A Seneca man waived the reading of his indictment and pleaded not gulity to meth and weapons charge this morning in U. S. District Court in Springfield.
From the detention motion:
The Government is aware of the following evidence:
In relation to the nature and circumstances of the offense charged, the evidence includes statements made by the defendant indicating that he enjoyed access to firearms and would use those firearms against law enforcement.
The Government also possesses evidence of statements made by the defendant following his arrest Case for committing the instant offense, wherein he lists persons who he suspected had informed, or “ratted,” on him, who were responsible for his arrest, and against whom he would retaliate upon his release from custody.
In relation to the history and characteristics of the defendant, the defendant’s criminal activity and past law enforcement contacts have not always resulted in criminal convictions; however, the circumstances surrounding such activity indicates that he has a propensity to commit violent acts, fueled by his addiction to methamphetamine, and his actions are increasing in severity.
For example, the defendant was arrested three separate times in 2013 and charged with committing both misdemeanor- and felony-level domestic assaults. One of those charges resulted in a misdemeanor conviction for domestic assault and the other two cases were ultimately dismissed.
In 2016, the defendant was arrested by the Seneca, Missouri, Police Department after he intentionally drove his vehicle into the rear of his mother’s vehicle, for which incident he was charged with the felony of property damage in the first degree and the misdemeanor of domestic assault.
At the time the defendant was taken into federal custody on or about September 1, 2023, there was pending against him multiple state criminal charges, including Newton County, Missouri, case number 23NW-CR01376, in which he was charged with one felony count of harassment in the first degree and one felony count of stalking in the first degree, for events occurring on or about August 9, 2023.
The alleged victim in that criminal case was the defendant’s former spouse who continues to have an active order of protection against the defendant. The alleged victim is also considered by the Government to be a witness to the instant offense; where the defendant has previously knowingly violated orders of protection against persons including said witness, he has proven that no court order or threat of incarceration could deter him from further offending the law.
4 comments:
Sounds like a real punk. I hope they give him substantial jail time. He's a menace to society with no respect, not even respect for his own mother. He's been given sufficient time to change , but is still blaming others for his behavior.
Lock this POS up and throw away the key.
Don't believe everything you read. There is a lot more to this than what the media is disclosing.
Let him out he's a good dude!!! Love you Driver
Post a Comment