Monday, September 09, 2013

Administration source: Turner targeted for firing before No Child Left Alive was published

Just a little more than three months ago, I went through a futile 10-hour hearing in the Joplin R-8 Administration Building in which the public and board of education members were told how I "dangled" my novel No Child Left Alive in front of impressionable young people, though my prosecutors were never able to produce even one student who had read the book.

The first few minutes of the hearing were spent warning parents and young people about the strong sexual nature of the book and the language they were going to hear and then the board's hired gun, a woman who gives seminars on how to get rid of teachers, spent the first part of the hearing reading selected excerpts from the book.

Why did she bother?

A highly-placed source within administration tells the Turner Report that if it had not been No Child Left Alive or Scars from the Tornado (which I supposedly wrote without administration's permission, even though my principal was thoroughly aware of it and two witnesses testified to that fact), it would have been something else.

Those in the bunker at 32nd and Duquesne were told to "find something on Randy Turner" more than a year ago, a command that reportedly began nearly 12 months of surveillance of everything I wrote on Facebook, Twitter, district e-mail, and some checking on my background. Just how much taxpayer money was spent on this venture is something that will probably never be known.

While the source did not know exactly what it was that triggered upper administration's obsession with me, the timing coincides with a meeting I had with East Middle School Principal Bud Sexson on March 12, 2012.

Human Resources Director Tina Smith, the same person who conducted the four-minute interrogation of me April 8, sent word through Sexson on March 12, 2012, that administration was unhappy with the Turner Report's coverage of Missouri Southern State University President Bruce Speck and was also unhappy that I had the nerve to refer to myself as a teacher in the Joplin School District.

Sexson also told me that "they," never specifying who he meant by "they," wanted me to stop writing about politics and politicians. "They see that it might cause problems because they are trying to get money from the state for the disaster."

The meeting, my notes from that day indicate, also included an admonishment about writing about a problem that was going on at McAuley High School, concerning a coach who had been fired. When Sexson brought up our discussion during his testimony at my May 23 termination hearing, the McAuley part of the conversation was the only thing he mentioned.

Sexson began the meeting by telling me that Tina Smith, and that was the first time I can ever recall hearing that name, wanted me to remove all mention of the school district from the message at the top of the Turner Report.

I noted that I had already changed that message, at administration's request, to reflect that any opinions expressed on the blog were mine and not those of the Joplin School District.

"That's not enough," Sexson said. "They don't want any mention of the school district. They do not want anything that identifies your blog with R-8."

At that point, Sexson brought up Bruce Speck. "I know some people see a conflict with Bruce Speck and what you have been writing about him."

A check of my Turner Report posts from that time period indicates I had written four recent posts about Missouri Southern State University. One was titled: "Memo: Bruce Speck tells Faculty Senate to stop being so mean," another about the Joplin Globe's"cozy relationship" with Speck, and a third describing how while faculty jobs were being cut, the university was spending half a million dollars to hire a consulting firm.

The final one was an opinion piece I wrote offering financial advice to Speck- stop hiring consultants.

That one was published March 10, two days before my meeting with Sexson.

The principal pointed out that there was a problem with me writing about Speck because he was an East Middle School "lunch buddy," and a member of our Site Council.

"They see it as creating problems with the professional relationship we want," Sexson said.

I asked if "they" were wanting me to stop writing about Bruce Speck and Missouri Southern State University entirely.

"That's what Tina Smith said would be the best thing," Sexson answered.

After that he said, "Don't mention that you are a teacher with Joplin R-8."

"I am a teacher with Joplin R-8," I said.

He said he knew that, but that was what "they" wanted.

Again, he did not specify who "they" were, but it was obviously someone higher up the food chain than Tina Smith.

At that point, I agreed not to write anything about Missouri Southern State University until after the bond election and I also said I would change the description at the top of my blog to remove any mention of the Joplin School District.

The one thing I did not do was stop writing about politics and politicians, something that apparently embarrassed or caused problems for the man at the top of the Joplin R-8 School District.

As the hunt for something that could me get fired continued, the existence of No Child Left Alive became known to upper administration in December and while neither C. J. Huff nor Assistant Superintendent Angie Besendorfer was happy with the way the novel depicted education in general and some of the programs of the Joplin R-8 School District in particular, they also knew that the book alone was not enough to get rid of a tenured teacher.

Reportedly, a lower-level employee in the admin building was the one who uncovered the fact that I had inadvertently posted a link to No Child Left Alive on Room 210 Discussion, a blog that had been used in my classroom for about three weeks nearly three years earlier. At that point, not wanting to reveal the surveillance program that had uncovered Room 210 DIscussion, upper level administrators made sure the one who "discovered" the blog was another administrator, the one who eventually testified to that effect at my hearing.
***
From earlier:

Sources: Crackup imminent at Joplin Schools Administration Building

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

They are the most manipulative and dishonest people on earth. They have failed in every aspect of their jobs and have wasted millions of dollars doing so. But they're still employed. Apparently, the only people who need to worry about getting fired in Joplin are the teachers and principals. Inept upper level administrators must have iron clad lifetime contracts for lots of money and lots of extra benefits, like free insurance. Strange set of values in that district. Glad I'm gone somewhere sane and I'd recommend the rest of you go too. Nobody will be sad to see you go because nobody cares about teachers there.

Anonymous said...

It's a good thing they fired you, because that one move totally did more to improve their public image, inspire confidence, and reduce opposition than anything else they have done in the past few years.

Since I know they are reading and probably not inclined to understand subtext, I would like to explicitly state that the above was sarcasm. The campaign against Turner backfired in every way and if anything has informed and inspired a lot of people who otherwise wouldn't know anything about the proceedings in R-8 administration.

This one move has increased coverage that R-8 leaders were trying to avoid, because now that Turner doesn't work for you, he has no reason to hold his tongue at all. Do not kid yourself into thinking it is just him; a lot of otherwise good kids and responsible people are not happy with the way things have gone down. Do not rationalize that these people are simply "troublemakers," they are educated and respected members of the community, accomplished students, and they are sincere in their beliefs. The students especially are learning a lesson about authority that they will carry with them their whole lives, an example of what they do not want to become as they assume positions of responsibility in their own lives.

R-8 administrators, you share responsibility for the negative image in the community. It is not just the work of "embittered" former employees and students. You are complicit in how this has gone down, regardless of good intentions. You will never be able to force people to like you, you will have to actually acknowledge that you are not completely right, just as we on the other side would not be right to completely demonize you, and begin to adjust to a point of compromise. Administration has more power, so the greater responsibility is with you, just as parents are responsible for setting the tone in their home (and too-strict or inflexible authority results in rebellion).

Anonymous said...

1) if the McAuley principal - Gene Koester and the Parish priest at St Peter's would have done their jobs, the firing of the coach would not have escalated to where it went. They sat on that information for 3 weeks before they did anything and it was only after pressure that they let that coach go.

2) the entire faculty at MSSU is glad that Bruce Speck is gone. The faculty gave him a vote of NO confidence. Did that tell the Board of Directors anything? No. Their pig headed foolish idea to hire Speck and retain him sure came back to bite them in the ass. Southern was run into the ground by Speck.

3) I sat through your hearing Randy. I heard parents, students, and other teachers say what a good teacher you were. I heard your evaluations discussed. I saw a group of school board members including Jeff Flowers, Randy Steele, and Mike Landis did their seat time, by the looks on their faces, they already made up their minds long before the board hearing. At least Ann Sharp and Dawn Sticklen took notes and appeared interested.

Who needs the NSA when you have Joplin R-8 spying on their employees ? evidently-they were stopping you before you could do any more damage you blogging educational terrorist.

I am a voter. I plan to exercise my voting rights by voting school board members out of their seats as well as keeping my eyes and ears open for any information you can use Randy against the admin. CJ Huff and Besendorfer may think they run the big show, but sometimes its the little people who have the connections

Anonymous said...

I am a teacher. I find going to work every day depressing. I love my kids. They are great young people. But I can't do what I need to do for them anymore. Even if the district would invest in the classroom instead of in excess people at Castle MODOT, there is so much nonstop chaos and so many interruptions to learning that it is impossible to make headway. The kids don't take their work seriously since the learning environment is so lax.

But there are those administrators putting the pressure on us to make a miracle happen in an environment they have destroyed. I've never felt such utter contempt for people. I don't like cheating the kids of what they need, but the blame falls on me if they don't learn. All I can say in defense of teachers is that we're doing the best we can with what we have to use at our disposal--jack squat. As long as parents allow this to go on, and as long as the Board allows the current administration to stay, Joplin will get nowhere. Send your kids to Mac County. They'll stand a better chance there. Like dozens of others around me, I'm already planning to go where I can feel successful again. That's not fair to the kids, but nothing in Joplin Schools is.

Anonymous said...

No doubt about it--prosecuting/persecuting Randy Turner was the dumbest move Joplin R-8 administrators ever did, and that's going some, because from what I can see everything they do is pretty damned stupid and ineffective, and the numbers back that up undeniably.

Now a lot of people are looking at what Randy accidentally told us in his book, and the answers to the mystery are certainly interesting. They had to completely discredit him, didn't they? But it didn't work, and now Pandora's box is open, there's no putting those furies back in.

Anonymous said...

I can confirm that admin lower level employees were told to find something on you last March. I can also attest to the fact that the person who stated she found the link can barely turn on a computer.

Anonymous said...

So, 4:51, if you knew this was happening, why didn't you say something? That's horrible after what they did to Mr. Turner. So do it now. That's not right. It's time to get the truth out.

Anonymous said...

Randy, what exactly is the surveillance program that dug into your 210 discussion blog? I'm sure teachers would appreciate knowing some details about it.

Anonymous said...

Dawn Sticklen was not elected to the Board. It seems odd that she is able to serve a full 4-year term without being elected.

Anonymous said...

Maybe someone should check for contracts with Geo Listening or similar. This is the kind of thing some in the administration might think is a really good way to "improve" things.

http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2013/08/26/glendale-unified-hires-local-company-to-monitor-students-social-media-posts/

Maybe the Turner report should post all the board's expenditure information for the last few years. If there is something to hide it can probably be found by Turner Report readers.