A Joplin, Mo., man was sentenced in federal court today for receiving and distributing child pornography over the Internet.
Mark Eugene Drew, 59, of Joplin, was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Beth Phillips to eight years in federal prison without parole.
On Jan. 25, 2016, Drew pleaded guilty to receiving and distributing child pornography.
Court documents cite Drew’s long-term involvement in a Web site that hosted a massive collection of child pornography and erotica, some of which Drew contributed. Beginning in November 2010, the Department of Justice Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section launched an investigation into a Web site (referred to as “website A” to protect the integrity of the investigation) that was used to post and exchange depictions of the sexual abuse of children. During the course of the investigation, approximately 24 individuals in the United States were identified as contributors to “website A.” In over half of these cases, the investigation revealed that the users not only posted images to “website A,” but also actively committed sexual crimes against children.
Drew was identified as one of the contributors. According to court documents, he created digital albums and posted them to a Web site utilized for the exchange of child pornography. Law enforcement officers executed a search warrant at Drew’s residence on Nov. 21, 2013, and seized three computers, a flash drive and a DVD. A total of 351 images of child pornography were found on the computer equipment. Messages exchanged between Drew and other individuals were also recovered. During these exchanges, Drew claimed to have engaged in sexual intercourse with a minor.
Drew also admitted to the investigators that he was sexually attracted to children and bragged about having sex with children.
This case was prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney James J. Kelleher. It was investigated by the Southwest Missouri Cyber Crime Task Force and the FBI.
Mark Eugene Drew, 59, of Joplin, was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Beth Phillips to eight years in federal prison without parole.
On Jan. 25, 2016, Drew pleaded guilty to receiving and distributing child pornography.
Court documents cite Drew’s long-term involvement in a Web site that hosted a massive collection of child pornography and erotica, some of which Drew contributed. Beginning in November 2010, the Department of Justice Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section launched an investigation into a Web site (referred to as “website A” to protect the integrity of the investigation) that was used to post and exchange depictions of the sexual abuse of children. During the course of the investigation, approximately 24 individuals in the United States were identified as contributors to “website A.” In over half of these cases, the investigation revealed that the users not only posted images to “website A,” but also actively committed sexual crimes against children.
Drew was identified as one of the contributors. According to court documents, he created digital albums and posted them to a Web site utilized for the exchange of child pornography. Law enforcement officers executed a search warrant at Drew’s residence on Nov. 21, 2013, and seized three computers, a flash drive and a DVD. A total of 351 images of child pornography were found on the computer equipment. Messages exchanged between Drew and other individuals were also recovered. During these exchanges, Drew claimed to have engaged in sexual intercourse with a minor.
Drew also admitted to the investigators that he was sexually attracted to children and bragged about having sex with children.
This case was prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney James J. Kelleher. It was investigated by the Southwest Missouri Cyber Crime Task Force and the FBI.
2 comments:
I really wish the media would describe these cases accurately. He did not brag about having "sex" with children: he bragged about raping children. By law, minors cannot consent to intercourse. This was rape. Let's start calling these crimes for what they are. No amount of discomfort we might experience by simply hearing/reading the word "rape" is remotely comparable to the psychological anguish of actually being a victim of rape. Do not erase what these children went through by marginalizing the crimes committed against them because society is uncomfortable with the reality. There's no justice in that.
Why did it take six years to bring charges? I am thinking of all the children who were exploited and raped during that time that might have been spared.
Post a Comment