Friday, September 09, 2005

Feagans sentence: It's all in how you look at it

I have no problem with the Neosho Daily News leading its story on embezzler Melanie Feagans' sentencing today by saying, "Three Neosho organizations will see stolen funds refunded to them in the very near future."
That's a positive way of looking at it. I have no doubt the Oakwood Cemetery Association, South School PTO and the Neosho Wildcat Booster Club could use the repayment of the thousands of dollars, Ms. Feagans stole from them.
I probably would have stressed the information in the second paragraph of the Daily's story. "On Friday, Melanie Feagans received a suspended sentence of three years in state prison and was given five years supervised probation."
She will have to repay $46,000. This isn't a woman who had a momentary lapse and grabbed a handful of cash to meet an immediate obligation, something which would still be wrong, but would be understandable. This is a woman who systematically robbed grieving widows, elementary schoolchildren, and high school athletes.
Some will ask, "What good would it do to send her to prison? If that happened, the three organizations would never be paid back?" There is a great deal of truth to that, but I ask, "If the only risk involved in stealing thousands is that you will have to pay back, why should anyone be deterred from dipping their hands into the till?"
I would have preferred at least a couple of years in prison, and then make her pay back the money, or at least a few months of shock time.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I read this report daily and on this issue I must respectfully disagree. When you are a "leader" and your reputation is forever either destroyed or tarnished by admitting to stealing, no amount of jail time can trump that. Further, unlike in the federal system, if you go to prison longer than 120 days, you do not have to pay any restitution. The victims in this case wanted their money as quickly as possible. They got it. Lastly, it is a fact, every time a person is sent to prison-one must be released. Soon no first time offender will be sent except for violent crimes. We either have to find alternatives or pay more to house and inventory our criminals-and I've heard no huge clamor to pay more taxes.

Randy said...

You make some valid points; I just have a problem with people who steal from not-for-profit organizations. Of course, when I was at The Carthage Press we had a woman who embezzled money from the newspaper (the wife of a Carthage policeman, no less). She was caught, fired, pleaded guilty, received no jail time...and then sued the newspaper because she did not receive her vacation pay. Thankfully, Judge Joe Schoeberl threw that one out of court.