Newton County political sources told The Turner Report a tale that shows that Matt Blunt is continuing to employ the play-for-pay method of making political appointments, even during the waning months of his only term as governor.
After Prosecuting Attorney Scott Watson opted to resign and take a position with St. John's Regional Medical Center, the Newton County Republican Central Committee refused to back down to Gov. Matt Blunt's demand that it help him pay back one of his major contributors by nominating the man's daughter to replace Watson.
The attempt to install attorney Anne Wells, daughter of Moark bigwig Jerry Wells, into the prosecuting attorney's office was first noted by Fired Up Missouri blogger Howard Beale in a Jan. 8 post, which was quickly brushed aside when Skouby's appointment was announced.
Beale had it right on the money...and that is exactly the way to phrase it. Beale wrote:
Insiders familiar with the situation believe the appointment will go to Anne Wells. Why? Why else: because she, her family and their business have a long history of giving cash to Matt Blunt in large quantities.
In fact, since 2003, Anne Wells has given no less than $29,750 to Missourians for Matt Blunt. Most notably, Wells gave Blunt a massive $25,000 check in June 2007. This in addition to checks of $1,200 in 2005, $1,200 in 2004, and $2,350 in 2003 ($1,175 came from her law firm) which means Blunt is into Wells for nearly thirty large.
And this barely scratches the surface, as it doesn't include the tens of thousands given to Blunt by Wells/ father, Jerry Wells, both personally and through MOARK, at which he is an executive.
When Blunt asked the Newton County Republican Central Committee to recommend possible replacements for Watson, the governor let it be known that he wanted Ms. Wells' name to be on that list.
In an act of political courage, especially considering how brutally the Blunt administration has dealt with Republicans who get in its way (see Scott Eckersley), the committee, rightly ascertaining that no one else would receive any consideration on a list that included Ms. Wells' name, refused to nominate her, instead submitting the names of Skouby and longtime Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Bill Dobbs. Committee members also made it understood that their preference was for Dobbs, who not only has been an efficient prosecutor, but also has been a heavy lifter for the Newton County Republican Party.
Blunt, irritated by the committee's action, reportedly considered appointing Ms. Wells anyway, but instead opted to punish the committee by not going along with its recommendation, and appointing Skouby rather than Dobbs.
Though it was an undeserved blow for Dobbs, who has worked hard for the position, Newton County Republicans attempted to make sure by submitting Skouby's name that they would have a qualified prosecuting attorney rather than someone who bought the office with campaign contributions.
***
Find out the scoop on Missouri politics in The Turner Report book, available at Amazon.com.
***
The Turner Report will live blog the Democratic debate tonight.
5 comments:
Thanks for reporting this story. To many people dismiss this as "politics as usual" when in fact it is "corruption as usual." Now someone really wants to show courage they should talk publicly.
To have Wells as the prosecutor would have reverted back to the pre-Watson days when the prosecutor was more a defense attorney than a prosecutor. Thank you, Republican Committee for having backbone.
Blunt needs to return his political millions and get out of politics now, not later.
I have the information only second hand since I wasn't able to be at that meeting, but I heard nothing about that. What I did hear was that Wells pretty much flubbed the "interview" and her resume wasn't as impressive as Dobbs or Skouby. Since the Governor had asked for only two names to be submitted, that did her in. Also, they voted by secret ballot.
The version from your source makes for great political theater, but I'm afraid like most theater it is fiction.
Mr. Hanna:
I'm not sure how your version conflicts with Turner's. I can tell you as a fact that Blunt people contacted committee people in St. Charles to let them know who Blunt wanted to fill a senate seat. The ballot was secret in that one to but the contact by Blunt's people is made before the meeting and then in the meeting itself Blunt's supporters make known his desire. Wells may very well have "flubbed the interview" but does this mean Blunt did not push her? My question is which part of the story do you dispute?
The committee members I talked to were not contacted by Blunt. The first indication I heard that anyone was pushing Wells was at the State of the State address - a week after the Newton County committee meeting - and it was a surprise to a state committee member. Somebody messed up because several people didn't get the memo that they were supposed to push Wells.
It's also my understanding that the decision is the Governor's to make. The decision to ask the committee for a recommendation is a courtesy extended by the governor's office, but it's a formality and he was free to pick her regardless of the committee recommendation. Relevant statute is here:
http://www.moga.mo.gov/statutes/c100-199/1050000050.htm
Post a Comment