Tuesday, July 28, 2015

Doesn't anybody want to talk to the Joplin Globe?

For the dwindling number who continue to read the Joplin Globe, one thing that continues to amuse is the Globe's increasing lack of success at getting people to talk to its reporters, especially when it comes to articles dealing with the Joplin R-8 School District or with Joplin city government.

The newspaper's problems were on display again in an article  about Joplin businessman Jon Buck's decision to withdraw from the legal actions against the R-8 Board of Education.

Buck didn't talk to them, which led to this fascinating paragraph from reporter Emily Younker:

Buck told the Globe by telephone on Monday morning that he was unable to talk at that time but suggested an interview after lunch; attempts to reach him later in the day were unsuccessful.

The lawyer for Buck and the two other plaintiffs in the case, Joshua Bard and Jamie Johnson, also refused to comment.

Last week, the Globe made a big deal out of R-8 Board member Debbie Fort's not returning calls or giving the newspaper quotes. It happened about a dozen times, the reporter (or more likely the editor who forced the reporter to add that tidbit of information) said.

It appears that the only people who are talking to the Globe are those who are aligned with the side the Globe has been supporting, both in its editorials and in its news articles.

My book, Silver Lining in a Funnel Cloud, details the Globe's efforts to fight former City Manager Mark Rohr's battles for him, leading the charge against Councilman Bill Scearce with allegations concerning a bookie operation from two decades earlier. When investigator Tom Loraine cleared Scearce and found considerable evidence against Councilman Mike Woolston concerning the sale of property in the tornado area, the Globe soft pedaled both findings, as well as Loraine's recommendation to get rid of master developer Wallace-Bajjali immediately.

The Globe's attacks on those who voted to fire Mark Rohr continued, including a page one story, seven months after the incident occurred, detailing Councilman Ben Rosenberg's traffic stop for driving with his poodle on his lap, which is also detailed in my book.

Is it going to be any wonder when the state audit of the City of Joplin is released and those who receive most of their news from the Globe are completely stunned by the level of corruption that has occurred in this city?

Now many of the city's elected officials are steering clear of answering questions for Globe reporters.

I totally understand where the people who are refusing to comment are coming from. Two years ago, prior to my hearing, I received a phone call from Emily Younker, asking me to comment on my situation.

I told her I was not going to give any comments, but since I had written a considerable amount about my situation on this blog, I told her to feel free to use anything I had written.

In the next day's Globe, there were no attempts to use even one word from the Turner Report. "Turner refused to comment."

I can't really feel too bad about the Globe's predicament. If the Globe had been doing its job these past few years, the Turner Report would never have been able to take hold in this area.

Thank you, Carol Stark!
Keep informed and help the Turner Report/Inside Joplin continue to increase its coverage of Joplin and the surrounding area. You can subscribe or make a contribution at the buttons below, or send a contribution to 2306 E. 8th, Apt. G, Joplin, MO 64801. Thanks.

Payment Options
Support the Turner Report


Anonymous said...

They do the same thing regarding Galena. They called one council person over here 15 times in one day on their cell phone. The reporters for the Globes are worthless just like Carol Stark the worst choice ever for a Editor. She is nothing more than a Feature Writer who is WAY OVER her head. She was never a good feature writer as well by the way. So this does not surprise me that they do this to everyone they want to talk too. They even will take quotes from Facebook pages and say they talked to a person without stating it came from social media. WORTHLESS JOURNALISM.

kitty chiwawa said...

When Emily contacted me, I told her why I would not comment regarding the Change.org petition...via telephone, I expressed to her what I thought of her employer. They got nothing from me other than disdain for the Glob.

Anonymous said...

@ 10:17
I'm so glad to know I'm NOT the only person who feels they totally ignore the whole Galena situation! That's pretty important information that,i feel, needs to be covered & dug into! I'm truly amazed by the total lack of coverage.

Anonymous said...

Always, always give any comments to the Globe IN WRITiNG. It's the only way to hold them accountable. Their misquotes are both stupid/ careless as well as intentional.

Anonymous said...

Well I have a question. What would we have to do to change Carol Stark as editor? Who's her boss/ who does she have to answer to? I will make it a point to call at least 15 times a day letting them know my opinions. THE GLOB is truly one of the worst examples of journalism I have ever seen in any city.

So when will Turner be working on a real newspaper again said...

Some of us read both the Glob and Randy Turner in making up our minds as to what the truth lies. Both of them have agendas which they don't reveal to their readers.

Both the Glob and Turner practice yellow journalism. That understood, make up your own mind.

Anonymous said...

Really? You're comparing Randy's reporting and the Globes reporting in the same light? One of them backs up their reporting with solid facts...one does not.

Anonymous said...

I know you are but what am I.,,,