Saturday, May 31, 2025

Joplin woman charged with statutory rape of boyfriend's autistic son bound over for trial


A Joplin woman waived her preliminary hearing Thursday in Jasper County Circuit Court and was bound over for trial on a statutory rape charge.

Trial court arraignment for Shannon Roxanne Mari McLaughlin is scheduled for 1:30 p.m. July 16 with Judge Dean Dankelson presiding.

The probable cause statement alleges the Joplin Police Department caught Shannon Roxanne Mari McLaughlin (DOB 1983) in the act in a parking lot at E. 10th Street/S Kentucky Avenue and says the alleged victim, her boyfriend's son, had been diagnosed with autism.








From the statement:

On 03/29/2025 Officers with the Joplin Police Department checked on a suspicious vehicle, parked in a gravel lot near 10th Street and Kentucky Avenue Joplin, Jasper County, Missouri. The approximate time was 11:48 PM. The vehicle was a grey Chevrolet Trail Blazer, parked, headlights were on.

Shannon McLaughlin opened the rear driver side door and Officers observed she didn't have any shoes on. Victim 1 was sitting in the front passenger seat without a shirt on and the windows of the vehicle were fogged up. McLaughlin is in a relationship with Victim 1's father, however they are not married.

They were the only ones inside the vehicle upon police contact.

An interview was conducted at the Children's Center of Southwest Missouri with Victim 1. During the interview with a children's advocate interviewer Victim 1 acknowledged and discussed having sexual intercourse with McLaughlin.







Victim 1 states that they were parked in a parking lot, he and McLaughlin entered the back seat, and McLaughlin asked him if he wanted to have sex. Victim 1 agreed by saying "Ok" and he states they started playing with each other.


During the interview, the boy was shown diagrams of a man and a woman and showed where he touched McLaughlin and where McLaughlin touched him, the probable cause statement said.

The woman and the boy were having sexual intercourse when "the cops drove by and turned on their lights, so they stopped."

Friday, May 30, 2025

Homeschool athletes await Missouri governor’s decision on access to public school sports


By Annelise Hanshaw

A decade of work by lawmakers and activists culminated earlier this month with the legislature sending a bill to Missouri Gov. Mike Kehoe expanding extracurricular opportunities for homeschool students.

The legislation, which has been filed every year in Missouri since 2014, will require public schools to allow homeschooled students in the area to try out for sports teams and other activities beginning in August.








Throughout much of the bill’s history, it couldn’t even get a committee hearing. By 2023, the proposal managed to barely pass a Senate committee in a 5-4 vote, with three Democrats and one Republican opposed.

Things changed in February, when it cleared the Senate unanimously — a rarity for the chamber. But then the House made changes to the bill, like prohibiting background checks of homeschooling families that receive money through a private school tax credit program.

That change drew the ire of some senators and put the bill’s chances in jeopardy. But ultimately, the two chambers worked out a compromise and only three senators ended up voting no.

The legislation has had 10 sponsors over the years. Each points to different reasons the bill finally made it to the governor’s desk this legislative session, such as unrelenting dedication from homeschooling families and the fervor of this year’s sponsor, state Sen. Ben Brown.

Brown, a Republican from Washington, told The Independent that “the stars were aligned” for the bill to pass this year.

“It took a tremendous amount of work, both in the legislature with support from leadership and from the grassroots support,” he said. “Those were all key factors that just culminated and finally, after more than a decade, ensured that these kids get these opportunities.”

State Rep. Josh Hurlbert, a Smithville Republican who sponsored the legislation from 2021 to 2024, gave kudos to homeschooling families that came to Jefferson City to support the legislation.

“Legislators come and go,” he said. “But it is the families that have been the constant and saw it through.”








Hurlbert was a homeschooled student who played soccer in a league of students like him. He sponsored the bill thinking of students in rural areas who don’t have access to homeschool leagues, and his young, home-educated children who play in recreational teams with kids educated both in and outside the public school system.

His bill passed committee in 2021 and 2022 after families with home-educated children came to testify in favor of the legislation. Some families who submitted testimony in 2021 returned to push for the bill this year.

“We have had so many homeschool families and kids come over through the years to testify and tell their side of the story,” Hurlbert said. “They really made an impact.”

The bill’s journey in Missouri began in 2014, when it was first introduced by then-state Rep. Eiljah Haahr.

Haahr, a Springfield Republican and homeschool student who went on to become speaker of the Missouri House, participated in a homeschool sports league as a student.

“When I got in the legislature, I was like, ‘I don’t want kids to be the same way as me, where they want to participate in sports and they don’t have an opportunity to do so,’” he told The Independent.

The greatest opposition in 2014 came from the Missouri State High School Activities Association, or MSHSAA, which regulates extracurricular activities and sports in public schools.

Former state Rep. Kirk Mathews, a Republican from Pacific, picked up the bill after Haahr in 2016. It was not heard in committee that year, and Mathews told The Independent that MSHSAA was a big reason.

“(MSHSAA) had enough influence with leadership to have a bill not get advanced through the process,” he said.

The legislation continued to languish in 2017, sponsored by former state Rep. Don Rone, a Portageville Republican. He told The Independent that leadership continued to overlook the bill.

“We had some problems back then,” he said, “and (the bill) just didn’t get put on the front burners.”

New leadership in both chambers this year showed support for the bill that Brown “had never seen before.”

Senate President Cindy O’Laughlin, a Republican from Shelbina, sponsored the bill in 2022. And current leaders in the House told Brown they liked the legislation, a departure from the resistance he said he faced from the House’s former speaker, Dean Plocher.

Prior to Plocher’s term as speaker, the bill largely moved only in the House. But the Senate version has seen the most activity in the past two years.








“The narrative had kind of flipped over the years,” Hurlbert said. “The past couple of years, the hardest part was the House.”

Other things have changed as well. State lawmakers have been increasingly interested in alternatives to public education, passing and expanding a tax-credit scholarship system benefiting private schools.

“The entire climate towards public education has changed in Missouri over the last couple of years,” Mathews said. “With school choice being looked upon more favorably.”

MSHSAA has been largely quiet about the legislation, saying it would cause “substantial changes” in a press release but omitting details.

The legislation awaits Kehoe’s decision on whether to sign it or veto it. If he doesn’t take action by July 15, the bill is automatically approved.



“We had days where 50 people showed up from different homeschool families around the state of Missouri,” Brown said. “To be able to get this done for them, it was probably the most rewarding moment that I’ve had in my time (in the Senate).”

Mark Alford: Passage of Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill was a victory for the American people


(From Fourth District Congressman Mark Alford)

Last week, in the early hours of Thursday morning, House Republicans reached a monumental victory for the American people by passing President Trump’s “One, Big Beautiful Bill.”

This bill is a testament to our commitment to restoring fiscal responsibility, securing our borders, and reaffirming the values that make our country exceptional.








This legislation includes the following America-First wins:

It stops the largest tax increase in American history, ends taxes on tips and overtime, and provides relief for seniors, allowing hardworking Missourians to keep more of their hard-earned money.

Strengthens Medicaid for those who need it most by eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse, removing more than a million illegal immigrants from the program, and ensuring able-bodied adults with no dependents are pursuing work.

Permanently secures our southern border with funding for wall construction, new border agents, and additional security measures.

Strengthens and restores the integrity of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) to ensure it is a temporary life vest for the needy, not a lifestyle.

Modernizes air traffic control, making our skies safer and air travel more efficient.








Boosts defense funding to ensure the U.S. military remains the most lethal on earth.

Ensures that not a single taxpayer dollar is used for gender transition surgeries on minors, protecting our children.

While the passage of this bill in the House is a significant achievement, our work is not done. As the legislation moves to the Senate, we must remain vigilant and continue to advocate for policies that serve the best interests of the American people.

Together, we are building a stronger and more prosperous America. I am proud to stand with President Trump and my colleagues in the House to deliver on our promises and uphold the values that make our nation truly great.


Trial date set for Arkansas truck driver's malpractice suit against Dr. David Hargroder

A September 24, 2026 jury trial is scheduled in Jasper County Circuit Court for a malpractice lawsuit filed in 2024 by an Arkansas truck driver who claims Dr. David Hargroder botched a gastric bypass surgery and falsely claimed he was board certified.

In the petition, Randy M. Manning, 51, Little Rock, Arkansas, claims Hargroder's surgery caused him to lose his health and business. His wife, Theressa J. Manning, 55, claims lack of consortium with her husband.







Also listed as defendants are MGB Surgery, Carthage; Mercy Clinic Joplin, and three John Does.

The details are spelled out in the petition:

Randy M. Manning is a truck driver who used to own a trucking business named Randy M. Manning LLC that operated several trucks, including but not limited to 13 dump trucks, four semi-trucks and three plow trucks.

Manning lost his health, his entire business, and many of his personal items as a result of his inability to work, which was proximately caused by Defendants’ acts and omissions complained of herein.


Manning struggled with a weight problem for many years of his life. After numerous attempts of dieting and/or exercise failed, Plaintiffs began investigating gastric bypass surgery as a possible solution to Randy M. Manning’s weight problem and related health problems.


In late 2017 or early 2018, Theressa J. Manning reached out to the Valley Health Metabolic and Bariatric Program in Winchester, VA to find out if her husband was a candidate for gastric bypass surgery.


Mrs. Manning was told by a representative of the Valley Health Metabolic and Bariatric Program that Manning was not a candidate for surgery because patients must weight under 400 pounds at the time of gastric bypass surgery. At the time, Randy M. Manning weighed in excess of 400 pounds.


In the summer of 2018, while attending a semi-truck show, Plaintiffs learned about Dr. Hargroder and how he performed surgery on some fellow truck drivers.


In an effort to maximize profits, Dr. Hargroder markets to and targets truck drivers as potential patients, including but not limited to setting up booths and displays at truck shows. Theressa J. Manning called Dr. Hargroder’s office, and Plaintiffs were provided some information about Dr. Hargroder and the procedure he performs, the mini-gastric bypass (sometimes referred to herein as “MGB”).


Dr. Hargroder did not have a 400-pound weight limit in performing the MGB In an effort to attract patients and maximize profits, Dr. Hargroder represented to the public and Plaintiffs that he is “America’s Weight Loss Doctor.”


Dr. Hargroder also represented to the public in general, Plaintiffs, and their primary care physician, Dr. Tracy Johnston, that he was “Board Certified and Specializing in General & Bariatric Surgery.”


Dr. Hargroder’s representation that he was board certified was false. Dr. Hargroder knew his representation that he was board certified was false at the time it was made. Dr. Hargroder intended to induce Plaintiffs to consent to the MGB procedure in misrepresenting that he was board certified. Dr. Hargroder knew his misrepresentation of board certification is a material fact the public relies upon in determining whether to consent to surgery, including Plaintiffs.

Upon information and belief, MGB– Surgery and Mercy Clinic knew or should have known Dr. Hargroder failed to inform Plaintiffs that he was not board certified. Upon information and belief, MGB– Surgery and Mercy Clinic failed to take any action to correct Dr. Hargroder’s misrepresentation because it was in their financial interest to conceal this information.

Plaintiffs and Dr. Johnston relied upon Dr. Hargroder’s misrepresentation in Exhibit B that he was board certified in consenting to the MGB procedure. Plaintiffs and Dr. Johnston would not have consented to Dr. Hargroder performing the MGB procedure had they known he was not board certified as represented in Exhibit B. Plaintiffs and Dr. Johnston were unaware that Dr. Hargroder was not board certified until they were informed of this information after the MGB procedure. Plaintiffs would not have consented to the MGB procedure by Dr. Hargroder or signed any consent form if Dr. Johnston refused to consent to the MGB procedure.

After contacting Dr. Hargroder’s office, over the course of the next several weeks, Plaintiffs went through the pre-operative procedures required by Defendants. Randy M. Manning’s MGB procedure was scheduled for December 27, 2018.

The MGB procedure was scheduled without Plaintiffs having ever seen Dr. Hargroder or any other health care provider associated with Defendants. Before the MGB procedure, Plaintiffs met with Dr. Hargroder to discuss the upcoming surgery. Dr. Hargroder informed Plaintiffs the MGB procedure would last 35 to 40 minutes.








According to the medical records, Dr. Hargroder documented Randy M. Manning’s “predicted weight” as 240 pounds based on a loss of 70 percent of excess weight following the MGB procedure.

On December 27, 2018, Dr. Hargroder performed the MGB procedure on Randy M. Manning and upon information and belief approximately four other patients at Mercy Hospital Carthage. Randy M. Manning’s preoperative weight was 441 pounds.

The MGB procedure lasted close to two hours. After the surgery, Dr. Hargroder informed Theressa J. Manning that the surgery lasted longer than he anticipated because he had a difficult time seeing inside Randy M. Manning’s body during surgery.

Dr. Hargroder told Theressa J. Manning that he had never seen belly fat as dense as Randy M. Manning’s fat, and that it was like cutting into “pig fat.”

On December 29, 2018, Randy M. Manning had an abdominal x-ray with contrast at Mercy Hospital Carthage following severe nausea, vomiting and tachycardia. Dr. Hargroder, a radiology technician, and Theressa J. Manning saw a leak on the x-ray monitor.

The radiology report documented findings consistent with an anastomotic leak. Dr. Hargroder made arrangements to transfer Randy M. Manning to Mercy Hospital Joplin for emergency surgery to repair the leak.

Randy M. Manning was taken to the operating suite and underwent diagnostic laparoscopy. The operative report specifically describes no evidence for leak, but Dr. Hargroder indicated in the operative report that he “over sewed” the anastomosis and stomach staple line, and a drain was placed.

Manning aspirated prior to surgery and remained on a ventilator until the following day, December 30, 2018. Randy M. Manning was discharged from Mercy Hospital Joplin on January 4, 2019 to a local hotel.

On January 7, 2019, Randy M. Manning was readmitted to Mercy Hospital Joplin with abdominal pain and dry heaving. His white blood cell count was 30. Manning developed bilious drainage and evidence of gastric obstruction on imaging studies.

On January 8, 2019, Randy M. Manning was taken back to the operating suite by Dr. Hargroder for diagnostic laparoscopic exam. A perforation of the afferent limb of the small bowel at the Billroth II anastomosis was encountered and repaired, and two drains were placed over the repair. A percutaneous drainage catheter was placed within the excluded stomach to attempt to relieve distention.

Manning’s postoperative course was rocky, with peritonitis, sepsis, acute renal failure, prolonged hospitalization and enterocutaneous fistula. Randy M. Manning was ultimately discharged from Mercy Joplin on February 8, 2019 to a local hotel with IV antibiotics. Postoperative images demonstrated persistent distention of the distal stomach.

On February 19, 2019, Randy M. Manning was readmitted to Mercy Hospital Carthage for labs and an x-ray. The x-ray showed distention of Randy M. Manning’s excluded stomach with fluid. On February 20, 2019, Randy M. Manning was taken to the operating suite for esophagogastroduodenoscopy, jejunostomy feeding tube revision, and drainage of his stomach.

On February 21, 2019, Manning was discharged from Mercy Hospital Carthage to a local hotel with pain pills and nausea medication. On February 22, 2019, Randy M. Manning was released to return home, which at that time was in Virginia.

Manning continued to have abdominal pain, nausea without vomiting, and dry heaves. Dr. Tracy Johnston made an appointment for Plaintiffs to see Troy Glembot, MD, MBA,CPE, FACS, FASMBS, who is Medical Director of the Valley Health Metabolic and Bariatric Program, on April 5, 2019.

On April 5, 2019, Manning went to the Valley Health Metabolic and Bariatric Program in Winchester, VA to get a second opinion. Troy Glembot, MD, FACS, FASMCS, who is Medical Director of the Valley Health Metabolic and Bariatric Program, documented part of his discussion with Plaintiffs, including: “We had a long discussion about his overall course. Multiple records from his hospitalization were reviewed as were operative notes. We specifically discussed the fact that the mini loop gastric bypass is NOT an endorsed procedure by the ASMBS [American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgeons], that according to the ABS website (https://www.absurgery.org) his surgeon is NOT board certified by the American Board of Surgery and that the management of his complications has been unique.”








Since that time Randy M. Manning has undergone additional surgical procedures with hospitalizations to correct problems caused by the MGB performed by Dr. Hargroder, including: a) b) c) laparoscopic gastrostomy tube placement and lysis of adhesions; conversion of MGB to Roux-en-Y bypass with partial gastrectomy and upper endoscopy; laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy of atonic, denervated gastric remnant with Roux-en-Y, EGD and lysis of adhesions; and d) exploratory laparotomy and gastrojejunostomy revision with repair of gastric perforation.

In the response to the Mannings' petition, Hargroder denied any negligence and denied all other allegations and notes that Manning signed an agreement to take any issues to arbitration and claimed Manning "failed to receive timely medical examinations and treatment."

The Mannings, who are asking for a jury trial, are represented by attorney Thomas G. Buchanon, Little Rock.

The lead attorney for Hargroder will be Brian L. Burge of Sanders, Warren & Russell LLP, Overland, Park, Kansas.

Thursday, May 29, 2025

Bipartisan resistance building against Missouri governor’s stadium funding plan


By Jason Hancock and Rudi Keller

Missouri Independent

Gov. Mike Kehoe’s stadium funding plan for the Kansas City Chiefs and Royals is facing growing resistance from across the ideological spectrum as lawmakers prepare to return to the Missouri Capitol on Monday.

From the right, the Senate Freedom Caucus is threatening a return to procedural gridlock if the agenda for next week’s special session doesn’t expand to include broad-based tax cuts and changes to the initiative petition process.






 

“If Gov. Kehoe and legislative leaders insist on using taxpayers’ hard-earned dollars for a half billion dollar (or more) handout to billionaire sports team owners in a standalone bill, the Missouri Freedom Caucus will vote against such a proposal and will consider utilizing any tools at its disposal to stop it,” state Sen. Rick Brattin, a Harrisonville Republican, said in a statement on behalf of the four-member Senate Freedom Caucus.

From the left, Democrats are seething that the governor’s agenda for the special session includes hundreds of millions for stadiums but only $25 million in disaster recovery funds for victims of recent tornadoes in the St. Louis region.

“The conversation can’t even begin until serious disaster relief is considered,” said state Sen. Stephen Webber, a Columbia Democrat. “Why do I care about a billionaire’s stadium when people have lost their homes? There’s absolutely no way we’re going to serve a billionaire a feast and leave crumbs for people who just lost their homes. That’s not happening.”

Complicating all calculations is the Democratic fury over how the regular session ended. Republicans used a rare procedural rule to end debate on controversial bills on abortion and paid sick leave.

Democrats promised the Senate would not function normally until they feel they can trust the GOP to work towards compromise.

On Thursday, Democrats showed just how disruptive they could be when Webber halted the routine work of signing bills from the regular session by noting that the chamber lacked a quorum because a majority of senators were not present.

The Senate was stuck as it waited for GOP legislators to make the unplanned trip to Jefferson City from their homes for what was supposed to be a largely ceremonial day.

Then Senate Minority Leader Doug Beck, an Affton Democrat, made a motion to adjourn the session for the year. Without voting on that motion, Senate President Pro Tem Cindy O’Laughlin, a Shelbina Republican, adjourned the Senate until Friday so more members could be rounded up.

The day ended in shouting, with Webber accusing his GOP colleagues of violating the chamber’s rules by ignoring Beck’s motion and moving forward to adjourn even though there was no quorum.

“You’re a coward,” Webber yelled as the session was gaveled to a close. “You know that was against the rules and you did it anyway.”

The tension on display Thursday doesn’t bode well for next week’s special session.

“It’s not coming together just swimmingly as of right now,” said state Sen. Lincoln Hough, a Springfield Republican who chairs the Senate Appropriations Committee.

The delaying action Thursday was about how the regular session ended, Beck said in an interview. He said he hasn’t had enough conversations with members of his caucus to decide tactics for the special session.

“The only part of the special session I think would be critical would be trying to get some relief for the people of the city of St Louis after the tornado,” Beck said. “There’s some hard feelings out there about how things happened. There’s also a feeling of like the amount of aid that they’ve offered is kind of a slap in the face.”

On Tuesday, Kehoe announced he was calling the legislature back into session to approve $25 million in disaster recovery funds and a little over $200 million in construction projects that failed to win House approval during the regular session.








But the highest profile piece of Kehoe’s special session agenda is his plan for the state to pay up to half the costs of a new stadium for the Kansas City Royals and renovations to Arrowhead Stadium for the Kansas City Chiefs — projects estimated to cost up to $3 billion.

Both teams have expressed interest in leaving Missouri when the lease on their current stadiums expire in 2030, and Kansas lawmakers have put a deal on the table that would use state incentives to pay for up to 70% of the costs of new stadiums.

Kansas House Speaker Dan Hawkins told The Kansas City Star on Thursday that if the Chiefs or Royals are interested in leaving Missouri, they should act on the state’s offer soon before the deal expires at the end of June.

Kehoe argues that the cost to keep the teams in the state would be less than what Missouri stands to lose if either team leaves the state. He claims the economic activity associated with the Chiefs supports 4,500 jobs, while a new stadium for the Royals would generate about 8,400 jobs.

But while the proposal easily cleared the Missouri House in the legislative session’s final days, it died in the Senate.

A bipartisan filibuster derailed its progress, with complaints ranging from the price tag to the lack of legislative input on the plan.

Senators also complained that stadium funding was taking precedence over $500 million in construction projects killed by the House days earlier that would have funded eight hospitals around the state, supported a new nuclear reactor at the University of Missouri to make cancer treatments and a new mental health hospital in Kansas City.

How opposition in the Senate plays out — the Senate will take up the special session bills first because of anticipated difficulty — will decide what the House can do.

State Rep. Doug Clemens, a Democrat from St. Ann, applauded the moves Thursday to disrupt the normally routine Senate action.

“It’s high time that Democrats dig their heels in and I support this,” Clemens said. “The governor needs to sit down and negotiate with Senate Democrats if we’re going to change things we’re going to make government work for the people.”

House Speaker Jon Patterson, a Republican from Lee’s Summit said he’s ready to act on Kehoe’s package but knows things could change.

“This is politics and negotiating is all part of it,” Patterson said. “There may be negotiations ahead but we will take a look at the current package and move ahead.”








House Minority Leader Ashley Aune, a Kansas City Democrat, said she’s generally supportive of the items Kehoe is requesting but would like to see more for disaster aid and construction spending.

What happens in the Senate, she said, is the key to the special session.

“The tenor in the Senate is probably going to dictate a lot of what happens,” Aune said.

Kehoe’s special session agenda includes very little of the construction budget spending, creating blowback. Instead of $50 million originally slated for the University of Missouri nuclear reactor, the governor called for only $25 million.

“The governor’s office gave me their word on $50 million, and I expect not one penny less than that,” Webber said. “I’m genuinely perplexed why they would give me their word then go back on it. I didn’t play games with them, and I don’t understand why they are playing games with my district.”

Hough also said the capital construction bill should spend more. And he questions whether the state should start paying for disaster recovery in cases where FEMA is not participating.

The $25 million proposal, he said, “is kind of like a drop in the bucket. That’s also why the state doesn’t do disaster payments, generally, because we don’t have a printing press like the feds.”

Republicans hold a super majority in the Senate — 24 of 34 seats. But it’s unclear if there are 18 GOP votes in support of Kehoe’s stadium plan, meaning Democratic support may be crucial.

Kehoe has a big hammer to sway votes — there are 248 items added to the budget by lawmakers at a cost of $550 million that are in bills awaiting his action. Kehoe has the power to veto any item from the budget he doesn’t like.

“I’ve got members calling me saying, is he gonna veto my stuff?” Hough said.

Kehoe will have to use every bit of his political skills to win passage of the special session package.

“The easiest way to frame this, from my perspective right now, is that there’s an awful lot of negotiation still yet to be done,” Hough said. “It’s just not as simple as everyone’s going to show back up after the way the session ended.”



A spokeswoman for the governor said he “respects the legislative process and hopes that legislators will work together to deliver on the time-sensitive issues in his call for the special session.”

Neosho man charged with statutory sodomy, child molestation


The Newton County Prosecuting Attorney's office filed statutory sodomy and child molestation charges against a Neosho man who allegedly performed a sexual act on an underage girl in 2020.

A warrant was issued for the arrest of Dusty Allen Scott (DOB 1988) to be held without bond.

According to the probable cause statement, Scott told the child "not to tell anyone because he would get in trouble."

Joplin man ordered held without bond for sexual exploitation of a minor

 A Joplin man will be held without bond while awaiting trial for sexual exploitation of a minor.

Joshua Stanley Miloszewski, 35, who is also awaiting trial in Jasper County Circuit Court on rape and statutory sodomy charges, was ordered held for grand jury or other proceedings following a preliminary hearing this morning in U. S. District Court in Springfield.

The probable cause affidavit in the federal case indicates the complaint against Joshua Stanley Miloszewski, 35, stems from the Jasper County case, which alleged Miloszewski was having sex with his live-in 16-year-old babysitter.






The federal charge was filed against Miloszewski after a search warrant revealed videos of him having sex with the 16-year-old, according to the affidavit.

Carthage man with four DWI convictions charged with illegal re-entry into U. S.


A Carthage man and Guatemala native was charged with illegal reentry into the United States today, 

Selvin Adolfo Mejia-Ramos, 32, is being held in the Greene County Jail. 

Mejia-Ramos was put on an ICE detainer after the Carthage Police Department arrested him for a traffic violation May 17, according to the probable cause affidavit.

The affidavit says Mejia-Ramos was deported March 9, 2020 and did not have permission to re-enter the country.

The government filed a detention motion today, asking that Mejia-Ramos be held while awaiting trial because he is a flight risk and has four convictions for driving while intoxicated.


Sakura Sushi & Grill fails Joplin Health Department inspection

Sakura Sushi & Grill, 1802 W. 32nd Street, failed a Joplin Health Department inspection Wednesday with four priority violations, according to information posted on the department website:

-Several PHFs in the prep cooler were being cold held above 41 degrees.

-Several PHFs in the three-door sushi reach were being cold held above 41 degrees

-Separation pesticide was stored on top of the dish machine.






-Sanitizer concentration for chlorine in the bar dish machine was at 0 ppm

Four core violations were cited.

***

Chipotle Mexican Grill, which failed an inspection May 15, passed its reinspection Wednesday.

***

Establishments that passed their inspections included:

Kim's, 842 S. Range Line Road

Target Retail/Produce, 3151 E 7th Street

Wendy's, 4500 S 43 Highway 

Agenda posted for Joplin City Council meeting



 JOPLIN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
MONDAY, JUNE 2, 2025
5th FLOOR COUNCIL CHAMBERS
602 S. MAIN ST. JOPLIN MO
6:00 P.M.


1.

Call to Order

Invocation
Pledge of Allegiance of the United States of America
2.

Roll Call

3.

Presentations

1.

Introduction of Matthew Fry President/CEO of Freeman Health Systems

2.

Annual Audit Presentation

3.

Joplin Area Chamber of Commerce Quarterly Update

4.

Finalization of Consent Agenda

5.

Reports and Communications

1.

News from the Public Information Office

6.

Citizen Requests and Petitions

1.

Maurice Filon Requested to Speak on Excessive Speeding Between 8th and Railroad on Vermont.

2.

Audi Perez Requested to Speak on Excessive Fast Driving and Failure to Stop at Stop Signs When Children are Playing.

7.

Public Hearings

1.

Public Hearing Procedures

2.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2025-270

AN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance No. 2022-274, passed by the Council of the City of Joplin, Missouri, August 1, 2022, by removing from District M-2 (Heavy Industrial) and include in District R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) property as described below and generally known as 1148 S Pennsylvania Ave, Joplin, Jasper County, Missouri. (Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval)

3.

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-007

A RESOLUTION granting a Special Use Permit (1st Request) for duplexes, located at 3105 Wisconsin Ave, City of Joplin, Jasper County, Missouri. (Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval)

8.

Consent Agenda

1.

Minutes of the May 5, 2025, City Council Meeting

2.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2025-120

AN ORDINANCE approving an Agreement and Purchase Order 2025A with Ace Pipe Cleaning, Inc. for the 2025 Evaluation and Rehabilitation Toolbox for Wastewater Collection System in the amount of Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($750,000.00) and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin; and, setting a date when this Ordinance shall become effective.

Documents:
  1. CB2025-120.pdf
3.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2025-268

 AN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance No. 2022-274, passed by the Council of the City of Joplin, Missouri, August 1, 2022, by removing from R-1 (Single-Family Residential) and include in District C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) property as described below and generally known as 410 W 26th St, Joplin, Jasper County, Missouri.

Documents:
  1. CB2025-268.pdf
4.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2025-269

AN ORDINANCE providing to vacate part of a street, lying north of property described as 2100 E Rolla St, City of Joplin, Jasper County, Missouri.

Documents:
  1. CB2025-269.pdf
5.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2025-516

AN ORDINANCE adopting an updated step pay plan by reference the City Salary Administration Plan; establishing the annual salary of certain Classified and Unclassified positions for Fiscal Year 2024-2025; and, setting a date when this Ordinance shall become effective.

Documents:
  1. CB2025-516.pdf
6.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2025-611

AN ORDINANCE approving a Contract by and between the City of Joplin and RAVENii, LLC., to implement Co-Managed Services and Network Upgrades; authorizing the City Manager to execute said Contract by and on behalf of the City of Joplin; and containing an effective date.

Documents:
  1. CB2025-611.pdf
9.

Resolutions

10.

Ordinances - Emergency

1.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2025-517

AN ORDINANCE    approving the Real Estate Contract by and between the City of Joplin, Missouri, a Municipal Corporation, and Melissa Dickerson, for the sale of one parcel located at 201 North Tyler Avenue, totaling approximately 750 square feet of land; and authorizing the City Manager to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin; and containing an emergency clause.    

2.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2025-518

AN ORDINANCE    approving the Real Estate Contract by and between the City of Joplin, Missouri, a Municipal Corporation, and Boyd Metals of Joplin, for the sale of one parcel located at 10th Street and Byers Avenue, totaling approximately 25 square feet of land; and authorizing the City Manager to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin; and containing an emergency clause.

3.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2025-519

AN ORDINANCE    approving the Real Estate Contract by and between the City of Joplin, Missouri, a Municipal Corporation, and James Crane, for the sale of one parcel located at West of 402 North Mineral Avenue, totaling approximately 2,500 square feet of land; and authorizing the City Manager to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin; and containing an emergency clause.    

4.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2025-520

AN ORDINANCE    approving the Real Estate Contract by and between the City of Joplin, Missouri, a Municipal Corporation, and Country Care Properties, LLC., for the sale of one parcel located at the Southwest corner of Spring and Division, totaling approximately 1,200 square feet of land; and authorizing the City Manager to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin; and containing an emergency clause.        

5.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2025-521

AN ORDINANCE    approving the Real Estate Contract by and between the City of Joplin, Missouri, a Municipal Corporation, and Murrell and Kristi Bass, for the sale of one parcel located at North of Central Street and Galena Avenue, totaling approximately 4,482 square feet of land; and authorizing the City Manager to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin; and containing an emergency clause.    

6.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2025-522

AN ORDINANCE    approving the Real Estate Contract by and between the City of Joplin, Missouri, a Municipal Corporation, and Mr. Zazzle’s Homes, LLC., for the sale of one parcel located at 1005 West 6th Street, totaling approximately 3,744 square feet of land; and authorizing the City Manager to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin; and containing an emergency clause.    

11.

Ordinances - First Reading

1.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2025-003

AN ORDINANCE amending Chapter 82 – Offenses and Miscellaneous Provisions, as it pertains to hunting within city limits; establishing regulations; and fixing the time when this ordinance shall become effective.

2.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2025-109

AN ORDINANCE approving the issuance of a Purchase Order to United Access in the amount of Fifty-Five Thousand Five Hundred Two Dollars and No Cents ($55,502.00) for the replacement of the two Wheelchair Lifts on the large trolley; amending the Annual Budget of the City of Joplin for the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 as adopted by Ordinance 2024-151 on October 21, 2024; and, setting a date when this ordinance shall become effective.

3.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2025-124

 AN ORDINANCE approving the City of Joplin to enter into an agreement with Emery Sapp and Sons Inc. in the amount of Two Million Eight Hundred Forty Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty-Three and 59/100 dollars ($2,840,723.59) for construction of the Zora Street Improvements Phase 2 project and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin; and setting a date when this Ordinance shall become effective.

12.

Ordinances - Second Reading and Third Reading

13.

Unfinished Business

14.

New Business