Friday, August 02, 2024

Anonymous donors pump $2M into ad campaign backing Jay Ashcroft for Missouri governor


By Rudi Keller

A national political group is pouring millions into Missouri to boost Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft in the Republican primary for governor, stepping in when his campaign was running out of cash and drawing howls from the backers of his rivals.

The Stand for US PAC began ordering television and radio time in the state in early July, first to broadcast an ad touting Attorney General Andrew Bailey, and then to boost Ashcroft in a fight over a new law signed by the governor that mandates steep discounts on wholesale prescription prices.

On its website, the PAC states its “mission in 2024 is to hold Republicans across the country accountable for capitulating to Joe Biden’s dangerous open border agenda.”








The group is airing two ads attacking Lt. Gov. Mike Kehoe and backing Ashcroft. The ads do not mention state Sen. Bill Eigel, the other Republican running a full-scale campaign for the nomination.

Stand for US PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission and the only donation this year is $1 million from Building America’s Future. It will not report the donors paying for the Missouri ads until mid-August, after the primary is over.

Stand for US has not filed a report with the Missouri Ethics Commission, and a spokeswoman disputed whether it is required under state law. Committees operating outside of Missouri are supposed to make reports to the commission when spending to influence a state election exceeds $1,500.

Its treasurer is Cabell Hobbs, also the treasurer of Save Missouri Values, a PAC that entered the 2022 U.S. Senate primary to spend $8.8 million late in the race on behalf of Republican Eric Schmitt.

“I appreciate the fact that they’re supporting me,” Ashcroft told The Independent in an interview Thursday evening. “I wonder who’s doing it, what’s behind it, but I’m thankful for anyone that wants to actually have a conservative leader for the state of Missouri.”

Kehoe’s campaign is furious.

“What secret promises has Jay made to secure this support and what do they get if he’s elected governor?” said Kehoe spokeswoman Gabby Picard.

The outside help came at a crucial time for Ashcroft.

When Ashcroft’s campaign closed the books on July 25 for its final report before Tuesday’s primary, it had $92,466. He had spent $800,000 since June 30. His joint fundraising PAC, Committee for Liberty, had $58,833 after spending $1 million.

Kehoe’s campaign, meanwhile, had $1.2 million left after spending $1.1 million. His PAC, American Dream, had $331,062, and had spent $5 million.

Cash continues to pour in for American Dream PAC. It reported $465,500 in donations of more than $5,000 on Wednesday and Thursday.

Eigel, whose insurgency campaign has made the contest a three-way race, is not mentioned in the Stand for US ads. His campaign spent $333,000 between July 1 and July 25 and had $135,502 on hand. BILL PAC, his joint fundraising committee, had $242,694.

Eigel’s campaign manager Sophia Shore said she is focused on building on earlier work.

“Bill Eigel is the only true conservative in the race for governor,” she said. “His message is resonating, we have all the momentum — our opponents know this and they’re scared to death.”

Kehoe’s campaign is also pushing back by trying to get one of the Stand for US ads removed from the airwaves. Marc Ellinger, a veteran Jefferson City attorney representing Kehoe’s campaign, wrote to stations claiming an ad paid for by Stand for US is libelous.

The ad fuses fear of crime by undocumented immigrants with concern about political corruption, stating that “the Parson-Kehoe Administration is adding fuel to the fire, caving to Jefferson City lobbyists and approving legislation subsidizing health care for illegals.”

“The assertion that there is a ‘Parson-Kehoe administration’ is false,” Ellinger wrote. “There is a Parson administration. All the actions referred to in the ad were solely and exclusively taken by

Governor Parson and not one action was taken by Lt. Gov. Kehoe.”

Unlike the federal system where the president and vice president run as one ticket, Missouri elects all its statewide officers separately.

Stand for US distributed the letter to reporters with a press release exulting in the response. It said the letter shows Kehoe is distancing himself from Parson while enjoying the governor’s endorsement.

“Stand for Us is doing the Lord’s work, showing Missourians what kind of hypocrite Kehoe is,” said Katie Miller, a Washington, D.C.,-based political consultant and chair of Stand for US.

340B Bill

The legislation at the heart of the Stand for US ad campaign, which passed with overwhelming bipartisan support, pertains to a federally mandated drug discount program.

Called 340B pricing, it allows qualified medical providers to obtain prescription drugs for their patients at a steep discount.

There is no requirement that the discount be passed on to the patient and the profits from retail sales often underwrite other operations at the hospital, such as charity care. That is how health care for people lacking immigration documents fits into the picture.








The bill required drug makers to ship medications purchased at a discount to any pharmacy under contract to a qualified provider. The only vocal opponents of the legislation are pharmaceutical manufacturers who have been warring with providers over how many contracts to allow.

Parson allowed the bill, which he called “flawed,” to become law without his signature.

There are two versions of the Stand for US ad, which was quickly recut to note that Ashcroft was endorsed for governor by former President Donald Trump. It does not mention that Trump also endorsed Kehoe and Eigel.

Chinese land ownership

In a news release, the bill’s sponsor and House handler, state Sen. Justin Brown and state Rep. Tara Peters of Rolla, were joined by Senate Majority Leader Cindy O’Laughlin of Shelbina in denouncing Stand for US. All three support Kehoe.

They accused it of producing ads using talking points from Phrma, the lobbying arm of drug manufacturers in other campaigns, then responding with the Missouri ads when Ashcroft posted support for repeal of the legislation on social media.








“It certainly appears Jay Ashcroft is willing to trade the health of his constituents and health care providers’ ability to care for their patients for millions in campaign cash,” Peters said in the release.

The other ad focuses exclusively on China and foreign ownership of farmland. It accurately states that Kehoe, as a state senator, voted to repeal Missouri’s complete ban on foreign ownership of farmland and that Kehoe campaigns on a bus owned by the only lobbyist for Smithfield Foods, a subsidiary of a Chinese company that would have had to sell its Missouri landholdings without the 2013 legislation.

Then, using silent B-roll posted on Ashcroft’s YouTube channel, it calls him a “Trump-endorsed conservative” who has fought to ban Chinese land ownership “to protect our food supply from being outsourced to Chinese Communists.”

The single donor to Stand for US before July 1 has a tangential connection to Ashcroft’s campaign. Jason Roe, a consultant working for Ashcroft, in 2022 was on the board of Building America’s Future, the PAC that gave Stand for US $1 million.

Building America’s Future describes itself as “a national, bipartisan coalition dedicated to infrastructure investment and reform” on its social media.

Roe said he has had no involvement with Building America’s Future since leaving the board in September 2022.








The appearance of the ads was as surprising to him as it was to Ashcroft’s opponents, Roe said.

“I don’t know who they are or why they are doing it but I am grateful for their support,” Roe said.

The Ashcroft campaign cannot legally work with outside groups, Roe noted.

“When it comes to coordinating with outside spending,” he said, “not only can you not coordinate on how they do spend their money, you can’t coordinate about how they don’t spend their money.”


Eigel, one of three candidates for governor endorsed by Trump, to be in Joplin

 

Bill Eigel, who along with Lieutenant Governor Michael Kehoe and Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft is one of three candidates former President Donald Trump endorsed for governor will be in Joplin Saturday.

Eigel is scheduled to be at Hackett Hot Wings, 520 S. Main for a meet and greet.

















Thursday, August 01, 2024

Joplin woman sues University of Kansas hospital that denied emergency abortion; Freeman may be next


By Anna Spoerre

Two years ago, Mylissa Farmer was denied an emergency abortion at hospitals in Missouri and Kansas while experiencing a miscarriage.

On Tuesday, she filed a lawsuit against one of the hospitals — The University of Kansas Health System — accusing the hospital of sex discrimination and saying it violated a federal law meant to ensure doctors treat patients who come into the emergency room.

(Photo- Mylissa Farmer shares her story for a 2022 TV ad for Democratic Senate candidate Trudy Busch Valentine/screenshot).

A spokesperson with the health system did not immediately respond to a request for comment.








“While Ms. Farmer was clearly in the midst of a complicated and dangerous miscarriage — and there was no chance her fetus could survive — the care she needed was an abortion because fetal cardiac activity was still detectable,” states the lawsuit filed in Kansas federal court. “Ms. Farmer was entitled to this emergency abortion care under state and federal law.”

Farmer was living in southwest Missouri when she miscarried. Several weeks earlier, Missouri banned abortion in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court overturning the constitutional right to the procedure.

The day she went to an emergency room — cramping and bleeding at 18 weeks pregnant — Kansas voters were heading to the polls to vote in favor of keeping abortion legal in that state.

Farmer went to the emergency room at Freeman Health’s emergency department in Joplin at her OB-GYN’s urging. There, medical staff determined the pregnancy was no longer viable, but because the fetus had a heartbeat, and because Farmer’s condition wasn’t immediately life-threatening, she was turned away.

According to the lawsuit, doctors told Farmer that she was at risk of infection, severe blood loss, the loss of her uterus and death. But they would not help her because of Missouri’s abortion ban, which had only been in place for several weeks, outlawing all abortions with limited exceptions in cases of medical emergencies.

Farmer then traveled three hours across the border to a hospital in Kansas, where abortion is limited after 22 weeks gestation. However, doctors at the University of Kansas Health System also refused to perform an abortion. Kansas law bans abortions at any facilities run by the University of Kansas Hospital Authority, with exemptions for the life and health of the mother.

“Ms. Farmer arrived at (the University of Kansas Health) heartbroken, in pain and terrified for her life,” the lawsuit reads.








The doctor who saw Farmer initially told her the hospital would induce labor so Farmer could then hold her daughter and say goodbye, according to the lawsuit. But the doctor later said her decision had been overridden by others at the hospital, and that she could no longer induce labor because it would be too “risky” in Kansas’ “heated” political environment to do so when the fetus still had a heartbeat.

Instead, according to the suit, the hospital refused to even perform routine checks such as taking her temperature and assessing her pain. She was turned away without so much as Tylenol or antibiotics to ward off potential infection despite Farmer being at high risk for infection and experiencing heavy bleeding, mental fog and acute pain.

She returned to the Joplin hospital the next day, was kept overnight and then released without additional treatment.

Farmer eventually traveled several hours to Hope Clinic in Granite City, Illinois, for an abortion on Aug. 5. On the drive there, according to the suit, she was in excruciating pain, by then several days into her miscarriage and almost fully dilated.

Back home after the abortion, Farmer’s OB-GYN diagnosed her with an infection and prescribed her antibiotics.

The damage to Farmer’s health and wellbeing was long-term, the lawsuit argues. She was hospitalized several times after the miscarriage, and was unable to work for months. She eventually lost her home and moved out of Missouri.

What Farmer experienced at the Kansas hospital “compounded the trauma of her pregnancy loss and denied her the ability to mourn that loss on her own terms,” the suit reads.

Farmer, who has a history of polycystic ovary syndrome, had feared she and her husband would not be able to get pregnant prior to the summer of 2022, the lawsuit reads.

Her story caused national outrage as women and providers in states with abortion bans and restrictions navigated new and often vague laws. Under Missouri’s new ban, health care providers who perform abortions that weren’t deemed medical emergencies can be charged with a class B felony. If convicted, they would face up to 15 years in prison and their medical license could also be suspended or revoked.

In a letter to the hospitals several months later, U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra warned that both locations had to provide all necessary care required by federal law. A report by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services found both hospitals had violated the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act.

This act, known as EMTALA, requires that hospitals treat patients with emergency conditions despite their ability to pay.

“Although her doctors advised her that her condition could rapidly deteriorate, they also advised that they could not provide her with the care that would prevent infection, hemorrhage, and potentially death because, they said, the hospital policies prohibited treatment that could be considered an abortion,” Becerra wrote in May 2023. “This was a violation of the EMTALA protections that were designed to protect patients like her.”



The federal lawsuit comes in the wake of an Idaho EMTALA case recently argued before the U.S. Supreme Court. While awaiting the decision, thousands of doctors, including dozens across Missouri, asked the court to uphold EMTALA.

The nation’s highest court sent the case back down to the court of appeals. Earlier this year, several women with high-risk pregnancies were airlifted to other states in order for emergency physicians to avoid performing emergency abortions in a state with a ban on the procedure.








Unlike the Idaho case, which was brought by the government, Farmer’s is the first high profile EMTALA lawsuit brought after the fall of Roe by an individual denied an emergency abortion, said Kenna Titus, a legal fellow with the National Women’s Law Center, the organization representing Farmer.

“In the post-Dobbs world, we know that these protections that are provided by EMTALA for pregnant people are more important than they’ve ever been,” Titus said. “A clear decision in this case will make it clear for people across the country that are dealing with this that this is not a gray area. Federal law requires abortion care in emergency situations like this.”

As of Wednesday, no lawsuit had been filed in federal court against the Joplin hospital.

Government withdraws detention motion; Webb City man released on his own recognizance


During a detention hearing this morning in U. S. District Court in Springfield, the government withdrew its detention motion for a Webb City man charged with receiving and distributing child pornography.

Magistrate Judge David P. Rush released Charles Blake Tyler, 47, on his own recognizance.

Tyler was arraigned and entered a not guilty plea. 

The hearing lasted four minutes, according to court records.








More information on the case can be found at the link below.

The Turner Report: Detention motion: Illegal photos of 8-year-old were downloading when Webb City man's home was searched (rturner229.blogspot.com)


Granby Municipal Court Judge killed in mowing accident


Longtime Granby Municipal Judge Steven M. White was killed in a mowing accident this morning on Gum Road two miles north of Granby.

According to the Highway Patrol report, the 2015 Grasshopper mower White was driving overturned off a concrete culvert while he was mowing the right of way. The exact time of the crash is unknown.







Newton County Assistant Coroner Jerry Deems pronounced White dead at the scene at 12:23 p.m.

The fatality was the 54th this year for Highway Patrol Troop D.


Agenda posted for Joplin City Council meeting

JOPLIN CITY COUNCIL
 REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
MONDAY, AUGUST 5, 2024
5th FLOOR COUNCIL CHAMBERS
602 S. MAIN ST. JOPLIN MO












1.

Call to Order

Invocation
Pledge of Allegiance of the United States of America
2.

Roll Call

3.

Presentations

1.

Community Revitalization Program Status Update

2.

Public Works Reorganization Planning Update and Request

4.

Finalization of Consent Agenda

5.

Reports and Communications

1.

News from the Public Information Office

6.

Citizen Requests and Petitions

1.

Mary Price Requested to Speak on Fiscal Accountability & City Council responsibility to citizens

2.

Joshua Shackles requested to speak regarding Reducing speed on Euclid Ave and Utica Street to 25 MPH

3.

Brian Evans requested to Speak on Freeman Demolition Proposal and Unequal Treatment of Joplin Residents

4.

Donna Bray requested to speak on Freeman building demo

7.

Public Hearings

1.

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-012

A RESOLUTION granting a Special Use Permit (1st Request) for the operation of a Home Beauty Salon, located at 3502 S Park Ave in the City of Joplin, Newton County, Missouri. (Requested by Jennifer Hicks. Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval). 

8.

Consent Agenda

1.

Minutes of the July 15, 2024, City Council Meeting

2.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2024-275

AN ORDINANCE authorizing the City of Joplin, Missouri, to enter into an Agreement with ALLO Communications LLC, a Nebraska limited liability company, for the purpose of leasing a certain land in the area commonly known as 1301 W 2nd Street, Joplin MO to ALLO Communications LLC to use the premises for a central office and/or data bunker, which is a building for utilities, computers and a generator using electricity, but without any temporary or permanent occupancy; authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin.  

Documents:
  1. CB2024-275.pdf
3.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2024-276

AN ORDINANCE authorizing the City of Joplin, Missouri, to enter into an Agreement with ALLO Communications LLC, a Nebraska limited liability company, for the purpose of leasing a certain land in the area commonly known as 2749 E 30th Street, Joplin MO to ALLO Communications LLC to use the premises for a central office and/or data bunker, which is a building for utilities, computers and a generator using electricity, but without any temporary or permanent occupancy; authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin.  

Documents:
  1. CB2024-276.pdf
4.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2024-507

AN ORDINANCE approving a Petition to Terminate the Northpark Lane Community Improvement District.

Documents:
  1. CB2024-507.pdf
9.

Resolutions

1.

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-013

A RESOLUTION    of the City of Joplin, Missouri, stating the intent to apply for federal assistance from the Recreational Trails Program for the purpose of the City of Joplin Trail Amenities Project in the amount of $147,210.00; and, committing to the match funding of $98,140.00. 

2.

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-014

A RESOLUTION    approving modifications to the City of Joplin Purchasing Policy.  

10.

Ordinances - Emergency

1.

COUNCIL BILL NO.2024-132

AN ORDINANCE    approving the City of Joplin to enter into a construction agreement with Rosetta Construction in the amount of One Million, Five Hundred Eighty-Eight Thousand, Five Hundred Ninety-Nine and 00/100 DOLLARS ($1,588,599.00) for the Tin Cup Lift Station and Pressure Line Improvement Section 2 (Force Main) and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin, and containing and emergency clause.

2.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2024-615

AN ORDINANCE approving the issuance of a Purchase Order to SHI/Microsoft Corporation to cover the annual support payment for the Public Safety and Financial software, as budgeted in the Annual Budget of the City of Joplin for the Fiscal Year 2023-2024, was budgeted and approved for by Council during the budget process and finalized by Council Bill 2023-519 on October 16, 2023; and containing an emergency clause.

11.

Ordinances - First Reading

1.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2024-002

AN ORDINANCE re-adopting Chapter 2, Administration, of the Joplin City Code, Section 2-107, "Financial interest disclosure", requiring certain officials and employees of the City of Joplin to file Financial Interest Disclosure Statements as described herein.

2.

COUNCIL BILL NO.2024-126

AN ORDINANCE    approving the issuance of a Purchase Order to Armor Equipment (Sourcewell Contract #101221-SCA), in the amount of Three Hundred Twelve Thousand Nine Hundred Thirty-Eight Dollars and 89/100 Cents ($312,938.89) for the purchase of a 2024 800-HDR-ECO Series IV Truck Mounted High Pressure Sewer Cleaner; and, amending the Annual Budget of the City of Joplin for the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 as adopted by Ordinance 2023-158 on October 16, 2023; and, setting a date when this ordinance shall become effective.

3.

COUNCIL BILL NO.2024-130

AN ORDINANCE    approving the City of Joplin to enter into a construction agreement with Goins Enterprises, Inc. in the amount of One Million, Seven Hundred Seventy-Seven Thousand, Seven Hundred and 00/100 DOLLARS ($1,777,700.00) for the Tin Cup Lift Station and Pressure Line Improvement Section 1 (Lift Station) and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin, and setting a date when the ordinance shall become effective.

4.

COUNCIL BILL NO.2024-131

AN ORDINANCE approving Amendment 1 to Work Authorization AND-15th ST. EXT-001 with OWN, Inc. (formerly Anderson Engineering) in the not to exceed amount of One Hundred Sixty-Five Thousand Four Hundred Ninety-Nine and 00/100 dollars ($165,499.00) for professional engineering services for the East 15th Street Extension project and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin; and setting a date when this Ordinance shall become effective.

5.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2024-277

AN ORDINANCE authorizing the City of Joplin, Missouri, to enter into an Agreement with ALLO Communications LLC, a Nebraska limited liability company, for the purpose of ALLO installing, maintaining, and operating facilities for communications related services including but not limited to wholesale broadband transmission service to Internet Service Providers within the City’s Rights-of-Way and ensuring compliance with the City’s requirements of such use of City property; authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin; and setting a date when this Ordinance shall become effective.    

6.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2024-278

AN ORDINANCE approving the First Amendment for Consulting Services “First Amendment” and Work Authorization 3 with Alvarez and Marsal Infrastructure and Capital Projects LLP to provide administrative services for Phase 2 implementing broadband and connectivity solutions in the not to exceed amount of Eight Hundred Thirty-Six Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety-Seven Dollars and No Cents ($836,897.00) and authorizing the City Manager to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin; amending the Annual Budget of the City of Joplin for the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 as adopted by Ordinance 2023- 158 on October 16, 2023; and, setting a date when this Ordinance shall become effective.

7.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2024-279

AN ORDINANCE approving an Agreement between the City of Joplin, Missouri, and the Economic Security Corporation to administer all activities and complete the Joplin Homeowners Rehabilitation Program provided through a American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Community Revitalization Program; authorizing the City Manager to execute same on behalf of the City of Joplin; and setting a date when this Ordinance shall become effective.

8.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2024-280

AN ORDINANCE authorizing the City of Joplin to enter into a Donation Agreement by and between Randal and Shelly Kraft, "Donor", and the City of Joplin, Missouri, "Donee", dealing generally with the donation of certain real property (the old Freeman Hospital) located at 2008 South Sergeant A venue in Joplin, Missouri. 

9.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2024-616

AN ORDINANCE approving a contract by and between the City of Joplin and Bentek, LLC, a Florida limited liability company in the not to exceed amount of $50,000 for Benefit Administration SaaS and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin; amending the Annual Budget of the City of Joplin for the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 as adopted by Ordinance 2023-158 on October 16, 2023; and, setting a date when this ordinance shall become effective.

10.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2024-617

AN ORDINANCE authorizing the City of Joplin, Missouri, to enter into an Agreement with Springfield Sign and Graphics Inc., a Missouri Corporation, d/b/a Springfield Sign, for the purpose of completing three wayfinding projects for the not-to-exceed price of Thirty-One Thousand Four Hundred and Thirty-Seven Dollars ($31,437.00) and authorizing the City Manager to execute the same by and on behalf of the City of Joplin.

12.

COUNCIL BILL NO. 2024-620

AN ORDINANCE approving a Memorandum of Understanding by and between the City of Joplin Police Department and Ozark Center for the purpose of integrating a social work program within police department. 

12.

Ordinances - Second Reading and Third Reading

13.

Unfinished Business

14.

New Business

1.

Set date for Public Hearing on the Proposed Budget for August 19, 2024.

2.

Set date for Public Hearing on the Property Tax Levy for August 26, 2024.



Carthage R-9 Board to discuss personnel in special closed session