Considering everything that
has happened to me over the past three months- losing my teaching job and being
smeared in a public hearing by public school administrators, I would guess no
one would blame me if I happened to be bitter toward public schools.
I am not. I am as big an
advocate of public schools as I have ever been. Public schools are not perfect
and they have many flaws, but when I look at the so-called “reforms” that have
been proposed by people like Michelle Rhee and her misnamed StudentsFirst
organization and in my home state of Missouri- retired billionaire Rex
Sinquefield and his bought-and-paid-for think tank, the Show-Me Institute, it
is obvious that the preservation of public schools in some recognizable form is
vital.
We cannot let the public
schools and their hard-working teachers who report to classrooms that are open
to everyone, unlike their private school counterparts, be destroyed by those
who claim to be reforming them.
Nothing makes me angrier when
the proponents of “reform” twist facts beyond recognition to make a point. That
happened Monday when a writer for Rex Sinquefield’s Show-Me Institute, James
Shuls, tried to make the case for school choice by using my situation.
He began his blog post, titled "Monopsony: Why Teachers Should Support School Choice" on
Show Me Daily in this fashion:
On April 9, former journalist-turned-middle school teacher Randy Turner published a blog titled “A Warning to
Young People: Don’t Become a Teacher.” Shortly after, Turner was
removed from the classroom and placed on leave. It was initially believed that
he was being persecuted for his criticism of the Joplin School District and his
political musings (it later come out that there were more serious accusations
and he would
subsequently lose his job).
Early on, I penned an op-ed. Not in defense of Turner, for I
didn’t know the details of his case, but in support of school choice. How, you
may ask, does Turner’s story mesh with the topic of school choice?
Like this:
The Joplin School District has the corner on teaching jobs in
Joplin. In economic speak, this is called a Monopsony. Whereas a monopoly means having a single provider of goods or services, a monopsony means having a single buyer of goods or services. Buyers or
employers with a monopsony control the market and are able to dictate terms to
the supplier — in this case, the teacher. In most cities, public school
districts have a monopsony on the teaching jobs.
You see, in a school choice system, it is not just students who
have options; teachers have greater options as well.
The First Amendment provides Sills, Sinquefield,
Ms. Rhee and other opponents with the right to express their views and have
them considered in the marketplace of ideas. The billionaires and special
interest have the means to make sure those ideas receive far more consideration
than they are worth.
All I ask is that you leave me out of any
argument against public education.
Public education is not perfect and needs improvement in many areas, but
it is a system that has served this country well.
The way to destroy that system is by tearing
down the teachers who have served as its backbone.
Do not use my situation to push that agenda.
No comments:
Post a Comment