Monday, September 17, 2007

Current Sunshine Law encourages politicians to remain ignorant

An article in this morning's Cape Girardeau Southeast Missourian points out the problem state residents have with officials who completely disregard the intent of the state's Sunshine Law, sometimes because of ignorance, sometimes by exploiting loopholes.

What has been apparent in every version of the Sunshine Law that has been approved is that no one is looking out for the interest of the average citizen. The law is written in such a way that any politician can simply claim he did not understand the law and did not mean to violate it. By doing that, he can avoid the penalties (which aren't that much anyway) and can also avoid paying the legal costs of those who challenge him in court:

Chapter 610 of the Missouri Revised Statutes opens with a strong statement in favor of public access. "It is the public policy of this state that meetings, records, votes, actions, and deliberations of public governmental bodies be open to the public unless otherwise provided by law. Sections 610.010 to 610.200 shall be liberally construed and their exceptions strictly construed to promote this public policy."

The law allows any taxpayer, citizen, aggrieved person, county prosecutor or the attorney general to go to court to enforce the law.

But proving a violation is difficult and the penalties are so small that private enforcement lawsuits are rare. And unless the case proves a "knowing" or "purposeful" violation, the penalty does not include the costs of bringing the lawsuit.

"Enforcement of this law for the average citizen is next to impossible," said Jean Maneke, attorney for the press association.

It is time for the legislature to re-examine the Open Meetings Law and make the penalties severe enough that politicians will think twice, and maybe even three times, before going into a closed session. Until that happens, we will continue to have our elected officials going into a closed meetings on any flimsy pretext to avoid public scrutiny of their actions.
Find out more about the newly published Turner Report book at this link or order it through


Anonymous said...

Yes this should be changed.

After all, the media doesn't like competition. Politicians who are ignorant of the sunshine law would be in competition with most of the media, and particular bloggers, who are ignorant of most if not all things especially the truth.

Randy said...

You certainly said that better than anyone else could have said it. Of course, I doubt that any of us understand what you said, but if you prefer to remain in the dark while politicians conduct public business behind closed doors, you deserve whatever happens to you.

Anonymous said...

The reality is the politicians are more honest about what they do behind closed doors than the media and bloggers are when they write in the open.

Randy said...

With all of the evidence to the contrary, I am surprised anyone can actually believe that.

Anonymous said...

Hopefully, there are enough statesman-like legislators on both sides of the aisle in 2008 to force significant changes to the sunshine law for the good of our state and its taxpaying citizens.

Anonymous said...

Bloggers are unethical, cowardly hacks. And Turner, there is no evidence to the contrary. That is simply your opinion that you try so often to present as fact.