Thursday, May 02, 2019

Proposal calls for stand-alone police department for Joplin Regional Airport

With daily flights to Chicago being added June 6 and more flights planned to Dallas-Fort Worth, the Joplin Regional Airport will need a stand-alone police force, according to documentation provided to Joplin City Council for its 6 p.m. Monday meeting at City Hall.

In the report he will give to the council, Airport Manager Steve Stockam has listed the airport's immediate needs, including the hiring of four police officers.

Manpower issues

With the new flight schedule beginning in June, our responsibilities for Safety and Security will demand Police and Airport staff be at post for 10 hours each day. o LEO Time – 

There will be at least six additional hours above the current staffing level required at the Screening Checkpoint. Airport ARFF Time – 










The additional time required to cover the flights will reduce the Airport staff time available for maintenance/Janitorial duties. o Develop a stand-alone Airport Police Department under the Airport.

This proposal will allow an officer to cover the TSA for all outgoing flights. These will be Airport Positions not JPD. We will develop a new job for this position to be brought for formal council action at the next council meeting, along with a budget amendment,
Other immediate needs Stockam lists include the following:

*Canopy for Bridge #2 (Completed $8000)

• Hold room seating changes (rearranged existing for immediate change)

• Gate Check counter for Bridge #2 (Data & Electrical $1,000)

• Expand Employee Parking (Street Dept. Labor & Base Rock, Paving this summer)

• Expand AA Terminal Lease Space (Additional 660 sq./ft office space)

• Relocate Airport Staff offices to Fire Barn

The report also covers the funding arrangement that was reached earlier.

The new service will begin June 6th with 2 flights per day, except Saturday, with 50 passenger ERJ-145 Regional Jets. In order to secure this service, the Airport/COJ signed a 1-year $600,000 MRG (Minimum Revenue Guarantee) agreement for the service. Council previously approved a partnership agreement to fund the MRG, if needed. The City will fund $400,000 while the remaining $200,000 was pledged through the Economic Development arm of the JACC. These are our community business partners. If the monthly revenue fall short of the baseline the difference will be made up from an equal share from each funding source.


Bill White addresses the beginning of tornado, flood season







































Hartzler votes against resolution to return U. S. to Paris Climate Accord

(From Fourth District Congresswoman Vicky Hartzler)

Citing serious inequities with the Paris Climate Accord signed by President Obama in 2016, Congresswoman Vicky Hartzler today voted against H.R. 9, legislation that would prevent the current president the flexibility to withdraw from the agreement.

 The Paris Agreement, which President Obama signed without the consent or support of Congress, creates a highly unfair playing field for the United States setting emission requirements far above those of other nations including some of the worst offenders such as China and India.

“The Paris agreement unwisely tied the hands of American economic growth while allowing the world’s largest emitters of pollution to continue unabated until at least 2030,” said Congresswoman Vicky Hartzler who noted China’s role as the world’s largest polluter, accounting for more than half the planet’s carbon pollutants in 2017. 








“The Chinese government would love for the United States to adhere to this agreement which could cost the American economy over $250 billion dollars and a loss of 2.7 million jobs within the next ten years,” added Hartzler.

The Paris agreement signed by President Obama committed the United States to reducing its greenhouse gas emissions by 26 to 28 percent below its 2005 level by 2025. Meanwhile other countries like China, which is the world’s largest greenhouse gas emitter, do not pledge to address this issue until 2030. This puts the United States at a severe disadvantage with its largest economic and security competitors in the world.

“America is currently a global leader in cutting CO2 emissions, representing the largest decline among all countries since 2000. In fact, from 2000 and 2014 the United States reduced emissions more than 18 percent while leading the world in reductions. Emission levels in the U.S. have retracted to 1990 levels. Our efforts are working, and we should not be penalized by being forced into a treaty that puts us at an unfair disadvantage with our global competitors,” added Hartzler.


Lawsuit by sexually abused minor against Ozark Christian College appealed to Missouri Supreme Court

Can a sexual abuse victim sue an institution because it gave a favorable job recommendation to the man who committed the abuse, despite previous allegations of sexual misconduct?

Jasper County Circuit Court Judge Dean Dankelson did not think so and his ruling was upheld by the Missouri Southern District Court of Appeals in April.

Today, the plaintiffs, referred to as "John Doe" and "Mother Doe' appealed to the ruling to the Missouri Supreme Court.

In his original decision, Dankelson said even if the allegations were accurate, Ozark Christian College could not be held responsible for the minister's action.








From Dankelson's original opinion, which was issued May 25, 2018.

The undisputed facts are that Steven Butler was a student at Ozark Christian College (“OCC”) from 1982 through 1989. Ozark Christian College is an independent college and a separate entity from Independence Christian Community Church (“Church”).

The Church did send money to OCC on a monthly basis. OCC would provide names of recommended pastors and would on occasion provide temporary pastors on the weekends. The Church is an autonomous self-governing church that chooses its own leadership without oversight by OCC. That is the entirety of the relationship between OCC and the Church.

Butler was the pastor of a church in Barnsdall, Oklahoma. In September, 2000, he resigned from that position as a result of an allegation of sexual misconduct against a minor.

OCC was copied on the resignation letter which acknowledged but denied the allegation No criminal charges were filed as a result of the allegation.

In 2004, the Church was in the process of hiring a new pastor. It contacted OCC and received recommendations for a new pastor which included Steven Butler. The Church contacted OCC and received a positive recommendation.

OCC did not mention the allegations in Oklahoma. 










The court is unaware of any other background check the Church performed on Butler but finds it irrelevant for purposes of this motion. The Church at least in part relied on OCC’s recommendation and hired Butler.

Minor plaintiff was a child who attended the Church. Between 2006 through 2010, Butler performed acts of sodomy upon him, acts for which he was subsequently charged and convicted.

During this time frame, Butler did not attend nor work for OCC. Plaintiff brought this suit against OCC claiming that it should not have made a positive recommendation to the church, that it had a duty not to, and that the damage suffered by plaintiff is a foreseeable consequence of that failure.

The first question is what duty was owed by OCC to the Church? Is there a duty to not make a negligent recommendation to a prospective employer, whether it come from another employer or an educational institution?

Plaintiff admits that it cannot find a Missouri case that holds such a duty exists. There are other states that have reached that conclusion, California, New Mexico and Texas, but the Missouri legislature has not defined such a cause of action and the Missouri Courts have not recognized one. This court declines to create such a cause of action now.

Even if a duty is assumed, the plaintiff cannot show that the defendant’s action is the cause of the injury. The acts of Butler were intentional. There is no allegation otherwise. His intentional acts are an intervening and superseding cause of plaintiff’s injuries and negate any cause of action against defendant.


***
Lost Angels: The Murders of Rowan Ford and Doug Ringer, is available in paperback and e-book formats from Amazon.com

They're no longer my Facebook friends, but they will always be in my memories

Few things in life are more frustrating than sitting for what seems like hours in a medical clinic waiting room.

Having a friend with you makes the wait much more bearable.

It was early 2016 and I was in the waiting room at the Freeman clinic on 32nd waiting for a doctor to see me about some discomfort I was feeling that eventually required a stent (and started me on the path to eventual triple bypass surgery in April of that year).

My anxiety needed some kind of distraction and I received it when I saw my old friend and fellow member of the East Newton High School Class of 1974 Rob Crawford and his wife Martha in a corner of the waiting room.

As usual, Rob was smiling, acting like he did not have a care in the world and he immediately began bombarding me with questions about how he was doing.








Rob brought his own kind of medicine into that clinic. You couldn't help but feel better after talking with him.

He did not say much about his reason for being at the clinic and I did not pry.

After he was called in to see the doctor, I talked with his wife, who clearly showed far more concern about the seriousness of Rob's condition and as she told me what he had endured over the preceding years, it was easy to understand why.

Rob was facing daunting medical problems with the same good cheer as he approached every other aspect of his life.

While I was still concerned about my own health, he had given me a fresh perspective and a life lesson on how to deal with adversity.

I thought about that day at the clinic when I learned of Rob's death at age 62 on June 5, 2017.

I thought about it again and felt a strong sense of guilt a few days ago when I removed Rob from my Facebook friends list.

Facebook has a strict limit of 5,000 friends and I was pushing against that limit. About a year ago, I removed a few hundred from the list, most of them inactive accounts, a few being people who had slipped through the cracks and did not appear to be real people (and definitely not friends) and some who are no longer with us.

While the idea of removing people as friends whose friendship you valued does not appear to be a great example of friendship, the act did give me a chance to think about some people whose paths crossed mine and who are no longer with us.

J. D. Pahlow

When Lamar attorney and Golden City resident George Nichols elected not to run for a third term on the Barton County Commission in 1986, Barton County Clerk Bonda Rawlings and the courthouse crew decided to have a combination dinner and roast for him.

As the editor of the Lamar Democrat, I planned to attend, but the courthouse workers AIwere not content to let me just take photos and write about the event.

Bonda asked me if I would be willing to speak at the roast and provide a few examples of what I passed off as wit. (Others would say I was half right.)

I agreed and began collecting stories from the courthouse workers and his fellow commissioners Doug Haile and John Stockdale that I could use for my presentation.

A few days later. I saw the list of speakers and I was terrified.

They were saving me for last.

Normally, that kind of pressure would not bother me, but it looked like I was set up for failure. The speaker right before me was J. D. Pahlow.








You only had to meet J. D. once to realize one thing- the man was funny.

He had a quip for every occasion and when he left a room, he left laughter in his wake.

There was no way I could follow J. D. Pahlow.

Thankfully, I had a secret weapon. In addition to the stories provided to me by his fellow county commissioners, courthouse custodian Bea Mayes related an incident she said would crack up George Nichols.

She could barely tell me the story she was laughing so hard. I jotted down the information and added it to my list. I was ready for the roast.

The room at the Blue Top Restaurant was packed as the courthouse employees said goodbye to George Nichols.

The speakers were well received and, as usual, J. D. Pahlow was at the top of his game, delivering one hilarious one-liner after another.

I was at the top of my game, too.

I told the stories, adding my own take on each of them. Laughter filled the room. George was enjoying himself even though the jokes were at his expense.

I was down to one last story- the one provided to me by Bea Mayes.

I told it just the way she said it, adding the little reference (which I no longer remember) that she said George would love.

The room was almost silent...except for Bea Mayes, who was convulsing with laughter.

I quickly recovered and brought my presentation to an end.

To this day, I have a feeling Bea's joke would have worked if J. D. Pahlow had delivered it.

J. D., who died November 3 was that funny.


Arielle Ideker

Each year, on the last day of school, I offered the same message to my students.

"You may not be in my classroom any more, but you always will be one of my students."

I look forward to seeing what my students will do in later life and learning how their lives progress, whether it be jobs, accomplishments or the time when they have children who were the same age they were when they sat in my classroom.

That classroom was Room 210 at South Middle School and one of my favorite students was Arielle Ideker, who was not only in my communication arts class, but also was in my home room at the beginning of school each day.

During that year, Arielle offered me an eighth grader's perspective each day, as well as many laughs.

The promise that Arielle showed came to an untimely end when she died in an accident December 21.

I thought about those times when I removed Arielle from my friends list.

She may not be a Facebook friend any more, but she will always be one of my students.

Wednesday, May 01, 2019

Graves: Rural America needs access to high-speed internet

(From Sixth District Congressman Sam Graves)

In the 1930s, rural electrification was a game-changer for folks across the country. It completely changed the future for millions of Americans, bringing their lives into the 20th Century. Now we face a similar moment in our nation’s history and the history of rural America.

In the world we now live in, everything seems to revolve around high-speed broadband internet access. This isn’t just about streaming movies; it’s about millions of Americans having access to reliable, high-speed internet for telecommuting, telemedicine, precision agriculture, online college courses, and just about any business activity today. This is about driving our economy forward into the 21st Century by connecting rural America.

Last week, I met with stakeholders from across North Missouri who are actively engaged in expanding high-speed broadband service throughout our state. They know the importance of being connected, the roadblocks that stand in our way, and what it will take to get it done.
Expanding high-speed broadband access across North Missouri and the rest of the state comes with a high cost, but it will pay dividends for years to come.








This is why my congressional colleagues and I are working to ensure grant and loan programs help bring high-speed internet access to those without. In fact, the USDA released a report this week which showed that building out high-speed broadband to farms and ranches alone could offer at least a $47 billion boost to our economy, every year. This shows just how critical this is to the future success of our economy in rural America.

One thing I heard clearly in our meeting is that the federal government must help—not hinder—the build-out of high-speed broadband. We need accurate, up-to-date maps reflecting who has access to reliable, fast internet and who doesn’t. We need to make sure our rules and regulations ensure that federal money is being spent appropriately and effectively. Companies awarded federal money must provide the speeds they have committed to offer and they should be the ones on the hook if they don’t, not folks who live in the areas they promised to serve.

We also must make sure rural America has access to "high-speed" internet, not prohibitively slow and unreliable internet. There are a lot of folks in North Missouri that can get something masquerading as usable internet, but don’t have access to the fast, reliable high-speed broadband they need. The speeds that used to be adequate 15 years ago don't cut it today. And what’s usable today, won’t be 15 years from now. Our policies should reflect that reality.

This problem is complicated, but we must solve it. Folks affected by it know exactly how significant this problem is every time they receive a “buffering” notification while trying to complete an online course or carry out even routine business online. I do believe we are making great strides towards getting the high-speed internet access we need, but we still have a long way to go. We cannot stop now; the future of North Missouri depends on it.

Hartzler introduces bipartisan veteran employment bill

(From Fourth District Congresswoman Vicky Hartzler)

Congresswoman Vicky Hartzler (MO-04) today introduced the bipartisan Veterans Preference Parity Act, H.R. 2433, which would allow more Reserve, National Guard, and retired service members to receive preference when competing for federal jobs.

“Whether in the Reserves, National Guard or on active duty, our service members have made tremendous sacrifices for our nation’s safety and security,” said Congresswoman Hartzler. “However, outdated federal hiring rules prevent many of these patriots from being recognized when competing for federal positions. The Veterans’ Preference Parity Act rights this wrong by modernizing the archaic federal hiring process and recognizing those who have served our nation,” added Hartzler, who represents over 475,000 veterans in her Missouri congressional district.

The purpose of veterans’ preference is to provide eligible veterans with an advantage when they compete for federal employment. These longstanding guidelines acknowledge the economic loss suffered by citizens who served their country in uniform, restores veterans to a favorable competitive position for government employment and recognizes the larger obligation America owes to disabled veterans.








Currently, federal hiring preference rules require “more than 180 consecutive days” of active duty time for service members to qualify for this preference. The Veterans’ Preference Parity Act modifies the current guidelines from a consecutive day requirement to a non-consecutive total day threshold. This change will allow Reserve and National Guard members to have an equal opportunity to qualify for veterans’ preference when competing for federal positions.

Additionally, existing federal hiring preference rules ban many retired service members from receiving veterans’ preference points. Current guidelines exclude those who retire in the rank of Major, its equivalent, or higher. The Veterans’ Preference Parity Act will remove this restriction.

“The exclusion of so many retired service members from veterans’ preference is outdated, unnecessary, and unfair,” said Hartzler. “Service members of all ranks, including higher ones, enter the civilian workforce after their military service concludes. There is no reason to penalize them. The Veterans’ Preference Parity Act addresses this issue and, in doing so, will open up eligibility to over 130,000 of our working-age retired heroes.”








The Reserve Officer Association (ROA) is among numerous Veterans’ Service Organizations who have voiced their support for Hartzler’s bill: “ROA applauds Rep. Hartzler and those who join in reforms that help members of the Reserve and Guard participate in a federal workforce that needs the nation’s best, to serve the nation. Gainful employment is also a key in the fight against homelessness and suicide among our citizen-warriors and veterans.”

Congresswoman Hartzler’s legislation is also endorsed by the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States, Enlisted Association of the National Guard, National Guard Association, Fleet Reserve Association, Jewish War Veterans, American Veterans, and Association of the United States Navy.

Representatives Paul Cook (R-CA), Michael Turner (R-OH), Joe Wilson (R-SC), Gwen Moore (D-WI), Sanford Bishop (D-GA), Rodney Davis (R-IL), Louie Gohmert (R-TX), Tom McClintock (R-TX), Julia Brownley (D-CA), Don Bacon (R-NE), Jim Baird (R-IN), Don Young (R-AK), Joe Cunningham (D-SC), Rob Wittman (R-VA), and Tom Cole (R-OK) have signed onto this measure as original cosponsors.

Parson: Trump tax cuts, Missouri tax cuts have created more job opportunities

(From Gov. Mike Parson)

As the 2019 tax season comes to a close, two key facts have emerged:Incomes are Up, and Taxes are Down Since the passage of President Trump’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) and the adoption the largest single year income tax cut authored by Speaker Elijah Haahr, Missouri has demonstrated strong economic growth, delivered real savings, and created more job opportunities for hard-working individuals and families.

Since January 2017, Missouri’s unemployment rate has fallen 1.2 percent and has remained near historical lows, currently at 3.3 percent, the lowest level since 2000. Also, Missouri’s employment levels have recently reached all-time highs, topping a total of 2.9 million jobs.

“Thanks to President Trump and Republican pro-growth policies, more Missourians are going back to work, seeing an increase in take-home pay, and keeping more of their hard-earned money,” said Governor Mike Parson. “Missouri conservatives have long championed the fundamental principle of reducing the tax burden for individuals of all incomes, and it’s encouraging to see the immediate results of these pro-growth policies; incomes are up and taxes are down.”

Approximately 3 million people file a Missouri state income tax return each year. As of Monday, April 29, nearly 2 million taxpayers had filed original returns with the same filing status in tax year 2018 as they did in tax year 2017.










In terms of take-home pay, 64 percent of taxpayers in the sample saw an increase, bringing home $6 billion, or 5 percent, more than last year. Fifty-one percent of taxpayers in the sample saw a decrease in their effective tax rate

“As we said from the beginning, the focus of tax reform was always about expanding opportunity and making sure hardworking Missourians could keep more of what they earn,” said Senator Blunt. “The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act has helped fuel the strongest economic growth we’ve seen in more than a decade. We now have an economy where people feel more secure in the job they have and more optimistic about the opportunities they’ll have in the future. We’re on the right track and we’ll keep moving forward on pro-growth policies that will allow our state, and our country, to continue leading in a global economy.”

The increase in take-home pay because of Republican tax cuts is having a positive impact on local economies. In the first 12 months following passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, sales and use tax revenue increased by nearly 2.5 percent. That means more money going into small businesses that drive job growth.

“We cannot lose sight of the fact that Missouri incomes rose 5 percent over the past year, that Missourians paid less in taxes, and that Missouri unemployment continues to drop,” said Treasurer Scott Fitzpatrick. “This pro-growth agenda is working for Missouri families, farmers, and business owners who now get to keep more of what they earn.”








“My Senate colleagues have worked incredibly hard to keep taxes low for every Missourian. Our pro-growth policies and balanced budgets, paired with the President’s tax cuts, are delivering real results for Missouri families: higher incomes, lower taxes, and record employment,” said Senate President Pro-Tem Dave Schatz. “And as we wrap up the final weeks of the legislative session, Missourians will see us use that growth to make record investments in our schools, infrastructure, and public safety.”

Speaker of the House Elijah Haahr added, “Missouri families are the clear winners from the General Assembly’s efforts last year to pass historic tax cuts, so they keep more of their own money. Businesses across the state are investing in their workforce, adding new jobs, and boosting individual incomes. Today’s economic data is proof that reducing the overall tax burden on Missourians has provided opportunities for Missourians that has fostered an economic surge for the state.”





Dirk Deaton named Freshman Legislator of the Year

(From Rep. Dirk Deaton)

State Representative Dirk Deaton has been recognized as a “Freshman Legislator of the Year” for his work this legislative session to protect Missouri taxpayers and promote fiscally responsible spending.

Deaton was awarded the honor by House Speaker Elijah Haahr, who commended the Republican for his work on protecting the tax dollars of Missouri citizens and ensuring that state funding is utilized as efficiently as possible.

As a member of the House Budget Committee, Deaton has led efforts to reduce ineffective spending across multiple departments while working diligently toward completing a fiscally accountable state budget. He also serves on the Fiscal Review Committee, where he has earned the respect of his colleagues as a voice of reason concerning the budgetary impact of proposed bills. He also is a member of the Special Committee on Government Oversight, where he has had a laser focus on taxpayer-funded institutions and their actions.








“I would like to thank the Speaker for this honor and for putting me on these committees that give me the ability to truly improve the level of fiscal responsibility here in Missouri,” Deaton said. “Each dollar counts when it comes to making sure our government is working for the good of all Missourians in a fiscally responsible and accountable manner, and it is a privilege to serve the constituents of my district and the state.”

Emery: During budget process, DESE should be asked why public education efforts are not working

(From Sen. Ed Emery, R-Lamar)

The Missouri Senate passed 13 budget bills last week. All told, these measures authorize the state to spend $29.75 billion in 2020. That’s $4,850 for every man, woman and child in Missouri.

It took the Senate less than eight hours to approve its version of the state budget. In truth, the process actually began weeks ago in the House of Representatives, which holds the constitutional responsibility of drafting the state’s budget.

With deference to the governor’s requests, the House presents its budget recommendations to the upper legislative body in 13 spending proposals. These bills address repayment of bonding obligations, state employee payroll and benefits and anticipated expenses for each state agency and department. 

The Senate Appropriations Committee reviews the House proposals, accepts some and revises others. Finally, the full Senate votes on the committee’s substitute bills. The differences between the two budgets must be sorted out by a conference committee and finally passed prior to May 10.










The good news is that revenues are meeting projections this year. There was some question whether Missouri’s taxpayers would come through with all the money lawmakers expected for 2019, but initial analysis of state tax returns show that revenue is on track. That could easily turn the other direction in the future and Missouri could find itself in a revenue hole. If that happens, another process kicks in – governor withholds.

The 2020 budget of $30 billion surpasses the previous year’s spending by one billion dollars. Likewise, one year ago, the Legislature outspent the previous budget by another billion dollars. Do we sense a pattern? Clearly, whatever amount of money the state gets, we will spend.

Nearly 40 percent of the state budget is spent by the departments of Social Services, Health and Senior Services and Mental Health. These three agencies administer the various parts of MO HealthNet, Missouri’s version of Medicaid. An ever-increasing share of Missouri’s budget is simply redistribution of citizens’ income from one group to another. We have built an ever-increasing constituency of dependents.

I was especially disappointed in the Senate substitute for House Bill 2, the $6.2 billion budget for the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Included in DESE’s budget is more than $3.5 billion to fully fund the School Foundation Formula. This represents a $61 million increase in the cost of K-12 education, and follows a $100 million jump last year and a sizable increase the year before.

During floor debate on the DESE budget, our Appropriations Committee chairman was asked what information the department provided to show positive outcomes from the ever-increasing spending. Surely, there are studies or statistics to show lawmakers that bigger education budgets equate to improved student performance. The chairman replied that no such evidence was provided.










I can’t help but think that there would be a different expectation in the private sector. When budget requests are made in industry and business, you must explain how the money will be spent and then follow up with a report of your successes. That doesn’t happen in public education. In the future, I would hope that the Appropriations Committee will ask departments (especially the Department of Education) to demonstrate that their efforts are working.

This year, a number of bills have been introduced in the Senate that would equip parents to demand accountability for education spending. Measures to expand charter schools or allow the creation of education savings accounts could provide parents flexibility in how their tax dollars are spent. If they’re not satisfied with the traditional schools in their area, they could choose an alternative.

It’s not clear that any of these bills will make it through the legislative process because the status quo is so vigorously opposed to the competition. It’s somewhat of a tradition for state agencies to submit perpetually larger funding requests annually without offering justification. As long as the Legislature continues to accept these increases as inevitable, the drain on Missouri taxpayers will continue.

***
Randy Turner's book Let Teachers Teach is available in paperback and e-book formats from Amazon.com