Saturday, September 12, 2026

Latest Missouri poll finds another razor thin margin ahead of November vote on abortion


By Anna Spoerre

Just 10 days ago, Steven Rogers says he would have predicted Missourians were set to reinstate an abortion ban this November.

Then the latest polling results landed in his inbox. Now the professor of political science at Saint Louis University says he’s not so sure.

Of 900 likely Missouri voters surveyed in August by the SLU/YouGov Poll, of which Rogers is director, 44% opposed the abortion ban and 43% supported it. The remaining 13% were unsure, according to the latest survey released Thursday. The poll took place between Aug. 13 and Aug. 24 and has a margin of error of roughly 4 percentage points. 







In November, Missourians will be asked if they want to repeal a reproductive rights amendment voters approved in 2024 and reinstate an abortion ban with limited exceptions for survivors of rape and incest and medical emergencies. That proposal, placed on the ballot by the legislature, will be listed on the statewide ballot as Amendment 3, the same name as the 2024 abortion rights amendment. 

In the latest poll, the abortion ban garnered more support among men, with 46% of those surveyed in support compared with 40% of women in support. Republicans were three times more likely to vote in support of the amendment than Democrats. Only 20% of Democrats said they planned to vote in favor of the ban; 65% of Republicans expressed support.

The strongest support for the abortion ban amendment came from Missourians in southeast and northwest Missouri. Those polled in the Kansas City and St. Louis metro areas expressed the greatest opposition.

“The path is there. Let’s get it done,” Tom Estes, a leader with Her Health, Her Future, the campaign advocating for the abortion ban amendment, said of the poll results on social media. 

The August results erased a gap that had favored the amendment several months earlier.

Polling done in February, with the latest results updated after YouGov changed its weighting strategy, showed an 11 percentage point margin between the “yes” and “no” votes, with 50% of those surveyed saying they planned to support the abortion ban amendment and 39% saying they planned to oppose it. 

“Politicians made it abundantly clear that Amendment 3 was designed to overturn the will of voters and ban abortion,” Tom Bastian, a spokesman for Stop the Ban, the campaign effort to defeat the amendment, said in a statement. “As more Missourians are tuning in to the election, it’s not surprising to see a growing number of voters saying NO to Amendment 3 to stop the abortion ban and protect reproductive freedom in our state.”







The 2024 vote that overturned the state’s 2022 near-total abortion ban and created a constitutional right to the procedure up to the point of fetal viability passed with support from 51.6% of the nearly 3 million Missourians who cast a vote.

A few months before the 2024 vote, a SLU/YouGov survey found that 52% of Missourians polled planned to vote for the reproductive rights amendment; 34% planned to vote to keep a ban in place.

Rogers said he doesn’t foresee the polling results lining up as perfectly this time. But he was able to compare responses from 305 people who took the survey in both February and August. Among that sample, 17% of the people who supported the abortion ban in February flipped to opposition, and 14% flipped from oppose to support. 

While the August poll only asked for Missourians’ view on Amendment 3, the February poll asked more specific questions around both abortion and gender-affirming care for minors. The survey found that 59% of Missourians support abortion access through at least 8 weeks of pregnancy. 

The same survey also found a majority of Missourians opposed access to gender-affirming healthcare for minors, with 66% of those surveyed opposing hormone therapy or medications for minors and 72% opposing gender transition surgeries. 

This matters because November’s Amendment 3 would also place a ban on gender-affirming care for minors into the state constitution. This type of healthcare has been banned in state law since 2023. The Missouri Supreme Court upheld the ban earlier this year. 

Proponents of Amendment 3 say a more permanent ban is needed, noting that the ban on puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones expires in 2027, though the ban on surgeries is permanent. Those opposed to the abortion ban amendment decry the ban on gender-affirming care as ballot candy meant to bring more people to the polls in favor of the amendment and distract from the effort to reinstate an abortion ban.

When comparing the latest polling results with those from August 2024, Rogers said they found both Democrats and Republicans are less-supportive of the reproductive rights amendment this go-around. That was also the case for non-white voters.

He suspects that Republicans’ decision to attach a ban on gender-affirming care for minors to the proposed abortion ban accounts for some of that shift. 

But the increase in opposition to the proposed abortion ban between the February poll and August poll came from several groups, including young, elderly and male Missourians, he said. 

In general, he said the latest poll results points to increasing discontent with those in power. 

Trump, Kehoe post first negative approval ratings in new Missouri poll

The August SLU/YouGov poll also found both President Donald Trump and Gov. Mike Kehoe’s approval ratings among Missourians took a hit since February.







In that span of several months between surveys, voters shot down a few major Republican policy proposals, including an attempt to make it more difficult to amend the constitution using citizen-led initiative petition process, which is how the reproductive rights amendment currently in place was passed.

“A general theme of the (August) poll is that people are upset,” Rogers said, noting that most of the Republican establishment didn’t fare well in the latest survey, nor in the primary. “If that carries over into November, then this Amendment 3 may fail.” 

Missouri Independent is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Missouri Independent maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Jason Hancock for questions: info@missouriindependent.com.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hands off women's healthcare!

Anonymous said...

5:37AM, Is this Truly Women's Healthcare or a way for Women to deal with their Bad Behavior and Bad Life Decisions- Using Abortion as their Personal Birth Control?

Women's Group want to Push - Abortions because of Rape, Incest, or Health Reasons of the Child or Mother - - - THIS IS A BOLDFACE LIE - -
LESS THAN 3% of ALL ABORTIONS ARE BECAUSE OF RAPE, INCEST, OR HEALTH OF THE CHILD OR MOTHER - - LESS THAN 3% - - THAT IS THE FACTS AND TRUTHS - - - SO PLEASE STOP LYING ABOUT IT - - - WHILE 97% OF ABORTIONS ARE BECAUSE OF THEIR BAD BEHAVIOR, SELFISHNESS, AND LACK OF VALUES, MORALS, AND CHARACTER!

Let's Look at the Real Facts and Truths of Abortions - -

According to aggregate state health reporting and data compiled on elective versus medical exceptions, explicit medical or traumatic circumstances represent a small fraction of total reported figures:

Rape or incest: Less than 1% (approx. 0.4%–1%)

Fetal health / physical abnormalities: 1% to 3% (varying by localized reporting definitions)

Risk to maternal life or health / physical health concerns: 2.5% combined

NOW LET'S LOOK AT THE REAL FACTS AND TRUTHS OF WHY WOMEN HAVE ABORTIONS - - SO THEY WON'T BE INCONVENIENCED - -

Primary Reported Reasons and Percentages

Surveys show that socioeconomic, timing, and relationship factors make up the vast majority of reasons:

Interference with education, work, or care for dependents: 74%
Inability to afford a baby / financial reasons: 40% to 73% (depending on whether it is tracked as a primary or contributing factor)
Timing / not ready for a child: 36% to 38%
Partner-related reasons (fear of single motherhood, relationship problems): 31% to 48%
Need to focus on existing children: 29%
Completed childbearing / don't want more children: 38%

This Clearly Shows why nearly 44% of Women who have had an Abortion in the U.S. will have at least a Second, Third, Fourth, or More Abortions. Women use Abortions as Birth Control - Not for Rape, Incest, or the Health of the Child or Mother, but for their own Selfish and Undeniable Reasons - So - PLEASE STOP LYING ABOUT IT - 97% of all Abortions are because Women are Feel they are being Inconvenienced, because of their OWN ACTIONS! DEAL WITH THE FACTS AND TRUTHS - AND STOP ALL YOUR LIES!

Anonymous said...

5:37 women’s health care, what about the babies healthcare, these people have more sympathy for an animal that has no soul. No Bible based individual could possibly believe in abortion. For you folks that don’t believe in GOD Almighty I pray that you’re eyes will be open before it’s to late and know Jesus Christ died on the cross and rose 3 days later, all for us, Only way to the father is through Jesus Christ or Lord and Savior. I am a sinner just like everyone, I’m no better than anyone, I sin everyday just like everyone else. I hope you understand this there was only 1 perfect person to walk the Earth, and there is only 1 person that has defeated death. Before you reply please read this again and understand I’m not judging you, that would be hypocritical for me to do that. God Bless Everyone

Anonymous said...

It's really none of your business what any woman does with her body or how she chooses to live and deal with her health concerns.

Anonymous said...

“Her body, her choice” conveniently ignores the body that doesn’t get a choice.

Anonymous said...

8:53AM, Thanks for your opinion and if my Hardworking Tax Dollars are Supporting her to have an Abortion or Multiple-Abortions - because she wants to live a care-free life making bad life decisions and using Abortion as her Personal Birth Control, then I think I have the right to object and say - I DON"T WANT TO SUPPORT THAT - - NOT WITH MY TAX DOLLARS!!!!!!!!!

Again, STOP WITH THE LIES - AND THE ABORTION CLICKBAIT - LESS THAN 3% of ALL Abortions are for Valid Reasons - the rest of the 97% is because of Lifestyle Consequences and Bad Decisions, and their own Personal Inconveniences - that is why 44% of all women that get an Abortion have a Second, Third, Fourth, and Fifth One - -

THESE ARE THE ONLY REASONS LISTED BELOW THERE IS HEALTH CONCERNS AND WOULD POSSIBLE NEED AN ABORTION - LESS THAN 3% - STOP YOUR LIES AND THE REST OF THE BS, YOU KEEP TELLING THE PUBLIC TO FUND ABORTIONS -

LESS THAN 3% OF ABORTIONS ARE FOR HEALTH CONCERNS!
Rape or incest: Less than 1%.
Fetal health / physical abnormalities: 1% to 3%.
Risk to maternal life or health / physical health concerns: 2.5% combined.

SO WHY DO THE REST OF THE 97% OF THE WOMEN NEED ABORTIONS?

Anonymous said...

Abortions for minorities! What's that? This statement made you angry? Why would you be offended by this comment? I'm both pro minorities and pro abortion, so therefore I support abortions specifically for minorities! If there's nothing wrong with abortions why would this offend you?

Anonymous said...

1:02PM, I don't know who you are having a conversation with, except in your own mind, but NO ONE MENTIONED OR COMMENTED ABOUT MINORITIES - EXCEPT YOU.

Having Abortions, for simply being inconvenienced in life is without merit, when only 3% of all Abortions are for Real Health Concerns - - The Question is why are Hard Working Taxpayers - Paying for 97% of these Women that are having Abortions for Non-HealthCare Reasons - - Just for their bad behavior, selfishness, and lack of values, morals, and character - using Abortions for their personal birth control - all the while 44% of these women that have Abortions will have a second, third, fourth, and sometimes a fifth Abortion - so why should Taxpayers be Paying for this type of horrendous lifestyle behavior???

LESS THAN 3% OF ALL ABORTIONS ARE FOR HEALTH CONCERNS!
SO, STOP YOUR LIES - ALL YOU PRO-ABORTION ADVOCATES AND DEAL WITH THE REAL PROBLEMS - YOUR LIFESTYLE CHOICES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Rape or incest: Less than 1%.
Fetal health / physical abnormalities: 1% to 3%.
Risk to maternal life or health / physical health concerns: 2.5% combined.

Anonymous said...

Sorry 319, my trolling is sometimes too multi-leveled and makes me come off as an actual leftist, which I admit makes me laugh.
I'm pretending to be a leftist that is pro abortions for minorities specifically, which I think is hilarious because that just means there will be less minorities if they're the main ones targeted for abortions, you know, Margaret Sangers original intentions.
I want leftists to see the absurdity in supporting abortions for minorities. You want minorities to thrive yet you also push for their deaths by supporting abortion... Of course they are not very smart and believe that abortion "saves the life of the mother" when in fact that is never the case. A doctor is never required to murder the life of the baby in order to save the life of the mother. A doctor always tries to save both lives when possible, sometimes the end result is the baby not making it because it's too premature, but the key point is that they try, it's part of their oath. But as you already pointed out, "medical emergencies" only account for a small fraction of abortions anyways, and they don't care, as long as they're loud and proud they are right!