March 31, 2021, at 600 East 17th, here in Lamar.

Vanmeter was watching his 16-month-old child, and the child was placed in a pack n play. The top of the pack n play was covered with a side rail from a crib, and a computer tower was placed on top of the side rail for weight to keep the child from climbing out of the pack n play.









Approximately 4 hours after placing the child in the pack n play, Vanmeter checked on the child and found the child’s neck was caught between the top of the pack n play and the crib rail and the child was not breathing.

The child was transported to Cox Barton County Hospital where the child was pronounced dead.

Sentencing for Vanmeter has been set for May 14, 2026.


Lawsuit claims man struck, dragged by forklift operator at Lowe's on Range Line

 


In a lawsuit filed today in Jasper County Circuit Court, a man claims he was injured when he was run over by a forklift operator at Lowe's, 2600 S. Range Line Road, Joplin.

The lawsuit was filed by Terry and Teresa Ingle with Terry Ingle accusing Lowe's Home Center of negligence and Teresa Ingle alleging loss of consortium.

From the petition:

At all times relevant hereto, Plaintiff Terry L. Ingle was employed by The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company. In that capacity, his regular job duties required him to work at various retail locations, including the Lowe's Store, to merchandise and maintain Scotts products on behalf of his employer.







At all times relevant hereto, Defendants employed or otherwise utilized the services of a forklift operator (hereinafter the "Operator") at their Store, whose identity is presently unknown to Plaintiff but who is believed to be known as "Dale." At all relevant times, the Operator was acting within the course and scope of his employment and/or agency with Defendants.

On the morning of May 8, 2023, at approximately 9:20 a.m., Plaintiff Terry L. Ingle was performing his regular job duties in and around the parking lot of the Lowe's Store. At that time, Plaintiff was asked by the Operator to assist with forklift operations by "flagging" — a safety procedure in which one person serves as a designated spotter to guide forklift operations and ensure the safety of the surrounding area and personnel.

Plaintiff complied and was properly positioned and performing this safety function at the request of the Operator when, without warning, the Operator negligently drove the forklift directly into Plaintiff from behind with significant force. The impact knocked Plaintiff forward, causing him to become caught on the forks of the forklift, whereupon he was pushed and dragged across the pavement by the negligently operated machinery.

As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing, Plaintiff sustained severe injuries to his right shoulder, left ankle, left wrist, and right knee.

Plaintiff was immediately taken for emergency medical treatment at Freeman Urgent Care on May 8, 2023, where he reported right shoulder pain, left ankle pain, left wrist pain, and right knee pain. He was diagnosed with sprains of the left ankle and left wrist, contusions, and right shoulder pain, and was directed to follow up with orthopedic care.

Plaintiff sustained significant injury to his right shoulder. An MRI performed on June 29, 2023, revealed a full-thickness rotator cuff tear, superior labral tear, and degenerative joint disease of the AC joint, all confirming severe structural damage requiring surgical intervention.








Plaintiff was referred to orthopedic surgeon Dr. Robert K. Lieurance, who determined that surgical repair was necessary. On August 2, 2023, Dr. Lieurance performed arthroscopic surgery on Plaintiff's right shoulder, including arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, synovectomy, extensive debridement, subacromial decompression, and distal clavicle excision, under general anesthesia.

Following surgery, Plaintiff was unable to use his right arm and was placed in a sling for an extended period. He participated in extensive physical therapy at Fyzical Therapy & Balance Centers beginning in June 2023 and continuing through January 2024, both before and after surgery. He further participated in a work hardening program from December 22, 2023, 
through January 19, 2024, to rebuild the strength and endurance necessary to return to his job duties. Plaintiff was released from care on February 19, 2024.

As a result of his injuries, Plaintiff was unable to work from May 8, 2023, through January 3, 2024, a period of approximately 36.58 weeks and suffered lost actual wages.

As a further result of his permanent injuries, Plaintiff has been unable to return to his previous full-time work schedule and is now limited to working only approximately 25 to 28 hours per week, representing a substantial and permanent reduction in his earning capacity that will continue for the remainder of his working life.

Plaintiff has incurred more than $60,000.00 in medical expenses as a result of the forklift accident.

The petition indicates Ingle has lost more than $20,000 in wages.

The Ingles are represented by William Peterson of the Neosho firm of Wood & Peterson, LLC.



Agenda posted for Joplin City Council meeting



 JOPLIN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
MONDAY, MARCH 16, 2026
5th FLOOR COUNCIL CHAMBERS
602 S. MAIN ST. JOPLIN MO
6:00 P.M.



1.

Call To Order

Invocation
Pledge of Allegiance of the United States of America
2.

Roll Call

3.

Presentations

1.

Proposition Police And Fire Presentation 

4.

Finalization Of Consent Agenda

5.

Reports And Communications

1.

News From The Public Information Office 

6.

Citizen Requests And Petitions

1.

Amanda Bearden

2.

Mary Price 

3.

David Lewis

7.

Public Hearings

8.

Consent Agenda

1.

Minutes Of The March 2, 2026, City Council Meeting 

2.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2026-259

AN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance No. 2022-119, passed by the Council of the City of  Joplin, Missouri, August 1, 2022, by removing from District M-2 (Heavy Industrial) and include in C-2 (Central Business) property as described below and generally known as 1721 S Joplin Avenue, Jasper County, Missouri.

Documents:
  1. CB2026-259.PDF
3.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2026-504

AN ORDINANCE approving a Cooperative Agreement among the City of Joplin, Missouri, the Joplin Sports Facility Community Improvement District, and Prospect Village, LLC; and authorizing the City Manager to execute said Agreement on behalf of the City of Joplin, setting a date when this Ordinance shall become effective. 

Documents:
  1. CB2026-504.PDF
4.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2026-505

AN ORDINANCE approving a Cooperative Agreement among the City of Joplin, Missouri, the Woodsonia Marketplace Community Improvement District, and Prospect Village, LLC; and authorizing the City Manager to execute said Agreement on behalf of the City of Joplin, setting a date when this Ordinance shall become effective.

Documents:
  1. CB2026-505.PDF
5.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2026-506

AN ORDINANCE approving the Real Estate Contract by and between the City of Joplin, Missouri, a Municipal Corporation, and Nathanial Dagley, for the sale of one parcel located at East Furnace Street – West of St Louis, totaling approximately 5,525 square feet of land; and authorizing the City Manager to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin; and setting a date when this Ordinance shall become effective.

Documents:
  1. CB2026-506.PDF
6.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2026-507

AN ORDINANCE approving the Real Estate Contract by and between the City of Joplin, Missouri, a Municipal Corporation, and Nathanial Dagley, for the sale of one parcel located at North Street – West of St Louis, totaling approximately 7,225 square feet of land; and authorizing the City Manager to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin; and setting a date when this Ordinance shall become effective.

Documents:
  1. CB2026-507.PDF
9.

Resolutions

10.

Ordinances - Emergency

1.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2026-120

AN ORDINANCE authorizing the acceptance of an agreement by and between the City of Joplin and Crawford, Murphy and Tilly for the Design and Bidding Phase services for the Restroom Expansion and Renovation Terminal Standards Update - Phase 1A at the Joplin Regional Airport in the not to exceed amount of Two Hundred Thirty-Four Thousand Six Hundred Fifty-One and 40/100 Dollars ($234,651.40) authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute this agreement by and on behalf of the City of Joplin; amending the Annual Budget of the City of Joplin for the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 as adopted by Ordinance 2025-143 on October 20, 2025; and containing an emergency clause.

11.

Ordinances - First Reading

1.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2026-112

AN ORDINANCE approving the City of Joplin to enter into an agreement with KCI Construction Company in the amount of One Hundred Twenty-Two Thousand Two Hundred Ninety and 00/100 dollars ($122,290.00) for construction of the Newman Road Bridge Deck Repairs project and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin and setting a date when the Ordinance shall become effective.

2.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2026-115

AN ORDINANCE authorizing the City of Joplin to enter into a work authorization with Allgeier, Martin and Associates, Inc. for Professional Engineering Consulting Services in the not to exceed amount of Four Hundred Thirty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($430,000.00) for the Shoal Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Final Clarifier Addition and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin; and, setting a date when this Ordinance shall become effective.

3.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2026-116

AN ORDINANCE authorizing the City of Joplin to enter into a work authorization with Allgeier, Martin and Associates, Inc. for engineering consultation services in the not to exceed amount of Ninety-Eight Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($98,000.00) for the Wastewater Treatment Plants Electrical Upgrades and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin; and, setting a date when this Ordinance shall become effective.

4.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2026-117

AN ORDINANCE authorizing the City of Joplin to enter into a work authorization with Allgeier, Martin and Associates, Inc. for engineering consultation services in the not to exceed amount of Eighty-Eight Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($88,000.00) for the Wastewater Treatment Plants Lime Silo and Digester Roof Rehabilitation Project and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin; and, setting a date when this Ordinance shall become effective.

5.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2026-508

AN ORDINANCE    approving an agreement for banking and depository services by and between Commerce Bank and the City of Joplin, Missouri, for Commerce Bank to provide banking and depository services to the City of Joplin; authorizing the City Manager to execute said agreements; and setting a date when this Ordinance shall become effective.

6.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2026-606

AN ORDINANCE approving the purchase of annual insurance premiums from multiple insurance carriers to provide property, casualty and liability coverage for the City of Joplin; authorizing the City Manager to execute said agreement; and setting a date when this Ordinance shall become effective.

12.

Ordinances - Second Reading And Third Reading

13.

Unfinished Business

14.

New Business

1.

Certification Of Results For Referendum Petition No. 2026-001-R (Annexation) 

Petition to Repeal Ordinance No. 2026-041 (Annexation)

2.

Certification Of Results For Referendum Petition No. 2026-002-R (Rezoning) 

Petition to Repeal Ordinance No. 2026-042 (Rezoning)

3.

Vote To Go Into Closed Session, Which Shall Pertain To Legal Action, Causes Of Action, Or Litigation Including A Public Governmental Body And Any Confidential Or Privileged Communications Between A Governmental Body Or Its Representatives And Its Attorneys Pursuant To State Law, As Set Forth In Section 610.021 (1) RSMo, As Amended, 2020. This Meeting, Record, And Vote To Be Closed. Council Shall Adjourn At The End Of The Session. 


Six Webb City R-7 teachers resign


The Webb City R-7 Board of Education accepted resignations from six teachers at its most recent meeting:

Brooke Bundy, physical education and assistant girls basketball coach

Nathan Hulstine, junior high multi-media teacher

Alison Johnson, teacher at Madge T. James Kindergarten Center

Elizabeth Beaver, third grade teacher at Mark Twain Elementary







Kristen Gavenda, fourth grade teacher at Eugene Field Elementary

Lisa Stanley, kindergarten teacher at Bess Truman Primary Center.

***

Andrew Campbell was hired as.a social studies teacher and assistant wrestling coach.

Bipartisan group of lawmakers, religious leaders call for an end to Missouri death penalty


By Steph Quinn

There are 32 attorneys, investigators and specialists in the Missouri State Public Defender Office dedicated to preventing the wrongful execution of innocent people on death row.

The agency spends almost $3 million each year on salaries for these personnel, said Matthew Crowell, director of Missouri’s public defender system.

“We’re also using 16 of my best and most experienced attorneys to handle 11 cases out of 90,000,” Crowell said.







Guards, parole officers and other corrections staff also spend years of their working lives alongside Missourians who are sentenced to death — supervising them in the visiting room and locking them up for bad behavior.

And these staff “are still watching the state take the life of that person,” said Dr. Heidi Moore, executive director of Missourians to Abolish the Death Penalty and a former institutional parole officer in Potosi Correctional Center.

As Missouri lawmakers this week once again consider a bill that would abolish the death penalty, religious leaders, advocates and a former lawmaker urged them to heed the financial and human costs of capital punishment in the state.

The bill, sponsored by Republican state Rep. Jim Murphy of St. Louis County, would mandate a sentence of life imprisonment without parole for people convicted of first degree murder or other serious crimes. It would not alter the sentences of Missourians already on death row.

Lawmakers have sponsored similar bills in each of the past five years. Murphy’s bill did not get a committee hearing last year.

Since 1973, at least 202 people nationwide have been exonerated after being sentenced to death, according to the Death Penalty Information Center. In Missouri, four people have been acquitted or had their charges dropped after receiving the death sentence since 1999.

“The state, frankly, makes mistakes,” Murphy told reporters.

But it was the experience of a victim’s family that led Murphy to change his position on the death penalty, he said.

During his first run for office eight years ago, he spoke with a man who witnessed the killing of his parents in their house as a child.

The man opposed the death penalty because the mandatory appeals process for capital sentences delayed closure for him and his family, Murphy said. Missouri law requires the state Supreme Court to review all death sentences, giving the court the choice of affirming the trial court’s sentence, re-sentencing or remanding the case to the lower court.








“The next 15 years, over and over and over again, he and his family were dragged back to court, appeal after appeal after appeal,” Murphy said.

The man told Murphy the state should do away with the death penalty.

“We can’t continue to relive this,” he told Murphy.

Financial and human cost

Two religious leaders testified in support of the bill, citing the sanctity of life and urging against irreversible punishment.

Archbishop Mitchell Rozanski of the Archdiocese of St. Louis described the death penalty as “an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the human person” and quoted Pope John Paul II, who during a 1999 trip to St. Louis urged the abolition of the death penalty and called on people to be “unconditionally pro-life.”

The death penalty, Rozanski said, also “deprives the offender of the opportunity of redemption.”

Advocates and members of the legal team for Lance Shockley — a man who was convicted in 2009 of murdering a Missouri State Highway patrolman, insisted on his innocence and was executed in October — argued last year that his work as a mentor to fellow inmates in Potosi should have qualified him to continue that role while incarcerated.

Republican state Rep. Barry Hovis of Whitewater said he was concerned that there would be no possibility of meaningful consequences for people sentenced to life without parole who might kill a fellow incarcerated person or guard.

“They’re not going to be able to get to double life without parole,” Hovis said.

Clifton Davis, representing Missouri Justice Coalition, told committee members that while he was an inmate in the state’s Department of Corrections, most of the men he met who had received death sentences were housed in the honor dorm as a reward for good behavior.

“Yes, men on death row violated the rules, like all of us violate the rules, but I don’t know a single case of a man on death row killing anyone,” Davis said. “I do know individuals who were not on death row that have killed other offenders while they were serving sentences that were parolable.”

The Rev. Brian Kaylor, a Baptist minister from Jefferson City, encouraged lawmakers to “do what’s best for the state.”

“What is actually justice?” Kaylor asked. “What is actually fiscally responsible? What is actually going to work?”

Crowell, of the state public defender’s office, told lawmakers that abolishing the death penalty would allow his agency to devote more resources to other cases and services that could keep people out of the criminal justice system.








“I’d be able to reassign the capital attorneys and staff to our many non-death penalty clients throughout the state and to recidivism-reducing programs,” Crowell said. “…Missourians would get far more value for their dollar.”

But Republican state Rep. Jim Kalberloh of Lowry City said victims’ families should be able to express to prosecutors if they want to pursue the death penalty.

While that’s ultimately the prosecutor’s choice, Crowell said, prosecutors often look to families’ wishes for guidance.

“That’s the way it should be,” Kalberloh said. “If they don’t want [the death penalty], then we ought not to do that. If they do want it, I don’t know that I want to take that choice away.”

Davis said what he hears from supporters of the death penalty is always, “what about the victims?”

“Well,” he said, “there’s a lot of things we could do to reduce victims.”

Prospects

The bill has bipartisan support that spans both legislative chambers.

Democratic state Rep. Steve Butz of St. Louis told reporters he supports Murphy’s bill, partly because of his experience of his sister’s murder 15 years ago.

Butz’s dad told prosecutors he didn’t want to pursue the death penalty.

“He said, ‘My faith says all life is sacred, even this murderer’s life,’” Butz said.

Republican state Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman of Arnold told reporters that vengeance is not the same as justice. She is sponsoring a bill that would keep judges from deciding on the death penalty in cases when there is a hung jury.

“If we are a pro-life state, and I believe that we are,” Coleman said, “we need to be protecting even those who deserve it the least.”

Deaton plan cuts $51 million out of child care subsidies


By Annelise Hanshaw and Steph Quinn

Every child who starts at Lemay Child and Family Center in St. Louis County receives a developmental screening during their first month of attendance.

Based on these screenings, kids can receive speech or occupational therapy at the center, and staff can connect families with community support like help sourcing healthy food.

“The economy right now is just really challenging,” said Denise Wiese, the center’s executive director. “So we feel that those extra supports we give parents and children are really critical.”








More than 60% of the children the center serves qualify for a state subsidy program that helps cover the cost of day care for low-income and foster children.

But if lawmakers approve a proposed $51.5 million cut to that program, Wiese told The Independent, the center could be forced to roll back services or reduce scholarships that make child care more affordable.

The cuts are part of a budget plan laid out by Republican state Rep. Dirk Deaton of Seneca, chairman of the House Budget Committee, that would eliminate incentives the state currently pays on top of the basic child care subsidy rate.

Deaton told the committee the enhancements were created before the state started paying market-rate costs for child care.

“When those were put in place, the rates weren’t, in some cases,100% of market rate,” he said. “In a lot of cases, we’re already paying the market rate. So why would we be paying more than the market rate?”

“Some people think, ‘Okay, that funding just gets cut, and so they still get paid the market rate. They don’t get this extra bit,’” Hanson said. “But it’s not an extra bit to be able to provide that additional therapy or additional support.”








With the cut to their bottom line, child care providers may have to turn families away.

“What decisions do they have to make?” Hanson asked. “Do they have to lay off staff? Do they have to close?… Do they just quit taking foster families?”

Some facilities already hesitate to take on those families, Hanson said, and the proposed cuts would “de-incentivize that even more.”

The cuts come during a period of instability for the program. At the end of 2023, the state changed software providers to manage the subsidy payments, and technical difficulties led to a backlog of missed payments that dragged on for months.

Some day care providers closed under the pressure, and the stress continues today.

Demand for child care subsidies has risen 19% in the past year, exceeding the amount of money appropriated to the program this fiscal year.

With available funds shrinking, the state’s education department launched a waitlist for the program at the beginning of March. Children under state care, like foster children, are exempted from the waitlist. Those who qualify based on their income, though, will have to wait until funds are available.

“Our system is already at or over capacity,” Hanson said. “We don’t have enough resources to serve the children and families that are qualified with this current [funding] structure.”

Despite mounting pressure, providers are expected to see a long-awaited change in the way subsidies are paid that state officials promise will be initiated by this summer.

Currently, child care providers submit attendance logs and are reimbursed based on the number of days subsidy children are in their care. In May, the department plans to pay subsidies at the beginning of the month based on enrollment, not attendance.

Gov. Mike Kehoe championed the switch in his inaugural State of the State address last year.








“We will not allow late payments, or technology issues to put these small businesses at risk of not being able to provide for families in need of child care,” he said.

The governor is still supportive of paying providers based on enrollment, but Deaton’s proposed budget could prevent this change.

Deaton’s budget plan includes instructions to pay “solely on a child’s actual attendance and shall not be made prospectively, on authorization, enrollment, contracted slots or any other non-attendance-based methodology.”

State Budget Director Dan Haug told the House Budget Committee Monday that the state would hold off on paying by enrollment in May if Deaton’s suggestion is signed into law for next fiscal year, which begins in July.

“I don’t think it would make sense to make a change in May and then go back on July 1,” he said. “That would not be good for the providers, moving them around with how they’re being paid.”

Paying on enrollment gives flexibility to providers, Wiese said. A family may need to miss 10 days in a month, but the center can only get paid for five absences.

“If a family wants to spend their day with their child, that’s the best thing for the child,” she said. “If [the state is] paying us based on authorization, that slot is paid for whether that child is here or not.”

With budget amendments forthcoming, Hanson hopes to see edits to benefit child care providers.

“We know that (lawmakers) care about children and families,” she said. “But sometimes these decisions don’t reflect that these [cuts] are going to be really painful for children and families in our state.”

The Independent’s Rudi Keller contributed to this report.

Wednesday, March 11, 2026

Bill clarifying women’s right to divorce while pregnant heads to governor


By Anna Spoerre 

The Missouri Senate unanimously approved legislation Tuesday clarifying that pregnant women can get divorced, making it the first non-budget bill to be sent to Gov. Mike Kehoe this year.

The bill, filed by state Reps. Cecelie Williams, a Republican from Dittmer, and Raychel Proudie, a Democrat from Ferguson, also received unanimous approval in the House last month.

Williams, a domestic violence survivor, first shared her harrowing story of being denied the finalization of a divorce while pregnant when she presented identical legislation last year. 








“The number one cause of death in pregnant women is homicide,” Williams told the Senate Families, Seniors and Health Committee on Monday. “And it’s from partner violence. If we could prevent that by allowing women to leave when they want, we absolutely shouldn’t be creating barriers in situations like that.”

One in six women who experience abuse are first harmed during pregnancy, according to estimates by the March of Dimes. Homicide is the leading cause of pregnancy-related deaths in the United States and among the leading causes in Missouri.

While nothing prevents Missourians from filing for divorce while a party is pregnant, the current statute is interpreted by many courts as preventing the final dissolution of marriage from being issued until after the child is born, so that a custody agreement for that child can first be put into place. 








The same bill died at the eleventh hour last session after it was returned to the House with an amendment proposed by state Sen. Mike Moon, an Ash Grove Republican, that would have required the total alimony amount received be reduced by the amount collected in social security.

Williams on Monday reiterated her belief that the bill will prevent some abortions.

“Where in anything that we stand for as Missourians would we ever allow a woman to have to make that decision,” she said, “to save herself and to sacrifice her child.”

Department of Conservation receives "good" rating in state audit


(From State Auditor Scott Fitzpatrick)

A report released today by Missouri State Auditor Scott Fitzpatrick finds the Missouri Department of Conservation is well managed overall but needs to make improvements to increase its level of transparency. The audit gives the department a "good" rating while also making recommendations to improve certain controls and procedures the department has in place.

"With the level of autonomy the department has over how its funds are used, this audit was conducted to provide accountability and transparency for taxpayers. I am encouraged to see the department is in most regards well managed and following the law, but there are some areas where the department can improve," said Auditor Fitzpatrick. "Our audit gives the department a road map to increase transparency and tighten up some controls and procedures so their policies are fully complied with. I am hopeful the department will take these recommendations seriously and work to put them into place."








One finding in the audit identifies how the Conservation Commission does not clearly identify its workshops as being open to the public, nor does the Commission maintain detailed minutes of the meetings. The workshops are separate from the Commission's regular open meetings, are more informational in nature, and generally include more detailed deliberations of the Commission. The report notes that while the Commission appears to be in compliance with state transparency laws, improvements in meeting disclosures and increased access to workshop discussions would improve transparency to the public. 

The audit also found the department has not consistently applied its salary policy when a promotion creates a salary inequity. The report notes an instance in which an employee was awarded a salary that resulted in a promotional inequity per MDC policy. The MDC Branch Chief and Human Resources Branch Chief reviewed the 6 additional employees in that job title, as required by policy, and also included 8 employees in an unrelated job title. The review resulted in raising the salary of 3 employees with the same job title to the same amount, and raising the salary of another employee with the same job title to a higher amount. However, 2 other employees with the same job title who had salaries lower than these adjusted amounts were not given the raise. Additionally, the MDC increased the salary for 6 of 8 employees in the unrelated job title, which is not in accordance with policy. 








In addition, the audit found the department needs to improve controls and procedures to ensure the Agriculture Crop Policy and Procedures Manual is followed. The report notes the department currently does not provide adequate supervisory review or verification of all required documentation. The department also needs to improve controls and procedures for the timber sales checklist. The report found the department does not follow all of the steps of the checklist as required by the Sale of Forest Products Manual, which has resulted in missing or inconsistent documentation. 

The final finding in the audit documents the failure of the Department of Conservation Employees' Benefit Plan (CEBP) Board of Trustees to implement some prior audit findings related to the administration of the CEBP. The audit found the CEBP does not allocate the proportionate share of personnel costs of MDC employees who administer the CEBP to the CEBP Trust Fund. As a result, these costs were paid from the Conservation Commission Fund rather than the CEBP Trust Fund, and therefore, were not covered by plan premiums. Additionally, the CEBP has not evaluated its Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB) liability amounts, considered prefunding the OPEB liability, or obtained experience studies and audits of actuarial valuations.



The complete audit is available online here.

 

Pittsburg man arrested for Pierce City burglary


(From the Pierce City Police Department)

On 03/05/2026 a theft of motor vehicle parts occurred from a private business located at 202 East Commercial. 

Through our investigation, Officer Vogt identified suspects and the location of stolen property at 100 South Myrtle. The suspect identified as 52 year old Geoffrey Kramer of Pittsburg, Kansas was arrested.







Property has been returned to its rightful owner. Kramer has been given a court date and is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
Thank you to the Lawrence County Sheriff's Office for their assistance.