Monday, October 01, 2012

Superintendent of the Year C. J. Huff delivered on promise to begin school on time after tornado

(The following post includes a chapter from Spirit of Hope: The Year After the Joplin Tornado.)


It did not come as a surprise when the Missouri Association of School Administrators (MASA) selected Joplin Superintendent C. J. Huff as its superintendent of the year Saturday night.

Joplin Schools’ remarkable comeback from the EF-5 tornado that destroyed or severely damaged 10 school buildings inspired the nation. Buildings were found for all of the displaced students, with high school students in grades 11 and 12 attending school in a former anchor store building at a mall and students at East Middle School where I teach eighth grade communication arts (English) relocated to a warehouse building in an industrial park.

The tone for the Jopiln Schools’ remarkable comeback was set by Dr. Huff when he stunned the nation just a few days after the May 22, 2011, tornado by announcing that school would start on time.

I wrote about that declaration in a chapter of the recently-published book, Spirit of Hope: The Year After the Joplin Tornado. That chapter is reprinted below.

***
 “Which one is the superintendent?” a photographer for one of the cable networks asked the middle-aged woman standing a few feet from him.
She pointed at the man standing a few feet away from the makeshift podium that had been set up in front of the shattered remnants of what only two weeks before had been Joplin High School.
At first, the photographer didn’t believe her. School superintendents were older, distinguished gentlemen, wearing suits and fighting the effects that too many chicken dinners at too many educational seminars can create for the waistline.
These, however, were not ordinary times in Joplin, Missouri, and C. J. Huff was not an ordinary superintendent. Maybe he had been a couple of weeks before, in those blissful days before a tornado destroyed one-third of the city and damaged or destroyed 10 of his schools, including the one a few feet behind him. Normalcy was a thing of the past for Huff and it would be a long time before it would ever return.
A brisk wind whipped through the gathering crowd as they waited for the superintendent to speak. This was the first meeting of school district personnel since the tornado- a family reunion of sorts, and the audience was filled with the same dreadful fears that had taken hold of their lives since 5:41 p.m. on May 22.
Had their colleagues survived? Were the students who had sat in the classrooms a few days before ever going to have a chance to move on to the next grade, or to grow to adulthood?
They also had to worry about their jobs. It was almost a certainty that there would be fewer students whenever school started again. Would there be the need for as many teachers, as many secretarial staff, as many custodians? Was there a possibility that this gathering might be the last time they would ever see each other as co-workers and colleagues?
As the photographer took a closer look at C. J. Huff, his earlier doubts had been erased. Though he had cast aside the suit and tie in favor of a maroon baseball cap with a proud “J” for Joplin and looked more like a Sunday golfer than a community leader, it was clear that this was the man in charge.
The face was boyish, something that had concerned some Joplin School District patrons when Huff had been hired. Ironically, the May 2008 board meeting when Huff had first been introduced to the public had been interrupted by the sounding of a tornado siren. Outwardly, the superintendent looked the same, but a closer examination showed the stress of having to deal with a crisis few school administrators had ever faced, the slight redness in eyes that had not been closed many times since the tornado.
Huff and his staff had been at the biggest event of the 2010-2011 school year, the culmination of 13 years of schooling, the high school graduation, held at Missouri Southern State University, when the tornado sirens sounded.
It seemed like an eternity had passed. In the days since, school officials and teachers had mounted an unceasing effort to locate every employee and every student in the school district.
It was no easy task. Phone service was down in many areas. Those whose homes had been hit by the tornado were staying in hotels or with relatives, some out of state.
It was a task made easier due to the advent of social networking. Through Facebook, teachers were able to locate many students.
But even with that technological marvel, district employees who had reported to work the day after the tornado, did much of the work by going door-to-door in the devastated areas of the city, marking as many names off the list as they could.
And there were other concerns. The administrative office building had been hit by the tornado. The team had to spread to different buildings and somehow manage to coordinate its duties. After some trial and error, the team had established a working rhythm.
Its ability to do so was aided by the members of the Board of Education. In a meeting, two days after the tornado, Huff told them, “We are going to start school on time.”
Their reaction to that seemingly impossible goal did not surprise the superintendent. “They didn’t question the decision. They got out in front and took care of business,” Huff said.
“These folks on a normal day work long, hard hours at the job and deal with patron calls about everything from overcooked chicken nuggets to angry cheerleader moms.”
The board also included a board member who had lost her home. “They were all affected by the tornado.”
Despite all of this, the board never hesitated to do what needed to be done.  “They knew getting our kids back to school and out of the rubble was the best thing we could do for our community,” Huff said.
The first order of business was to give Huff and his staff the ability to do what needed to be done without having to call a school board meeting for approval every day. They approved a Missouri School Boards Association policy granting authority to Huff to make emergency purchasing decisions without board approval.
At the same time as the hunt for staff and students continued, Huff and his team were making arrangements for temporary buildings that could house the students when the 2011-2012 school year began, a task made all that much more daunting by the fact that school was scheduled to start just 87 days after the tornado.
And now on Memorial Day, May 30, 2011, just eight days after the tornado, Huff prepared to address the “family gathering.”
The crowd quieted as a man stepped to the microphone and said, “How about a great hand for our superintendent of schools, C. J. Huff?”
As the crowd applauded, Huff adjusted the microphone and wiped sweat from his forehead.
“First of all, it’s good to see the family here. I miss you guys. I want to thank you for making the time to join your Joplin Schools family today as we celebrate life in the midst of destruction.”
“Memorial Day is set aside to honor those who have given their lives to defend those principles we hold most dear. I was thinking about this last night and the parallels to our situation are striking. Our soldiers don’t choose the battles they fight. They suit up, show up, and do their jobs. We didn’t sign up for this war either. But true to form, in the past week you have pulled together as a family, supporting one another through prayer, words of encouragement, volunteerism, and action. No task was more daunting than our primary mission following the tornado last Sunday evening- the mission- locate and account for all of our family members.”
At that point, Huff’s voice began to falter and tears streaked down his face. He took a few seconds to collect himself as he prepared to deliver the most difficult portion of the most difficult speech of his life.
“At 3:16 last Friday, I received a text message-“ he stopped again, took a deep breath.
‘Are you all right?” someone asked, the question picked up by the microphone.
Huff nodded and continued his sentence,  “that indicated that mission was complete. As a result of your diligence and unwavering fortitude in the face of insurmountable challenges, 100 percent of our family are accounted for.”
The hoops, hollers, and applause began, but the news was not as positive as Huff’s words indicated. All of the family members had been accounted for, but not all of them had survived the tornado.
“I personally believe that all things happen for a reason,” Huff continued. “I believe in God and I believe 3:16 last Friday had significance for all of us. It was a great moment of relief for our family, but more significantly, I believe there were biblical implications, as well.
“John 3:16 says this- For God so loved the world that He gave his only begotten son that whosoever believe him shall not perish, but shall have eternal life.”
Huff paused, took a deep breath and collected himself once more. Many in the crowd, understanding the words that would come next, were also fighting tears, some unsuccessfully.
“Today, we grieve the loss of eight members of our family. We lost seven children and one educator. Today, we celebrate that we are all together again in body and in eternal spirit. Please join me in a moment of silence to honor the family members who are no longer with us.”
After the moment of silence, Huff began what he knew would be the most important part of his speech. With all of the death and destruction that had hit Joplin eight days earlier, with all of the school buildings that were damaged and destroyed, Huff had to point his family toward the goal that would pull them all together- the goal that became a rallying cry for the community that sounded across the nation.
It would have been easy to use the tornado as an excuse for canceling summer school and delaying the beginning of the 2011-2012 school year. Not one person would have questioned that decision had it been made.
Huff, his team, and the Joplin Board of Education never considered any option other than full speed ahead.
“Schools are at the heart of every community,” Huff continued. “It’s where we go to learn, to be inspired and discover and cultivate those qualities that eventually evolve into our careers, so it is only fitting that our schools are not only an essential part of our recovery, but are helping to lead the charge, working in concert with city, state, and federal officials and we will recover and come back stronger than ever.
“One week and one day ago, we were celebrating graduation and preparing for a flurry of parties and other activities. Today, we find ourselves on the back end of a natural disaster that brought more chaos and havoc than we have ever seen before in our lives.
“Our loss has been great. We must never forget those who died in this battle. And today, we celebrate their lives, and their hopes and dreams. We honor their memories by moving forward, rebuilding, and continuing to take care of one another as a family.
“Taking care of family means being your advocate and helping you make it through this crisis. Several of you have inquired if you still have jobs. Let me assure you, we need you now more than ever.  It may seem chaotic until we get all of our buildings rebuilt and restored and you might find classes meeting in locations you haven’t expected…but we will have school,” Huff said, emphasizing each of those last four words.
The news, unexpected to many in the crowd, that somehow, despite all odds, the goal was to start school on time, without a single day of delay, was greeted with thunderous applause.
Thanks to the cameras from the local television stations, as well as those from the networks, and those videoing it to place it on YouTube, C. J. Huff’s words became a rallying cry, not only for the school, but for the city of Joplin. The work that went into making those words a reality made the city and the school district the symbol for a nation.








New Ed Martin ad: He won't waste our time or money

Spence: What is Jay Nixon hiding?

(From the Dave Spence for Governor campaign)


After sixteen years as Attorney General, you’d think Jay Nixon would understand and respect the Sunshine Law and government transparency.  But nothing could be further from the truth.

                 Virginia Young of the St. Louis Post Dispatch and Phill Brooks of KMOX have both written in the last week about the lack of transparency from the Nixon administration. Also already reported today that Jay Nixon is impeding lawmakers' access to information they have requested.

                More egregious examples abound. This Sunshine Law request for documents was filed in November 2011. The simple request was for documents related to a staffer supposedly responsible for board and commission appointments.  The campaign was trying to find out if someone in the Nixon administration was working full-time on this important task. There are unacceptable numbers of vacancies for boards and commission appointments all throughout state government because Jay Nixon is not doing his job.

                “What in the world is Jay Nixon hiding?” asked Dave Spence, Republican gubernatorial nominee.  “When the staffer responsible for boards and commissions doesn’t show up to work and there are questions related to whether she is still on the job, people deserve access to records that answer those questions.  The recent revelation that Jay Nixon issued an edict to all departments that they are not to respond to Sunshine Law requests without those being reviewed by the governor’s office first is another example of Jay Nixon putting politics before service to the people.”

                Jay Nixon knows he was legally required to respond to the Sunshine Law Request within three days and to fulfill the records within the time period he laid out in his response. His failure to comply with the law can mean only one thing: he is hiding politically damaging information to try to get re-elected.

They railroaded Ron Paul, but we still have Cynthia Davis

And that is supposed to be good news?

Council for Citizens Against Government Waste endorses Billy Long


(From the Council for Citizens Against Government Waste PAC)
Today, the Council for Citizens Against Government Waste Political Action Committee (CCAGW PAC) announced its endorsement of Rep. Billy Long (R-Mo.), who is seeking re-election to Congress in Missouri.
“Vigilance on cutting deficits and reducing the debt has never been more essential,” said CCAGW PAC Chairman Tom Schatz. “Taxpayers need friends in Washington who will defend their interests, not the special interests. That is why the CCAGW PAC is supporting Rep. Billy Long, a bona fide fiscal conservative committed to reducing the size of government by working to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse.”
Rep. Long was a principled advocate for lower taxes and smaller government during his first year in Congress and was designated a “Taxpayer Hero” in CCAGW’s 2011 Congressional Ratings for his score of 86 percent. “The CCAGW Congressional Ratings certify that Rep. Long will strive to control spending, fight for lower taxes, and eradicate wasteful programs,” declared Schatz.
The CCAGW PAC also urges Missouri voters to closely examine the records of all incumbents because some have received abysmal vote ratings. Rep. William Clay (D), for example, received a score of 10 percent in the CCAGW 2011 Congressional Ratings and has a lifetime rating of 12 percent, earning him the rank of “Hostile to Taxpayers.” Rep. Emanuel Cleaver scored 5 percent in 2011 and has a lifetime rating of 4 percent. Reps. Clay’s and Cleaver’s ratings demonstrate continued support for higher taxes and profligate spending, which have placed the country on a path to fiscal ruin.
“In the current political and fiscal climate, Congress has engaged in an historically unprecedented level of spending, and is supporting actions that will mortgage our children’s futures. On November 6, 2012, voters in Missouri should support Rep. Long, and other candidates like him, so that they can fight for fiscally conservative principles that will be vital to taxpayers in the 113th Congress. We also urge voters to oppose Reps. Clay and Cleaver, who have been antagonistic to the interests of taxpayers throughout their tenures in Washington,” concluded Schatz.
CCAGW PAC is affiliated with the Council for Citizens Against Government Waste, a 501(c)(4) organization. CCAGW PAC’s mission is to support political candidates who will fight to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse in government and represent the best interests of taxpayers.

Akin votes to cut veterans benefits, votes seven times to raise his own pay

(From the Claire McCaskill campaign)


In a brazen display of hypocrisy, Todd Akin, who’s served in Congress for 12 years, has repeatedly turned his back on Missouri’s veterans by voting to cut veterans benefits, often during the same period of time he voted to raise his own Congressional pay. In 2006, Akin voted to raise his own pay just one month after voting to cut veterans benefits by $6 billion. In 2001, Akin voted to raise his own pay just five days before he voted against fully-funding veterans benefits.

"It takes some real gall for Todd Akin to tell veterans we can't afford to fully fund their benefits just five days after he voted to raise his own Congressional salary," said Erik Dorey. "During his 12 years in Congress, Todd Akin made it clear that he prioritizes his own well-being over the needs of Missouri's veterans. The contrast is clear: Claire voted to stop her own pay raises while working to strengthen funding for veterans' benefits and programs, and Todd Akin voted to raise his own pay while trying to reduce this important funding. Simply put, Todd Akin would not be a Senator on our side."

In 2006, 2005, and 2003, Akin voted to cut veterans benefits while also voting to raise his own pay. Between 2000, when he was elected, and 2007, Akin voted seven times to raise his own Congressional salary by nearly $40,000 over the course of 10 years.

Fully funding veterans benefits and ensuring all veterans have proper access to the healthcare they need has been a top priority for Claire, whose father was a World War II veteran. As a daughter of rural Missouri, Claire paid special attention to rural veterans who have to drive long distances for their treatment at VA hospitals. Claire fought to raise the mileage reimbursement rate for rural veterans, so that they are not being financially punished for receiving the health care they need.

Claire not only fought for access to VA hospitals, she also fought for expanded access to mental health services and improved conditions at VA hospitals. As we continue to learn more about the impact of conditions like Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Claire continues to fight for expanded access to mental health services.

BACKGROUND

2006

2006: Akin Supported Budget That Cut $6 Billion from Veterans Programs and Increased Fees. In May 2006, Akin voted in favor of a $2.8 trillion budget that cut key programs like education, health and veterans programs. The budget cut veterans' healthcare beyond 2007. Despite an initial boost in veterans' health spending, the Republican budget resolution actually cut funding for veterans' appropriated programs by $6 billion below the level that CBO estimates is needed to maintain current services. Additionally, the Republican budget resolution included significant increases in TRICARE costs for military retirees under 65. In fact, healthcare fees will triple for retired officers, double for retired senior enlisted personnel, and increase by 40 percent for junior enlisted retirees. The budget passed 218-210. [House Budget Committee, Minority Staff Analysis of the FY 07 Budget; Vote 158,5/18/06]
  • Akin Vote to Allow $507 Million to Be Stripped from Veterans Programs. In May 2006, Akin voted in favor of the rule governing debate of the Military Quality of Life and Veterans Affairs Appropriations bill. The rule left $507 million worth of projects unprotected from points of order. Rep. Jeb Hensarling, a member of the ultra-conservative Republican Study Committee (RSC), lodged points of order against $507 million worth of projects in the bill, thus stripping them out of the legislation. The points of order were only allowed because the rule governing debate of the bill put forward by the GOP leadership did not protect the funds from points of order. The rule passed 216-187. [CQ Today, 5/19/06; Vote 174, 5/19/06]
Akin Supported Congressional Pay Raise. One month after voting to cut $6 billion from veterans programs, Akin voted to kill an amendment that would block an automatic pay hike for members of Congress. By killing the attempt to block the pay raise, Akin voted to receive a 2 percent increase and an annual salary of $165,200. The effort to block the anti-pay raise amendment passed 249-167. [H RES 865, Vote #261, 6/13/06] NOTE: This pay raise was later blocked by the Democratic Congress in 2007.

2005

Akin Supported Budget That Cut Veterans Programs by $13.5 Billion. In April 2005, Akin voted in favor of final passage of the $2.6 trillion budget conference report for 2006. The conference report cut funding for veterans' health care by $13.5 billion over five years. The budget passed 214-211. [House Budget Committee Democratic Caucus, "Summary and Analysis of FY 2006 Budget Resolution Conference Report," 4/28/05; Vote 149, 4/28/05]

Akin Supported Congressional Pay Raise. Akin voted in favor of a measure intended to prevent the introduction of an amendment blocking an increase in the annual salary for House members by $3,100 to $165,000. The House blocked a bid by Congressman Jim Matheson (D-UT) to force an up-or-down vote on the pay raise. The effort to block the anti-pay raise amendment passed 263-152. [HR 342,Vote #327, 6/28/05]

2004

Akin Supported Budget That Under-Funded Veterans Programs and Was Strongly Opposed by Veterans' Groups. In 2004, Akin voted in favor of a the fiscal year 2005 budget resolution that cut funding for veterans programs and was strongly opposed by major veterans' organizations. A coalition of veterans groups, including the AMVETS, Disabled American Veterans, Paralyzed Veterans of America, and Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States was vehemently opposed to the bill. "Passage of the budget resolution, as presented, would be a disservice to those men and women who have served this country and who are currently serving in Iraq, Afghanistan, and around the world in our fight against terrorism," the groups said. The budget resolution passed 215-212. [Letter to Members, 3/23/04; Vote 92, 3/20/04]

Akin Supported Congressional Pay Raise in 2004. Akin voted in favor of a motion to order the previous question (thus ending debate and possibility of amendment) on adoption of the rule to provide for House floor consideration of the bill that would appropriate $89.8 billion in fiscal 2005 for the departments of Treasury and Transportation and related agencies. If the motion had been defeated, an amendment to block the Congressional pay raise would have been allowed. The motion passed 235-170. [H Res 770, Vote #451, 9/14/04]

2003

Akin Supported Budget That Cut $15 Billion from Veterans Programs and Increased Fees. In March 2003, Akin voted for a budget that called for cutting $15 billion from veterans' benefits, including veterans' pensions, compensation, education and other benefits, over 10 years. The Disabled Veterans of America strongly opposed the budget, sending a letter to all members of Congress "to communicate our deep-seated outrage regarding the fiscal year 2004 budget adopted by the House Budget Committee, which would cut veterans programs by more than $15 billion during the next 10 years." The GOP budget also included the President's proposal to impose a $250 fee for enrollment in VA health care for category 7 and 8 veterans, along with a doubling of the drug co-payment for those veterans. The budget passed 215-212. [Letter from Edward R. Heath, National Commander, Disabled Veterans of America, 3/17/03; Vote 82, 3/21/03]

Akin Supported Congressional Pay Raise in 2003. Akin voted in favor of a motion to order the previous question (thus ending debate and possibility of amendment) on adoption of the rule to provide for House floor consideration of the bill that would appropriate $89.6 billion in fiscal 2004 spending, including $27.5 billion in discretionary spending, for the departments of Treasury and Transportation and related agencies. If the motion had been defeated, an amendment to block the Congressional pay raise would have been allowed. The motion passed 240-173. [H. Res. 351, Vote #463, 9/4/03]

2001

Akin Opposed Full Funding for Veterans Benefits. In 2001, Akin voted against a motion to recommit the VA-HUD appropriations bill to the House Appropriations Committee with instructions to add language to increase funding for VA medical care programs by an amount adequate to fully fund the cost of all currently authorized services, including those under the Veterans Millennium Health Care Act (PL 106-117). The motion was defeated, 196-230. [Vote 296, 7/30/01]

Akin Supported Congressional Pay Raise in 2001. Akin voted in favor of a motion to order the previous question (thus ending debate and possibility of amendment) on adoption of the rule to provide for House floor consideration of the bill that would appropriate $32.7 billion in fiscal 2002 for the Treasury Department, U.S. Postal Service, various offices of the Executive Office of the President and certain independent agencies. If the motion had been defeated, an amendment to block the Congressional pay raise would have been allowed. The motion passed 293-129. [H Res. 206, Vote #267, 7/25/01]

Akin Also Voted to Raise His Own Pay in 2002 and 2007. Akin has voted against efforts to block the annual cost-of-living increases that Members of Congress receive seven times since 2001.
  • Akin Supported Congressional Pay Raise in 2007. In 2007, Akin voted in favor of a measure to kill an amendment that would block an automatic pay hike for members of Congress. By voting in favor of the effort to the kill the amendment, Akin voted for a 2.5 percent salary increase ($4,400) for an annual salary of $169,600. The motion to kill the amendment passed 244-181. [Washington Post, 6/28/07, HR 517, Vote #580, 6/27/07]
  • Akin Supported Congressional Pay Raise in 2002. Akin voted in favor of a motion to order the previous question (thus ending debate and possibility of amendment) on adoption of the rule to provide for House floor consideration of the bill that would appropriate $35.1 billion in fiscal 2003 Treasury-Postal appropriations. If the motion had been defeated, an amendment to block the Congressional pay raise would have been allowed. The motion passed 258-156. [H. Res. 488, Vote #322, 7/18/02

Seattle Seahawks release Allen Barbre

The Seattle Seahawks released former East Newton High School and Missouri Southern State University standout Allen Barbre today.

Barbre was coming to the end of a four-game suspension for use of performance-enhancing drugs and either had to be added to the 53-man roster or released.

Barbre has also played for the Green Bay Packers, who drafted him out of MSSU, and the Miami Dolphins.

Chris Christie: Todd Akin does not have my support

Lobbyists' gifts to House members attending GOP National Convention buried in report

Documents posted today on the Missouri Ethics Commission website indicate lobbyists hid contributions to individual House members attending the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Fla., by attributing them to the Majority Caucus.

Four lobbyists buried $3,689.70 in meals in that fashion, according to the reports, including the following:

-$860.10 from Ron Fitzwater, lobbyist for the Missouri Pharmacy Association

-$934.80 from Drue Duncan, lobbyist for Pfizer, Inc.

-$934.90 from Brent Evans, lobbyist for Missouri Hospital Association

-$959.90 from Thomas Krewson, lobbyist for Comcast.

All meals were listed for Aug. 26.

Nationally known speaker to be at League of Women voters event



(From the League of Women Voters of Southwest Missouri)

League of Women Voters of Southwest Missouri is hosting an event Oct. 4 designed to inspire women to be involved in the democratic process and to help equip them to run for public office in the future.
    “Women Leaders: A Conversation with Jessica Grounds” will feature nationally known speaker Jessica Grounds, who is executive director of Running Start, an organization based in Washington, D.C. dedicated to motivating and educating young women to become political leaders. The event will be held at 5:30 p.m. Thursday, Oct. 4, at Kentwood Hall, 700 E. St. Louis St.

    In addition to her speech, the event will showcase winners of the League’s cell-phone photo contest “Picturing Women Leaders.” Tickets for the wine and hors d’oeuvre reception are $20 for adults and $10 for students. Purchase tickets here. 

    Individuals may also register now for a companion training event in November. “Speak up, Power up, Step up!” is a one-day training session that will be held from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. Saturday, Nov. 10. Presenter will be Catherine Gray, senior partner at Clarity Central, who is recognized nationwide for her leadership in growing the Vote Run Lead Program at The White House Project. The workshop is designed to prepare women who are considering running for elective office, wanting to serve on public boards or commissions or seeking to improve their skills in public policy leadership. A limited number of seats are available. The cost is $50. Register here or get more details on Facebook at “League of Women Voters of Southwest Missouri.”

    This  League initiative is made possible by a major grant from the Missouri State University Public Affairs Program; and the generosity of these sponsors: AT&T; Allison Cash; Community Foundation of the Ozarks; Drury University Departments of Communications, Community Outreach and Leadership Development, and Women and Gender Studies; Ann Elwell; Empire Bank/Central Trust; Husch Blackwell; MaMa Jean’s Natural Market; Evelyn Gwin Mangan; MSU Departments of Communications, Political Science and Gender Studies; Dr. Nancy O’Reilly; and Webster University.