Six years have passed since
my school went into lockdown after a shooting at another Joplin middle school.
A seventh grader took an
assault rifle into the building, fired one shot into the ceiling and had the
weapon squarely aimed at the school’s principal when the gun jammed.
That fortunate circumstance
prevented Joplin parents, children, and school personnel from having to go
through the horrors that happened in Newtown, Conn. Friday.
Violence is never far from
our minds in America, with one event following another in rapid succession and
with anyone who has the effrontery to talk about our national obsession with
guns quickly finding out that our First Amendment rights are being trumped by
Second Amendment rights that could never have been intended by our Founding
Fathers.
Rather than taking logical
steps to bring this gun epidemic under control, our legislators continue to
work their way around the problem and keep the NRA cash flowing into their
campaign accounts.
The problem with school
shootings, one Missouri legislator seems to believe, lies not with the weaponry
that makes this kind of tragedy possible, but with school personnel and
officials.
Rather than taking common
sense efforts to make sure that the kinds of guns that no one needs for protection
or for sport are taken off the
marketplace, Missouri Sen. Dan Brown, R-Rolla, has a different, more
gun-friendly solution.
SB 75, the “Active Shooter
and Intruder Response Training for Schools Program,” would require the use of a
National Rifle Association training program for all first graders.
The bill also tosses aside
that pesky old First Amendment by mandating that those teaching the course make
“no value judgments about firearms.”
Instead of keeping the
high-powered weapons away from potential school shooters, Brown’s bill would
require all Missouri public school personnel to undergo eight hours of training
on how to deal with shooters and intruders, with a required four-hour refresher
course annually.
According to his biography on
the state website, Brown is a lifetime member of the National Rifle
Association. “I’m a gun guy,” he has said numerous times.
I cannot wait to hear the
other solutions that our leaders will offer to deal with this kind of violence.
I am sure that someone will bring up the idea of arming teachers so they can
handle any school shooters or threatening intruders. It is the same tired
argument that comes up every time a shooting takes place.
If someone would have had a
gun in Aurora, Colo, or at that Tuscon grocery store parking lot, lives could
have been saved.
It is that same type of
nonsense that finds legislators pushing bills every year that would permit
weapons to be carried into public buildings, stores, and even churches.
Last year, a bill was filed
in the Missouri Legislature that would have prevented any employer from
discriminating against an employee who believed in gun rights. As far as I can
determine, no one has ever offered any evidence that any gun proponent has ever
been discriminated against because of those beliefs, but that did not stop the
bill from being seriously considered.
Every year, more and more
states carve new rights for gun owners. First, it was the Castle Doctrine, to
allow people to defend themselves with deadly force whenever their lives were
threatened, a right they already had. This cookie-cutter NRA bill passed in one
state after another, despite no one ever being able to show one case that would
prove a need for it.
After that, it was the Stand
Your Ground law, which carried the concept of Castle Doctrine into the streets
and ended up costing Trayvon Martin his life. Again, no evidence was ever
provided to show this bill was needed.
Apparently, the only people
whose rights are never considered are those who are the victims of gun violence.
Each time a tragedy like the one that occurred Friday in Connecticut, or the
one that occurred earlier this year in Aurora takes place, someone says it is
time for a national discussion on guns and that person is quickly shot down
(pun intended) by the gun lobby which levels accusations of politicizing a
tragedy.
Somehow in the warped point
of view of people who seem to think the Second Amendment covers everything from
handguns to nuclear weapons, claiming that “guns don’t kill people, people kill
people,” is not politicizing tragedy.
Those of us who man the
trenches in our nation’s public schools can be thankful that schools are still
the safest place our children can be.
Our first graders don’t need
to learn safety lessons about guns from the NRA. The NRA leadership could do
far more to protect our nation’s children by advocating common sense
regulations that could lessen the chance of a repeat of the tragedy at Sandy
Hook.
4 comments:
The right wing extreme nut cases in the NRA are a part of the problem. There has to be moderation in any situation, but in this case, it is their way or the highway.
Leave the NRA out of the discussion.
Again Randy the gun is not the problem if someone want's to commit a terrible act such as the shooting in Conneticut they will do so weather there are a ban on guns or not, and actually the guns used in this shooting were not assault rifles, they were the type of guns that you would call what we use for protection.
Jim Adams, the same day 20 children and 7 adults were killed in Connecticut by a man with guns, a mentally ill man attacked 22 children at a school in China using a knife.
None of the people he attacked, died.
Not even the attacker.
There is evil in this world and atrocities will continue, whether there is "gun control" or not. Knee-jerk reactions are not the solution, nor is psychiatric counsel of these individuals. Many veterans have killed and died by various weaponry, and could not be convinced that any measure of "gun control" laws would stop these acts. Mankind, like our nation has flaws that cannot be managed by our Lord, much less well-intentioned humans. When the evil surpasses the good, our Lord will rectify the problem with certainty. Until that time we must embrace the good, and quit making celebrities of these warped, evil individuals.
Post a Comment