As if Chuck Purgason wasn't enough for Roy Blunt to deal with, a new candidate is about to jump into the GOP primary for the U. S. Senate seat currently held by Kit Bond.
White supremacist Martin Lindstedt, Granby, announced his plans in a filing in U. S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri in his attempt to have his lawsuit against President Barack Obama reinstated and that it be "brought to trial by jury, preferably all whites."
Lindstedt said he would run for Senate in 2010 "if alive and even if jailed."
In the lawsuit, Lindstedt somehow sees a connection between the fact that Obama, a black man can run for president, but that he, Lindstedt, was tossed in jail for statutory sodomy and was not able to mount a candidacy for governor and sheriff. The judge requested that Lindstedt make his motion understandable and not a long, rambling statement. Here is how that worked out:
Can a non-white be allowed to run for public office while at the same time a White Christian can, under sundry pretexts, be denied his Constitutional right to run for Governor and for Sheriff? The way things are set up, it really doesn’t matter whether Plaintiff Lindstedt and his political organs even were unlawfully imprisoned or not. The way things are set up, thanks probably to a federal agent provocateur named ‘TraitorGlenn Miller’ no openly White Christian Man can run on a political party with ballot access. Couple that with the fact that many and most of the Defendants had Plaintiff Lindstedt unlawfully imprisoned without trial or habeas corpus or affordable bail although not a flight risk, were unlawfully doping him up as happened during the worst days of the former Soviet Union, and that all or most of the Defendants benefitted from this treasonous tyranny, then any complaint which sets these matters down may well be “overly long and rambling.”
Lindstedt does not explain why his court filings in his various lawsuits before he was allegedly doped up were also long and rambling.
Lindstedt, aligning himself with such Missouri stalwarts as Rep Cynthia Davis, R-O'Fallon, and possibly even his potential opponent in the 2010 primary, Roy Blunt, by expressing his belief in the birther notion that OBama is not a United States citizen:
"This Court by dismissing the lawsuit against Defendants who have not even bothered to make an answer, especially the lead thieving fraudulent n----- alleged president who isn’t even a citizen of the United States isn’t even bothering to play by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. C’mon, make them give an answer of some kind or sort before you turn them all loose to commit election treason again. "
Lindstedt continues:
"This Court has the power – if it chooses to use it – to question whether it is lawful to allow non-whites to run for the highest public office in the land while on the other hand allowing White Christian heterosexual men to not be allowed to run for state and local office precisely because they are openly and unapologetically pro-White and pro-Christian."
Lindstedt adds, "Essentially now us White Men are on the bottom and slated for slavery and extermination and we sure as hell don’t like it."
Then in a section entitled "So What Are You Going to Do About It?", Lindstedt notes that many of his fellow white supremacists have been put behind bars recently:
Given that quite a few of my White Nationalist colleagues like Hal Turner and Pastor Robert Joos, and the not much liked or respected Bill White/Weiss and Hardy Mongrol-Lloyd are in jail on trumped-up charges for running their mouths and thinking that the CONstipation and Bill of Goods was going to protect them, and an acquaintance James Von Brunn (Note: Von Brunn is the man who murdered a guard at the Holocaust Museum) the only one who got his licks in precisely because he kept his mouth shut, Plaintiffs are certainly not going to make any threats. However, this decision to essentially disenfranchise White people from being able to peacefully run for public office openly as White Nationalists will have consequences.
8 comments:
It makes one wonder where the line exists between freedom of speech and hate speech or where the line is drawn between tolerance and intolerance. I do not agree with anything this man says, thinks or believes in, but the first amendment covers everyones right to spout off.
And who, pray tell, is infringing on his right to spout off?
I fear Mr. Purgason has trouble on his hands now....might not come in second now
Randy, for the sake of your readers, you should at least identify which one is the dog in the picture. Now, I just used my freedom of speech. :)
Diamond Gem
Why bother posting things about this nut! If he was in jail for a felony, he can't run...
The charges were dropped.
When did Charlie Manson get a dog?
I want it to be known that Martin Lindstedt does not represent either the white nationalist movement or the Christian Identity community, he is a sick lunatic who is constantly making posts about how he wants to kidnap and torture the children of State officals. This type of degenerate behavior is not shared by the Christian Identity community, the vast majority of whom are non violent and seek seperation from, not the extermination of non whites. Lindstedt has vastly more enemies among white nationalists than he does friends and is commonly referred to as Martin Loonstedt. I repeat: Martin Lindstedt does not represent anyone but himself, he is not a leader of any white nationalist group nor does his "Church" have any members or services, he is a fraud and continous embarrassment to the true white nationalists who seek to protect our race through legal means.
Post a Comment