Tuesday, March 02, 2010

Blacks, gays, you name it, MSSU president will discriminate


After the events of the past few days at Missouri Southern State University, I decided to revisit an old Turner Report entry, added some information to it and submitted it today as my Daily Kos post. That post is printed below.)

A uniter not a divider.
That was the slogan George W. Bush used in his first campaign for president and that was how current Missouri Southern State University President Bruce Speck was described when he first strolled onto the campus.
The phrase did not turn out to be accurate for either man, though it comes closer in the case of Speck. Speck is succeeding in doing something that has never happened in the seven decades Missouri Southern has existed, going back to its days as Missouri Southern State College and Joplin Junior College.
For the first time, the MSSU faculty is united…in opposition to Speck. Furtive attempts to unionize the faculty have occurred from time to time during the quarter of a century that Dr. Julio Leon was in charge of the campus, but nothing ever came of it.
Recently, a chapter of the American Association of University Professors was organized on campus and late last year, the faculty overwhelmingly issued Speck a vote of no-confidence. Still, the Board of Governors has stood by its man and told him he needs to be nicer to the faculty.
And now the students have joined the battle. Last week, students organized to protest the exclusion of gays from campus non-discrimination policy.

A sit-in was held outside Speck’s office Thursday, less than a week after a member of the Board of Governors resigned after making a comment about the university’s mascot changing from a “fag lion” to a “ferocious lion.”

Speck, as usual, did not offer any illuminating comments to the media about the situation, preferring to engage in doublespeak. He told the Joplin Globe, “If we have issues that we need to deal with, then I am committed to dealing with those issues,” he said. “And we have systems in place to deal with them.”
Speck also insisted that adding language concerning non-discrimination against gays to the policy could pose legal problems for the university.

Since Speck’s arrival, the university has been permeated with an atmosphere of fear as programs have been cut without notification, and seemingly without rhyme or reason, at a time when the country is having deep economic difficulties, but when the university itself appears to be in reasonably good shape.

In addition to the programs that have been eliminated, Speck has taken substantial steps toward dismantling the university's international program, the campus’ state-approved mission, and one which has brought students from all over the world, as well as taking MSSU students to numerous foreign countries.

It appears the MSSU Board of Governors either did not look carefully at Speck’s recent background, or it did look carefully, and decided that he was precisely the person it wanted to lead the university.

On April 14, a lawsuit in which Speck was initially a defendant came to a close when the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Speck’s former employer, Austin Peay University in Tennessee, did not discriminate against four African American professors. Though the court ruled there was not enough evidence to prove discrimination, the decision noted that the only evidence of racism that had been offered was a quote allegedly made by Speck. I wrote about the lawsuit and other controversial issues surrounding Speck and racial discrimination on my blog, The Turner Report:

“The lawsuit said that Speck, who served as vice president of academic affairs at the university, insulted two of the plaintiffs, Jacqueline Wade, director of the university's African American Cultural Center (AACC) and Nancy Dawson by saying ‘he 'was tired of your arm-twisting and resistance to my decisions.'

“He also made clear that he would not tolerate Dr. Wade’s and Dr. Dawson’s 'pushiness' and 'uppityness.' Dr. Wade was offended by the latter comment as 'covert racial denigration.' "


Though the situations at Austin Peay and Missouri Southern are not the same, both involve a “my way or the highway” attitude that has created friction at the faculty level.

It would be easy to give the Missouri Southern State University Board of Governors a free pass since everyone makes a hiring mistake at one time or another, but the hiring of Bruce Speck was a bit unusual.

Despite his previous record at Austin Peay, which apparently was not investigated closely by the board, Bruce Speck was the only person the board interviewed for the most important job on campus.

Former Kamp mom/journalist: Kanakuk officials were well aware of Pete Newman problems


Defenders of Kanakuk Kamp have bristled at comments on this blog that Kanakuk officials had received previous complaints about former director Pete Newman but failed to do anything about them.

Newman, of course, pleaded guilty Feb. 18 to two counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree, three counts of statutory sodomy in the second degree, and three counts of enticement of a child. All of the crimes involved underage boys.


Former Kanakuk Kamp mom Amanda Tackett, a journalist, who normally writes about the lighter, more humorous things in life, is dead serious when she says Kamp officials were well aware of the serious issues surrounding Newman. She left this comment on one of my older posts earlier this evening:

I am a former Kanakuk mom. I've already spoken to law enforcement, and have been quoted in the media previously. I am a writer, journalist, but most importantly a Christian. This entire situation makes me sick.

To address some of the earlier comments, yes, the camp knew, or should have known there were issues with Newman going back several years. My daughter returned from K-Kountry her last year reporting that there was something wrong with Newman. I asked a lot of questions, and two days after we returned to Dallas, she told me, "Pete is gay." I told her how serious a claim that was, and she recounted numerous instances when Newman isolated boys in the woods. She was only 10, and yet she knew.

One of the boys she knew, as he was on the bus the first year she attended. He is from Dallas, and no matter what anyone wants to think, there are more victims out there.

I called the camp and spoke to two different staffers. My cell phone records back this up. I reported my daughter's observations as delicately but honestly as I could. I was told they would look into it, and get back to me. I was shocked the following day when I received a return call. They had "investigated" my daughter's complaints and wanted me to know that her counselors and Newmand felt "she didn't have a heart for Christ." They went on to detail how my daughter wasn't into sports enough to make it another year at Kanakuk. That's funny, my husband is a former college athlete, his father was a 1st round NBA draft pick, and she's been involved in Upward and a variety of sports her entire life. But, whatever.

I asked, "Okay, you've got an opinion about my child, but what about Pete?" I was then lectured, much like the admonishment on this blog about starting rumors. They also asked "if" we attended church, ever.

The camp knew. I know they knew. My complaint came well after 2001. If anything, it should have been a "second strike" for some further investigation, but instead they diminished my daughter.

I was furious when I got the email from Joe White. I called Kanakuk and told them about my call to the camp three (now four) summers ago. "That just doesn't sound like something we would say," is what I was told.

I would NEVER, ever send my child there again, and I would strongly encourage others, based on the FACTS of how they have handled this entire situation to re-think Kanakuk for their children. There are numerous other faith-based camps and activities in which our kids can participate.

Biblical law protects two classes in society: the very old, and the very young. Kanakuk needs to get very real and very honest about what has happened.

I'm writing this on March 2, 2010. Newman has pleaded guilty. I'm not interested in any more hand-wringing over all the "ifs." This is now an "is." Right now, this is about justice and punishment, for the sake of the victims, and to remove this blight from society.

Newman sought to deceive everyone around him, but he cannot hide from the Lord. It's senseless to speculate on "if" he's a Christian or not. The Lord will take care of his ever-after. Right now, we need to focus on punishment.

Each of his victims will serve a life sentence in their own right. I'm good with 171 years.


Taney County Circuit Court Judge Mark Orr ordered a pre-sentencing investigation and set Newman's sentencing for April 30 in Taney County Circuit Court.

Criminal charges filed against former Joplin Globe editor


Ohio officials announced today they have filed criminal charges against former Joplin Globe Editor Edgar Simpson.

An arrest warrant was issued charging Simpson, 46, with a misdemeanor, filing a false disclosure statement:

Simpson is charged with failing to report on required state financial disclosure forms $350 he received from Dann's campaign committee and about $800 he received from the committee Dann formed during his transition into office.


Simpson is expected to plead guilty Thursday and has agreed to testify against others involved in the scandals in Marc Dann's office, according to a story in today's Columbus Dispatch.

Previous Turner Report posts on Edgar Simpson can be found at this link.

Thor Hearne: Restoring campaign contribution limits is "a fool's errand"

In the accompanying video, Thor Hearne, a big player in the push for photo I. D. legislation, explains why it is a "fool's errand" to have campaign finance limits and why it is a violation of First Amendment.

Apparently, in Hearne's estimation, government can and shall regulate elections when it comes to the poorest of the electorate, but it should be hands off when it comes to the rich and privileged special interests:

Nodler at Eggs and Issues: Gays in army leads to more casualties

At Friday's eggs and issues breakfast sponsored by several Joplin-area Chambers of Commerce, Sen. Gary Nodler, R-Joplin, a candidate for Seventh District Congressman, repeated his opposition to the repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell, saying allowing gays to serve openly in the military will lead to more casualties:

Responding to the fact that many of our allies, like Great Britain, allow homosexuals to serve openly, Nodler says, “The fact is, in Iraq, and for a period of time in Afghanistan, that happens to be the force that has the highest casualty rate.” Continuing, “I can’t say with any certainty that I have any proof that that’s because there’s less comfort from the Iraqis and Afghanis in dealing with those forces, but it might be.



***
Another good job by Eli Yokley at Joplin Fuse as he continues to put politicians on the record.

Obama supports Rhode Island district that fired all of its teachers

During a speech Monday, President Barack Obama voiced support for the Rhode Island board of education that fired all of the 93 teachers in its district because of low scores. If the president's argument is that we have to fire good teachers as well as bad in order to improve schools, then his approach to education is already as bankrupt as that of his predecessor:

Pay freeze ends at News-Leader, Gannett newspapers

Gannett announced Monday it is dropping the pay freeze at its newspapers, including the Springfield News-Leader:

"Going forward, we will get back into the normal review cycle where people will be eligible for raises based, as always, on performance and contributions to the overall organization," (Publishing Division Chairman Bob Dickey added.

The freeze was imposed April 1, 2009.

Monday, March 01, 2010

Burnett: Tilley doing everything he can to stop return of campaign contribution limits


In his latest report, Rep. John Burnett, D-Kansas City, a member of Kevin Wilson's Committee on Government Accountability and Ethics, says Majority Leader Steve Tilley, R-Perryville, is doing everything he can to stop the restoration of campaign contribution limits:

In the special Committee on Government Accountability and Ethics Reform that I serve on we are still working of drafting a bill to bring "ethics reform" to Jeff City. Not nearly as easy as it sounds. So far we have identified about fifty issues that should be addressed.

The big ticket item is campaign finance limits on donations. That issue is admittedly hot and holds the key to other problems as well such as transparency and reporting.

And we have to try to reach a consensus on this very difficult issue while Republican leaders do their level best to sabotage the effort. This week we had a committee meeting and had been discussing the limit issue for over an hour when Steve Tilley, the Majority Floor Leader, and one of the dozen who filed bills just popped into the meeting and joined the discussion. Now he has that right as a member of the leadership but this is the first time in 7 years I have seen such a thing happen. He makes no pretense he will do all he can to stop limits. Oh. It is his job to raise big bucks for the Republican House candidates and he is doing a very good job at it and limits would make his job more difficult. I understand. I just do not agree. 74% of the Missouri citizens voted for campaign limits in Proposition A a few years ago. Beyond me how they can keep a straight face in this argument.

The Chair of the Committee is doing a fantastic job in keeping this issue on track. I expect we will have the skeleton done this next week.

Emerson files for re-election

Incumbent Eighth District Congresswoman Jo Ann Emerson filed for re-election today. From her news release:

Jo Ann Emerson filed for re-election to the U.S. House of Representatives from Missouri's Eighth Congressional District this morning in Jefferson City. Emerson, a Republican, has served southern Missouri in Congress since 1996.

"Representing the Eighth District in Congress is a tremendous honor, and I am very much looking forward to the conversation about the issues on voters' minds that we will have over the next several months," Emerson said. "Our congressional district is diverse, we have unique strengths, we're home to wonderful people, and our voice is very important in today's political environment. I like to think we come to the national political discussion with common sense on our minds, not hyper-partisanship or narrow interests."

According to Emerson, the political environment in the nation's capital has never been more challenging.

"The next two years are crucial to Missouri. I'm entrenched in a fight to prevent cap-and-trade taxes on the gasoline and electricity we use in our homes and economy. I've long been working to lower the price of prescription drugs and to expand health care in rural areas of our country, by rejecting huge government expansion of our health care system that eliminates choices for Americans. And we need to see through some major contributions to our economic infrastructure that will create jobs and grow opportunity in southern Missouri. The next two years will bear out many of these discussions. I'm looking forward to being part of some real solutions for the American people."

She also noted that national liberal political interests are targeting every Republican seat they can.

"In a year where conservatives are sure to pick up seats in Congress, Nancy Pelosi and the liberal establishment are going to fight for any and every seat they can get in order to cling to power in the House. But I think the policies of the liberal left have been roundly rejected in southern Missouri, and I look forward to the opportunity to work on an agenda where the ideas of our district are given the credence and merit they deserve," Emerson said.

Emery offers fairy tale to explain fair tax proposal

In his latest capitol report, Rep. Ed Emery, R-Lamar, offers a story to illustrate why he believes the fair tax is the way to go:

In a far away world lived a king who governed well with roads, bridges, and protection from foreign enemies. The kingdom was known as Tomatoland because the sole industry was the sale of tomatoes which provided for the people’s needs.

The king gathered a tax of tomato seedlings each year at the beginning of planting season. These were exported to fund his kingly projects. The families would then plant what was left and from the harvest would supply themselves and their workers for the year. If tomatoes were left over, they were either shared with those more needy or converted into savings, helping to grow investment capital and the economy.

One day the king’s daughter married a man from Freeland, a nearby country, and the new son-in-law came to dinner. The son-in-law had spent a day touring the kingdom, and he offered the king a suggestion: “Instead of taxing the people’s seedlings which reduces their crop and thereby their potential, the wealth of the kingdom, and the welfare of the people, why don’t you take tribute in tomatoes? Each seedling,” he explained, “can be converted to many tomatoes by the people. “In other words, what is only a single seedling to the king may be a bushel of tomatoes in the hands of the farmer.”

The king was ecstatic with the idea. Here was a way he could continue to fund his kingdom but at a lower economic cost to his kingdom. The people could grow more tomatoes, making his tribute less burdensome. Even after the tomato tax, there would be more tomatoes to invest or give away because the value of the tomatoes would be so much greater than that of the seedlings. The king couldn’t wait to tell his Court.

As he shared this powerful economic idea with his Court, however, he was distressed. Their faces grew stern with resistance. Many of them had spent time and money on the old system of seedlings and couldn’t see how they would personally benefit from the change. Others thought it unfair because the farmers with larger farms would benefit more - they had more acreage to plant the untaxed seedlings. The Court seemed oblivious to the king’s appeal that the large farms would need more laborers because of the larger plantings, increasing employment and wages. Since they were employed by the king and had no personal interests in the fertilizer dealerships, the irrigation companies, or the processing plants that would benefit from increased productivity, the King’s Court refused the change.

Disappointed, the king returned to his castle, his son-in-law departed to share his idea with other kingdoms, and Tomatoland went on taxing the means to wealth instead of the use of it. Some subjects moved to other lands who were prospering and growing by adopting the new system. Some devised a way to join the king’s Court and win personal benefits from the old system. What was left of the kingdom just endured. I pity those whose plight was to just endure; I condemn those who used the king’s court to benefit themselves over the people; I blame the king for not trying harder.