Sources who are nowhere close to Gary Nodler (in fact, they have never even talked to him or wanted to talk to him) insist that the Seventh District Congressional candidate has a plan to clear up the controversy over what exactly constitutes an earmark.
If you will recall, the media, particularly Chad Livengood at the Springfield News-Leader, have been holding Nodler's feet to the fire concerning the senator's claim that the $25 million forgivable loan he arranged for Eagle-Picher of Joplin was not an earmark.
These sources claim Nodler actually said, "It's not an earmark, and the only way you can prove it is through DNA testing of my ears. You won't find a mark anywhere on the bill."
The same sources insist Nodler conceded that if DNA proves it is an earmark, that the ears belong to Kit Bond.
6 comments:
Randy, 10 out of 14 of you last posts have been about Nodler and one of the other 4 mentioned him. Some suggest you have a "Nodler fixation". Let’s see, does 11 out of fourteen posts on one subject a fixation make? Hmmmmmm! Very interesting! Not necessarily the subject of your posts, but your mental condition.
Nodler's news. Besides, you are reading these posts, what is your problem?
I am an insomniac with deep insecurities; I come here because I feel so connected to you Randy.
fortunately for Nodler nobody reads this blog but we loons.
Nodler 4 President!
Nodler 4 president ... of mssu?...
uh, Dwight?
Post a Comment