(From the U. S. Attorney for the Western District of Missouri)
A Houston, Mo., woman pleaded guilty in federal court today to hiring someone to murder her sister.
Leta Faye Douglas, 52, of Houston, pleaded guilty before U.S. District Judge M. Douglas Harpool to the charge contained in a Feb. 24, 2015, federal indictment.
By pleading guilty today, Douglas admitted that she agreed to pay another person – who was actually an undercover law enforcement officer – $2,000 to murder her sister. Douglas must forfeit the $2,000 that she paid the undercover officer to the government.
According to court documents, Douglas sent a letter to her ex-husband in January 2015, asking for his help. Douglas’s ex-husband, who lives in Nebraska, has been divorced from her for about 18 years and has not maintained contact with her. When he called her in response to receiving the letter, Douglas told him that she wanted her sister killed. Douglas told her ex-husband that her parents were in a home for the elderly and that her sister was in charge of their finances. He believed that Douglas wanted to have access to her parents' financial estate.
Douglas’s ex-husband contacted law enforcement authorities. An undercover employee of the Missouri State Highway Patrol contacted Douglas and made arrangements to meet in the Walmart parking lot in Houston on Feb. 9, 2015. The undercover, who was wearing an audio recording device, approached Douglas’s vehicle and got into the front passenger’s seat. During the initial conversation, she provided the undercover with a photograph of her sister and a hand-drawn map to her sister’s residence.
The entire conversation between Douglas and the undercover was recorded. Douglas told the undercover that her sister’s husband would also be home and that they had two dogs inside the house. She handed him an envelope that contained $2,000.
Douglas was arrested at her residence a few days later.
Under federal statutes, Douglas is subject to a sentence of up to 10 years in federal prison without parole, plus a fine up to $250,000. A sentencing hearing will be scheduled after the completion of a presentence investigation by the United States Probation Office.
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney James J. Kelleher. It was investigated by the FBI, the Missouri State Highway Patrol and the South Central Drug Task Force.
This blog features news and commentary from Randy Turner, a former teacher, newspaper reporter and editor. Send news items or comments to rturner229@hotmail.com
Monday, January 04, 2016
Special announcement about Turner Report, Inside Joplin blogs
For the first time, I am going to be able to provide local advertising space on four of my blogs.
Beginning this week, local advertisers can place orders for spots on the Turner Report, Inside Joplin, Inside Joplin Obituaries, and Turner Resports.
Examples of the ad space and size can be seen in the right hand column.
A few facts for potential advertisers to know:
-The Turner Report reaches an average of 5,000 to 6,000 visitors daily and between 150,000 and 180,000 per month. Those numbers will generally increase during peak times for the blog, including the time just before the April elections when political coverage is in full swing. (A note to candidates for Joplin R-8 Board and Joplin City Council. Your advertisements on the Turner Report blogs will be seen by people who plan to vote and will not be buried in a pricey newspaper ad that few will ever read.)
-Inside Joplin has built its average up to 2,000 to 2,500 visitors daily.
-Inside Joplin Obituaries consistently reaches 1,500 visitors daily and lately, more often than not, has been between 2,000 and 2,500.
-Turner Resports averages about 500 visitors daily with the lion's share (pun intended) coming from supporters of Missouri Southern State University.
Special discounted rates will be offered to those who advertise on multiple blogs or who buy advertising for a longer period of time.
For information about the rates and how to place ads, you can e-mail rturner229@hotmail.com.
Beginning this week, local advertisers can place orders for spots on the Turner Report, Inside Joplin, Inside Joplin Obituaries, and Turner Resports.
Examples of the ad space and size can be seen in the right hand column.
A few facts for potential advertisers to know:
-The Turner Report reaches an average of 5,000 to 6,000 visitors daily and between 150,000 and 180,000 per month. Those numbers will generally increase during peak times for the blog, including the time just before the April elections when political coverage is in full swing. (A note to candidates for Joplin R-8 Board and Joplin City Council. Your advertisements on the Turner Report blogs will be seen by people who plan to vote and will not be buried in a pricey newspaper ad that few will ever read.)
-Inside Joplin has built its average up to 2,000 to 2,500 visitors daily.
-Inside Joplin Obituaries consistently reaches 1,500 visitors daily and lately, more often than not, has been between 2,000 and 2,500.
-Turner Resports averages about 500 visitors daily with the lion's share (pun intended) coming from supporters of Missouri Southern State University.
Special discounted rates will be offered to those who advertise on multiple blogs or who buy advertising for a longer period of time.
For information about the rates and how to place ads, you can e-mail rturner229@hotmail.com.
Remembering the Joplin Daily
A reader reminded me yesterday that it was 10 years ago that Gatehouse Media launched what should have been the first serious competitor to the Joplin Globe in a long time- the Joplin Daily.
The idea was a bold one. It was called Joplin Daily, but the newspaper was only published once a week with a chief purpose of directing readers toward the website, which would be updated daily.
Joplin Daily was launched with a considerable amount of fanfare, including promotion in television ads and billboards.
Gatehouse did everything right- until the newspaper began publishing.
The Daily never had much of a chance. All promotion stopped once the first few issues had been published. No effort was made to sell the online product. Apparently no one ever bothered to tell the advertising sales crew that the website was the focus. It used the same approach that it would have used for a typical newspaper and even worse, no salespeople were ever dedicated solely to selling ads for the Daily. The sales staff of the Big Nickel, another Gatehouse publication, was used.
The Daily had a three-person news staff, which obviously put it at a disadvantage when it came to competing with the Globe. The product was still solid, thanks to Editor John Hacker, now managing editor of the Carthage Press, who has been the best shoe leather reporter in this area for years, and Kaylea Hutson, now managing editor of the Grove Sun, whose coverage of education was far superior than that provided by the Globe.
In order for an undermanned newspaper staff to have a chance against a bloated competitor, it has to take a different approach. That was never really done by the Daily. It had good stories and good photos, but there was never anything that really set it apart from the Globe. The Daily never made a case for its continued existence and thus lasted only a little more than a year.
After the Daily shut down, I examined the reasons in a Turner Report post on March 15, 2007:
What went wrong with the Joplin Daily?
1. GateHouse officials promoted the first issue heavily, but then failed to get copies of the print edition to much of Joplin, and the same areas were never adequately sampled (many were never sampled at all). There are Joplin residents who will never mourn the passing of the newspaper, because they never knew it existed.
2. Except for positive news reporting, the paper never demonstrated any major differences between its brand of reporting and the brand employed by the Globe.
3. The Daily had few, if any, stories that would create the kind of water cooler buzz that would steer readers in its direction. Hacker and his staff did their jobs well, but never had the kind of major scoops that could put the Daily on the map. A lot of that was due to the pressures placed on what was essentially a three-person staff to put out a daily publication, something that is virtually impossible if you plan to adequately cover a town of 40,000 plus.
4. Promotion for the Daily was non-existent after the first few weeks. GateHouse never gave it a chance.
5. The Daily never had even one full-time ad salesperson and never had anyone who made a concentrated sales pitch for the web product.
The Joplin Daily should never have existed if GateHouse didn't plan to give it a fighting chance to succeed. Sadly, it could have succeeded, and would have had at least a ray of hope if the following steps had been taken:
1. The website should have been easier to navigate instead of being one of GateHouse's cookie-cutter sites. A greater emphasis on comments and discussion could have kept readers coming back to the website every day.
2. The minute the decision was made to make the website and not the print edition the focus, GateHouse should have emphasized links, links, and more links. Links should have been offered to anything remotely connected with Joplin, the school systems, city offices, the public library, businesses. If people want to know what is going on in Joplin, this would have given them a one-stop site, which would make it far more attractive to potential advertisers.
3. Make up for the lack of manpower by using links to increase coverage of Joplin news. The Daily could have offered links to legislation sponsored by Joplin's representatives and senator, legislation that affected Joplin residents or businesses, on the state or national level. Provide links to newspaper stories about Roy Blunt, Kit Bond, Claire McCaskill, Matt Blunt, other statewide officials. When people or businesses with connections to Joplin are in the news provide links to the stories. Links could have been done quickly and could have greatly expanded the coverage provided by the Daily.
4. Take major issues that hit the city and featurize them. Keep providing the nuts-and-bolts coverage, but blanket the website with information and features. Show how the major news stories affect the readers. Scan or link to documents that provide background. Obviously, a small staff does not have the capability to take on the Globe on every story, but by picking and choosing the right battles and offering far more coverage on those stories, the Daily could have staked out a claim to readership. Alternative publications thrive in many areas across the United States.
5. Build a stable of columnists that people actually want to read. One failure of the Daily is that it never had regular columnists that people want to come back to read every day or every week. In a town where the Globe's Mike Pound is the only daily columnist, the target would not have to be set too high. Unfortunately, the Daily took the advertising department approach to lining up columnists. In other words, let's find a columnist who represents the Chamber, let's find one that covers this niche or that niche, the Humane Society or some museum. Forget about that nonsense. Find people who can write, and who are willing to share their opinions, and give them a forum. Find people who can tell a story.
6. Find things that are not being covered by the Globe and cover them well. The positive news about schools was a step in the right direction, but there are other areas that could also be effective. Media coverage, comings and goings at the radio and television stations and offer coverage of the trials and travails of the Joplin Globe itself. You certainly are not going to read about those in the Globe. The New York tabloids and the Village Voice constantly make hay by writing about problems at the New York Times.
7. Find a voice. The Daily never did. A competitor needs to be feisty and deliver stories with attitude and a little bit of a swagger. If the Globe is the voice of big business, then the Daily should have been the voice of the little guy.
The failure of the Joplin Daily discouraged anyone from mounting a startup against the Globe, but the same conditions that made it feasible to launch a competitor in 2006 exist 10 years later.
For the most part, the Globe has become a parody of a news organization and more an arm of the portion of the city's well-to-do that has been willing to sacrifice the integrity of city government and the Joplin R-8 School District to achieve its own ends. Consider the following:
-To this day, people who rely solely on the Joplin Globe for their news have no idea why it was necessary for the C. J. Huff era to end in the R-8 School District.
-The same holds true with the city where those who rely on the Globe still think of former City Manager Mark Rohr as a misunderstood hero who was railroaded out of Joplin and believe that former City Councilman Mike Woolston made a noble sacrifice by resigning.
-The Globe has steadfastly did its best to protect the local special interests against the three investigations that showed conclusively how government was being mismanaged- the Loraine Report and the state audits of the city and school district.
-The newspaper continues unsuccessfully to pass off an average columnist, Mike Pound, as being the voice of the community and has given considerable space to guest columnists like Anson Burlingame and Jeff Caldwell, who have little appeal to any readers.
-The Globe's investigative reporting is limited and often seems designed to prove that public figures who are under fire are misunderstood and do not deserve criticism. Remember the efforts the Globe went to (unsuccessfully) in an effort to back up C. J. Huff's contention that the school district really did not have a problem with teachers leaving?
-The Globe still does nothing to provide a voice for the average citizen in this community.
Many of the suggestions I made in 2007 would work just as well today. I have used many of them on the Turner Report/Inside Joplin blogs, which have continued to grow steadily and this is just one person, with no other reporters and no advertising staff.
A startup newspaper with a small staff similar numberwise to the Joplin Daily would have a fighting chance because of the goodwill that has been squandered by the Globe over the past few years. There is a segment of the business community that has been alienated by the newspaper. The main problem you would run into is that many business people have a tendency to hold back advertising from a new publication until they see if it is going to last, thus preventing the new publications from getting the money they need to succeed.
Another possibility would be to buy an existing publication and tailor it as a competitor to the Globe. For instance, the Webb City Sentinel is for sale, along with the shopper, the Wise Buyer. I would never suggest doing anything to change the Sentinel from being a Webb City newspaper, but expanding it to twice a week with an edition concentrating on Joplin/Jasper County news, would be feasible and would also enable the new edition to immediately begin seeking legal advertising, something that makes more money for smaller newspapers because they have less overhead. (Startup newspapers have to wait a certain amount of time to be able to sell legal advertising, while a second edition of the Sentinel geared to Joplin/Jasper County could begin publishing them immediately.)
A reporter or two and aggressive ad sales, along with well chosen columnists, and the type of approach I described above should enable that kind of weekly to inflict damage upon the Globe. Someone willing to use that approach could either establish a viable competitor to the Globe, or it could follow the example set by Jimmie Sexton when he published the weekly Neosho Post as a competitor to the Neosho Daily News. Sexton not only made money with his venture, but after a few years, made a pretty penny when the Daily bought him out to stop the bleeding.
The idea was a bold one. It was called Joplin Daily, but the newspaper was only published once a week with a chief purpose of directing readers toward the website, which would be updated daily.
Joplin Daily was launched with a considerable amount of fanfare, including promotion in television ads and billboards.
Gatehouse did everything right- until the newspaper began publishing.
The Daily never had much of a chance. All promotion stopped once the first few issues had been published. No effort was made to sell the online product. Apparently no one ever bothered to tell the advertising sales crew that the website was the focus. It used the same approach that it would have used for a typical newspaper and even worse, no salespeople were ever dedicated solely to selling ads for the Daily. The sales staff of the Big Nickel, another Gatehouse publication, was used.
The Daily had a three-person news staff, which obviously put it at a disadvantage when it came to competing with the Globe. The product was still solid, thanks to Editor John Hacker, now managing editor of the Carthage Press, who has been the best shoe leather reporter in this area for years, and Kaylea Hutson, now managing editor of the Grove Sun, whose coverage of education was far superior than that provided by the Globe.
In order for an undermanned newspaper staff to have a chance against a bloated competitor, it has to take a different approach. That was never really done by the Daily. It had good stories and good photos, but there was never anything that really set it apart from the Globe. The Daily never made a case for its continued existence and thus lasted only a little more than a year.
After the Daily shut down, I examined the reasons in a Turner Report post on March 15, 2007:
What went wrong with the Joplin Daily?
1. GateHouse officials promoted the first issue heavily, but then failed to get copies of the print edition to much of Joplin, and the same areas were never adequately sampled (many were never sampled at all). There are Joplin residents who will never mourn the passing of the newspaper, because they never knew it existed.
2. Except for positive news reporting, the paper never demonstrated any major differences between its brand of reporting and the brand employed by the Globe.
3. The Daily had few, if any, stories that would create the kind of water cooler buzz that would steer readers in its direction. Hacker and his staff did their jobs well, but never had the kind of major scoops that could put the Daily on the map. A lot of that was due to the pressures placed on what was essentially a three-person staff to put out a daily publication, something that is virtually impossible if you plan to adequately cover a town of 40,000 plus.
4. Promotion for the Daily was non-existent after the first few weeks. GateHouse never gave it a chance.
5. The Daily never had even one full-time ad salesperson and never had anyone who made a concentrated sales pitch for the web product.
The Joplin Daily should never have existed if GateHouse didn't plan to give it a fighting chance to succeed. Sadly, it could have succeeded, and would have had at least a ray of hope if the following steps had been taken:
1. The website should have been easier to navigate instead of being one of GateHouse's cookie-cutter sites. A greater emphasis on comments and discussion could have kept readers coming back to the website every day.
2. The minute the decision was made to make the website and not the print edition the focus, GateHouse should have emphasized links, links, and more links. Links should have been offered to anything remotely connected with Joplin, the school systems, city offices, the public library, businesses. If people want to know what is going on in Joplin, this would have given them a one-stop site, which would make it far more attractive to potential advertisers.
3. Make up for the lack of manpower by using links to increase coverage of Joplin news. The Daily could have offered links to legislation sponsored by Joplin's representatives and senator, legislation that affected Joplin residents or businesses, on the state or national level. Provide links to newspaper stories about Roy Blunt, Kit Bond, Claire McCaskill, Matt Blunt, other statewide officials. When people or businesses with connections to Joplin are in the news provide links to the stories. Links could have been done quickly and could have greatly expanded the coverage provided by the Daily.
4. Take major issues that hit the city and featurize them. Keep providing the nuts-and-bolts coverage, but blanket the website with information and features. Show how the major news stories affect the readers. Scan or link to documents that provide background. Obviously, a small staff does not have the capability to take on the Globe on every story, but by picking and choosing the right battles and offering far more coverage on those stories, the Daily could have staked out a claim to readership. Alternative publications thrive in many areas across the United States.
5. Build a stable of columnists that people actually want to read. One failure of the Daily is that it never had regular columnists that people want to come back to read every day or every week. In a town where the Globe's Mike Pound is the only daily columnist, the target would not have to be set too high. Unfortunately, the Daily took the advertising department approach to lining up columnists. In other words, let's find a columnist who represents the Chamber, let's find one that covers this niche or that niche, the Humane Society or some museum. Forget about that nonsense. Find people who can write, and who are willing to share their opinions, and give them a forum. Find people who can tell a story.
6. Find things that are not being covered by the Globe and cover them well. The positive news about schools was a step in the right direction, but there are other areas that could also be effective. Media coverage, comings and goings at the radio and television stations and offer coverage of the trials and travails of the Joplin Globe itself. You certainly are not going to read about those in the Globe. The New York tabloids and the Village Voice constantly make hay by writing about problems at the New York Times.
7. Find a voice. The Daily never did. A competitor needs to be feisty and deliver stories with attitude and a little bit of a swagger. If the Globe is the voice of big business, then the Daily should have been the voice of the little guy.
The failure of the Joplin Daily discouraged anyone from mounting a startup against the Globe, but the same conditions that made it feasible to launch a competitor in 2006 exist 10 years later.
For the most part, the Globe has become a parody of a news organization and more an arm of the portion of the city's well-to-do that has been willing to sacrifice the integrity of city government and the Joplin R-8 School District to achieve its own ends. Consider the following:
-To this day, people who rely solely on the Joplin Globe for their news have no idea why it was necessary for the C. J. Huff era to end in the R-8 School District.
-The same holds true with the city where those who rely on the Globe still think of former City Manager Mark Rohr as a misunderstood hero who was railroaded out of Joplin and believe that former City Councilman Mike Woolston made a noble sacrifice by resigning.
-The Globe has steadfastly did its best to protect the local special interests against the three investigations that showed conclusively how government was being mismanaged- the Loraine Report and the state audits of the city and school district.
-The newspaper continues unsuccessfully to pass off an average columnist, Mike Pound, as being the voice of the community and has given considerable space to guest columnists like Anson Burlingame and Jeff Caldwell, who have little appeal to any readers.
-The Globe's investigative reporting is limited and often seems designed to prove that public figures who are under fire are misunderstood and do not deserve criticism. Remember the efforts the Globe went to (unsuccessfully) in an effort to back up C. J. Huff's contention that the school district really did not have a problem with teachers leaving?
-The Globe still does nothing to provide a voice for the average citizen in this community.
Many of the suggestions I made in 2007 would work just as well today. I have used many of them on the Turner Report/Inside Joplin blogs, which have continued to grow steadily and this is just one person, with no other reporters and no advertising staff.
A startup newspaper with a small staff similar numberwise to the Joplin Daily would have a fighting chance because of the goodwill that has been squandered by the Globe over the past few years. There is a segment of the business community that has been alienated by the newspaper. The main problem you would run into is that many business people have a tendency to hold back advertising from a new publication until they see if it is going to last, thus preventing the new publications from getting the money they need to succeed.
Another possibility would be to buy an existing publication and tailor it as a competitor to the Globe. For instance, the Webb City Sentinel is for sale, along with the shopper, the Wise Buyer. I would never suggest doing anything to change the Sentinel from being a Webb City newspaper, but expanding it to twice a week with an edition concentrating on Joplin/Jasper County news, would be feasible and would also enable the new edition to immediately begin seeking legal advertising, something that makes more money for smaller newspapers because they have less overhead. (Startup newspapers have to wait a certain amount of time to be able to sell legal advertising, while a second edition of the Sentinel geared to Joplin/Jasper County could begin publishing them immediately.)
A reporter or two and aggressive ad sales, along with well chosen columnists, and the type of approach I described above should enable that kind of weekly to inflict damage upon the Globe. Someone willing to use that approach could either establish a viable competitor to the Globe, or it could follow the example set by Jimmie Sexton when he published the weekly Neosho Post as a competitor to the Neosho Daily News. Sexton not only made money with his venture, but after a few years, made a pretty penny when the Daily bought him out to stop the bleeding.
St. Louis Democrat indicates legislature will be tale of guns and neurosis
(From Rep. Stacey Newman, D-St. Louis)
Missouri legislature begins again in 3 days on January 6th promptly at Noon. Ready?
We have been notified that we will be fast tracking a bill in the next 2 weeks but have absolutely no idea what it is. GOP leadership won't tell us.
According to bills pre-filed, it's clear that attacking abortion providers and Planned Parenthood, allowing guns on campus & making them tax-exempt and taking away voter rights (10th straight year of Voter ID proposals) is the leadership's priority.
The media reports constantly on our lack of ethic requirements in the Capital (unlimited campaign contributions, unlimited lobbyist gifts & no rules on lawmakers becoming lobbyists) but I guarantee a bill addressing this will NOT make it to the Governor's desk. Why? There's no will by the leadership to change a system that many find profitable.
However we are required now to attend a 30 minute sexual harassment training by McMahon Berger law firm, which represents companies who have had claims of sexual harassment and discrimination. After two highly publicized intern harassment scandals last session, one resulting in the resignation of former Speaker John Diehl along with the media coverage of ongoing sexual harassment in the Capitol, the training is a recommended tool. Hopefully the message will be simply, "don't do it".
For those of you who are not sure who represents you in the MO Legislature - FIND OUT HERE. It's imperative this session that you know who is standing up for you or... not.
This is presidential election season with many statewide offices on the ballot along with every single House member. Make sure you're registered to vote where you live - check HERE.
We need you to be engaged, involved and closely paying attention.
GUN VIOLENCE
Out of sheer frustration, I pre-filed HB1397 on December 1st, which would require firearm purchasers to undergo similiar restrictions as accessing an abortion in Missouri. Cosmopolitan Magazine asked me recently to write an op-ed on why I proposed a bill which would require gun buyers to visit a doctor - HERE.
Since December 1st, I've heard from almost 1000 people in 45 states who are as mad as I am about the lack of action on gun violence from Congress & most state legislatures.
The New York Times recently profiled Missouri's increasing gun violence rate: In Missouri, Fewer Gun Restrictions and More Gun Killings. St. Louis & Kansas City mayors, police chiefs and prosecutors keep asking for help for "slow motion mass murder", as KC Mayor Sly James calls it. St. Louis City ended 2015 with a record number of gun violence deaths including over 180 homicides, as tracked by STLPD Chief Sam Dotson. There is currently NO
ability to accurately track every gun death in Missouri - including those from domestic violence, accidental shootings of children and suicides.
We ended 2015 with more mass shootings in the U.S. (with 4 fatalities or more) than days of the year - a total of 372, killing 475 and wounding 1870.
So far in 2016? Check out the box at left from www.GunViolenceArchive.org.
Monday January 4th President Obama is scheduled to meet with Attorney General Loretta Lynch to finalize a series of executive orders on fireams to be announced as early as this week, including anticipated expanded federal background checks.
On January 7th, CNN is hosting a hour long town hall on guns with President Obama. I will be
be watching and hope you will too.
We know that 90% of Americans & 80% of Missourians want the background check loophole closed at gun shows and online. Those include NRA members and gun owners. The majority of us want to restrict guns from convicted felons, domestic abusers and those on the federal no-fly list. We want negligent "accidental" firearm deaths of children to be prosecuted. We, including college administrators, do NOT want guns on our college campuses.
My additional firearm bills pre-filed (others coming shortly):
HB1595 - Allows law enforcement, family members to obtain temporary gun violence restraining orders for known armed dangerous persons
HB1596 - Universal background checks, including via internet, gun shows & private sales
We KNOW that More Guns is Not the Answer
Missouri GOP's reaction:
HB1468 by Rep. Eric Burlison (Springfield) - allow concealed weapons anywhere
HB1746 by Rep. Rick Brattin (Harrisonville) - tax exception for firearms & ammunition
HB1819 by Rep. Joe Don McGaugh (Carrollton) - expands legal use of deadly force ("shoot to kill")
HB1899 by Rep. Jered Taylor(Nixa) - allow concealed weapons on college campuses
HB1901 by Rep. Jered Taylor (Nixa) - sales tax holiday for firearms
HB1910 by Rep. Mike Kelley (Lamar) - allow concealed weapons on college campuses
HB1938 by Rep Ron Hicks (St. Peters) - allow concealed weapons on public transportation
SB589 by Sen. Bob Dixon (Springfield) - allow concealed weapons on college campuses
SB731 by Sen. Brian Munzlinger (Williamstown) - allow concealed weapons on college campuses
SB782 by Sen. Bob Onder (Lake St. Louis) - allow concealed weapons on public transportation
We Want Action.
Not "More Prayers" and More Pandering to the Gun Lobby.
Missouri legislature begins again in 3 days on January 6th promptly at Noon. Ready?
We have been notified that we will be fast tracking a bill in the next 2 weeks but have absolutely no idea what it is. GOP leadership won't tell us.
According to bills pre-filed, it's clear that attacking abortion providers and Planned Parenthood, allowing guns on campus & making them tax-exempt and taking away voter rights (10th straight year of Voter ID proposals) is the leadership's priority.
The media reports constantly on our lack of ethic requirements in the Capital (unlimited campaign contributions, unlimited lobbyist gifts & no rules on lawmakers becoming lobbyists) but I guarantee a bill addressing this will NOT make it to the Governor's desk. Why? There's no will by the leadership to change a system that many find profitable.
However we are required now to attend a 30 minute sexual harassment training by McMahon Berger law firm, which represents companies who have had claims of sexual harassment and discrimination. After two highly publicized intern harassment scandals last session, one resulting in the resignation of former Speaker John Diehl along with the media coverage of ongoing sexual harassment in the Capitol, the training is a recommended tool. Hopefully the message will be simply, "don't do it".
For those of you who are not sure who represents you in the MO Legislature - FIND OUT HERE. It's imperative this session that you know who is standing up for you or... not.
This is presidential election season with many statewide offices on the ballot along with every single House member. Make sure you're registered to vote where you live - check HERE.
We need you to be engaged, involved and closely paying attention.
GUN VIOLENCE
Out of sheer frustration, I pre-filed HB1397 on December 1st, which would require firearm purchasers to undergo similiar restrictions as accessing an abortion in Missouri. Cosmopolitan Magazine asked me recently to write an op-ed on why I proposed a bill which would require gun buyers to visit a doctor - HERE.
Since December 1st, I've heard from almost 1000 people in 45 states who are as mad as I am about the lack of action on gun violence from Congress & most state legislatures.
The New York Times recently profiled Missouri's increasing gun violence rate: In Missouri, Fewer Gun Restrictions and More Gun Killings. St. Louis & Kansas City mayors, police chiefs and prosecutors keep asking for help for "slow motion mass murder", as KC Mayor Sly James calls it. St. Louis City ended 2015 with a record number of gun violence deaths including over 180 homicides, as tracked by STLPD Chief Sam Dotson. There is currently NO
ability to accurately track every gun death in Missouri - including those from domestic violence, accidental shootings of children and suicides.
We ended 2015 with more mass shootings in the U.S. (with 4 fatalities or more) than days of the year - a total of 372, killing 475 and wounding 1870.
So far in 2016? Check out the box at left from www.GunViolenceArchive.org.
Monday January 4th President Obama is scheduled to meet with Attorney General Loretta Lynch to finalize a series of executive orders on fireams to be announced as early as this week, including anticipated expanded federal background checks.
On January 7th, CNN is hosting a hour long town hall on guns with President Obama. I will be
be watching and hope you will too.
We know that 90% of Americans & 80% of Missourians want the background check loophole closed at gun shows and online. Those include NRA members and gun owners. The majority of us want to restrict guns from convicted felons, domestic abusers and those on the federal no-fly list. We want negligent "accidental" firearm deaths of children to be prosecuted. We, including college administrators, do NOT want guns on our college campuses.
My additional firearm bills pre-filed (others coming shortly):
HB1595 - Allows law enforcement, family members to obtain temporary gun violence restraining orders for known armed dangerous persons
HB1596 - Universal background checks, including via internet, gun shows & private sales
We KNOW that More Guns is Not the Answer
Missouri GOP's reaction:
HB1468 by Rep. Eric Burlison (Springfield) - allow concealed weapons anywhere
HB1746 by Rep. Rick Brattin (Harrisonville) - tax exception for firearms & ammunition
HB1819 by Rep. Joe Don McGaugh (Carrollton) - expands legal use of deadly force ("shoot to kill")
HB1899 by Rep. Jered Taylor(Nixa) - allow concealed weapons on college campuses
HB1901 by Rep. Jered Taylor (Nixa) - sales tax holiday for firearms
HB1910 by Rep. Mike Kelley (Lamar) - allow concealed weapons on college campuses
HB1938 by Rep Ron Hicks (St. Peters) - allow concealed weapons on public transportation
SB589 by Sen. Bob Dixon (Springfield) - allow concealed weapons on college campuses
SB731 by Sen. Brian Munzlinger (Williamstown) - allow concealed weapons on college campuses
SB782 by Sen. Bob Onder (Lake St. Louis) - allow concealed weapons on public transportation
We Want Action.
Not "More Prayers" and More Pandering to the Gun Lobby.
Sunday, January 03, 2016
Petition drive seeks proper sentencing for Joplin man who bit, abused 9-month-old
Andrew Vaughan's sentences on child abuse charges in Jasper and Newton counties shocked the sensibilities of the people in this area.
There was no problem with the five years he was given by judges in the two counties, even though many would have liked to see a longer sentence, considering the crime, which was explained by Newton County assistant prosecutor Kathleen Miller in this passage from a KZRG report:
On March 6, 2014, the infant was left in the care of Vaughan and his wife. While Vaughan's wife took their own son to the doctor in Jasper County, he admitted to police to biting the baby, leaving teeth marks on the child because she wouldn't stop crying. Newton County Assistant Prosecutor Kathleen Miller tells News Talk KZRG the abuse continued at their Newton County home while his wife was napping.
"He had pulled her ears to the point that one ear had separated from the skull. Both ears were red and swollen to the extent that the earrings that were in the child's ears were bent. Additionally, there is indication, although no confession, that she had been hit a number of times in the back and squeezed. There was also bruising about her face and an examination determined that her collar bone had been broken."
The infant's mother immediately rushed her baby to the hospital upon picking her up, and reported the abuse to police.
My daughter, Tinsley Peterson, was abused by my babysitter's (now ex) husband, Andrew Vaughan, on March 6, 2015. She was 9 months old at the time and he bit her, choked her, broke her collarbone, almost detached her ears from her head and squeezed her stomach so hard that he left bruises. The biting occurred in Jasper County in Joplin, Missouri and the rest of the abuse happened in Newton County.
There was no problem with the five years he was given by judges in the two counties, even though many would have liked to see a longer sentence, considering the crime, which was explained by Newton County assistant prosecutor Kathleen Miller in this passage from a KZRG report:
On March 6, 2014, the infant was left in the care of Vaughan and his wife. While Vaughan's wife took their own son to the doctor in Jasper County, he admitted to police to biting the baby, leaving teeth marks on the child because she wouldn't stop crying. Newton County Assistant Prosecutor Kathleen Miller tells News Talk KZRG the abuse continued at their Newton County home while his wife was napping.
"He had pulled her ears to the point that one ear had separated from the skull. Both ears were red and swollen to the extent that the earrings that were in the child's ears were bent. Additionally, there is indication, although no confession, that she had been hit a number of times in the back and squeezed. There was also bruising about her face and an examination determined that her collar bone had been broken."
The infant's mother immediately rushed her baby to the hospital upon picking her up, and reported the abuse to police.
The problem was not the five-year sentence, but the fact that Vaughn was sentenced in both counties with a 120-day callback, meaning he could have been back on the streets in four months.
It was later discovered that the 120-day callback could not be used on child abuse charges. Newton County officials are looking to resentence Vaughan for child abuse, guaranteeing a longer sentence, but according to the child's mother, Jasper County officials do not see it the same way. Vaughan's hearing is scheduled for Monday in Judge David Dally's courtroom.
On her Change.org petition, Justice for Tinsley Peterson, Tinsley's mother, Amanda Peterson is asking that Vaughan receive more than a slap on the wrist for what he did to Tinsley:
He was charged with a felony Child Abuse (class C) in each county and sentenced to 120 day shock incarceration. When he arrived at the St.Joe Department of Corrections they told Newton and Jasper that he is not eligible for the 120 day shock program because of his charge.
Both counties planned on dropping the charge to Child Endangerment so that he could serve the 120 days shock. I talked to Newton County and they are leaving the charge as abuse, as they should and they are starting all over and re-sentencing him with the correct sentence.
Jasper County has been more of a battle. I argued with them on the phone for two days because they still want to change the charge to fit what they sentenced him to in the beginning. They charged him with the correct charge but sentenced him incorrectly.
Under Missouri law from the website dss.mo.gov Title: Child Welfare ManualSection 7: Glossary/ReferenceChapter 28: Physical AbuseEffective date: November 30, 2015 An adult biting a child is considered child abuse. NOT ENDANGERMENT! Please sign and share this petition to help me get the justice my daughter deserves! She was and still is somewhat, afraid of men. I cannot take her to the doctor if it is a male doctor. Me and my family have suffered so much mentally and emotionally and we would really like him to get the charge and sentence he deserves! Thank you all so much!
As of this writing, the petition has 1,725 signatures.
My New Year's Eve stay at the Freeman Hotel
I can't recall the exact moment or an incident that prompted my change, but sometime over the years, I stopped losing control of my temper over what I later realized were small incidents.
It might have been something that happened about 15 years ago that started me on the pathway to my current, more amiable disposition. I had been having problems when I went shopping at Hastings. Every time I left the store, I set off the security device. Since I almost always purchased something, someone would wave me through. It was more of a nuisance than anything else.
One Friday night, I shopped awhile, then started to leave without buying anything. Once again, I set off the security device and this time, I was not waved through. "Please stop," a young man said, so I did.
I was already frustrated, embarrassed and angry. so when the young man told me he needed to see what was in my pockets, I showed him- by dropping the items one after another, on the floor. After nearly five minutes of drawing attention for something that should have been finished in a few seconds, the Hastings employee, who stayed remarkably calm considering my actions, finally discovered that the offending item was a card I carried in my wallet.. The employee even picked up the items from the floor.
And then he apologized to me for the inconvenience.
As I walked out of the store, I couldn't help thinking, correctly, that I had behaved like a complete idiot. The employee had done nothing to deserve the hassle I gave him and I had gained nothing by my display. The problem would have been solved much sooner if I had behaved like a decent human being.
As the years have passed, I have mellowed in other ways, as well, not even realizing it. I doubt if those who remember me from the days when I was kicked out of six baseball games would have even recognized the person who worked as a classroom teacher.
And perhaps it was dealing with people and their frustrations with teachers, whether it be students or parents, helped prepare me for my unexpected holiday activities.
For the past few weeks, I have had problems with walking, I could go a few steps and then I would feel a pressure on my chest. When this happened, I stopped, took a breath, waited for the feeling to go away, and then continued walking, usually having no difficulties.
But it kept happening.
After Christmas, I called the office of Dr. Stauffer at the Freeman Heart Institute, the doctor who put in three stents when I had my problems in April. An appointment was scheduled for 10:30 a.m. New Year's Eve. I only had to wait about 15 minutes after I arrived before I was in to see the doctor. I was given an EKG and then walked on the treadmill. I made it for quite a while, but then I could go no further and when I was finished and was told to lay down, I felt the same pressure as before.
Dr. Stauffer said the problem appeared to be that a stent needed repair and gave me two options. I could have it done that afternoon or 10 days from then since he was going out of town. I opted to have it done sooner.
I was told I would be going home later that afternoon.
Less than an hour and a half later, the procedure was finished. It turned out I had needed another stent, which required me to stay overnight.
It was not the way I anticipated spending my New Year's Eve, but I was in a hospital filled with people who were working when others were celebrating. It was a full team of health care professionals who were there to keep things running smoothly.
As one nurse recorded my vitals at about 4:30 a.m., she was pleased with my blood pressure reading and noted that the my 122/79 at that point was not what she was seeing with her other patients.
I thought about that a few minutes after she left when I heard a call over the intercom that there was a "Code Blue in Room 255." It was the first of two Code Blues I heard during my stay.
From the window in my room, I saw helicopters taking off and landing at various times. While most people were bringing in the New Year, the people at Freeman were providing the same quality service they provide 365 days a year (and 366 this year).
As the nurses and technicians came in and out of my room the morning of January 1, I was told I would probably be able to leave late in the morning or early afternoon. They kept apologizing to me because they said it would take more time because it was a holiday and only one doctor was on duty at the Heart Institute.
I told them that was fine. At that point, though I was ready to go home, I was just so pleased I was feeling better that I had no problem putting up with a longer wait than anticipated. As it turned out, not only did the doctor have to make all of the rounds, his schedule was frequently interrupted by having to perform various emergency procedures.
Hospitals can't take holidays.
After being told I was likely to be released in late morning or early afternoon, I waited hour after hour for the doctor to arrive at my room. As 6 p.m. approached, a nurse named Sara who was on duty when I arrived the previous afternoon told me the doctor had been called out on another procedure, but that he was back and she would make sure that he came to my room as soon as possible. Even though she was at the end of her shift, she said she would stay until I was released.
I told her I appreciated that, but there was no need for her to do that. She insisted.
Finally, the doctor came in, checked me over, gave me the lowdown on my limitations for the next few days and information about my new prescriptions and said I could leave when the paperwork arrived.
After I dressed, the wait began for the paperwork. About an hour later, it arrived, and true to her word, Sara was the one who brought it in, long after her shift had ended and moments later, I was on my way home.
I can understand the frustrations people go through when they are in the hospital. When your life has been placed in others' hands and you have little control over what is happening, it is easy to get upset when the schedule doesn't go your way. I heard a few instances of that throughout the day. The people who work at Freeman or Mercy or any other hospital have to deal with that every day.
While I regret my temper tantrums of my younger years, I am happy that I have reached the point where I am not going to be the one who adds to the stress of people who have to deal with more stress than most of us can even imagine.
Thanks to everyone at the Freeman Heart Institute. I would have preferred to spend my New Year somewhere else, but I am grateful that you were there when I needed you.
Saturday, January 02, 2016
California venture capitalist donates $1 million to Greitens campaign
Former Navy seal Eric Greitens received a $500,000 boost to his campaign for governor on the last day of 2015.
The half-million dollars marked the second time Greitens has received that amount from California venture capitalist Michael Goguen of Sequoia Capital. The other contribution was reported in October.
In the week following Christmas,including the Goguen contribution, the Greitens campaign received $750,505. Out of that total, $640,003 came from out of state sources.
During this past week, Greitens also received the following contributions:
-$5,001 Michael Burns, Malvern, Pennsylvania,
-$5,001 Mary Beth Reilly, Nixa
-$10,000 Blake Spahn, Self School chancellor, New York, New York
-$50,000 Bryan Magers, Springfield, developer
-$25,000 Irvine Kessler, Wayzata, Minnesota, self investment management
-$50,000 Market Street Bancshares, Mount Vernon, Illinois
-$5,001 Jeff Layman, Springfield, Morgan Stanley senior vice president
-5,001 Howard Rosenbloom, Timonium, Maryland, Cruiser Capitol Advisers
-$10,000 Donald Sanders, Town and Country, Nightline Express, Inc. CEO
-$5,500 Mark Mantovani, Ansira executive
-$5,001 Mike Swann, Springfield, dermotologist
-$25,000 Bernard Marcus, Atlanta, Georgia, retired philanthropist
-$10,000 Frank Jay Steed, Branson West, Steed Communication
-$5,001 Thomas Smith, Boca Raton, Florida, Prescott Investors
-$15,000 Mark Gerson, New York, GLG chairman
-$20,000 ELX83 LLC, St. Louis
The half-million dollars marked the second time Greitens has received that amount from California venture capitalist Michael Goguen of Sequoia Capital. The other contribution was reported in October.
In the week following Christmas,including the Goguen contribution, the Greitens campaign received $750,505. Out of that total, $640,003 came from out of state sources.
During this past week, Greitens also received the following contributions:
-$5,001 Michael Burns, Malvern, Pennsylvania,
-$5,001 Mary Beth Reilly, Nixa
-$10,000 Blake Spahn, Self School chancellor, New York, New York
-$50,000 Bryan Magers, Springfield, developer
-$25,000 Irvine Kessler, Wayzata, Minnesota, self investment management
-$50,000 Market Street Bancshares, Mount Vernon, Illinois
-$5,001 Jeff Layman, Springfield, Morgan Stanley senior vice president
-5,001 Howard Rosenbloom, Timonium, Maryland, Cruiser Capitol Advisers
-$10,000 Donald Sanders, Town and Country, Nightline Express, Inc. CEO
-$5,500 Mark Mantovani, Ansira executive
-$5,001 Mike Swann, Springfield, dermotologist
-$25,000 Bernard Marcus, Atlanta, Georgia, retired philanthropist
-$10,000 Frank Jay Steed, Branson West, Steed Communication
-$5,001 Thomas Smith, Boca Raton, Florida, Prescott Investors
-$15,000 Mark Gerson, New York, GLG chairman
-$20,000 ELX83 LLC, St. Louis
Anson Burlingame: Why I won't subscribe to the Turner Report
( I received the following message earlier this week from frequent Joplin Globe guest columnist Anson Burlingame.)
Now is as good a time as any to make another comment on the Turner Report. In doing so I offer a reason not to follow the suggestions contained herein (buy a subscription to the Turner Report) and thus will again draw extreme views from anonymous commentators.
Let me also state, again, that I have the utmost respect for good teachers. Their worth to society is almost unmeasurable, at least in terms of money. Good teachers transmit knowledge that is critical for every student to learn to become a productive member of society. In doing so they develop within each student the ability to develop, over a lifetime, his or her own character. If anyone does not understand what that means, to me at least, I suggest you read David Brooks’s new book, The Path To Character.
Let me be very clear on what I mean by the essential level of knowledge for each and every high school student. Every (that is not a special needs child) graduating student from JHS should be able to read, write and do math, proficiently, at the 12th grade level before graduation. As well every student that advances to a higher grade level each year in K12 public education should be at the proficient, grade level of knowledge (and behavior) from the previous year. That should be the goal and it will take at least 10 years for R-8 to even begin to approach that goal from where it is right now.
I also agree that any K12 system of public education must “Let teachers teach”. It is teach and then test and grade to what level of performance by each student that becomes the disagreement between Turner (or at least the vast majority of his commentators, all anonymous) and me. But if a 1st grade teacher (or any other teacher) “passes” a child that has not yet reached proficient, grade level mastery of a given basic skill, then such teachers (and students and parents) are failing the system of public education and something must be done at the individual level to reverse that substandard level of performance. I am open to any reasonable approach to correct such a problem other than just passing such students on to others in hope that “they” will correct such errors in student performance (and behavior if applicable). The buck must stop somewhere other than “someone else” that might be at fault (but will never accept the responsibility of doing so).
Here is one obvious example, an approach that was suggested to me by ……., who should know better. Do away with all homework for any student, period, was the suggested approach. Why, I asked. The reply was in essence that “poor students” do not have the home environment that stimulates the need (demand?) that homework be completed, all the time. Thus such students fall farther and farther behind and that is not fair.
If that is not dumbing down the level of education to the lowest common denominator, I don’t know what it might be. Homework, meaning outside of class hours reading, writing and doing math each and every day to increase performance through repetition, is a critical part of public education. The challenge of every school must be to RAISE student efforts to such a level, not lower students to that level of no academic efforts, anytime, out of school.
I am sending this to Randy as an email due to its length. I leave it up to him how to publish, or not, such views on his blog. If he does publish it, you may “Fire when ready, Gridley”, an old Navy saying I learned long ago.
Now is as good a time as any to make another comment on the Turner Report. In doing so I offer a reason not to follow the suggestions contained herein (buy a subscription to the Turner Report) and thus will again draw extreme views from anonymous commentators.
Let me also state, again, that I have the utmost respect for good teachers. Their worth to society is almost unmeasurable, at least in terms of money. Good teachers transmit knowledge that is critical for every student to learn to become a productive member of society. In doing so they develop within each student the ability to develop, over a lifetime, his or her own character. If anyone does not understand what that means, to me at least, I suggest you read David Brooks’s new book, The Path To Character.
Let me be very clear on what I mean by the essential level of knowledge for each and every high school student. Every (that is not a special needs child) graduating student from JHS should be able to read, write and do math, proficiently, at the 12th grade level before graduation. As well every student that advances to a higher grade level each year in K12 public education should be at the proficient, grade level of knowledge (and behavior) from the previous year. That should be the goal and it will take at least 10 years for R-8 to even begin to approach that goal from where it is right now.
I also agree that any K12 system of public education must “Let teachers teach”. It is teach and then test and grade to what level of performance by each student that becomes the disagreement between Turner (or at least the vast majority of his commentators, all anonymous) and me. But if a 1st grade teacher (or any other teacher) “passes” a child that has not yet reached proficient, grade level mastery of a given basic skill, then such teachers (and students and parents) are failing the system of public education and something must be done at the individual level to reverse that substandard level of performance. I am open to any reasonable approach to correct such a problem other than just passing such students on to others in hope that “they” will correct such errors in student performance (and behavior if applicable). The buck must stop somewhere other than “someone else” that might be at fault (but will never accept the responsibility of doing so).
Here is one obvious example, an approach that was suggested to me by ……., who should know better. Do away with all homework for any student, period, was the suggested approach. Why, I asked. The reply was in essence that “poor students” do not have the home environment that stimulates the need (demand?) that homework be completed, all the time. Thus such students fall farther and farther behind and that is not fair.
If that is not dumbing down the level of education to the lowest common denominator, I don’t know what it might be. Homework, meaning outside of class hours reading, writing and doing math each and every day to increase performance through repetition, is a critical part of public education. The challenge of every school must be to RAISE student efforts to such a level, not lower students to that level of no academic efforts, anytime, out of school.
I am sending this to Randy as an email due to its length. I leave it up to him how to publish, or not, such views on his blog. If he does publish it, you may “Fire when ready, Gridley”, an old Navy saying I learned long ago.
Joplin Blasters lease on tap for Monday City Council meeting
COUNCIL AGENDA
January 4, 2016
6:00 P.M., Council Chambers
January 4, 2016
6:00 P.M., Council Chambers
1.
Call To Order
Invocation
Pledge of Allegiance of the United States of America
Pledge of Allegiance of the United States of America
2.
Roll Call
3.
Presentations
4.
Finalization Of Consent Agenda
5.
Reports And Communications
1.
Report Rob O’Brian President Of The Joplin Area Chamber Of Commerce On Economic Development
2.
Nick Heatherly To Give A Post-Flood Update And A Run Down On How All Of The Other Storm Water Efforts Have Helped Mitigate Many Of The Flooding Issues That Could Have Happened, Ie, 15th And Murphy.
6.
Citizen Requests And Petitions
1.
Request To Address Council
Harvey Hutchinson, 4512 W. 27th Place, requests to address Council on Economic Development.
Documents: REQUEST -HUTCHINSON.PDF
7.
Public Hearings
1.
PUBLIC HEARING PROCEDURES
2.
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-001
A RESOLUTION granting a Special Use Permit (First Request) to Mireya Gonzalez for the operation of a day care center located at 1918 South Sergeant Avenue, in the City of Joplin, Jasper County, Missouri.
3.
COUNCIL BILL NO. 2016-250
AN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance No. 2004-256, passed by the Council of the City of Joplin, Missouri, November 15, 2004, by removing from District R-1 and including in District R-3-PD property as described below and located at the northeast corner of Broadway Street and Buchanan Road in the City of Joplin, Jasper County, Missouri.
4.
COUNCIL BILL NO. 2016-251
AN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance No. 2004-256, passed by the Council of the City of Joplin, Missouri, November 15, 2004, by removing from District R-1 and including in District M-2 property as described below and located at 8220 East 26th Street in the City of Joplin, Jasper County, Missouri.
5.
COUNCIL BILL NO. 2016-252
AN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance No. 2004-256, passed by the Council of the City of Joplin, Missouri, November 15, 2004, by removing from District C-3 and including in District R-1 property as described below and located at 8220 East 26th Street in the City of Joplin, Jasper County, Missouri.
8.
Consent Agenda
1.
9.
Resolutions
10.
Ordinances - Emergency
1.
COUNCIL BILL NO. 2016-001
AN ORDINANCE amending Chapter 82, Offenses and Miscellaneous Provisions, Article III, Offenses Against Public Peace. In general, enacting a new Section 82-199 of the Joplin City Code, Inhalation or inducing others to inhale solvent fumes to cause certain reactions, prohibited—exceptions; and containing an emergency clause.
2.
COUNCIL BILL 2016-100
AN ORDINANCE approving an agreement for Olsson Associates (JET) for Two Hundred and Thirty Two Thousand and Nine Hundred no/100 Dollars ($232,900.00) for Engineering Services Associated with the Trail Improvements from 26th St. & Mc Clelland Boulevard to Main Street Project and containing an emergency clause.
3.
COUNCL BILL 2016-350
AN ORDINANCE approving the contract by and between the City of Joplin and Nelson Demolition for the demolition of the structure(s) and clearing of lot area located at 107 N. McKee. in the City of Joplin, Missouri, for the amount of Two Thousand Nine Hundred Fifty and 00/100 Dollar (2,950.00); providing how the cost thereof shall be paid; how the assessment thereof shall be made; and containing an emergency clause.
4.
COUNCIL BILL 2016-351
AN ORDINANCE approving the contract by and between the City of Joplin and Jordan Disposal for the demolition of the structure(s) and clearing of lot area located at 102 S. Florida. in the City of Joplin, Missouri, for the amount of Two Thousand Nine Hundred Seventy One and 00/100 Dollar (2,971.00); providing how the cost thereof shall be paid; how the assessment thereof shall be made; and containing an emergency clause.
5.
COUNCILL BILL 2016-352
AN ORDINANCE approving by and between the City of Joplin and Approval of an amendment to RE Smith’s contract to include additional drainage trenching and associated costs. The amendment is a not to exceed amount of Fourteen Thousand Nine Hundred and Seventy Dollars ($14,970.00), and authorizing the City Manager to execute said Agreement; and containing an emergency clause.
6.
COUNCIL BILL 2016-353
AN ORDINANCE approving by and between the City of Joplin and Approval of an amendment to RE Smith’s contract to include additional rock removal and associated costs. The amendment is a not to exceed amount of Fourteen Thousand Eight Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($14,850.00) and authorizing the City Manager to execute said Agreement; and containing an emergency clause.
7.
COUNCIL BILL 2016-354
AN ORDINANCE approving by and between the City of Joplin and Approval of an amendment to RE Smith’s contract to include additional concrete removal and associated costs. The amendment is a not to exceed amount of Eleven Thousand Nine Hundred Forty-Four Dollars and Fifty Cents ($11,944.50,) and authorizing the City Manager to execute said Agreement; and containing an emergency clause.
8.
COUNCIL BILL 2016-355
AN ORDINANCE approving by and between the City of Joplin and Approval of an amendment to RE Smith’s contract to include remobilization and associated costs. The amendment is a not to exceed amount of $3,125, and authorizing the City Manager to execute said Agreement; and containing an emergency clause.
9.
COUNCIL BILL NO. 2015-628
AN ORDINANCE authorizing the City of Joplin to enter into a Lease Agreement with the Joplin Blasters, LLC for the purpose of leasing Joe Becker Stadium to the Joplin Blasters, LLC; and authorizing the City Manager to execute said Agreement by and on behalf of the City of Joplin, Missouri; and containing an emergency clause.
11.
Ordinances - First Reading
12.
Ordinances - Second Reading And Third Reading
13.
Unfinished Business
14.
New Business
1.
Discussion Of Change Order Policy
2.
NEWS FROM THE PIO
Billy Long: I support empowering our educators
(From Seventh District Congressman Billy Long)
For several decades now, the federal government has poured more resources into education in good faith efforts to improve academic performance of our nation’s youth. While it is great to prioritize American student achievement to enhance America’s competitive edge, I believe we are approaching the issue in a backward fashion. What is best for our schools should not be decided from the top-down, but rather the bottom-up.
Earlier this Congress, I voted for the Student Success Act, which would allow local schools more control and decision-making power in determining what is best for its students. Among the provisions of the bill, states would have the ability to set their own education standards. It would forbid the federal Department of Education from forcing one-size-fits-all standards and testing requirements and end the “Adequate Yearly Progress” program, which the Department of Education has used to influence every public school curriculum in the country. This legislation also means that states and local school districts could level their own procedures to student and teacher performance and publish their progress for parental review, giving parents greater control over their child’s education.
Furthermore, this legislation consolidates more than 65 grant programs into a new “Local Academic Flexible Grant” program with funds to be divvied among the states for local school districts and education programs, allowing more flexibility in how funds can be used to truly better student accomplishment. This would take a more local, efficient approach to education programs. Additionally, the Student Success Act would prevent any nationally-set mandate or benchmark from being attached to grant opportunities.
Ultimately, the Student Success Act places more control of academic achievement in the hands of states and local schools and out of the federal government’s hands. It is an excellent move to increase the quality of our children’s education to tailor each program’s need to students at each school. After all, what works in Springfield or Forsyth, for example, does not work for Chicago or Los Angeles. I support empowering our educators and parents who know best how to give children the proper tools they need to succeed, not Washington. The House has taken a strong step in achieving that goal, and I will continue fighting to improve American education standards.
For several decades now, the federal government has poured more resources into education in good faith efforts to improve academic performance of our nation’s youth. While it is great to prioritize American student achievement to enhance America’s competitive edge, I believe we are approaching the issue in a backward fashion. What is best for our schools should not be decided from the top-down, but rather the bottom-up.
Earlier this Congress, I voted for the Student Success Act, which would allow local schools more control and decision-making power in determining what is best for its students. Among the provisions of the bill, states would have the ability to set their own education standards. It would forbid the federal Department of Education from forcing one-size-fits-all standards and testing requirements and end the “Adequate Yearly Progress” program, which the Department of Education has used to influence every public school curriculum in the country. This legislation also means that states and local school districts could level their own procedures to student and teacher performance and publish their progress for parental review, giving parents greater control over their child’s education.
Furthermore, this legislation consolidates more than 65 grant programs into a new “Local Academic Flexible Grant” program with funds to be divvied among the states for local school districts and education programs, allowing more flexibility in how funds can be used to truly better student accomplishment. This would take a more local, efficient approach to education programs. Additionally, the Student Success Act would prevent any nationally-set mandate or benchmark from being attached to grant opportunities.
Ultimately, the Student Success Act places more control of academic achievement in the hands of states and local schools and out of the federal government’s hands. It is an excellent move to increase the quality of our children’s education to tailor each program’s need to students at each school. After all, what works in Springfield or Forsyth, for example, does not work for Chicago or Los Angeles. I support empowering our educators and parents who know best how to give children the proper tools they need to succeed, not Washington. The House has taken a strong step in achieving that goal, and I will continue fighting to improve American education standards.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






