Wednesday, July 08, 2026

Neosho man charged with fourth DWI


A felony driving while intoxicated  charge was filed Tuesday against a Neosho man with three previous DWI convictions.

Robert Guarino, 62, was cited by the Missouri State Highway Patrol following a crash May 25 on Iris Road near Whispering Pines Road.

From the probable cause statement:

During my contact with Guarino, I formed the opinion that he was intoxicated. This opinion was based on the following:

1) He was involved in a crash. (He crossed the center line of the roadway and traveled off the left side of the road, resulting in overturning.)








2) He admitted to having a few drinks.

3) He displayed physical traits of someone who was intoxicated. His speech was very slurred.

4) He had a very strong odor of intoxicants coming from his breath.

5) Trooper Coleman located a bottle of alcohol. (Known as an airplane shooter.)

6) The odor of alcohol was strong, where he had crashed and inside the ambulance.

7) Guarino was using vulgar language while in the ambulance.








8) He was falling asleep while I was reading his Miranda rights.

Guarino was processed and released at Freeman Hospital. He was assigned a court date of July 22, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. in the Associate Circuit Court of Newton County, in Neosho, Missouri.

According to the complaint, Guarino pleaded guilty to a DWI in 1984 in Jasper County and to two DWIs that occurred one month apart in 2019.

Seneca woman charged with harassment

The Newton County Prosecuting Attorney's Office charged a Seneca woman with harassment Tuesday after the woman allegedly would not stop texting her, threatened to use a voodoo doll on her and sent her information on how to hide a dead body from the police.

The allegations against Krisnie L. Morrow (DOB 1954) are detailed in the probable cause statement.








On 6/12/26 at approximately 10:30 am I, Officer William Housley met with Victim 1 who advised me that she sent a message to Krisnie Morrow stating "I will inform you as soon as we are finished. Please do not text me again,” after Morrow had repeatedly messaged her. 

After Victim 1 sent the text to Morrow to stop communicating with her, Morrow later responded that she would not stop texting Victim 1 because it was not against the law. 

Victim 1 then stated that Morrow continued to text her multiple times despite her request for the communication to stop. While reporting this to me, Victim 1 became visibly upset and began crying stating that Morrow had started sending threatening messages including a message stating that she
"might have a voodoo doll" and that Victim 1 was "chopped." 

Victim 1 then stated that Morrow had then later sent her a video that referenced how to hide a dead body from the police and how to conceal a weapon.








Victim 1 then showed me the video Morrow had sent referencing how to hide a body from the
police as well as the text messages including the message stating "I might have a voodoo doll."

Morrow also verbally stated to her that she intends to find the new residence that Victim 1 is moving to and that she also verbally stated to her that she intends to find the new residence that Victim 1 is moving to and that she intends to continue to harass her.

Victim 1 stated that she feels in fear for her life as well as the well-being of her family and that she is emotionally overwhelmed.

The case was investigated by the Seneca Police Department.

Tuesday, July 07, 2026

Springfield senator who sponsored Amendment 5 faces stiff primary challenge


By Jason Hancock

Before Curtis Trent can try to run the Missouri Senate floor, he has to win reelection in southwest Missouri.

Trent, a Springfield Republican seeking his second term in the state Senate, is also running for majority floor leader — one of the most powerful jobs in the Capitol and a position that could shape the 2027 legislative session. But his path to leadership now runs through Lori Rook, a Springfield elder law attorney casting him as exactly the kind of Jefferson City insider Republican primary voters have punished before.

So the Aug. 4 contest in Senate District 20 isn’t just an incumbent-versus-challenger primary. It is a test of whether Trent’s growing power in Jefferson City is his strongest argument for reelection — or Rook’s strongest argument against him.







Rook shows up with a sharper edge than the usual long-shot bid against an incumbent. She has personal money, statewide campaign experience and a team led by Sophia Shore, who managed Jill Carter’s 2022 upset of incumbent Republican state Sen. Bill White — the last time GOP primary voters tossed a sitting senator in southwest Missouri. Shore also helped run Bill Eigel’s campaign for governor in 2024.

Trent is no easy target. He enters with a large financial edge, years representing the area and backing from much of the Republican establishment.

Daniel Ponder, a Drury University political scientist who lives in the district, said Trent starts with advantages Rook will have to overcome, namely money and name recognition in southwest Missouri.

Trent has “been on the yard signs and on the ballot for coming up on 10 years,” Ponder said. Recent mailers, he said, have urged voters to thank Trent for supporting President Donald Trump’s agenda — a sign the incumbent is already working to blunt any argument he’s insufficiently conservative.

Fate of Missouri bill on gas station slot machines could turn on GOP primary results

What makes this particular primary matter beyond southwest Missouri is the prize waiting for Trent if he survives it.

If he is reelected and chosen by his Republican colleagues as majority floor leader, Trent would help decide which bills come up for debate, when they move and how Gov. Mike Kehoe’s agenda is managed in 2027. The job is opening at a moment of turnover: Term limits are removing President Pro Tem Cindy O’Laughlin and Majority Floor Leader Tony Luetkemeyer.

The floor leader controls the calendar, which means controlling what reaches a vote — power that touches taxes, energy, education, the budget and the long-running fight over whether to expand gambling in Missouri.

Rook rejects the argument that the district benefits from sending one of its own into leadership — a case she says her own party often frames as “sit down, shut up, wait your turn.”

“None of that benefits Senate District 20,” she said. “People outside the echo chamber of this establishment group just want somebody that’s going to go up to Jefferson City and fight for them and come back and talk to them and show up at their local meetings.”

The challenger

Rook is making her second run for office.

In 2024, she ran for state treasurer in a crowded Republican primary and finished third, with 127,970 votes — 19.4% — behind incumbent Vivek Malek and former state Sen. Andrew Koenig.

She ran stronger in the counties that make up Senate District 20, finishing second in Greene, Dade and Webster counties and winning Barton County, according to official election results.







Rook lost that race but built name recognition among conservative activists and showed she would spend her own money. She has put $100,000 of it into her Senate campaign.

The treasurer’s race, she said, opened her eyes to “dysfunction” and “corruption” in both parties. She said she decided to run after looking at Trent’s record and seeing someone in “lockstep with the things that bothered me.”

A self-described Republican outsider, she has run squarely against the Capitol’s governing class.

“I am running for state Senate because southwest Missouri deserves actual conservative fighters, not more go-along-to-get-along lobby corps lackeys,” she said in announcing her candidacy.

Rook grew up in Springfield, graduated from Nixa High School and earned a criminal justice degree from Missouri State University before law school in Oklahoma City. After several years as a trial attorney, she shifted into elder law in 2012.

Her argument against Trent is that his record is a catalog of favors to corporations and insiders.

She points to the 2025 utility law Trent supported, which opened a path for electric companies to bill customers for power plants while they are still under construction. Rook ties that law to rising utility bills and to the data centers seeking to plug into Missouri’s grid, including a proposed project in Webster County that led county officials to approve a six-month moratorium.

She also opposes Amendment 5, the tax overhaul Trent sponsored, arguing it ignores the state’s spending problem and will result in higher costs for families. To her, Trent’s sponsorship of the measure reflects his alignment with lobbyists and Jefferson City insiders — who she believes will benefit the most if Amendment 5 passes.

And then there is gambling.

For years, Missouri lawmakers have fought over whether to legalize and regulate video lottery terminals — slot machines that have spread into gas stations, convenience stores and bars. House-backed bills have repeatedly died in the Senate.

Video lottery supporters believe a friendlier Senate is within reach in 2027, and an analysis by The Independent found gambling interests have poured more than $4 million into Missouri legislative campaigns since the start of 2025 — money concentrated in the primaries that could clear the path.

Trent’s committee has taken a share of it.

Four days after lawmakers adjourned in May, J&J Ventures, an Illinois company that operates video gambling terminals, gave $50,000 to 417 PAC, a political action committee aligned with Trent. More recently, PACs tied to former House Speaker Steve Tilley, who lobbies for Torch Electronics, donated a combined $30,000 to 417 PAC.

“It’s pay to play,” Rook said of that money. “It’s completely corrupt, and none of it surprises me.”

The incumbent

Trent’s case for himself is that he’s a conservative willing to do the complicated work of moving major policy through the statehouse.

He grew up on a small farm in southwest Missouri, graduated from Missouri State University and earned his law degree from Saint Louis University. Before winning the open 20th District seat in 2022, he worked as deputy chief of staff to former U.S. Rep. Billy Long and served three terms in the Missouri House.

In the Senate, he has risen fast, serving as assistant majority floor leader and chairing the General Laws Committee. He has drawn endorsements from business-oriented conservative groups, including Americans for Prosperity Missouri.

Trent did not return calls seeking comment for The Independent’s earlier story on gambling money, and his campaign did not respond to requests for comment for this article.

On gambling, he argued during Senate debate that Missouri needs legal clarity around games already operating in much of the state. He questioned whether a crackdown led by Attorney General Catherine Hanaway — her push to shut the machines down as illegal — would succeed, and pointed to cities that have passed ordinances against the machines as a sign the law is less settled than opponents claim.

“If it’s already illegal, you don’t pass an ordinance outlawing it or prohibiting it,” Trent said, arguing lawmakers would do better to “create a deliberate framework.”

On energy, Trent has been outspoken in support of the 2025 utility law, arguing in a January op-ed that it did not cause recent rate increases and that its construction-financing provisions are tightly restricted.

James Harris, a veteran Republican consultant and Jefferson City lobbyist who has known Trent since Billy Long’s 2010 congressional campaign, said Trent is routinely underestimated.

“He is really smart, he’s a good campaigner,” Harris said. “If I was going to go with who fits the district, I’d say Curtis.”

Harris said Trent’s southwest Missouri roots, prior wins in the district and low-key style make him harder to caricature than other incumbents. He did not quarrel with the description of Trent as a deal-maker popular with Capitol insiders. But he treated it as an advantage.

The “swamp” attack Rook is running, Harris argued, is easy to throw and hard to land against a well-funded incumbent.

Trent “will have more resources,” he said, “so he can define himself and withstand some slaps of swamp.”







The clearest example of Trent’s approach this year was Amendment 5, the plan to give lawmakers a temporary window to broaden the sales tax in order to phase out the individual income tax.

At an April Springfield Area Chamber of Commerce event, Trent argued the state risks falling behind if it does not move faster.

“The states around us are being very aggressive about lowering their income tax rates, even more aggressive than we have been,” he said.

The cause has a longtime patron, and in late June he surfaced in Trent’s own finance reports.

Rex Sinquefield — the retired financier who has spent years and tens of millions of dollars trying to abolish Missouri’s income tax — gave $125,000 to 417 PAC, by far the largest donation the committee has reported this year.

A familiar fight

The contrast is one Missouri Republicans have grappled with for a decade: Trent’s governing model, built around experience and leadership, against Rook’s insurgent model, built around hostility to lobbyist influence and the way business gets done.

“In current politics, personal ambition and ideological preferences trump traditional party loyalties,” said Peverill Squire, professor emeritus of political science at the University of Missouri-Columbia. “As a result, across the country we see incumbents in both parties being challenged by politicians on their ideological flanks.”

The last time disgruntled voters tossed a sitting senator in southwest Missouri was 2022, when Carter beat White — the race Rook’s campaign manager ran for the challenger.

Whether that precedent translates is another question. Harris said White lost in part because he had alienated voters with an abrasive style — a personal vulnerability he does not see in Trent.

“Curtis is not a villain,” Harris said.







Senate District 20 is heavily Republican, and the August primary will almost certainly decide the seat. Democrat Sean Falconer has filed but faces long odds. Trent won the 2022 general election unopposed after taking the GOP primary with more than 58% of the vote.

Squire expects Trent’s money to matter, but said the outcome of the race will turn on who actually shows up in August and “whether they remain comfortable with the incumbent or are anxious to try something different.”

Ponder, the Drury University political science professor, said the race has been relatively quiet so far. But in the closing weeks before the primary, he doesn’t expect that to hold.

“Usually, in campaigns like this,” he said, “particularly state elections and especially state legislative races, which don’t tend to be very high profile, the last month is really when you see the push.”

Missouri Independent is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Missouri Independent maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Jason Hancock for questions: info@missouriindependent.com.

Missouri governor to sign porn site age verification bill


By Jason Hancock

Gov. Mike Kehoe has announced he will sign legislation Thursday requiring pornography websites to verify that users are adults before allowing them to access sexually explicit content.

The bill, which will take effect Aug. 28, applies to commercial websites and social media platforms that knowingly and intentionally publish or distribute content in Missouri if more than one-third is “sexual material harmful to minors.”

It was included in a list of 22 bills Kehoe’s office said he plans to sign on Thursday.







Covered sites would have to use a third party to conduct “reasonable” age verification, confirming that a user is at least 18 through digital identification, government-issued identification or a commercially reasonable system relying on public or private transactional data, such as records from mortgage, education or employment entities.

Third-party age verification providers would be barred from retaining identifying information about users.

The bill is designed to put into state law a policy Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway has already begun enforcing through an administrative rule under the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act. That rule took effect in December and prompted Pornhub, the largest adult-content website, to block access in Missouri rather than implement site-level age checks.

New age verification rule causes Pornhub to shut down access in Missouri

“This is the source. Children do not need to view pornography,” state Rep. Sherri Gallick, a Belton Republican who carried the bill, told The Independent in May.

Gallick argued that easy access to online pornography distorts minors’ understanding of sex and relationships and can be used by predators to groom children.

“One of the things that was really compelling to me is that a lot of people growing up in today’s age look at a phone or they look at a computer, and they think that is reality,” Gallick said. “It’s very demeaning to women and to children.”

Under the bill, the attorney general could sue commercial entities accused of knowingly violating the law. Courts could impose civil penalties of up to $10,000 for each day a website operates without the required age checks and $10,000 per violation if an age-verification provider retains identifying information.

If at least one minor accesses sexual material harmful to minors because a covered website failed to comply, the court could impose an additional penalty of up to $250,000.

The bill includes exemptions for bona fide news and public-interest broadcasts, website videos, reports or events, and says it should not be interpreted to affect the rights of news-gathering organizations. Internet service providers, search engines and cloud service providers would also be shielded from liability when they merely provide access or connection to content they did not create and do not control.







The measure passed the Senate 32-0 in May before returning to the House, where it won final approval on a 112-25 vote. Twenty Democrats and five Republicans voted against it, while 11 Democrats voted “present.”

Supporters say the law is needed to make it harder for minors to encounter explicit material online. Opponents questioned whether the requirement would work, warning that teenagers could bypass age checks through virtual private networks and that privacy concerns could push major adult sites out of Missouri while driving traffic to less regulated websites.

“Kids are smart,” state Rep. Eric Woods, a Kansas City Democrat, said during House debate in March. “There are VPNs. There are browser settings that allow you to skirt around some of this stuff.”

The legislation advanced after the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a similar Texas law last year. In a 6-3 decision issued last year, the court ruled Texas could require pornographic websites to verify users’ ages, saying the state had an important interest in shielding minors from sexually explicit content.

Missouri Independent is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Missouri Independent maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Jason Hancock for questions: info@missouriindependent.com.

Monday, July 06, 2026

Lawsuit response: Joplin police officers used reasonable force during 2023 arrests


(Two lawsuits were filed last month against Joplin police officers alleging brutality. When this post was originally published Monday night and I was writing the lead, I called up the post on the wrong lawsuit to get background information. I apologize for the error.)


Two former Joplin police officers, Seth Lugenbell and Kyle Fallis, responded Monday to a lawsuit filed last month in U. S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri by Quinlyn Tosh and her brother Dausen Tosh who claimed the officers submitted false reports in March 2023 that led to them being charged with crimes they hadn't committed.

In their response, the officers claim they were exercising "reasonable force" and the Toshes were not complying with their instructions. 

(The photo, which was included in the lawsuit petition, is a screenshot taken from video recorded by Dausen Tosh of his sister Quinlyn being arrested by the officers.)







The officers, who are represented by Randy R. Cowherd of the Springfield firm of Cowherd, Reade, Adair & Laney, LLC, deny all allegations except that they were Joplin Police Department officers at the time of the incident.

The allegations against the officers can be found at the link below.

Civil rights lawsuit filed against former Joplin police officers

(From the response)

Defendants assert that all of their actions taken on March 20, 2023, with respect to the incident involving Plaintiffs, are protected from owing any duty towards or having any liability to Plaintiffs by reason of the doctrine of Official Immunity in that all of Defendants’ actions were discretionary, involving the exercise of judgment and applying their expertise, training and experience, and were done without bad faith or malice by the exercise of reasonable force in effecting the arrest of Plaintiffs and/or responding to Plaintiffs interfering with an investigation and resisting arrest.

Defendants asserts that all of their actions taken on March 20, 2023, with respect to the incident involving Plaintiffs, are protected from owing any duty towards or having any liability to Plaintiffs by reason of the Public Duty doctrine for the reasons set forth in paragraph 1 above.

Defendants assert that the sole cause of Plaintiffs’ claimed damage was the actions of the Plaintiffs in not complying with the instructions of officers, in interfering with an investigation, and in resisting arrest.

Defendants assert that their conduct, decisions and actions or inactions involved discretionary conduct and were objectively reasonable and justified under the circumstances then existing and were not in violation of clearly established law and therefore Defendants are protected from liability by reason of qualified immunity.

Defendants assert that the force used in effecting Plaintiffs’ arrest and/or in responding to Plaintiffs resisting such arrest was justified and de minimus in nature and thus not in violation of any constitutional rights of Plaintiffs.








For other affirmative answer and defense, Defendants state that Plaintiffs are not entitled to any punitive damage award against them for any one or more of the following reasons:

a. The standards by which Defendants’ conduct is to be determined as alleged by Plaintiffs are vague and wholly arbitrary and, as such, deny due process in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution;

b. The standards for determining the amount and/or subsequent imposition of punitive damages are vague, supply no notice to Defendants of the potential repercussions of his alleged conduct and are subject to the unbridled discretion of the fact finder, thereby denying due process under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution;

c. Plaintiffs’ request for punitive damages constitutes a request for and/or imposition of excessive fines in violation of the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution;








d. Plaintiffs’ request for punitive damages constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution;

e. Plaintiffs’ request for punitive damages constitutes a denial of equal protection of the law in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution in that defendants’ wealth or net worth may be considered by a fact finder in determining the award of damages in a punitive damages award;

f. Plaintiffs’ request for punitive damages cannot protect Defendants against multiple punishments for the same alleged wrong, thereby denying due process under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution;

WHEREFORE, Officers Seth Lugenbell and Kyle Farris, Defendants, pray to be discharged from all claims asserted in the Complaint of Dausen Tosh and Quinlyn Tosh, Plaintiffs, for costs, expenses and attorney’s fees incurred herein, and for such other and further relief as the Court deems appropriate

Marionville woman killed in accident on 39


A Marionville woman was killed in a one-vehicle accident 1:40 p.m. today on MO 39 three miles north of Aurora.

According to the Highway Patrol report, a 1993 Chevrolet delivery vehicle driven by a 74-year-old Marionville woman began skidding, traveled off the roadway and overturned ejecting the driver, who was pronounced dead at the scene by Lawrence County Coroner Scott Lakin.

The fatality was the 67th this year for Highway Patrol Troop D.

Jason Smith: Working Families Tax Cuts working for Americans


(By Eighth District Congressman Jason Smith)

One year ago this Fourth of July, President Trump signed the Working Families Tax Cuts into law. When I was writing these tax cuts, I promised the president I could deliver this bill to his desk by July 4th so our nation could celebrate the most transformational tax reform in our lifetime on the same day our nation marked its founding, and Republicans in Congress delivered. This year, as families across Southeast Missouri gather with family and friends to grill out and watch fireworks, they’ll do it with more money back in their pockets — where it belongs.

But a year later, it’s also worth remembering what almost happened instead. If Democrats had gotten their way, this year Americans would have faced the largest tax increase in American history, resulting in smaller paychecks, dwindling savings accounts, and lower tax returns. Every single House and Senate Democrat voted to increase every American’s taxes by an average of more than 20 percent. Let that sink in. That’s what was on the table, and that’s what Democrats voted for unanimously. But with Republicans delivering on our promise and passing the Working Families Tax Cuts, we not only avoided that catastrophe, but we passed the largest tax cut in American history.








Democrats have spent years lying about tax relief. First about the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and now about the Working Families Tax Cuts. Turn on the legacy media and you’ll hear them call it a giveaway to billionaires. But how many billionaires clock overtime hours? How many billionaires live off tips or Social Security?

Under the One Big Beautiful Bill, if a family makes less than $73,000 a year, they are free from federal income tax. That’s not relief for the wealthy or Washington elites. That’s relief for the guy pulling 60-hour weeks to keep the mortgage paid. And Democrats voted against all of it — no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, real relief for seniors, enhanced Child Tax Credit — you name it. Every single provision that Republicans fought for to help working families, Democrats refused to support. When they had the chance to stand with waitresses, factory workers, and retirees across Southeast Missouri and the rest of the country, they chose to stand against them.

Thankfully, clearer heads prevailed and one year later, the results speak for themselves. 97 percent of all tax filers got a tax cut this year. More than 7.5 million workers claimed No Tax on Tips, with an average deduction over $7,000 — and more than 90 percent of them made under $100,000. Nearly 29 million workers claimed No Tax on Overtime. Over 35 million seniors claimed the enhanced senior deduction, with an average deduction of more than $7,500. Nearly 40 million families claimed the permanently doubled Child Tax Credit I fought to secure. In total, families and workers have already claimed $82 billion in new individual tax relief this filing season that would not have gone back into their pockets if we didn’t pass the Working Families Tax Cuts.








Trump Accounts are another provision I’m incredibly proud of securing. Officially rolling out this July 4th, more than 5.5 million children have already signed up to get a financial head start for their future. This revolutionary initiative is going to give the next generation a personal stake in the success of our nation’s economy. A child’s future shouldn’t depend on whether they grew up on a city block or a country road, and Trump Accounts will help make that a reality for kids all across the country.

One year in, the verdict is clear: these policies are delivering for working families. I fought to pass this legislation because Southeast Missouri families deserve more opportunity, more promise, and to keep more of what they earn, and I will keep fighting for those Americans as long as I represent them.

Friday, July 03, 2026

Three businesses fail Joplin Health Department inspections

Three businesses failed Joplin Health Department inspections this week, according to information posted on the department website. 

Best Western Breakfast, 3508 S. Range Line Road; Joplin 44 Petro, 4240 S. 43 Highway; and Microtel Inn & Suites Breakfast, 4101 S. Richard Joseph Boulevard; received failing grades.

4th Street Bowl, 1419 W. 4th Street, which had failed to recent inspections, passed on the third try. It was one of nine businesses to pass inspection.







Best Western Breakfast

Best Western Breakfast received a priority violation for having milk and shredded cheese on the buffet being cold held above 41 degrees.

Joplin 44 Petro

Joplin 44 Petro received three priority violations and one core violation.

The priority violations were for having pasta salad with missing or improper date marking, for having potentially hazardous food being cold held above 41 degrees in two coolers (two separate violations.)

The core violation was for having an accumulation of dust on the vent covers of the cooling unit in the retail walk-in cooler.

Microtel Inn & Suites Breakfast

Microtel Inn & Suites Breakfast received three priority violations for having orange juice at the buffet being cold held above 41 degrees, eggs at the buffet being hot held below 135 degrees and for having eggs, gravy and cream cheese spread in an upright cooler being cold ahead above 41 degrees.








***
Establishments that passed inspection were the following:

4th Street Bowl, 1419 W. 4th Street (re-inspection)

Best Western Breakfast, 3508 S. Range Line Road

Creek Crew BBQ and Catering

Han the Sushi Man, 2640 E. 32nd Street

Blimpie @ Petro, 4240 State Highway 43

El Heavenly Donuts, 1915 S. Main Street (re-inspection)

Twin Hills Main Dining/Jolly Boys Tavern, 2019 S. Country Club Drive

Pilot Travel Center, 4500 S. 43 Highway

Missouri Attorney General investigating ESPN NFL Draft analyst Matt Miller


ESPN NFL Draft Analyst Matt Miller, a Webb City resident, is being investigated by the Missouri Attorney General's office, according to a report on the website Awful Announcing. 

The website said the attorney general's office said it has "an open investigation into this issue."

The investigation was confirmed by USA Today, which received the following statement from the attorney general's office:

 

The Missouri Attorney General’s Office encourages consumers who believe they have been misled to contact us. Attorney General (Catherine) Hanaway takes consumer protection very seriously, and we will work diligently to uncover the facts.

Much of the attention that has been centered on Miller, 42, came after a June 17 crash on MO 96 a mile and a half west of Oronogo that occurred when the 2023 Ford Bronco Miller was driving crossed the center line was struck by a 2024 International driven by a 28-year-old Springfield man.







Miller was flown to Mercy Joplin where he was treated for numerous fractures and had to have an arm amputated.

After the accident and a subsequent Go Fund Me page was established for Miller's expenses, Awful Announcing, Reddit and other social media sites were bombarded with complaints about fantasy sports leagues and charities operated by Miller.

From Awful Announcing:

Much of the scrutiny of Miller centers on the framing of these leagues and other ventures as being tied to his charitable efforts. Miller has said his 417 Foundation started in 2013, inspired by his mother’s work with low-income preschoolers in Joplin. 

Public incorporation records instead show the foundation wasn’t formally established in Missouri until December 2018, and it received a cease-and-desist notice about a year later. 

The foundation has never filed a Form 990 with the IRS, its website is no longer active, and its social media account stopped posting in 2021, even though Miller continued advertising 417 Foundation fantasy leagues as recently as May 2022. In recent years, Miller has described his charitable efforts as being tied to a new nonprofit.

Miller's Go Fund Me page has raised $51,247 of its $55,000 goal at this writing with 435 donations. When the Turner Report first write about the page June 25, the goal was $30,000.

Miller, a Joplin native and Missouri Southern State University graduate, signed his most recent contract with ESPN in March 2025. The network released this statement at the time:

ESPN has re-signed NFL draft analyst Matt Miller, ensuring he remains a key part of ESPN’s year-round NFL draft coverage, including an integral part of ESPN’s NFL draft day three presentation, for the coming years.








Miller’s exceptional knowledge and expertise on all aspects of the NFL draft will continue to provide fans with informative information year-round on ESPN.com and ESPN+, specifically in the form of prospect and position rankings, multiple mock drafts and the latest draft intel from scouts around the league. As he has done for the past four years since joining ESPN, Miller will appear across SportsCenter, Get Up, NFL Live, mock draft specials and on ESPN+ exclusive specials during NFL draft season.

For the third year in a row, Miller will have a seat at the desk on day three of the 2025 NFL draft (Sat., April 26, 12 p.m. ET, ESPN/ABC), joining Mel Kiper Jr., Louis Riddick, Field Yates and Rece Davis, for the entirety of ESPN’s coverage of the final day of the NFL draft (rounds 4-7). Further details on ESPN’s coverage of the 2025 NFL Draft will become available in late March on ESPN Press Room.

Before joining ESPN in February 2021, Miller served as the lead NFL draft analyst and insider at Bleacher Report from 2010-21, where he helped launch The Draft Scout. Prior to Bleacher Report, Miller worked as Director of Scouting for New Era Scouting from 2006-10 and a coach and recruiting coordinator for the CFL’s Joplin Crusaders (2006-08).

According to Awful Announcing, ESPN isn't answering any questions about Miller's accident, the Go Fund Me page or his future with the network.

Audit finds former Gov. Mike Parson’s state flights often lacked public purpose


By Jason Hancock

Former Gov. Mike Parson’s office spent $375,000 flying him around on state aircraft without keeping flight records showing why, and for a third of those flights auditors could not identify any state business purpose.

That finding anchors a closeout audit of the governor’s office released Thursday by State Auditor Scott Fitzpatrick, which gave the office a “fair” rating — the second-lowest on the auditor’s four-point scale — and faulted Parson’s administration for improper payments to top staff, records that vanished when he left office and nearly half a million dollars in other agencies’ expenses quietly shifted onto the governor’s books.







For Parson, who spent much of his six and a half years in office fending off questions about his travel habits, the audit lands as an official coda to a familiar controversy: a governor whose air travel had already drawn years of scrutiny, and a paper trail that rarely explained what public business he was conducting or why taxpayers were paying for it.

Parson, in a written response included in the report, strongly disagreed with what he called “so-called findings,” saying none of the issues cited “constitute unethical conduct” and reflect “differences in interpretation or perception — not wrongdoing.”

The audit covered 174 trips Parson took on state aircraft, primarily during the final 18 months of his term. For every one of them, flight records listed only a generic purpose — typically “Flight for Governor Parson.”

Two moments that explain Mike Parson’s six years as Missouri governor

Because the governor’s office never archived Parson’s official calendar and his press releases were removed from the state website when his term ended, auditors were forced to reconstruct his itinerary using the Wayback Machine, an internet archive. Even then, they could not identify a state business purpose for 58 of the 174 flights.

Fifty-three trips — 30% — included a stop in Bolivar, where Parson lives. Eight of those flights went to Bolivar and nowhere else. Parson told auditors he often stopped there for personal business, so auditors excluded the Bolivar legs from their analysis entirely.

The audit also flagged 16 flights Parson took around the state in 2024 for trips that included signing events for “No Turnin’ Back,” his commemorative biography. On most of those trips, Parson also conducted other business. But one flight — to Marceline, home of the book’s publisher — had no purpose other than kicking off the book tour, according to the governor’s own media advisory.

The flight cost taxpayers $1,386.

And a December 2023 flight to Arlington, Texas, where Parson watched the University of Missouri play in the Cotton Bowl, carried the spouses of his chief of staff and deputy chief of staff — a violation of state policy, which bars everyone but state employees, officials and the first family from state aircraft.

Auditors noted the same travel documentation failures had appeared in the previous four audits of the office.

A familiar controversy

The findings fit a pattern that has trailed Parson for nearly his entire tenure.

Within his first two years in office, the St. Joseph News-Press documented 130 trips on the state-owned Beechcraft King Air 250 — including 20 to Bolivar. When state aircraft wouldn’t do, Parson turned to private planes supplied by donors and paid for by Uniting Missouri, the political action committee formed to support his 2020 campaign.

In December 2019, Parson flew to Washington, D.C., on the private plane of Rick DeStefane, a nursing home executive whose company had paid $8.3 million to settle a federal Medicare fraud investigation and whose facilities had racked up health and safety citations. DeStefane rode along, joined Parson at the White House and posted photos of the trip on Snapchat. Weeks later, Parson flew to the Super Bowl in Miami on the plane of an Independence businessman.

A Democratic official filed an ethics complaint arguing the flights amounted to illegal coordination between Parson and the PAC. The Missouri Ethics Commission dismissed the coordination allegation but fined Uniting Missouri $2,000 in 2020 for failing to properly report the value of the two flights.

Pro-Parson PAC has spent $110K on private plane expenses so far in 2023

The private travel never stopped. In the first three months of 2023 alone, Uniting Missouri spent more than $110,000 on private planes, most of it paid to an aviation company connected to lobbyist and longtime Parson adviser Steve Tilley — even as Parson insisted he was done with elected office.

The new audit examined only state-funded travel. But it identified the same underlying problem that dogged the private flights: no one could say, on paper, what the public was getting for the money.

Beyond the aircraft, auditors questioned lodging bills, including $355 in taxpayer-funded hotel costs for Parson to play in the John Deere Pro Am golf tournament in East Moline, Illinois, over the July 4th holiday in 2023. The office could produce no business justification. Parson told auditors he played at the request of Missouri’s John Deere tractor dealerships.







Auditors also found the state paid $594 for two nights of lodging in Hawaii for Parson and the First Lady during an October 2023 trip his staff described as a vacation. Parson personally reimbursed the other three nights, saying a battleship visit and crew luncheon that justified the charge appeared reasonable but was never documented.

Payments ‘in violation of state policy’

The travel findings were one item on a longer list.

The audit found the office paid $28,058 in compensatory time to four of its highest-paid employees — the chief of staff, deputy chief of staff, general counsel and legislative director, who earned between roughly $120,000 and $186,000 a year — in violation of a state rule that bars overtime pay for top-level staff except in “unusual circumstances.”

The office kept no timesheets documenting the extra hours. Without them, auditors wrote, the office cannot demonstrate the payments weren’t bonuses — which the Missouri Constitution prohibits for public employees.

Auditors also flagged $30,449 in tuition reimbursements to three employees that violated office or state policy.

That included $18,000 to Parson’s chief of staff for a second master’s degree — pursued while office policy barred reimbursement for duplicate degrees — with the final $3,000 approved after he had stepped down to part-time work in the administration’s waning days. When he began repaying the money after resigning his full-time post, as office policy required, Parson personally waived the remaining balance after $4,200.

The office also used $472,000 of its own appropriations to absorb other agencies’ expenses in fiscal year 2024 — including a bathroom remodel, an HVAC replacement and a mahogany door in the Capitol, plus $50,000 toward a trade mission billed to the Department of Economic Development. There were no written agreements and no documentation explaining the transfers, which auditors said “circumvents the appropriation process” and obscures the true cost of running the office.

And roughly $210,000 in state-paid food flowed through the governor’s mansion during the audit period, including about a dozen dinners and luncheons involving the Parsons’ friends and family that auditors said appeared to have no business purpose.







Then there are the records that simply cannot be found. State law required Parson’s office to transfer its official records to the State Archives when his term ended. It didn’t. Parson’s calendar, the office’s employee manual and policies, its Sunshine Law request log and its internal control plan are all missing — unlocatable by his former staff, by Gov. Mike Kehoe’s administration and by the archives.

‘We have no knowledge’

Kehoe’s office, in a response signed by chief of staff Adam Gresham, kept its distance. No one in a policymaking role under Kehoe served during the audit period, Gresham wrote, and “we have no knowledge of the facts discussed in the auditor’s report.” He added that most findings don’t reflect current practice: the office pays no compensatory time, handles travel differently and maintains a Sunshine Law log.

Parson was less measured. Beyond disputing the findings, he complained that a departed administration “no longer” has “access to their records,” writing that records “are placed in archive, so you exclusively can construe or neglect what records you decide to review.”

Fitzpatrick — whose statewide career began when Parson appointed him treasurer in 2018 — answered that argument directly in the report. The problem, the auditor noted, is that the records were never placed in the archive at all.

Parson’s response “does not indicate any specific inaccuracies or misinterpretations in the report,” Fitzpatrick wrote, and the findings are “supported by sufficient and appropriate evidence.”